Maureen Dowd Predicted Obama Over Hillary -- More Than Two Years Ago!

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Posted May 8, 2008 | 08:49 AM (EST)




"It's only 2006," I wrote way back in March of that year over at Editor & Publisher, "and New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd has already written off Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential race. She warned that Democrats "are racing like lemmings toward a race where, as one moaned, 'John McCain will dribble Hillary Clinton's head down the court like a basketball.'"

But she yearned for Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois. At 44, Obama, she pointed out, was already a year older than John F. Kennedy when he became president.

"The weak and pathetic Democrats seem to move inexorably toward candidates who turn a lot of people off," she advised. "They should find someone captivating with an intensely American success story... and shape the campaign around that leader....

"The Democrats should not dismiss a politically less experienced but personally more charismatic prospect as 'an empty vessel.' Maybe an empty vessel can fill the room."

She added that it may be true "that Americans, as one Democrat told me, 'will never elect a guy as president who has a name like a Middle East terrorist.'" But the Democrats, she said, do not "stand for anything" and they have "no champion at a time when people are hungry for an exciting leader, when the party should be roaring and soaring against the Bushies' power-mad stumbles.

"They should groom an '08 star who can run on the pledge of doing what's right instead of only what's far right....Democrats think Senator Potential's experience does not match Senator Pothole's [but] Republicans won with Ronald Reagan and W. by taking guys with more likeability and sizzle than experience."

For some time, Dowd promoted Obama before, inevitably, criticizing that very lack of experience and calling him "O'bambi." But at the start she had sketched the scenario that followed pretty damn accurately.

Oh, in the same column she wondered if Tom Brokaw might fit the bill for the Dems. Oh, well, there's always the VP slot. But could Tom help them carry Ohio?
*
Greg Mitchell's new book is So Wrong for So Long: How the Press, the Pundits -- and the President -- Failed on Iraq. It features a preface by Bruce Springsteen and has been hailed by Bill Moyers, Glenn Greenwald and others.

 
Comments
42
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I really wonder why anyone would care. I really wonder if perhaps it was a lucky guess and I know many people predicted it. You know - the celebrity thing, the Messiah, rock star and all.

So, who cares who she picked?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 05/11/2008

Maureen loves Hillary. She doesn't know it but she truly does love her. It is hard for her to imagine life without Hillary. I can't recall many articles (if any) of hers this year that do not talk about Hillary. Even now that Hillary is practically out Maureen still talks about her. Seriously, how many columns can someone write about inspiration alone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 AM on 05/11/2008

I predicted 4 years ago that I wouldn't read Dowd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 05/10/2008

Sadly, every political news site you visit publishes quotes from her articles. so, you, Mr. Political Junkie, are forced to endure the thing you promised you wouldn't. So much for predictions!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 05/11/2008

She's still a dangerous wacko.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 05/10/2008

"The weak and pathetic Democrats seem to move inexorably toward candidates who turn a lot of people off,"
------------------------------

They're doing it again. Obama won't win more than five states in November.

Clinton would do much better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 05/09/2008

Don't be silly. Republicans can't even hold on to Congressional seats they've held FOR THIRTY YEARS. How could they possibly win the White House? The Democrats could nominate a steaming pile of dog crap and it would win over McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/10/2008

LOL, true. Rethugs are running for their lives right now, even in hardcore red districts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 AM on 05/11/2008
- zbig I'm a Fan of zbig permalink

I predict Obama won't win ANY...in Canada. In the US, he'll get 70% of the states. McCain will just carry his Arizona and his urine bag.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 05/10/2008
photo

SHE IS FUNNY! but a broken clock is right twice a day, too!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 AM on 05/09/2008
- zbig I'm a Fan of zbig permalink

By that measure, Obama will win two terms. Good enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 05/10/2008
photo

Oh ! How hard is that ? Out of two candidates ?
Let`s see, here ia a quarter...two sides....flip...and I can predict too !

With age, Dowd is losing her senses, he meanness is the only thing that comes apparant...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 05/09/2008

Yes, but did she predict his inevitable loss to Grandpa Bush in November?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 AM on 05/09/2008

Ms. Dowd appears to be a pretty good wordsmith, but I do not understand her apparent obsession with agendas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:16 AM on 05/09/2008
- mi I'm a Fan of mi permalink

great writer but leans toward mean and petty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 05/08/2008
photo

Yep. Drudge once has a picture of her and asked for captions...this one is my favorite: "If You Want To Keep The Beer Cold, Put It Next To My Heart."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 AM on 05/09/2008

Quoting the Drudge Report speaks volumns about a person's intergrity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 AM on 05/09/2008
photo

She's a columnist, not a priest or a cheerleader.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 AM on 05/09/2008

I would say "was' a good writer and has become disturbingly mean and petty--when I read her, when I can bear to--I cringe at how her arguments are come out of immature hero-worship and and middle-school level vicious personal attacks. Obama may be a good candidate, but Dowd is his worst advocate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 AM on 05/09/2008

And Dowd will work like hell to get the straight shooter into office
on the down low so that McCain can give her a thank you wink
just as Bush did in 2000. She will always remember that as will we.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 05/08/2008

Good for Maureen. When I heard Obama speak in 2004 at the convention I thought to myself "i have no idea who this guy is but he is amazing and he should be our next presdient." I have had an Obama sign up since 2006 (the first sign said "draft Obama" since he hadn't decided to run yet). There are mant of us out there who have long seen Obama for what he is: he is our future, and our future president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 05/08/2008

I said the exact same thing when I first saw him in 2004.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:14 PM on 05/08/2008

You guys have really high standards.

Just because someone is a good teleprompter reader, they should be President.

OK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 05/09/2008

Oh for God's sakes, we knew in 2000 that Hillary wanted to be president, and anybody who watched Obama's 2004 convention speech knew he had the charisma to captivate the populace.
Do not give Dowd more credit than she deserves--as Obama said, "cynicism is a sad kind of wisdom." I so agree (even though it has become my kind of wisdom).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 PM on 05/08/2008
photo

I want to make love to Maureen Dowd.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 PM on 05/08/2008
photo

The line forms to the left......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 05/08/2008

She played her small but not so small part in getting Bush elected.
You can have her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 PM on 05/08/2008

I think she is trying way too hard to be the acerbic, sarcastic, smart woman who can talk about politics the way men do but in reality she just makes women look really bad. She also offers some really bizarre psychological explanations for the way candidates act that are way too simplistic.

And beyond that, she seems to hate women. Last week she compared Clinton to a vampire and she and her male co-workers were brutal to Clinton when she appeared to cry but they didn't seem to have any problems with John Kerry when he did it during his campaign. But of course the NYT has to have a bitter, angry woman for their op-ed pieces. They want to perpetuaate the myth that sucessful ambitious women have to be like her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 05/08/2008



Psychology 10---None --- Everyone has so much knowledge on everything this is the MOST ASTUTE Site anywhere---Wow, do any of us really know or are we just stating OUR Personal Feelings?????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 05/11/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect