- BIG NEWS:
- Wall Street Journal
- |
- Conde Nast
- |
- Oprah
- |
- Wash Post
- |
After four decades of writing in at least paragraph form, I finally joined, if that is the right word, Twitter yesterday. Presto: I already have over 190 followers, which makes Jesus, with 12, look like a piker. As Marvin Gaye sang, "How tweet it is to be loved by you." But it's the news scoop aspect that impresses me so far.
It was about time I signed on. I came across an online article just yesterday that stated, "Twitter has jumped the shark." It was dated March 25, 2007. Perhaps it is still in mid-air two years later.
So what happened yesterday?
For one thing, I discovered that another Huff Post blogger, who happens to work in my building in NYC, was recommending to everyone a Vietnamese sandwich shop in the nabe -- and I quickly replied that we ought to meet there for lunch some day.
At least three former online employees here at E&P, and a well-known writer who worked for me at a magazine 25 years ago, found me and are now true (if not necessarily rabid) followers. Also, three former interns tackled me. A former Hollywood producer I interviewed nearly 30 years ago did, too. A guy from The New York Times. Plenty of strangers. And so on.
Plus a bonus: I found out about the Christopher Walken page, which you simply must visit. L.V. Beethoven, too. And that guy Jesus now has more than 2,000 followers.
Why did I do it now? For one thing, I wanted to test it as a tool for E&P before committing the rest of the staff to it, singly or in a group twit. And I am amazed with the practical results so far. I have found numerous news tips on Twitter updates. Yesterday was a horrific day in the newspaper biz, with far-reaching furloughs and others cuts announced, and some of the twits I am following had the news first.
I then took those leads, contacted staffers to do full stories, tweeted quickly to "break" the news for E&P fans, then put up on our site the staff articles that in some cases were still scoops. All because of Twitter.
Later, at night, I found a few more quirky things that I linked at our blog. Meanwhile, I've already posted a couple of dozen tweets on subjects ranging from media and politics to film and music.
I've generally been dismissive of Twitter as a further dumbing down of our discourse and journalism but now I see, at least from the first day, the useful side - if you are in the news business. Frankly, I still don't want to know what you had for lunch. Unless you work in my building and want to do Vietnamese.
You can find me here.
*
Greg Mitchell is editor of Editor & Publisher. His new book is "Why Obama Won."
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
I'm no math person, but this article seems way longer than 140 characters.
Mike Vardy
www.effingthedog.com
It's sort of a more accessible IM, where you don't have to worry about the different, proprietary networks (and updating apps that claim to be cross-platform).
twitter has its pros and cons, just like any tool/technology. it enables communication of the now (hence great for breaking news ) and also propagates communication and amplifies it. And new Apps like the TrialX/Twitter app make twitter act like a personalized and responsive information interface. (see more info http://bit.ly/3dl8nH) . Just tweet to TrialX on twitter - for example if you send a message "@trialx CT looking for multiple myeloma trials for a 55 yr old female in CA' , the APP send you a link to clinical trials matching that criteria. So now you can "talk to twitter" through this app to find trials!
how is twitter different than facebook? don't they both function in the same way?
Twitter is basically only the status updates as in Facebook without the annoying apps. There's a lot less to wade through.
Okay, I tried it. But I guess I just don't get it. It did get me to go forward with doing a blog with photos of my artwork, because I saw some other artists who did this.
I'll have to check you out there. Just joined myself and I couldn't agree more about the Christopher Walken page. Thankfully nobody requires anyone to join so for those of you against twitter are safe; but if you have no interest at all then why would you read the an article about twitter and feel compelled to comment?
I "understand" Twitter. It's yet another grope toward making the details of each person's life "news." It may be useful for some folks, but overall I see no value in it except to inflate narcissism.
so if you DON'T work in the news business? give me an idea of why ( since i am not much concerned with instantaneity in the news cycle which seems to have shortened to about 6 or 8 hours inthe last 6 months) I might be interested in it?
I don't understand twitter.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with