Co-Authored by Lara Friedman
Two more houses in Palestinian neighborhoods in East Jerusalem taken over by settlers over the past two days, in the neighborhoods of Jabel Mukaber and A-Tur. Are these just routine settler provocations or something more? The answer is: both.
They are routine because settlers have been doing this for years, supported by Israeli police and courts. The phenomenon peaked in the beginning of the 1990s in Silwan then dropped off after Klugman Commission, which documented rampant Israeli government illegal support for settlers. It quietly picked up again after 2000, with return of Ariel Sharon to the political stage.
But what is happening is something more insidious and dangerous, too. Settler evictions of Palestinians picked up most visibly over the past year with new settler efforts targeting Sheikh Jarrah. This has been part of an effort by the settlers to aggressively expand their domain in the Palestinian neighborhoods in the heart of East Jerusalem and to establish a continuous (and ultimately contiguous) ring of Jewish settlement around the Old City. These past two days are the latest evidence of this expansionist trend. This growing penetration of Palestinian neighborhoods by settlers and the gradual encirclement of the Old City by settlement is, in turn, intended to block the emergence of any Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem. And of course, without a Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem, there will never be any two-state solution.
With their latest acquisition in Jabel Mukaber (their first in this neighborhood), the settlers are completing a continuous Jewish presence -- a chain of settlements and touristic projects -- in the area south of the Old City. The new property is located only a little to the north of the ancient aqueduct/tunnel that is the site of a major tourist project run by the Elad settlers association, and northwest of the house there is the "educational center" that Elad runs out of the "Hashalom Forest." The new house, whether the settlers use it as a residence or a tourist center, completes a wide belt of settlements around the southern areas of the Old City.
With their latest takeover in A-Tur, the settlers are set to expand their existing settlement in the neighborhood. The building where the apartment that was taken over is located is next to what the settlers call "Beit Hachoshen," a large building that was taken over by settlers in 2006. This building houses residences and is used for tourist activities by the settlers. It is well known to all in the area of the Old City as the building with the enormous Israeli flag flying on its roof.
Al-Aqsa Mosque and the "Beit Hachoshen" settlement at the background
So we have two incidents in two days of settlers taking over Palestinian properties in the heart of densely-populated neighborhoods of East Jerusalem. These evictions were well-organized and prepared in advance. The police assistance that the settlers received in both cases demonstrates unquestionable political intervention in both situations -- intervention most likely at the ministerial level, if not the level of the Prime Minister himself.
While the entire world is watching Prime Minister Netanyahu and waiting to see if the partial moratorium will be re-imposed, Netanyahu's actions speak volumes. While he engages in public theater of trying to sell President Obama's package of incentives to his Cabinet, he is supporting and assisting the settlers as they undertake actions that clearly threaten the possibility of any re-starting of negotiations, regardless of any resumed West Bank moratorium.
It is very hard to take Netanyahu's commitment to negotiations -- and to selling the American deal to his Cabinet -- seriously when he is deliberately creating provocations in the heart of the Palestinian neighborhoods of East Jerusalem. Indeed, one conclusion that could be drawn from the events of the past two days is the Netanyahu is actively seeking to torpedo the Obama Administration's efforts to re-start negotiations by making sure that the Palestinians will refuse to come back to the table -- a cynical strategy designed to ensure that talks will never re-start and that the Palestinians, not Netanyahu, are blamed.
Another even more troubling conclusion is that Netanyahu's support for settler penetration into the heart of Palestinian neighborhoods of East Jerusalem is evidence that his officially articulated support (or better yet, acceptance) of the two-state solution is an exercise is duplicity. Because while Netanyahu insists to all who will listen that settlement activity in Jerusalem does not effect final status, the reality is that these settlement activities inside Palestinian neighborhoods are designed, explicitly and unapologetically, to block the two-state solution.
The situation today in East Jerusalem is volatile. Israelis and Palestinians are both are already fed up and fearful from what they have seen going in Sheikh Jarrah. Palestinian families have been thrown out of their homes by Israeli police, who hand the properties over to celebrating extremist settlers. It is these images and this trend -- a trend that in 2010 is adding a new category of Palestinian refugees to the 1948 and 1967 groups -- that has energized one of the most significant grassroots protest in Jerusalem in recent years, in the form of weekly popular demonstrations in Sheikh Jarrah, which have continued for more than a year.
More of this, at a time when hopes for re-starting peace talks hang in the balance and a sense of despair and hopelessness is spreading in neighborhoods of East Jerusalem, could be disastrous. Barring a decision by Israeli political echelons to stop this madness, one of these provocations -- or the inevitable next one -- might prove to be one step too far.
Follow Hagit Ofran on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hagitofran
Carlo Strenger: Why Jewish Values Demand a Two-State Solution
The article below claims the Palestinians are refusing land swaps with the illegal settler gangs
http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=196972
For anyone Who's followed the events of this conflict it's prettry obvious by now, Israel does not want peace. Why the US allows and aids in the continuation of this charade can be summed up in one word - - cowardice. Our politicians are cowards for not standing up to the pro Zionist lobby groups in D.C., they are cowards for not standing up to a foreign country propped up with our money and weapons, while using our veto in the UN to shield them from any meaningful consequences while commiting bonafied war crimes. The same that is said of our politicians can be said of our "free press" as well - - cowards.
Cowards hiding behind words trying to make something sound like it's something it really is not. Cowards keeping silent and silencing
Cowards keeping silent and silencing others so as not to disturb the peace.
I knew I was out of space and wanted to thank the author also. Thanks.
Why hasn't the bulldozing of a Mosque yesterday in the West Bank been written up by someone on the Huffington Post?
Just got back from a demonstration called by the local chapters of Jewish Voices for Peace and Jews for Global Justice. There were a dozen Jews, a dozen of us goyen and a half dozen Palestinian peace activists present at the local lighting of the town square Christmas tree. We spoke out on our bullhorns against the illegal occupation of the West Bank and in particular the horrendous bulldozing of a Mosque in the West Bank.
Our reception from 3-4 thousand attendants at the lighting was excellent. Scores of people approached us signifying support. One Israeli partisan confronted me, holding a STOP FUNDING ISRAELI APARTHEID sign. He said I was sick. I asked him if he supported bulldozing of Mosques in the West Bank. He said yes, proceeding into incoherent invectives. The crowd intervened on my behalf. I called him a fascist, it was a visceral response, not helpful. But I was gratified this moral midget got nothing but scorn from the assembled crowd.
America is waking up. I suggest all on this blog who support peace spend less time trying to joust with the brainwashed hasbara element and more time educating the public to the hideous facts of the illegal occupation and the dangers to world peace presented by the Israeli ethnic cleansers and expansionists.
-- David Ben Gurion, 1937, Ben Gurion and the Palestine Arabs, Oxford University Press, 1985.
Since a lot of real estate property has defaulted on loans, that should not be a practical problem.
Ms. Ofran lives and works in Jerusalem. Where do you live and work that we should take your word over hers?
Sadly, the virulent strain of ethnicism that drives the settler movement is not helpful to this beautiful goal.
That the 'Settlements' growth rate far exceeds the growth rate of Israel proper, that the Israeli government spends more on developing and servicing these 'Settlements' than it does on developing and servicing the poorer (read nonJewish) parts of Israel indicates where the Israeli government priorities lie, despite all the PR attempts. If the Israeli government were to sign on to a twostate agreement tomorrow, the track record of the previous agreements suggests that it would only be because it (and much of the Israeli public) sees it as a stepping stone to a onestate eventual outcome.
And a large part ot the nonJewish population also sees a twostate agreement as a stepping stone to a onestate eventual outcome.
Realistically, the 'twostate solution' is actually nothing more than an interim agreement and should be looked at as such. And if you shift the paradigm that way, a lot of the 'intractable' problems become solveable, depending on what the eventual onestate is going to look like.
If the onestate is going to be made up of a permament overclass of Jews, and a permament underclass of nonJews (which is what the present Israeli government policies towards Israeli territory suggests is their goal), then the twostate step looks like Israel gets all of Jerusalem, the better parts of the West Bank, and the nonJews get some unimportant (in the view of the Jewish population) pieces of land in exchange, with a 'government' that has no power to do anything but basically administer Israeli policy on its 'citizens'. and is expected to take on the task of 'solving' Gaza.
If the onestate is going to be made up of a permament overclass of Muslims, and a permament underclass of nonMuslims (which the supporters of the Israeli government claim is what the nonJews are aiming for) then the borders, and who gets what, doesn't really matter, all that matters is getting Israeli control over who can live within the borders of the West Bank and Gaza ended.
And, if the onestate is going to be made up of a confederation of equals, with the languages, culture, and identities of the various groups all respected and protected by the federal government, then the twostate step would have to include two governments in the capital, protection for the minorities in each state, an agreement on funding to bring the development in both states on par (and something to ensure that the disparities of development within both states are also addressed as a priority), resource sharing, agreement that those who live in the state dominated by the other group will be subject to the authority of that other state, an agreement that immigration policies to both states must recognise the rights of both groups, and that foreign/military policy must be set by mutual agreement, not exclusively by one.