iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hal Herzog

GET UPDATES FROM Hal Herzog
 

Cancer, Oral Sex and Presidential Politics: Did Bill Clinton Cause an Increase in Throat Cancer?

Posted: 07/05/2012 4:51 pm

One of my favorite toys from the wunderkinds who gave us Google Earth is Google's Ngram Viewer. Ngram is a free and easy to use graphics program that tracks the ebb and flow of ideas through a culture. At its heart is a massive data set consisting of 500 billion words taken from 5 million digitized books published between 1500 and 2010.

Ngram makes anyone a player in the new science Ngram devotees call "culturomics." Plug a few words, names, or phrases you want to track into the search bar and off you go. In a click of a mouse, a graph pops up showing changes in the relative importance of the concepts over time. Ngram's uses are endless. For example, its developers tracked the Nazi suppression of modern art, and I used it to trace changes in the role of pets in American culture.

And I recently used Ngram to test a theory about rise of oral sex in America.

Bryan Fischer's Oral Sex Hypothesis

Politics is getting particularly dirty as we approach the presidential election, and my foray into the culturomics of American sexual behavior prompted by a statement made by Bryan Fischer, the preacher and radio commentator who is the new darling of the religious right. While you may never have heard of him, his status as a culture warrior was described by Jane Mayer in a recent article in The New Yorker. Though not as well known as Glen Beck or Rush Limbaugh, his radio show, Focal Point, reaches a million listeners -- about the same number as MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.

Fischer is most famous for his gay-bashing diatribes. But in a recent attack on Democrats, he also took on heterosexual oral sex (which he cryptically refers to as "the kind of activity that President Clinton practiced in the Oval Office"). Specifically, Fisher makes two claims about oral sex on his radio show (click here). The first was that oral sex has caused a dramatic increase in the number of cancers of the head and neck in the United States. The second is that Bill Clinton is the culprit. ("An entire generation imitated his behavior.") Let's examine these claims separately.

Is Oral Sex A Health Hazard?

Fischer says that oral sex can be bad for your health. Unfortunately, he may be right. With more than 30,000 new cases a year, cancers of the mouth and throat are on the rise, especially among the young. A 2007 study found that people with oropharyngeal cancers were considerably more likely to have had multiple oral sex partners than a cancer free control group. Another study found that oral sex (and even open-mouth kissing) facilitates the transmission of human papillomavirus. (HPV is the malicious family of bugs which can cause genital warts and cancer). But what really got Fischer in a twit was a January 2012 study which found that 7 percent of Americans aged 14 to 69 are infected with oral HPV. This spells trouble as the most common variety of the HPV in people's mouths is also among the most virulent in terms of causing cancer.

Oddly, Fischer neglected to mention another STD that is associated with oral sex -- herpes. In times past, the simplex 1 variant of herpes was considered a non-sexually transmitted oral form of the virus which caused cold sores around the mouth. A different form, herpes simplex 2, was thought to cause the STD, genital herpes. But because of the increased popularity of oral sex, more and more people are showing up at their doctors with cold sore herpes infections on their genitals. Indeed, at the University of Wisconsin, the proportion of students' genital sores caused by herpes simplex 1 jumped from 31 percent in 1993 (the year Bill Clinton became president) to 78 percent in 2001 (the year Clinton was replaced by his less kinky successor). Hmmm...

Testing Reverend Fischer's Oral Sex Hypothesis

So, while I hate to admit it, Fischer's claim that oral sex can cause health problems is indeed scientifically justified. But what about his second claim -- that the former president's "inappropriate relationship" (Clinton's term) with a White House intern instigated an epidemic of oral sex among the youth of America? Fischer is, of course, dredging up a charge that has been floating around for years. But now, thanks to Google, for the first time we can put it to an empirical test.

It was the easiest research project I ever conducted, and you can replicate it yourself. Here's how. Pull up Ngram viewer by clicking here. Then type Bill Clinton and oral sex separated by a comma into the search bar. Now limit the dates to the period you are interested in and specify the correct language. (I used the years 1960 to 2000 and American English). Finally, hit enter. Bingo...

Here's what I got.

2012-07-05-Screenshot20120705at4.14.59PM.png

In the graph, the relative frequency of usage of the term "oral sex' is in red and "Bill Clinton" is in blue. Ngram clearly shows that the rise of oral sex in the American lexicon began nearly three decades before Bill met Monica. The bottom line -- President Clinton had essentially no impact on America's sexual landscape.

So, sorry Mr. Fischer. Your theory on is wrong. When it comes to oral sex, Bill Clinton was product of his times rather than, as it were, a taste-maker.

By the way, I also used Ngram Viewer to test a well-known claim about religion and rock music. This time Bryan Fischer would probably approve of the results: John Lennon was wrong -- The Beatles were never more popular than Jesus (see the graph here). It's not even close.

* * * *

Hal Herzog is Professor of Psychology at Western Carolina University. He is the author of Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals.

 
FOLLOW SCIENCE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 113
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:08 PM on 07/07/2012
What really caused the increase in throat cancer from oral sex was abstinence pledges.  Another study found that teenage girls who took abstinence pledges were 6 times more likely to engage in oral sex (because they were still, so they thought,  technically, virgins) than teenage girls who did not take the pledge.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:20 PM on 07/08/2012
And what caused abstinence pledges.... superstitious republican doofuses.
We should do all we can to prevent their spread.
However, many (I'm looking at you Bachmann) are HPV's best friends.
03:52 PM on 07/09/2012
As well as an increase in anal sex. I don't want to gross anyone out, but you put the two behaviors together in kids with NO meaningful sex education, and you can expect some very unfortunate results.
11:32 PM on 07/06/2012
I read correlational studies on throat cancer/oral sex awhile back. It's crazy how the science behind all this is so nebulous to the youth.
To each his own I guess...
04:54 PM on 07/23/2012
One problem Sapphire is that while correlations do not necessarily mean causation, sometimes correlations are, in fact, the consequence of causality...cigarette smoking and lung cancer, for example. I suspect that HPV does increase the risk of cancer and that oral sex increases the risk of getting HPV.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnneRP329
05:58 PM on 07/06/2012
So would the HPV vaccine prevent these problems? It seems like this just strengthens the case for the vaccine.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
08:44 AM on 07/07/2012
Probably. Not that it needs strengthening.

It's good to see a leading spokesperson from the US taliban inadvertently raising the standard for this important public health issue, although I wish he would abstain from speaking.
05:02 PM on 07/09/2012
I think the vaccine in ways is overrated, because it does not protect against all the strains of HPV that can cause cervical cancer. According to the CDC, the vaccine protects against 70% of the HPV-related cervical cancer. And there is a concern that the vaccination will make women complacent about getting Pap smears.

The reality is that cervical cancer is 100% curable if caught early and the way to catch it early is for women to have regular Pap tests. Having the vaccine does not eliminate the need for regular Pap testing. Women need to keep getting regular Pap tests --- they are a life saver.

The vaccine now is approved for girls regarding cervical cancer and for boys for prevention of genital warts and anal cancer. Testing is ongoing for its efficacy in oral and other cancers. But presumably, yes, the vaccine would have some effectiveness in protecting against some oral cancers. Also, condoms reduce (but do not eliminate) the transmission of HPV infection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chowtaitat Taitat
02:36 PM on 07/06/2012
'Clinton was replaced by his less kinky sucessor'.....

How do we know.

I suspect Bush, the dumber gets sexually exited by declaring war and bombing other 3rd world countries like I raq.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:19 PM on 07/06/2012
yep, George Bush and Hillary are into wars.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KingKrub
07:19 PM on 07/07/2012
i don't know that the secretary of state has power over the president... i think it's probably the other way around... actually, congress is supposed to have sole power to declare war unless the president decides to invade a country but doesn't call it a war...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cgroes
09:14 AM on 07/10/2012
When I think of Bill Clinton I get excited by the fact that he was the only President in years that balanced the budget. Let's study that.
01:26 PM on 07/06/2012
man... that would suck!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cobraxus
Defend The Innocent_Protect The Weak
12:23 PM on 07/06/2012
the japanese term for oral sex is "a nominal congress".

"a nominal congress" also describes Newt Gingrich and his fellow republicans who tried to remove Bill Clinton from office.
04:56 PM on 07/23/2012
Is this true? What is the connection between "oral" and "nominal" in Japanese?
Hal Herzog
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cobraxus
Defend The Innocent_Protect The Weak
05:40 PM on 07/23/2012
a nominal congress refers to an incomplete sex act as oral copulation is not viewed as being...oh never mind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnderTheHedgeWeGo
Show me some evidence.
11:24 AM on 07/06/2012
There is also the issue of WHO spread the concept of having oral sex. Was Bill Clinton the first politician to be "taken care of" orally or was it the first time in American history that the opposing part yelled "Blow Job" as loud as it could and as often as possible to everyone within earshot (including their own children)?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cobraxus
Defend The Innocent_Protect The Weak
12:29 PM on 07/06/2012
I always thought this obsession the beltway insiders had with women performing oral sex on the president had to do with everyone calling them(the beltway insiders) the c*cksuckers in Washington.
03:54 PM on 07/09/2012
Yeah. During the 90's you had to practically censor the evening news.
photo
unitron
Reverse Chron Order never stays checked
10:09 AM on 07/06/2012
"Politics is getting particularly dirty as we approach the presidential election, and my foray into the culturomics of American sexual behavior prompted by a statement made by Bryan Fischer, the preacher and radio commentator who is the new darling of the religious right."

This sentence no verb.
10:57 AM on 07/06/2012
Depends on what the meaning of is is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Proud Progressive
danger may be real, but fear is a choice.
12:31 PM on 07/10/2012
Getting?
Prompted??
It is a poorly constructed sentence, but there are verbs.
photo
unitron
Reverse Chron Order never stays checked
01:38 PM on 07/10/2012
There should have been a comma following "religious right, and then a verb indicating what his foray did or was.

There is none.

It is not a complete sentence.

I'm guessing they quit teaching how to diagram them by the time he was in school.
07:18 AM on 07/06/2012
Cancer, Oral Sex and Presidential Politics: Did Bill Clinton Cause an Increase in Throat Cancer? Probably not but he sure ruined good cigars.
03:55 PM on 07/09/2012
Some people believe that breast cancer is caused by men who smoke.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MSROADKILL612
love auto biographys. any appS to write mine?
06:47 AM on 07/06/2012
Bill was also a big boost for the dry cleaning industry

It became a compulsory "perk" for secretaries at the big end of town to get free laundry
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MSROADKILL612
love auto biographys. any appS to write mine?
06:40 AM on 07/06/2012
cancer from BJs?

if true, article sure didnt substantaite it

other correllations?

girls eg into it more likely to smoke?

Great thing about oral sex is stdS are unlikely to transfer - not what they were designed for
10:39 AM on 07/06/2012
"cancer from BJs?"

Actually, it's more likely to result from the guy going down on the girl than vice versa, according to the studies.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:24 PM on 07/08/2012
HPV-16 causes a lot of throat cancers. Throat cancers are increasing. It is however a bit difficult to imagine that oral sex is becoming more common.
04:59 PM on 07/23/2012
I have taught a human sexuality class to college students for nearly 25 years and I regularly survey the students. My data, as well as national data, indicated that the rate of oral sex has gone up considerably. This is also supported by the Herpes simplex I and simplex II data that I discussed in the post.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:17 AM on 07/06/2012
Try doing a search with "abstinence, oral sex" between 1960-2008.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MSROADKILL612
love auto biographys. any appS to write mine?
06:43 AM on 07/06/2012
how can i do that - its 2012?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:50 AM on 07/06/2012
I don't think they have any stats past 2008. At least that is how it worked for me when I tried 2012.
05:03 PM on 07/23/2012
Interesting! -- now search for "oral sex" and "sex education"
Hal Herzog
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HellBank
Curve: The loveliest distance between two points.
02:46 AM on 07/06/2012
You know, if the chart substituted 'cellphone use' for Bill Clinton, it'd be almost the exact same chart. Only cellphones would look more guilty.
03:57 PM on 07/09/2012
Love ya man!! Fanned and faved.
02:31 AM on 07/06/2012
Living with Herpes is really hard, especially when you are a single. According to a report from the largest Herpes singles dating site HerpesSupport.net, 98% of its members who used to be on a general dating site to find the love and support were rejected by others. That could be the reason that why HerpesSupport.net is so popular and now has more than 650,000 members. It owns the most activity herpes blogs/forums and the most professional herpes counselor. HerpesSupport.net offers 24X7 customer services.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
open2facts
because, sometimes, I'm wrong
08:04 AM on 07/06/2012
LOL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnderTheHedgeWeGo
Show me some evidence.
11:27 AM on 07/06/2012
What's funny?
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
12:46 AM on 07/06/2012
I joked elsewhere that the right wing's fixation on small government comes from their wives and mistresses constantly assuring them "No honey, really, small is GOOD!"”
photo
catsanon
Humans... Such silly creatures.
10:16 AM on 07/07/2012
Why do you call that "joking"?

;-)
03:58 PM on 07/09/2012
Well I think it's funny!