iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hannah Weintraub

GET UPDATES FROM Hannah Weintraub
 

Pink Is Not Just For Girls

Posted: 11/07/11 06:58 PM ET

I remember the distinct chants from elementary school, "Blue is a boy color! Pink is a girl color!" Not able to understand why colors needed an assigned gender, I chose yellow as my favorite because it could be for both boys and girls. As a tom boy, the idea of "girl things" and "boy things" made no sense to me. If I wanted to play soccer I would, but only after I finished playing hop-scotch. This simplicity seems to have slowly seeped out of my life. I've spent the past few years trying to unearth this young feminist spirit from beneath my stacks of Seventeen. Just rifling through a few pages of this magazine can remind any girl that her place isn't out building a house, but rather, learning how to flirt and put on mascara. These messages of what girls and boys should be doing are everywhere. When our culture is so wired to think that gender dictates behavior, it's hard to remember that gender truly has no bearing on who we are.

These gender roles first developed out of a perceived necessity. During the Neolithic revolution, men were naturally stronger than women (or so they thought) so they were needed to farm and plow fields. As men became more and more economically important as farmers and then warriors, they quickly grabbed power and women dropped to the ranks of second-class citizens. As time went on, women were even more relegated to the role of housewife by increasingly arbitrary theories on gender. Even 70 years ago, people thought women shouldn't go to school because education could cause women to have "brain fever" or become sterile. Luckily we have gotten past this ridiculous gender stereotype, but there are many, equally as laughable, presumptions about gender that we have yet to surmount. In the last election, according to a CBS poll, 38 percent of Americans still did not think America was ready for a woman president. Abroad things look even worse. In Saudi Arabia, women have just earned the right to vote and run for certain (basically powerless) offices but they still can't drive.

Luckily, I have been raised with a certain distance from these gender role stereotypes. My parents have always been an example of gender equality. My mom cooks dinner while my dad does the dishes. If the house needs repainting, my mom is the first one out there, and my dad will help out as soon as he's done with the laundry. I was raised with my mom's stories of being the only girl on the boy's baseball team (and this was before Title IX) and my dad's tales of being the star of the musical. Writing this all out seems silly because, in my eyes, it is so incredibly unremarkable. It's not revolutionary for my dad to be grocery shopping, it's just responsible. Only when people can stop commenting on the rising number of working moms and stay-at-home dads and just see it as some people going to work and some people staying home can there be equality.

A few weeks ago, I stumbled upon a New York Times article that claimed that men lost testosterone when they had kids and began to do "womanly" chores. I could not believe that a person's body knew what a "manly" activity was and what a "womanly" activity was because we as a society have decided what's "girly" and what's not. There is nothing in my genes that says I should be sewing and not using a hammer, and something tells me that wearing pink will not suddenly make a man grow boobs.

This concept of gender needs to be abolished because it is just that: a concept. Boys and girls are both made of sugar, spice, everything nice and an equal blend of frogs, snails and puppy dog tails. Our culture needs to be critiqued with fresh eyes so that our constricting gender roles can be swept away.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
07:00 AM on 12/04/2011
Sorry, but if what you say is true, then we would not have the TG/TV/TS community.

If gender is taught, rather than a natural inclination, the TV/TG/TS community would have kept doing what they were told/taught/learned...

Instead, they have a concrete notion of what gender behavior means to them...and guess what, it's all of the things feminists claim to be learned behavior created by patriachal stereotypes.

Someone is wrong here.

So...is gender learned or natural?
08:08 PM on 11/28/2011
For all those who are bashing Hannah for saying that gender is biological, I just want to say that sex is what is biological, not gender. Sex might be determining things in our brain and certainly things in our physicality, but I do agree that gender is the one which is a societal construct.
08:31 AM on 11/27/2011
Hi, Hannah,

It's Ari Egar :)

I just wanted to say that it's great to see you writing such an influential piece about a vaguely-known topic. If I had the time on my hands I would write one too, but I've far too many things to do. Anyway, keep on with the incredible work.

With love,

Ari
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
01:36 PM on 11/10/2011
Great piece. Indeed the idea of gender roles is pathetic. Let each of us do what we can do best!

It would be great if modern feminism would return to it's roots and strive for gender equality here and abroad.
photo
abhorson
in favor of legalized bar fighting
01:14 AM on 11/10/2011
70 years ago MY grandmother finished law school ... 40+ years ago my mother was finishing her masters degree while my father was 'serving' ...

the "old" days weren't like you hear..... individual choices are what it's all about
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PatA
Juan Martinez! Rock Star!
11:08 PM on 12/23/2011
35 years ago I was working, in a male-dominated field, for an ' famous outlaw' musician. I did the 'dirty' work of booking and enforcing contracts. My boss called me 'the 'enforcer'. I'm 5 feet tall. 100 lbs.
30 years ago I was buying and selling feeder steers. That is an almost 100% male-dominated field.
25 years ago I was the first woman to photograph a tribal rodeo in the southwest. I was allowed to have the same privileges as the male workers/cowboys/stock producers had. Meaning I could go anywhere and do whatever I needed to do for my project.
I've remodeled three houses (sub-contracted out two) and landscaped two houses.
Most recently I worked as a corrections officer in a private prison so I could gather information for a new project. That is definitely a male-dominated job.

I set my sights on my passions. I grew up on a ranch where I worked along side my father and my brother in-law. My dad always told me that I could do any job that a boy/man could. If we have self-respect and project that respect to others, we'll all be okay. :)

It isn't about pink or blue.
It is about heart, commitment, passion and tenaciousness. p.s. I'm 68. :)
photo
abhorson
in favor of legalized bar fighting
12:50 PM on 12/24/2011
good job ... my point was, even back "then" it could be done ... you just had to WANT to do it and put more effort into it cause nothing was 'given' to you.

more effort is needed, more work, more action less talking ...
06:58 PM on 11/08/2011
Hmmm... I feel like you're on the right track! I think you're right, we certainly need to do away with stereotypes. But I don't think that we need to abolish gender as a whole. Differences are great, and they are part of what makes life so interesting. I don't think we need to completely get rid of gender to abolish stereotypes.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
01:37 PM on 11/10/2011
We can still celebrate our differences, and be different - without connecting these things to gender.
04:57 AM on 11/08/2011
The commercial culture wants to gender type items and activities to better market to their victims. I have no use for them. I cook and do the dishes, but don't particularly like cleaning. I can do a fair job of mending and sewed and repaired the back of the leather couch that my young son sliced up. My wife was surprised at how well the repair blended in.

My 14 year old daughter has no use for makeup or fashion - she is focused upon her pre-engineering education, as she will be off to college next year. I ran both her and her 11 year old brother through a 2 day rifle safety and marksmanship class last summer.

There is no need for the excessive gender typing of activities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnJalyn
06:21 PM on 11/07/2011
During the Neolithic revolution, men were naturally stronger than women (or so they thought)

Um, men ARE stronger than woman..... but just physically.
09:48 AM on 11/08/2011
I coach sports and teach martial arts. Men tend to be physically stronger, but women have a much higher tolerance for pain. I see this with kids as young as 6. Little boys will skin their knees and burst into tears, and little girls will take major face plants after running full speed and pop back up to their feet as if nothing happened.

It's a good thing women are the ones who give birth or the human species would have died out in the stone age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnJalyn
12:01 PM on 11/08/2011
haha good post.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:15 AM on 11/09/2011
Tell that to any woman giving birth XD
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnJalyn
12:01 PM on 11/09/2011
maybe we can handle pain better, but i was referring to when the writing was talking about 'plowing' and other manual labor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themightyabealrd
screw the real world-I'm an artist!
06:10 PM on 11/07/2011
It is unfortunate that such dated attitudes are still prevalent. I was Hannah's age in the early 1970s. Both our parents worked full time jobs, so my brother and I made dinner for everyone and did the laundry sometimes, too. The cooking was borderline acceptable (to my peers), but laundry chores were seen as 'women's work'. Such nonsense-if work needs doing, it needs doing. One's gender ought not to enter into it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themightyabealrd
screw the real world-I'm an artist!
06:06 PM on 11/07/2011
It is equal parts funny and sad to see these rigid attitudes still pevailing in some cases. When I was Hannah's age, in the early 1970s, my brother and I prepared dinner and did laundry because both parents worked full time jobs. Coooking was (in my peers' eyes) borderline acceptable, but doing laundry was seen as 'women's work'.
05:09 PM on 11/07/2011
Hi Hannah,

Your message struck a chord with me for I made little league when girls were not allowed to play; I made my college men's team and no other teams in our league would get on the court with me. Like you I was raised by parent's that "knew" girls and boys can do anything, not just what the color pink or blue suggested. I would love to share more with you on my path as a woman forging her way to equal pay, equal respect, and equal satisfaction. How do I do that?

Regards,

Sally Sullivan
sallysullivan@fibersphere.net
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
03:36 PM on 11/07/2011
The hippies got over a lot of those rigid gender roles, and the Nixon and the FBI conspired to destroy them for it, and for being anti war.
02:53 AM on 11/09/2011
Not so much, I don't think. The anti-war movement at the time was rather sexist, too, perhaps in part because only males were being drafted and sent to Viet Nam.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:07 PM on 11/09/2011
No it wasn't sexist. I was there. We marched for women's right and against the war, and for black rights all at the same time. The organization was as many women as men at a time when not a lot of women even worked outside the home. Welcoming of diverse lifestyles and personal appearance was infinity better than now and before that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
legalclubs
02:00 PM on 11/07/2011
Although I'm in complete agreement that the genders must be treated equally before the law and that gender roles, like those related to work or chores, should not be gender assigned, the author's article is contrary to the scientific studies in this area.

First, the comment that "it's hard to remember that gender truly has no bearing on who we are", is simply incorrect. Gender is extremely important in terms of "who we are" and one only need to look to the difference in brain function (neither sex is better, but there are differences) and body chemistry. Women and men, on average, process information in the world in different manners due to the differences. How can our thinking not be important to who we are?

The author also states that: "A few weeks ago, I stumbled upon a New York Times article that claimed that men lost testosterone when they had kids and began to do "womanly" chores". This idea that you can just reject anything you disagree with is anti-science. I'm not saying the article in the New York Times or the study it is based on is incorrect (I didn't read either), but to dispute the article and study because you don't like the results as they conflict with your worldview, as opposed to because you can disprove the results, is simply absurd.
06:43 PM on 11/07/2011
There is actually a lot of research that points to there being absolutely no difference in brain function between the sexes. Neuroscientist, Cordelia Fine, has theorised that any perceived differences in the brain are caused by the ways in which we are socialised and our own internalised expectations which effect the wiring of our neurons. As we learn certain things, different pathways in the brain are created, so why would this not be applicable to information processing?

Just keep in mind that a hundred years ago, scientists were drawing up diagrams which demonstrated that black people were less evolved versions of white people. The author is absolutely correct, scientific opinion used to favour the idea that educating women would cause them to be sterile. Supposedly, the blood would rush from their ovaries to their brains. These theories seem laughable now but it is important to remember that science is a discourse. It can be manipulated, consciously or unconsciously as a result of someone's internalised beliefs to reflect their own prejudices.
01:17 PM on 11/07/2011
Good article. One would think that after many many years of knocking down barriers for women you wouldn't still need to. I don't think the gender question will ever be won by either side, but I do think responsibilities of both genders just doing chores that need to be done are more accepted today than even ten years ago. Men cook and women drive nails. Its always been that way, but nobody caught them doing it. Today's young people say soooo what, and do it, that's good. Firewomen, policewomen, people don't think they can do it, but I've actually seen a little woman deck a guy, so I wouldn't say they "can't" even though its debated. Outside physical strength, its all intellectual debate.
gclafontaine
Sand is a small price to pay for sandlessness.
12:26 PM on 11/07/2011
Well, it's good that you are thinking about these things, but I suggest that you keep thinking. The world is never as simple as we want to believe. In particular, your claim that gender differences are merely a concept seems to need some refinement. Remember that men and women have genetic differences. The differences in physical appearance, behavior and preferences are based in these differences. Of course, society plays a role too, but you cannot ignore the biology.