More

In Victory, Magnanimity


John Edwards endorsement pretty much ratifies what we already know: Barack Obama will be our party's nominee for president. This is another great day for those of us who support the Obama campaign. I believe this is a great day for all Democrats.

It is a bittersweet day for many Edwards supporters. Senator Edwards began the campaign fighting a certain rap as a shallow pretty-boy. He shook this off the right way -- by presenting well-grounded, substantive proposals in healthcare, housing, and other areas to address our nation's gaping inequalities. Some of the nation's leading scholars helped to formulate these plans. If Senator Obama wins the presidency, his policies will be strongly influenced, for the better, by the contributions made by Senator Edwards and his team.

It is just a bitter day for many Clinton supporters, for whom this provides yet another sign that this campaign is effectively over. Senator Clinton's supporters can also be proud of her hard and skillful campaigning against long odds. They can be proud of her obvious substance and passion on issues of healthcare and other issues. They can be proud of her pioneering campaign.

Despite some wounds rubbed raw in recent weeks, Democrats should all recognize that this is a family feud now drawing to a close. It is time to come together, because we will need everyone to help in the hard task of defeating John McCain.

It's easier to reach out and to be gracious when your side won. So if you are an Obama supporter, you have a special responsibility to reach out. Reach out to your friends, colleagues, relatives, and associates who supported other Democrats, Encourage them to find out more about Barack Obama's personal story and policy views. Our best advertisement is a simple visit to http://www.johnmccain.com. Encourage your friends to compare Senator Obama's record and platform with Senator McCain's.

Most important, let's not get caught up in whatever nastiness that might ensue in the nomination endgame. Life is too short to worry about that. I hope that Senator Clinton navigates a graceful exit and can leave with her head held high. We all have a stake in this. The Clinton and Obama campaigns will negotiate the details. The rest of us, as individuals, can do our part to heal a little of the bitterness that has seaped into the Democratic campaign.

John Edwards endorsement pretty much ratifies what we already know: Barack Obama will be our party's nominee for president. This is another great day for those of us who support the Obama campaign. I ...
John Edwards endorsement pretty much ratifies what we already know: Barack Obama will be our party's nominee for president. This is another great day for those of us who support the Obama campaign. I ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:34 PM on 05/15/2008
Edwards was my first pick. Then Obama and I am a woman. I liked Hillary until she started changing before my eyes. But I am a Dem and Dems support each other. I am sorry Hillary supporters that you Senator lost, but it is time to come together as a party.I don't want my husband and brother to die in this war.If you can't do it for the sake of the party then do it for the troops. My little sisters boyfriend is 18 and will be leaving to fight this war and August....do it for him. Vote Dem. in 08'
03:35 PM on 05/15/2008
Well said Mr Pollack, well said.
God bless America and God bless Obama
11:35 PM on 05/15/2008
Thanks
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onlyThis
All I Am is You
12:57 PM on 05/15/2008
I know this has been said a million times but I think John Edwards would make a great attorney general! Sebelius or Strickland or another governor for VP. As much as Webb may help the ticket we still need that seat in the Senate and there is no guarantee that another Democrat would fill it in the next election. An Obama presidency with an obstructionist congress would not be good.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
azcamp
11:05 AM on 05/15/2008
John Edwards and Barack Obama both want to unite our nation. We are very proud of John and Elizabeth for the campaign they ran. The poverty issue is so important in this failed economy that Democrats can unite to make sure that nobody in this country goes to bed hungry. John Edwards will be the kind of leader that we need because he stood up against corporate interests and lobbyist at the start of his campaign and will be a good champion in cabinet position if not he vice presidency.

What a fine pair of leaders who along with Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson are true Democrats who want a Democrat in the White House more than they want personal power. This is a display of good judgment that should serve as a model for future presidential candidates.

John Edwards made a good decision.
09:37 AM on 05/15/2008
All sounds good, except for one thing: it is not over yet.

Reduce animosity? Sure? Be conciliatory? Yes. Let down our guards? No, not yet. If you listen to Hillary closely, she's got other plans which hopefully she will abandon. But for now, guys and gals, keep your eyes wide open.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LoyalOpposition
12:21 PM on 05/15/2008
I for one, am try'in.
09:02 AM on 05/15/2008
Yes, it's time to be grown up about this. For those of us who are Obama supporters, we've got what we've been fighting for -- an Obama nomination -- and now we've got to fight for the ultimate goal, an Obama presidency. To win that, we'll need the support of those who backed Hillary. And that probably won't come easy.

That doesn't mean we have to "make nice" with the likes of Mark Penn, Terry McAuliffe and Lanny Davis who said and did some outrageous things that shouldn't have any place in the Democratic primary process. But we must always remember that they do not reflect or represent the overwhelming majority of Hillary supporters who backed their candidate for the right reasons, even if we disagreed with them.

There is no point to be served by airing our grievances with the type of campaign she ran because we've won. We've already held her accountable. She'll have to live the rest of her life with the consequences of the decisions she made and the people she hired. That's penalty enough and further retribution serves absolutely zero purpose. If we want to win this fall, when it really counts, we've got to "get over it," reach out, be patient and understanding, and move forward.
justobserve
Not left nor right or center. Just a free thinker!
08:33 AM on 05/15/2008
The best ad is a McCain's website? Where is Obama's for the convertors to make a well-informed comparison?
10:14 AM on 05/15/2008
http://www.barackobama.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:37 AM on 05/15/2008
Mr. Pollack:

Your header should have read:

In Defeat, Humility
11:37 PM on 05/15/2008
We can't control that. We can only control what we do and say, remembering that we are the victors here.
03:27 AM on 05/15/2008
Edwards offered "well-grounded, substantive proposals in healthcare" ?

"Senator Clinton's supporters can also be proud of ...her obvious substance and passion on issues of healthcare" ?

Hogwash. The healthcare positions of Edwards, Clinton and Obama are all craven capitulations to the healthcare lobby. They will collapse under attacks from both left and right, and can only help elect John McCain.

Consider. Compared to the current "free market" system, albeit hopelessly broken, the plans of both Hillary and Barack. like that of Edwards, would:

1. Increase health insurance premium costs. (If open to everyone, no matter how sick or old, costs and premiums will increase.)

2. Mandate that people must buy coverage. (Or the insurance police will get you !)

3. Increase taxes, to fund needed subsidies.

4. Increase government intrusion into our lives, to enforce mandates and to check subsidy eligibilities.

5. Increase government regulation of the insurance industry.

6. Increase government bureaucracy and costs.

7. Increase the hassle for employers who provide healthcare, burdening them with various "portable" policies, paying multiple insurers, and creating disparities in employee coverage.

And after all this: millions of people STILL have no insurance, 31% of premium dollars are still wasted on the insurance companies who deny treatments and impose costs on healthcare providers for dealing with them. And people still go bankrupt over uncovered medical costs.

Solution? Single payer HR 676, “Medicare for All”. See “The Hillbar Healthcare Plan Revealed”:

http://whatsnotso.blogs.com/whatsnotso/2008/04/the-hillbar-hea.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:32 AM on 05/15/2008
Are you with a lobbying firm for the health care industry? Scary time, ain't it? LOL.
10:17 AM on 05/15/2008
I would love to see Single Payer systems in place in the US, and hope to see it within my lifetime. Having said that, I will NOT see it in this coming Presidential cycle. Single Payer is still a huge leap for a country that supported Bush in droves, and who the MSM encourages to believe that Single Payor programs are mandated socialism. We need a stepping stone.

I don't like any of the Democrats' plans for health care, but I do support a change that will bring us closer to what we need.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbrillante
I take action knowing Love will win.
03:18 AM on 05/15/2008
I consider Senator Obama to have the potential to become one of the greatest leaders of our lifetime. I trust him, he has integrity, and he is brilliant.
I beieve John Edwards to be the best match up with Senator Obama because of their shared goals and values. I trust John Edwards. If anything should happen to Senator Obama, John Edwards would be continue the fight for change in Washington for change in our politics...
Changing the way we do things in Washington will be hard. It will take a team rolling up their sleeves and going to it. I believe in John Edward and I am praying and hoping that Senator Obama will ask him and that he will say YES WE CAN!

Obama/Edwards '08
09:17 AM on 05/15/2008
This ticket would be great but I don't know if John Edwards wants to run for VP again.
09:42 AM on 05/15/2008
The best backup for Obama is Bill Richardson. (Disclaimer: I supported Richardson for Pres.) He has the international diplomatic stature, 15 years of legislative experience in Congress and administrative experience as a Democratic governor of a largely Republican state that borders Mexico. He can press forward quietly any agenda in any arena that a President Obama will need to represent symbolically in public.

Obama/Richardson '08
photo
Donnat
Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned
12:01 PM on 05/15/2008
and he speaks Spanish.
01:59 AM on 05/15/2008
Edwards would be the perfect VP for Obama. A northern wimp paired with a southern wimp. The only democratic candidate with gonads doesn't even have them. But let's not forget folks, you created Bill and Hillary in 1992. Now you get to deal with them!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:30 AM on 05/15/2008
If I were you, I'd watch what is happening in your own party. Look what has happened to three staunchly Republican districts in the past two months. It scares the hell out of you, doesn't it, the prospect of a black President?

You're not swaying any undecideds in this forum, sonny, all you are accomplishing is to let us know how scared you are and solidifying our resolve to permanently make your rotten party a permanent minority party.

Thank you for the signals. It reveals a lot. Well, time to get the credit card out again.......you see, loser, we put our money where our mouths are.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
urweatherman
12:26 PM on 05/15/2008
Powell for president not Obama! I prefer a candidate that has specific plans not just empty words and one-liners!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
urweatherman
12:28 PM on 05/15/2008
Forgot to mention....check out Illinois rankings in employment, education, poverty...etc. Obviously someone who has the talk has not walked the walk!
10:59 AM on 05/15/2008
In psychology 101 Mack20, that's called projection.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sd4david
01:16 PM on 05/15/2008
I doubt Mack20 has and "edjamication" past high school, if that. Call me an elitiest, if you will........

The Presidency requires brains, not bravado.

Lets not forget the CHICKENHAWKS of the right, who NEVER served in the military, but shoot their big mouths off when someone elses lives are on the line:

President Bush: MIA in the Alabama National Guard. Records "mysteriously" disappeared regarding his "Service"

DICK "5 Deferments" Cheney: "I had other priorities"

Rush Limbaugh : Medical deferment for hemorhoids

Sean Hannity: bust flag waving, not fighting.

Bill O'Relly: Nowhere to be seen

Joe Lieberman: I doubt he served, either.
11:36 PM on 05/14/2008
"This was Hillary's year."

Actually, from where I sit (outside looking in), no, according to the members of the Democratic Party that voted or caucused, it was not. It's that sense of entitlement that began the turnoff for me (not that I can vote, anyway), although I was never a great fan of Hillary's from Bill's day in the WH.

And based on the way the race started, it WAS hers to lose, which she has managed to do. You may want to direct your anger in the appropriate direction, i.e. her campaign (her campaign strategists, her refusal to toss them out, etc.), rather than Obama.
12:49 AM on 05/15/2008
Very fair observation. Thank you for lending an outside voice. We need more of them.
10:07 PM on 05/14/2008
Tonight John Edwards endorsed Barack Obama. In the course of his speech he mentioned Hillary Clinton's name, and the crowd of Obama supporters booed.

Please don't give me that soft soap about healing the wounds and all coming together for the good of the party and the good of the country.

I consider Obama to be unprepared, unqualified, and a liar. I consider the dirtiest trick of this campaign was for the Obama people to play the race card by twisting the Clinton's non-racist remarks and spinning it as the Clinton's playing the race card. African-Americans who should have known better, willingly played along with that slanderous campaign.

Obama and his thuggish supporters have made the Clinton's outcasts in their own party. Maybe the Clinton's can forgive and forget, but I can't.

This was Hillary's year. Obama, urged on by Kennedy, Daschle and Durbin decided to jump to the head of the line, and the Democratic Party wound up with two historic candidacies. What did they think would happen? Were they so dismissive of this woman that they didn't even consider the obvious, that the party would split badly?

I've had it with the party and with its so-called leadership.

I'm leaving the party and I will not vote for Obama. I can't stand the sight of him.
RabidRightRebel
A moderate voice who rejects the rabid right
12:00 AM on 05/15/2008
Sorry you feel that way. At first I thought that you were a Republican just here to make trouble but after reading your earlier comments you clearly are a un-happy Hillary supporter. All I can say is that your conviction that this was Hillary's year and that women should have supported her like blacks supported Obama are just not good enough reasons for me to support her.

I notice in many of your postings you talk about Hillary haters, are you sure that you are not seeing a relfection of yourself when you do this. By the way initially I was willing to support her but when she suggested the while she and McCain were qualified to be President but Obama was not, that turned me off as a potential supporter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CookieCrunch
08:49 AM on 05/15/2008
I'll say this, it took a long time for me to pick a candidate in the presidential election. I made up my mind a few weeks before the MD primary. I liked the positions of both Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama. What it came down to for me was who inspired me. I've always been into politics but from a far off spot, never up close, never fully engaged. Sen. Obama inspired me to get fully engaged in the process, to really care about what's happening on all levels of government. I also gave to a campaign for the first time ever. My first vote ever was for Bill Clinton and I'm still proud of that. I appreciate Sen. Clinton's toughness. I've always said that I'm not against Sen. Clinton, I'm just more for Sen. Obama.

Having said all that, I'll say this. My vote is first and foremost about policy, no matter who the standard bearer is!!!!!! So to all the Hillary supporters I say this, vote Hillary's policies. You don't have to like Sen. Obama, but when it comes to Iraq, economic policy, healthcare and the like, it's all about policy. The democratic platform is what I support first and foremost.

Let's stop voting personality and vote policy!!! That's the only way to move the country forward in a real way!!!!!!!!!!

DEMOCRATS 08!!!!
12:41 AM on 05/15/2008
"This was Hillary's year. Obama, urged on by Kennedy, Daschle and Durbin decided to jump to the head of the line,..."

What do you mean by " Hillary's year"? Why is it "her" year? Is there something special about this election year that belongs to her? That she's entitled to?

Obama "decided to jump to the head of the line."

I did not know people line up to run for the presidency, and that Hillary is first in line.

Last time I checked this is a free country, and anyone can throw his/her hat in the ring, in any election year.

Your sense of Hillary's entitlement is unjustified.

What has she done for the country? She is a senator from NY, and before that, she was a former president's spouse. Does her CV makes her head and shoulders above the other candidates? Is it not for the voters to decide on her aptitude?

What about Biden, Dodd, Edwards, etc... ,are they supposed to wait in line behind Hillary to run for the presidency? And where in that line do they fit?
09:07 PM on 05/14/2008
I've seen very little here at HuffPo to indicate that Obamans have any intention of showing any magnanimity. Their bitter remarks regarding the nerve of Sen. Clinton to remain in the race and the effrontery of her contention that she is the better qualified and more electable candidate leads me to have very low expectations of such a change.
photo
XME
Life is hard. After all, it kills you.
12:24 AM on 05/15/2008
There have been nasty remarks from supporters of BOTH. To be honest, I don't like Clinton, don't trust her, and don't trust Bill. However, what her supporters say and how I feel about her OR them is irrelevant if it comes down to having to choose her over McCain. Clintons in the WH makes me ill, but McCain scares me. It should scare anyone who supports Obama OR Clinton. As much as Bill disgusts me, and as much as some may think Clinton is more satisfied, McCain is a disaster. Anyone who supports either Dem and is willing to vote for McCain if "their" candidate isn't the nominee isn't voting issues. McCain wants to reverse women's right, bomb Iran, kill thousands more troops in Iraq, thinks proposed GI bill is too "generous" even though they were willing to give their lives, and is clueless about economics. In 4 years our economy will be much worse.

So what if you don't like Obama, or some of his supporters are nasty (HuffPo brings out the looniest!), or if you're POed at the DNC...voting for McCain for those reasons is against your best interest (and the rest of us) and a vote made to "show" us, or out of revenge is, to me, anti-American. You're not going to show anyone anything except what a disaster McCain will be, and I doubt that would make HRC proud that's what her supporters chose to do. Will that really make you feel vindicated?
12:43 AM on 05/15/2008
Well I'm an Obaman, and many fellow Obamans report that they agree with the sentiment of my posting. Yeah many of us would like HRC to withdraw, but that's not the ultimate point.

If we want poor people to get health care, a better environment, and a different approach to the rest of the world, us Democrats will see past the personal rivalries and squabbles and work together come November.
09:02 PM on 05/14/2008
i still stand by Edwards. I will respect his lead on this.
12:58 AM on 05/15/2008
He is a good candidate. He would have been my second choice after Senator Obama. I can only imagine how hard it must have been for him to do this. But he did it. And he did it very well. At times during his speech I would have hired him on the spot for VP. I don't know if this is in the cards, I don't even know if that would be politically wise. But just on an emotional basis, John Edwards is a fine man and in an Obama White House he would get a fair chance to contribute big time. We need a VP who wants to contribute in a really big way.