In answer to the many commenters who objected to the original thrust of the "Huh?" post, I only point out the lead sentence of the paragraph:
Before the grand jury, Mr. Fitzgerald asked me questions about Mr. Cheney. He asked, for example, if Mr. Libby ever indicated whether Mr. Cheney had approved of his interviews with me or was aware of them. The answer was no.
If I was misled in my interpretation, it was by that sentence. Fitzgerald is not asking questions about Mr. Libby at that point, according to Miller, he's asking questions about Cheney. I agree that the monosyllabic certainty specifically applies to Libby, but the question that remains is--why, in a paragraph about questions about Cheney, is the only example given a question about Libby?
HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY! In honor of the great American holiday, Huffington Post has pulled together...
US News and World Report printed a short piece about GOP fears that the...
Until last month, Jason Burnett was a high-ranking political appointee at...
Tracie Egan, and Moe Tkacik, two writers from Jezebel.com were invited to appear on my show, Thinking...
Florida's bachelor Governor Charlie Crist is getting married, and to a woman, too. That's how badly...
On the Fourth Of July Arianna appeared on CNN's Situation Room...
Even with the GOP convention nearly two months away, some in the Republican...
Jenny McCarthy struts her stuff in a sexy black swimsuit...
"The rule is, jam to-morrow and jam yesterday - but never jam to-day." "It MUST come sometimes to...
PENSACOLA, Fla. — Oil companies once viewed drilling in the deep waters off...
Posted October 17, 2005 | 02:38 AM (EST)