Barack Obama's 2012 budget marks a major escalation in the nuclear war against a green-powered future, whose advocates are already fighting back.
Amidst massive budget cuts for social and environmental programs, Obama wants $36 billion in loan guarantees for a reactor industry that cannot secure sufficient private "marketplace" financing for new construction.
In the past decade the reactor industry has spent at least $640 million lobbying for these massive advance bailouts. But since 2007, safe energy advocates have succeeded in keeping them out of the federal budget.
The $36 billion Obama wants to underwrite new reactor construction would be added to $18.5 billion set aside under George W. Bush. In 2010 Obama allocated $8.33 billion of that for two reactors under construction in Georgia. The Continuing Resolution for funding the government until the end of the 2011 fiscal year slashes all loan guarantees for energy except those for nuclear reactors and uranium enrichment.
Obama's proposed 2012 budget does contain some additional money for renewables. But it also allocates $97 million for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) which are untested and unproven. SMRs are vulnerable to public health, radioactive waste and potential terror problems that parallel those plaguing the larger light water reactors that have proven so economically and ecologically disastrous throughout the past half-century.
Industry allies in Congress are joining the White House in trying to classify such both large and small reactors as "clean energy." Though cosmetic, the designation would allow reactor backers to fit atomic power under the rubric of long-term goals for cleaning up America's hugely polluting energy supply.
Price tags for proposed new reactors have recently doubled and tripled. Projected at $2-3 billion as few as three years ago, proposed projects in Florida, Texas and elsewhere have soared to $10 billion and more.
The Congressional Budget Office has warned that the failure rate for reactor loan guarantees could well exceed 50%. The economic history of atomic power has been catastrophic, with the previous generation of reactors coming in on average around 200% over original cost projections. Reactors now under construction in Finland and France have soared to billions of dollars over budget and are years behind schedule.
In Georgia, where rate-payers are being forced to fund reactor construction even if the plant never opens, critics fear costs at the Vogtle site are certain to soar. New projects proposed for Texas, Maryland and South Carolina are also plagued by financial doubts.
At the same time, major breakthroughs in solar cell technology have prompted a wide range of studies showing deployment of green energy to be cheaper than new atomic power, and growing moreso.
But while slashing social programs, Obama seems determined to use taxpayer money to fund a radioactive technology that grows ever more expensive and uncompetitive.
Can the green power movement again stop the new loan guarantees, as it's done since 2007?
"This year, with more public attention on government spending, it seems even unlikelier that Congress will approve" more nuke guarantees, says Michael Mariotte, Executive Director of the Nuclear Information & Resource Service.
For a green-powered future, says Mariotte, "no funding for new reactors is acceptable."
|DionNissenbaum Does #Obama need the help of 'Scandal's' Kerry Washington? http://t.co/XtxPQjAzOT via @thedailybeast|
|KatrinaNation Read after week of scandalmongering & failure to see real scandals/ Obama Denies Role in Government http://t.co/LOwQAjyBU7|
|Toure RT @Steverocks35: Cons say Obama was micromanaging every aspect of government but had nothing to do with the Osama Bin Laden raid.|
|Heritage If Obama Were a CEO, Government Would Hold Him Responsible for Scandals http://t.co/dezb2hRjEj|
|WPIX Three scandals at once equal a bad week to be President Obama http://t.co/ovBjUC527v http://t.co/yFzMwOCHq4|
|DRUDGE_REPORT PAPER: Invoking Nixon diminishes Obama's real troubles... http://t.co/gUvfSL6xzv|
|Toure The IRS director was a Bush appointee. Makes it hard to really believe the IRS was functioning as a political weapon on behalf of Obama.|
Shorter @Heritage: SCREW AMERICA. THE GOP MUST ABANDON ALL PRETENSE AT GOVERNING AND FOCUS 100% ON DESTROYING OBAMA. http://t.co/j54zNFDvZz
1 hour ago from web
|thedailybeast Advice for Obama: forget Bulworth. Try Rambo. http://t.co/Tf5jX3kW4X|
|NebraskaDems Gallup: Obama Poll BOUNCE Since Fake Scandals http://t.co/0ofTr7WkfX via @dailykos|
President Obama remains lucky in one crucial category: his opposition. The GOP is inept and dysfunctional.
1 hour ago from web
|jaketapper Lawyer for NYT during Pentagon Papers fight asks: Is Obama Worse For Press Freedom Than Nixon? http://t.co/n0FUfbEY7C|
RT @Cosmic_Surfer: @JackieBlue4u @OsborneInk @whitehouse Women really Covered #ObamaCareInThreeWords
2 hours ago from web
|David_Shorr #RememberWhenBarackObama You guys do realize that all this hating is a gift to Democrats. No? Carry on, then.|
|TheAtlantic How Obama Has Contributed to His Own Aura of Scandal http://t.co/4mIxVYPagp|
|Toure Whenever someone calls it "the Obama IRS" you know they're doing propaganda. The acting director was a Bush appointee.|
|dsupervilleap #Obama motorcade leaves Andrews AFB after golf, just minutes after motorcade for @FLOTUS rolls by. @AP_Politics|