iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Harvey Wasserman

Harvey Wasserman

Posted February 17, 2009 | 04:31 PM (EST)

Was George Washington a Gay Pot Smoker?


Did George Washington raise hemp? Did he smoke it? Was he gay?

The easy answers are definitely, probably, and maybe.

The questions arise with pre-publication of the shocking satire Passions of the Patriots by Thomas Paine, which opens with Le General in the hemp-filled embrace of his beloved Marquis de Lafayette.

As Washington's February 22nd birthday approaches, his personal habits say much about today's America.

Like virtually every Revolutionary farmer, the Father of Our Country grew prodigious quantities of hemp. It was (is) a profitable cash crop, easy to grow, with scant demands for cultivation, watering or fertilizing. As a hardy perennial, it needs no year-after-year replanting, nor pesticides or herbicides.

Early American farmers used cannabis for cloth, rope, sails, paper and much more. At various times its cultivation has been mandatory. Kansas was virtually carpeted with it during World War Two. In today's conversion to a Solartopian economy, the cellulose of its stems and leaves, and the oil from its seeds, could be essential for green ethanol and bio-diesel fuels.

Washington and his fellow planter/presidents Tom Jefferson and James Madison would be astonished to hear that hemp is illegal. These early chief executives would certainly have told President Obama that a re-legalized cannabis crop would mean billions of dollars in desperately needed farm revenue throughout the United States.

As for smoking, I know of no significant communication among the Founders extolling their "great weed."

But in one of his meticulous agricultural journals, dated 1765, Washington regrets being late to separate his male hemp plants from his females. For a master farmer like George, there would be little reason to do this except to make the females ripe for smoking.

The medicinal uses of cannabis were known to the ancient Chinese. Thousands of years later, it's inconceivable American growers would not indulge in its recreational powers.

As for Washington's sexual preferences, his marriage to Martha was sometimes suspect. Historians joke that he did not marry her for her money, but rather for her stocks, bonds, land and slaves. In a letter to a friend, he complained that there was "not much fire between the sheets."

Ben Franklin, the ultimate liberal, loved so many women he joked that the great miracle in his life was that he contracted no related diseases. Tom Jefferson impregnated his slave mistress Sally Hemings as many as seven times. From Andrew Jackson to Bill Clinton, American presidents have been infamous for their sexual dalliances.

George Washington did not lack for female companionship. But his deepest affections may have been for his fellow warriors. His beloved brothers in arms included Lafayette and Alexander Hamilton. Both were married with children, but both excited his strongest comradely devotion.

That the general had no biological children of his own may have been due to a fever early in his life that could have rendered him sterile. Or maybe not. It's hard to imagine a gay George Washington in the 1790s. But in the 1990s, things might have been different.

The modern anti-choice assault, including California's Proposition 8, flies in the face of all Washington and the Founders dreamed of for this nation.

Today's puritannical "sunshine patriots" seem hell-bent on running our personal lives. But America has never been about that.

Let them contemplate an image of our first president, fresh from the battlefields and the hemp fields, desperate to marry his fellow winter soldier.

Harvey Wasserman's History of the United States is available on his website, as is Passions of the Patriots, by Thomas Paine.

Did George Washington raise hemp? Did he smoke it? Was he gay? The easy answers are definitely, probably, and maybe. The questions arise with pre-publication of the shocking satire Passions of th...
Did George Washington raise hemp? Did he smoke it? Was he gay? The easy answers are definitely, probably, and maybe. The questions arise with pre-publication of the shocking satire Passions of th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBisceglia
02:09 PM on 02/21/2009
I am sure George Washington was NOT gay.

I dated a couple of married men with children in my younger years, and ALL of them have insisted that they were "100% heterosexual". My current husband used to be married to a woman, and has 2 children from that marriage. He insists he's very gay now, but that's because I swore off dating all married closet cases in my 20's.
02:29 PM on 02/18/2009
Seems a little speculative to me, with regards to the homosexuality suggestions. Not to say he couldn't have been, or that I would hold him in any less regard, but the evidence doesn't seem to actually be there.

As for hemp, and the smoking of the females, I would say you're probably right. Why it is illegal in this day and age is beyond me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:09 PM on 02/17/2009
With all due respect have you read much about George Washington? He never had children but it wasn't from a lack of trying. The best explanation is that he was sterile.

Also Washington expressed the fact that he was in love with Sally Fairfax in at least one letter to her. The fact that he fell in love with her is pretty good indication that he was attracted to women. His relationsip with LaFayette was like a father and son.

It's ridiculous to base an article on the rantings of Paine (who had an axe to grind with Washington).

READ James Flexner's biography on the great man if you want to understand him better.
photo
slarabee
abusus non tollit
05:58 PM on 02/17/2009
I firmly believe that the founding fathers had freedom of the individual to be and do what he or she wants at heart.
And George Washington's love of Hemp is well documented and beyond dispute.
However to imply that the Father of our nation was gay is fanning the flames of contention unnecessarily. Without some evidence (of some homosexual behavior) such commentary accomplishes very little outside of provide rednecks and fear mongers with ammunition to say that the GLBT lobby wants to make the whole world gay.
Although I fully support freedom of speech it does not hurt too consider the battle ground and the people that are engaged in the fight.