iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Heather Taylor-Miesle

GET UPDATES FROM Heather Taylor-Miesle

Clean Energy Advances Despite Washington's Worst Efforts

Posted: 10/10/11 06:57 PM ET

Tea Party leaders like to paint clean energy and climate action as issues that matter only to elite Democrats living in coastal cities. This claim would come as a surprise to the 38,000 autoworkers building fuel efficient cars in Michigan, the 80 companies involved in the wind supply chain in Iowa, and the more than 100,000 Americans working in the solar industry across the nation.

But even if the Tea Party isn't interested in genuine opportunities for job growth, it can't ignore where the latest climate action is coming from: Texas and GOP statesmen.

Both are wellsprings of conservative values, and when Texas residents and Republican elders start talking about clean energy and global warming, it's time for moderate lawmakers to listen.

As of Oct. 1, Austin, Texas became the largest city in the nation to rely entirely on renewable energy to power all of its facilities. The city of Houston still purchases a larger amount of renewable energy, but Austin leads the way in meeting all of its energy needs from clean sources. City officials said they pushed for these changes because they wanted to reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality for residents.

Governor Perry may still live in Denialville, but the rest of Texas has joined the global community. The state is converting its West Texas wind into power and money, and it now gets 8 percent of electricity from renewable sources.

As Van Jones says, that's not hippy energy, that's cowboy energy. And it reflects range-land values of independence, resourcefulness, and putting a resource to use instead of wasting it.

A growing number of luminaries in the Republican Party share those values. Earlier this week, the National Journal reported on a quiet campaign among elder GOP statesmen to call for climate action.

John Warner, the former Virginia senator and former secretary of the Navy, is a senior advisor for the Pew Project on National Security, Energy, and Climate Change and he has been speaking at military bases to draw attention to the security threat posed by climate change and oil dependence.

George Shultz, President Reagan's secretary of state and an advisor on President George W. Bush's 2000 campaign, is also a member of Pew's climate project. Shultz says Republicans can no longer ignore evidence coming from places like the ice cap in the Arctic. He says people like climate deniers like Perry are "entitled to their opinion, but they're not entitled to the facts."

Shultz wields a considerable amount of influence. Last year, when Texas oil companies funded California's Proposition 23 to defeat the state's global warming law, Shultz told the National Journal his response was: "We're not just going to beat these guys, we're going to beat the hell out of them. We conducted a vigorous campaign. It was a lot of fun."

And it was wildly successful. Californians defeated Prop 23 by a ratio of 2 to 1. More people voted on Prop 23 than on anything else on the ballot, including the gubernatorial and Senate races, and even counties that backed Republican candidates shot down Prop 23.

Men like Shultz and Warner -- along with former Representative Bob Inglis (R-SC), former Representative Sherry Boehlert (R-NY), and others - -share the goal of making our nation strong, secure, and independent. They know the politicization of environmental issues is a recent phenomenon, and they are not afraid to say fighting climate change should be part of the Republican platform.

I admire these leaders; I only wish their campaign wasn't so quiet. I want to see them on Meet the Press and Face the Nation. If they make their voices louder, they will help create the political space for Republican candidates to start confirming climate science and advocating climate action.

Right now, the Tea Party has the megaphone. People like Rick Perry are yelling that climate change doesn't exist and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is shouting that Congress must dismantle the Clean Air Act and rob the EPA of its authority to set limits on carbon pollution. This would upend a law signed by President Nixon signed and strengthened by President George H.W. Bush. It would also endanger the health of millions of Americans.

This overheated rhetoric is pushing our nation into a more disrupted and more dangerous climate. We have to bring it back from the brink. I remember back in the 1980s, my mom watched infomercials in which Susan Powter would shout, "Stop the Insanity."

Cities like Austin, Texas, and leaders like George Shultz and John Warner are adding much needed sanity to the climate debate. They remind us that protecting our nation from climate change and putting Americans to work in the clean energy sector are not elite, partisan issues. They are the building blocks of the 21st century.

 

Follow Heather Taylor-Miesle on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NRDC_AF

Tea Party leaders like to paint clean energy and climate action as issues that matter only to elite Democrats living in coastal cities. This claim would come as a surprise to the 38,000 autoworkers bu...
Tea Party leaders like to paint clean energy and climate action as issues that matter only to elite Democrats living in coastal cities. This claim would come as a surprise to the 38,000 autoworkers bu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:24 PM on 10/18/2011
I absolutely hate the idea of bribing companies and investors (i.e, subsidies) to do the right thing for everyone. Instead let each of us pay a little, 1-2 ¢/kWh on all electricity (generates $40-80 billion/yr), and stimulate growth of new energy sources and sell "the Peoples-owned" electricity to offset social programs and energy growth in the future. To hell with paying good tax money so fat cats will win big. Once you start feeding them, they never stop. Let us win big for a change.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
05:03 PM on 10/18/2011
THE rush to subsidise solar power over the past decade has been massively wasteful and squalidly political. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the sorry saga of Solyndra, a Californian maker of novel tubular solar panels down the maw of which the Obama administration shovelled $535m in the hope of “green jobs” and photo ops. It got instead mismanagement, bankruptcy and scandal. The money wasted on Solyndra, though, is as nothing compared to the tens of billions of euros squandered on solar panels in Germany. So little electricity do these panels produce under its cloudy northern skies that the emissions from a single large coal-fired power station are enough to nullify all the benefits that their carbon-free contribution might bring. The green jobs they, too, were meant to bring are largely, though not entirely, in China.- The Economist magazine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChrisInYao
There's impermanence to all things big and small
10:35 AM on 10/12/2011
Likely, the 'shove' that's going to put us over the top and move us into cleaner energy with unfurled sails, is from the opposition to repeal pro-environmental progress. It's a no-brainer what must be done.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
08:21 AM on 10/12/2011
You are right. We need to hear more from them.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:50 AM on 10/12/2011
How many reasons do you need to stop Fossil and nukes and go green? Waste, Pollution, cost, sustainability, wars, massive ecosystem destruction...

Rooftop solar, offshore wind and waste bio char bio fuels are cheaper, or soon will be, than nukes, new coal, and oil wars. In combination, these green energies are 24/7, forever, clean, safe, ready to replace all fossil and nukes in 7-15 years, Carbon, land and fresh water negative.

Solar: http://solar.gwu.edu/Research/EnergyPolicy_Zweibel2010.pdf 1-2 cents per KWH after the first 20 years and the loan is paid off.

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/10/solar-power-graphs-to-make-you-smile/

Far more solar than any other energy: http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/23/solar-power-intro-3-key-solar-power-points-top-solar-power-news/

http://www.sunelec.com/ 75 cents per Wp.
cheapest new solar panels 1-2$/Wp http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/solar_panels.htm

Wind 6 months energy payback: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/01/wind_turbine_lca.php
http://www.wind-works.org/articles/EnergyBalanceofWindTurbines.html 3 months

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/03/18/offshore-wind-energy-cheaper-than-nuclear-energy-eu-climate-chief-says/

http://www.plancanada.com/biochar_basics.pdf
2$ per watt waste bio char energy plant. 100 GW electricity
12:32 AM on 10/12/2011
The tide is finally turning on teh great climate hoax. Here is a good video from three leading scientists in Australia, real climate scientists - not just bleeding hearts with an interest but no clue, and they have some pretty strong arguments against the climate hoaxers.

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/heres_a_video_of_scientists_being_listened_to_by_a_sceptic_mr_chubb/
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:46 AM on 10/12/2011
Humans emit some 200 times the CO2 as all of the volcanoes in the world combined.

Ya think that might change the climate?

Follow the money: the Trillions the fossil companies make. Grow up, get a real job.

Do you understand how many people, think tanks, lies you can buy for billions of dollars?

Climate change is real. Obviously, irrefutably.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
05:04 PM on 10/18/2011
Do human beings emit as much CO2 as all the oceans of the world combined?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:07 PM on 10/11/2011
George Schultz is actually an even more outspoken fan of generous FEED IN TARIFFS so that real people can see the financial upside of the transition to clean energy. The problem with NRDC's endless cheerleading for Big Energy is that it will cost all of us a FORTUNE and will keep energy supplies remote, centralized and corporatized, which is a dead end for our economy.

Schultz must have a better grasp on economics than the Big Enviros, since he understands that creating far more jobs, improving property values and keeping billions of dollars IN our communities that is currently flowing out in the form of energy bills is better than doubling then tripling our electric bills so Chevron and BP can slaughter millions more acres of wilderness and monopolize our energy supply by making it even less reliable! What a crock!

If you care about AGW, energy independence, grid reliability, jobs, the economy, open space, endangered species, democracy or fairness, you will rightly lump Big Wind and Big Solar and Big Transmission with all other Big Energy dead-ends and start working much, much harder to decentralize, democratize and clean our grid block by block, with the "resources" we already have - our structures and built environment. Talk about baking sprawling rooftop "resources" going to waste while pristine desert ecosystems are bulldozed into oblivion to create the same solar power at twice the cost - JUST SO BIG ENERGY CAN TAKE ALL THE MONEY!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:14 AM on 10/11/2011
The Fossil Fuel Industries are hell bent on keeping us on their cheap and dirty 100 year
old technology as long as possible.

They employ slick Madison Avenue twisted and untruthful spin
attempting to convince Americans that we should go back to the Wild West
where the man with the most money makes up the rules.

The first front in countering their lying, deceptive spin is to call them out
on WHERE these energy resources are going.

They want the dim witted to think that American Oil, Gas and Coal are somehow
staying in the United States for American use, when all of these resources
are sold to the highest bidder on the international market.

These Big Energy interests own the lawmakers and the judges and corrupt
every level of alternative energy research to prevent any truly competitive, viable
technology from seeing the light of day, unless they can somehow control the revenues.

They do not care about the long term effects as they rape, pillage and plunder
and pollute the planet. They only care about maximum Quarterly Profits for their investors.

They preach FREE ENTERPRISE while doing every thing possible
to shut down viable competition.

These energy interests are counting on Blind American Exceptionalism
to manipulate public opinion in their favor.

We must see them for what they really are.

Scoundrels Cheats and
Liars of the worst kind.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:47 AM on 10/12/2011
Yup. ff.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkanon
A pragmatic progressive
07:29 PM on 10/10/2011
NRDC is one of the bright lights combatting those who would destroy our environment in the name of money.
photo
abbienormal
What hump?
08:22 AM on 10/12/2011
Agreed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
feelingdisposable
Obama 332 - Romney 206
06:14 PM on 10/10/2011
Mr. Cantor - Do you really want to breathe bad air & die from pollution? Where are the jobs, Mr. Cantor?