More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hemanshu Nigam

GET UPDATES FROM Hemanshu Nigam
 

Silent Jury, Speaking Public

Posted: 05/31/11 02:47 PM ET

As the Casey Anthony trial begins to heat up, the media pushes out every word spoken inside the halls of justice to the awaiting public --  a public full of opinions on her guilt or innocence. Lawyers on both sides have spent hundreds of hours preparing for this trial, consulting jury experts, prepping witnesses, and preparing their prosecution and defense strategies. 

Now that the trial has started, everyone is watching the jury.  Did the smile that juror 6 have when Casey first walked in mean he's leaning toward her?  Was juror 9, who recently lost a niece who was about Caylee's age, deeply moved by pictures of the little girl?  We don't know. And we won't know.

Highly publicized jury trials are nothing new, like the trials of OJ Simpson, Martha Stewart, and Winona Ryder.  What is new is the instant online feedback from the public -- the speaking jury -- that can enlighten us all.   While the 12 citizens in the box might not be allowed to judge or talk until the very end, the 120,000,000 citizens online will say plenty every step of the way.  They will tweet, Facebook, post, and opine.  They will, in essence, render a daily verdict. 

Take this tweet from actor Jason Alexander: "Fascinated by Casey Anthony trial. I think the defense is almost ready to try alien abduction theory." Can all this coverage affect how justice is served? Should anyone involved in the case be paying attention to all this chatter?


Being "convicted in the media" is taking on a whole new meaning.  The public chatter can be a very valuable resource when judging the progress that either side is making.  It can be so valuable that legal teams on both sides would be remiss if they did not pay close attention to it every day.  As legal professionals we all need to take a lesson from this case.

Having prosecuted rapes and murders in Los Angeles and tried Internet predators as a U.S. Department of Justice prosecutor, I have had to 'read' a juror's body language and facial expressions in a constant effort to determine how my case was proceeding.  Every time, I could do nothing more than guess, speculate, and hope.   

Today's counsel in the Casey Anthony case and the soon to start Michael Jackson murder trial have a speaking jury that always has something to say when it comes to justice.  Because juries are picked from a group of our peers, there is no better way for us to understand what might be happening in the collective mind of the silent jury than to listen to ITS speaking peers.  That means listening intently to online chatter by having a social media savvy intern dedicated to scouring social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc) looking to see how the public jury is reacting to any given bit of evidence or testimony is a necessary component of prosecuting to the fullest or defending vigorously.  Legal teams can adjust their tactics as they continuously get a sense of how the jury might go.

Juries aren't always predictable.  And, anyone who has ever tried a case in front of a jury wishes they could have had more insight into the minds of the jurists.  Now, in a way, we actually can.

Justice may be blind, the jury may be silent, but the public will surely speak online.

 

Follow Hemanshu Nigam on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hemanshunigam

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:04 PM on 07/05/2011
what a muddle! no one can predict a jury as nigam writes, yet somehow we learn something from all this incessant online chatter? sounds like he has shared the experience of won cases tried to a jury that he thought he might not, and perhaps has lost some, he thought he could not lose.

no jury experts are going to be able to parse the jury before the verdict with any degree of accuracy. and now, the omnipresence of online public opinion has no predictability whatsover. all the fortune tellers in the world claim foreseeability, but i am still waiting for the dewey presidency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mspatz4u
09:25 PM on 06/04/2011
True that! I have been following this case from the very beginning. The OJ Simpson trial did not have nothing on this trial. Sometimes I have to pinch and remind myself that this is a real trial case and not a lifetime movie. I've watched the Detectives interview her, I watched as the Detectives and Police Officers testify about the wild goose chases she had them go on. However, what I have not seen or heard is the Police Officials telling her that she, "Had the Right to Remain Silent or The Right for Legal Representation" Is this something I missed out on and can it be an issue for appeal should she be found Guilty?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mommadona
I paint. I blog. Therefore, I am.
06:31 PM on 06/04/2011
Been following in print, so of course the livestream of the proceedings is the next focus. It's a window into "Our Town" of the 21st Century. Nothing is quite what it seems to be. My one surprise is the ineptness of the head defense lawyer. After listening on the tape of how Casey Anthony chose him (thru a recommendation from a few people in the holding tank with her) ~ it makes sense of what I'm watching.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bholly72
01:43 PM on 06/02/2011
I'm really amazed that there is so little discussion about the fact that virtually every "newsperson" (and I use that term loosely) has already decided that Casey Anthony is guilty. In fact, they all decided long before ANY evidence was introduced in court. The one exception I've seen is creepy Dr. Drew, who speculates endlessly about Casey's mental condition, even though he has never had a chance to perform a medical examination of her. Nancy Grace, of course, thinks everyone is guilty, but even she has reached new heights of screeching bias.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Hemanshu Nigam
12:21 AM on 06/07/2011
And those are just the folks who are able to get their opinions to the masses. If the jury is not sequestered like in many cases, would they be affects?
06:02 AM on 06/01/2011
This is a case that's had me mesmerized by Casey Anthony from the start, particularly her refusal to admit her child was even missing and her folly of acting like she was now 'free
03:38 AM on 06/01/2011
This case is full of unexpected twists and turns thus the fascination of the mass. It makes OJ Simpson's trial look like a parking ticket.
11:14 PM on 05/31/2011
For some reason, I have been riveted to this case since day one. I have followed it relentlessly ...Glued to my TV set every single day...George and Cindy Anthony are very forth coming with the real truth and very credible .... I hope the jury sees this..
03:41 PM on 05/31/2011
I'm sorry, I was displaying my fascination. I do like this take on the current media and the effects on this trial (or not?). The author is right, for every article there is an online reader that has an opinion. heh.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Hemanshu Nigam
04:55 PM on 05/31/2011
Thanks for your insight. I wonder what others have to say as well..
03:33 PM on 05/31/2011
I share Jason A.'s fascination. I am fascinated. The mother (on trial) is who interests me. Then the parents/grandparents. OMG! The grandpa wanted to kill himself? Why (a horrible sense of morality.)? Is this going to come up in trial?
Today's testimony by Cindy and her 911 call was telling, and riveting. Cindy was destroyed, and Casey, not so much. Chilling. The past revelations of Casey lying about a life she wished she had, or wanted to be true are intriguing. Sorry, it is sad, but this is a human condition of this woman. I am interested in human behavior. I can feel, and I can separate myself from the horrific crime.

This is a family dynamic that went wrong. The grandparents had good intentions (I think) in raising their child. But, their blame might be for them making her have this baby and keep it (I might want to rethink this statement. I'm not sure if this was the case.) This does lead to a lot of conflict between the young mother and her parents.
Tv or podcast or whatever couldn't get any better. Hollywood couldn't write this stuff.
04:10 AM on 06/01/2011
Yes, I think you should rethink that statement. Casey had her daughter for two almost three years and all of a sudden got this grand idea to kill her? Sure, let's just blame the grandparents for trying to teach their ADULT child to take responsibility. Choosing to keep an unborn child is not the issue here, it is the choice that Casey made about raising a child once living - her child. If we were to make it an issue of her parents "making her have this baby and keep it", why couldn't Casey just put her child up for adoption? It didn't seem like Casey had any issues about being a mother until she ended up killing her child.

If I was a parent of Casey, the pain and embarrassment I would feel would be in my own failure in raising a daughter who could not be a responsible and mature parent. I would feel endless sorrow for the little soul who was deprived of life experiences. I would feel cheated that I was given an angel of a grandchild who was murdered be her own mother. I would experience a lifelong suffering knowing that my own child was capable of such a terrible and tragic event.

What can you feel when you are the parent of someone who is clearly sick in the head?