Who Killed Katie Couric?

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

• Share
• Print View
• Comments

And now for your daily dose of boardroom intrigue.

Earlier this week, someone killed the nation's first solo woman evening news anchor. Specifically, someone told the press about a meeting in February in which Katie and some senior CBS executives discussed whether Katie should remain an unpopular anchor of CBS Evening news or just give up and quit. The moment this nugget hit the wires, Katie became a lame duck. The only question now is not "if" she's history, but when.

So who killed her? Because don't think for one second that the person who leaked the news of the meeting didn't know that that was exactly what he or she was doing.

If the NYT's report this morning is correct, there are four suspects: CBS CEO Les Moonves, CBS News president Sean McManus, Katie's agent, Alan Berger of the Creative Artists Agency, and Katie herself. Why? Because they were the only ones in the meeting.

Odds are, it was one of the two CBS execs, probably Sean. CBS doesn't want to acknowledge that one of the main problems with the CBS Evening News is that "evening news" shows are obsolete, so it has to blame Katie (who, it is true, was more beloved in her morning slot). CBS also, however, doesn't want to be seen as cutting and running on the nation's first solo woman anchor, especially after it paid so much to get her there.

So how best for CBS to ditch Katie? Make it look like they had no choice. Or, rather, make it look like leaving the anchor slot might have been Katie's choice. ("We tried to talk her out of it, but she decided that [INSERT NEW JOB HERE] was a better fit"). Odds are this is what happened: CBS just killed Katie.

On the other hand, maybe it was Katie herself. One of the reasons Katie isn't resonating with viewers in the evening news slot is that she's never seemed that comfortable in it herself. This doesn't mean she can't compete with the serious bid dogs of hard-core journalism -- of course she can. It just means that what she was best at was what she was doing before, the mix of light, heavy, and featury stuff on the morning shows (America loves to start the day with beautiful, smart, and perky, and Katie embodied that).

So maybe Katie and her agent decided to pave the way for her departure by leaking news of the meeting, perhaps in an attempt to head off the inevitable chatter that she had been canned. If so, this strategy backfired: Most news coverage suggests implicitly that she's getting canned. Katie and her agent are probably smart enough to have known that this is what the coverage would suggest, so we doubt she or her agent were the original leaker.

So who killed Katie Couric? Odds are it was CBS, most likely Sean McManus.

BREAKING: Senior Yahoo Execs Hate the Proposed AOL Merger But Are Too Scared To Tell CEO Jerry Yang

Comments

[lazlogasky]

I have high respect for Cour5ic just bcoz I've seen her broadcast and realized that it isn;t bad as anyone thought... it's actually better than ABC and NBC and Couric speaks with more heart. More power Katie!!

[Exit]

She is just too silly to be a serious news person. She needs a show like Martha Stewart or something. Connie Chung and Carole Simpson fit the model of a serious female news anchor.

[allpoliticiansaretraitors]

Anchor? Isn't that the object that one uses to:

1) Stop something from moving

OR

2) The object used to sink something


Either definition seems to fit Katie and her gig as news 'anchor'. I've no idea if she's any good at this job, but I always thought she was terrible on the Today show. BTW, Diane Sawyer has both humor and gravitas...Perhaps SHE'd like a shot @ the job.

[WilliePilgrim]

Hmmm..Anchor. That's a good title. It describes what that person's role is when it comes to the journalistic endeavor to prepare and bring us the news. In no way does it imply that they're the captain, or the navigator or the bosun or even an able bodies seaman. They are an achor. Why the networks pay them so much is because they need them as a draw to bring in advertising dollars. So why not get an attractive or high profile one since what the audience want to know is more about sex scandals and sports celebrities. There is no obligation to do public affairs anymore... I find the notion of an achor doing journalism as comforting as if I were on a boat and instead of having the captain or navigator to guide the boat, the crew went up to the bow of the boat and asked the great mute weight designed to keep the boat from going anywhere, where it is that the boat should go. Oh, sure an anchor is a journalist sometimes, but why expect an anchor to do any news reporting? What we have here, to borrow the old Strother Martin line from Cool Hand Luke, is "a failure to communicate". They pose, posture and pretend but communicate? What exactly? The roll of the eyeballs, the smirk? Really? The idea of replacing Couric with Chris Matthews strikes me as yet another attempt to get ratings and not integrity. So, really, who cares?

[BatedBreath]

I haven't watched cbs news since they threw Dan Rather under the train. It has nothing to do with Katie Couric.

[obsessed]

If this is actually true - thank god somebody is putting her out of her (and our) misery. Have you every listened to "Reporter's Notebook"? She's the most unscrupulous and transparent of the Bush-enablers - the poster girl for everything that's wrong with our pathetic corporate media. I find her significantly more offensive that Fox News.

[longnow]

It is much easier to get someone who will not get emotionally
mixed up with what might be lies, or half truth reporting.
The solution? Get someone who is totally uninterested
in world affairs or news. If she's told to nail the liberals
this week she will do it. If she's told to tell the truth about
conservatives she will do it, if she's told to balance the truth
with an opposing lie, no problem, as long as it's "balanced"
and bland and corporately satisfying. Don't worry, corporate
news will find it's way into your head one way or the other.

[mellene]

CBS just wants another parrot who will say anything they're fed to the public from the corporate suits. Newscasters are becoming the used car salesmen of this era. I'm so sick of nothing but repeat lies by the media that you can't believe anything they say anymore.

[dairyair]

Henry, HENRY, you didn't answer me a while back. HOW DOES A WALL STREET CROOK get to post articles in a somewhat newsworthy ezine?
Ripping off any more innocent people lately, HENRY?

[VictorLudorum]

Katie Couric is seated on the slippery chair that Dan Rather was on ,someone created a EXCHANGE on it...........................

[PuddyKatz]

I always like those two lady anchors on the PBS news! But somehow I just couldn't take to Katie. I stopped watching as soon as she came on. She seemed out of her depth and phony!

[Ozy]

Ah, This is another instance of scapegoating for Les Moonves .

In all the years I have followed this guy it has been astonishing how he has maintained his executive washroom key with the fake stature and phony or poor track record of accomplishments for failing upward.

My question is what does Les have on the management or better yet who's his daddy?

I would have kicked the under performer out six years ago!

Katie shot her self her first week trying to reinvent her feet into Dan Rathers giant shoes. Can you say "Free speech segment with Rush Limpbrain?" Please! Katie, go back to what you did best or even better just be a human being

[Horst]

A bubble head reading a Tele-Propmpter. Who cares?

[americanwhocares]

The real issue is why does Leslie Moonves still have a job? He is desperately trying to cover his backside for the huge mistake he made with Ms Couric and the salary she is paid along with pushing Dan Rather out when he reported the truth about our draft dodging president. If CBS had any intelligence (doubtful) they would fire Leslie Moonves in a New York minute.

[WordManMI]

Could it be that the story is actually the other-way-around? Did Katie kill CBS Evening News??? Given that all three broadcast networks were changing anchors, more or less, during the same time frame, this was a golden opportunity for CBS to regain some of it's past glory. ABC's move to put Charlie Gibson on has improved their ratings position. NBC was clearly vulnerable and either ABC or CBS could have scored a big hit. ABC did and CBS didn't.

With Couric demanding such a high salary, CBS News was forced to to go economy-class. The rest of their news division suffered thanks to Katie. Just look back at her earlier desires to do broadcasts abroad. CBS just didn't have the spare cash to do so, till they scraped up enough to send her to Iraq for a week. Hiring her was a bad move from Day One. She never had the journalistic 'creds' that Cronkite, Rather, Brokaw, Jennings or even Gibson and Williams had. She wasn't a match for Diane Sawyer, who kicked Katie's butt in the morning show slot. Face facts, Couric is over-rated. I can see her replacing Larry King and excelling at that. But doing 'hard news' has never been her forte.

[dr4Will]

who gives a rip when a puppet gets the shove out the door--believing the anchor is part of the job--no one believed this fake!

[jmort]

Goodbye! Nice to see you go. Don't let the door hit you...

[Grulg]

No loss, mis-casting. Reminds me of the great Bryant Gumbel signing that CBS did over 10 years ago, that kinda blew up in their faces, too! CBS-STOP importing NBC morning talkers-you'll live longer.

This is a job you give to Scott Pelley or someone like that ,w/ some real news credibility.

[InofTouch]

Apprently it works for ABC though.

[NotBeatenYet]

This is not a surprise. Couric was losing viewers for more than a year before she left Today, so when CBS hired her, it made as much sense as the AOL-Time Warner merger.

The CBS of the Tiffany-Network days died in the 1970's and only the call-letters remain today. I predict the rumors of Chris Matthews replacing her will come to pass. Once he fails to draw an audience (and you can bet the farm that he will fail), look forward to CBS outsourcing its "news" to one of the cable circuses.

[ekent]

Katie Couric - and all other news anchors - can only be as good as the reporters and writers who supply their scripts. CBS News gave up its mandate for objective reporting with such stories as this "Fox pas": http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/11/eveningnews/main3819364.shtml. If I were Ms. Couric, I would have executed an exit strategy long ago rather than be embarrassed by having to deliver such a weak excuse for journalism.

[Twocentsworth245]

Frankly, I'm surprised that Couric has lasted as long as she has in the anchor chair. I guess CBS has been vainly trying to justify all the millions they've invested in her. I just can't take her seriously as a "hard news" reporter, and I'm sure I'm not alone in that, which is probably why CBS's evening newscast never got out of last place with her there. Although I'm not of the geriatric set myself, I DO watch the evening news, specifically, "ABC World News Tonight," because I like Charlie Gibson -- a LOT. He has much the same demeanor as the late Peter Jennings, whom I also liked -- a LOT. However, the poster who said that the national evening newscasts seem to be geared towards the geriatric set is right, based on all the prescription drug commercials they have.

At any rate, I can't STAND Katie myself; never could. For some reason, she's just always made me want to vomit. She's the reason I didn't watch the "Today" show. I usually don't watch any of the moring shows, but when I do, it's "GMA" because I like Diane & Co.

Anyway, as I've said, I'm just very surprised that Couric's lasted as an anchor as long as she has. I think it's high time for CBS to cut its losses where she's concerned and cut her loose.

[peterg76]

Wait... Couric is a journalist?

[Pharos]

To the women of the younger generation who think sexism is dead. Read the comments here.

[NotBeatenYet]

Stating a preference for Diane Sawyer is sexist? Get over yourself.

[InofTouch]

Well is she taken seriouly or just a pass by and label as one of many who are fauling us in the media.

[pilotinfla]

Katie had a big build-up before going on the air and CBS spared no expense in recasting their news show. At first, people were watching the show but they turned to other sources for their news. The problem was lack of talent -- Katie was fine with the light infotainment of the Today show but she is not credible as a serious news broadcaster. Mabye she needs a bit more training or something but at $15 million a year, I'm sure her employer expected her to be ready from the start.

[VivaZapata]

CBS spent a fortune promoting Couric. To report this as if she is some kind of victim is silly. The struggling-to-make-ends-meet American worker would trade places with Couric in a heartbeat, and probably be more interesting. In fact, what has happened to presenting a broad spectrum of ideas from the "man (or woman) on the street?" We're buzzed at constantly by the so called pundits and so called comedians who prop themselves up as EXPERTS on politics but never seem to go into any depth. I saw Bill Maher ridicule bloggers and comment posters, on pages like these, and I wonder why he uses the internet if he feels that way. It seems a bit hypocritical, but I'll chalk it up to Maher's poorly thought through smart ass persona. He can be very funny, but he also can be smug and condescending. I've been far more informed by regular people on web pages than by the "experts" on TV. Couric will live well in retirement or on CNN, or wherever.

[InofTouch]

And this your infomation...bias please.

[PrdAmerican]

While I agree that KC isn't the best news anchor, I am amused that so many people haven't called out CBS and other so called "news" shows for the very lack of what their name suggests; news. The nightly news cycle has been dead for years, a true farce....gone are the days when we could actually derive some truth from what we saw and heard...gone are the Cronkites and Murrows....replaced with cute and perky.