More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Howard Meitiner

Howard Meitiner

GET UPDATES FROM Howard Meitiner

Bath Salts: New Drug, Old Problem

Posted: 02/10/11 08:13 AM ET

There will always be a designer drug of the moment. Entrepreneurs constantly monitor the trends in street drugs and exploit these demands in order to brand and sell new products.

Four Loko and K2 come to mind as recent examples, and apparently the current drug du jour is "bath salts."

What's it going to be tomorrow? Melting light bulbs? Whenever we cut off supply of a particular substance, young people, through their own creativity, have found new ways to get high. What has made this pattern more noticeable is that we're now seeing more families under pressure and more individuals who use mind-altering drugs.

Recently, there's been a lot of buzz about "bath salts," the newest over-the-counter item teens are using to get high. The synthetic powder -- sold legally online and in drug paraphernalia stores under such names as "Ivory Wave" and "Purple Wave" -- has been linked to an alarming number of ER visits across the country. Although we are less than two months into 2011, the American Association of Poison Control Centers has fielded more calls about "bath salts" overdoses than in all of last year.

"Bath salts" may look innocent, but their effects are powerful. According to ONDCP Director Gil Kerlikowske's office, bath salts mimic the effects of cocaine and LSD, causing extreme paranoia and delusions, hallucinations, and suicidal thoughts, among other symptoms. Furthermore, an overdose on "bath salts" can have tragic consequences, as was the case with 21-year-old Dickie Sanders. Dickie snorted a packet of Cloud 9 "bath salts" and was overcome by terror and delirium -- he killed himself that same night.

Dickie's father, Richard Sanders, met with local law enforcement officials in their Louisiana hometown to discuss preventative measures for other teens and their families. "This stuff is poison," Richard told the judges, who promised to take immediate action against the accessibility of the drug. "You don't get high on it; you go crazy," Richard added. Fortunately, there is now no doubt that "bath salts" are highly dangerous, and several states are moving to ban them.

But we've been here before -- and banning another drug won't be enough to protect our kids unless we parents look at the underlying causes of our teens' substance abuse. When addressing drug accessibility and use, it is important to take supply and demand into account, but the "War on Drugs" has been focusing too much on supply alone. We all know that attempts to simply shut down the world's sources of drugs are not successful; instead we need to start focusing more on the demand, and examine the reasons so many individuals turn to drugs in the first place.

These are not problems we can simply legislate away. Our approach needs to be twofold: addressing substance abuse on both macro and micro levels. On a macro level, we cannot keep treating substance abuse as a legislative/criminal justice issue. Instead, we need to follow President Obama's lead and treat substance abuse as a public health issue. We also need to address addiction for what it is: a chronic health condition that must be individually managed.

On a micro level, much responsibility lies within individual families -- namely, with parents, many of whom may approach teen substance abuse from an unproductive angle. Parents should keep tabs on their kids, instead of just keeping tabs on the latest designer drug news. Instead of spending time learning the pharmacological details of "bath salts," Four Loko, or K2, parents should spend time with their kids and learn the reasons for their drug use. To discover and address these reasons, it's crucial to listen to the teen's point of view and foster ongoing family communication.

We as a society must examine why teens turn to mind-altering substances and we must deal with these root causes of drug use through education, prevention, intervention, and treatment. Only when we address the demand for drugs, not merely the supply, can we hope to safeguard our children.

 
There will always be a designer drug of the moment. Entrepreneurs constantly monitor the trends in street drugs and exploit these demands in order to brand and sell new products. Four Loko and K2 ...
There will always be a designer drug of the moment. Entrepreneurs constantly monitor the trends in street drugs and exploit these demands in order to brand and sell new products. Four Loko and K2 ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 374
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clay Dunn-Roberts
lazy
03:17 AM on 03/03/2011
They aren't bath salts, they are marketed AS bath salts to get around FDA regulations. derp
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
11:23 AM on 02/17/2011
The path to less drug use for kids is to give them hope in our society's future. Pollution, war, environmental destruction, hypocrisy etc. have more effect on these kid's than is realized by most adults. Throw in bullying, classism, and racism and doesn't everyone want some escape? Maybe a drink? A cigarette? Or a Zoloft? Face it, the inspiration to take drugs today is everywhere just like the drugs. More common sense, hope for the world, and love are needed. Preaching, finger pointing, laws and Prisons will never change kids like helping them realize that working towards a better world is possible.
12:50 PM on 02/16/2011
This is a really important wake up call for many of us. Parents don’t often think that substance abuse can stem from common household items.

I also agree that it’s important to identify and address the underlining issues that might be contributing to the drug abuse in the first place.

It’s helpful for parents to understand that many factors can contribute to substance abuse (whether drugs or alcohol), such as genetics, peer influence, and anxiety. Many children and teens today do not understand how to cope with pain, disappointment, frustration, anger, fear, and other challenging feelings. When they experience these emotions, they may look for a way to ignore their feelings instead of addressing and managing them.

It’s important for parents to teach their children and teens how to cope with anxiety, stress, and other feelings as they grow up. It’s not uncommon for people, especially children and teens, who haven’t learned proper coping skills, to turn to drugs or alcohol as a way to deal with these feelings.

At Caron Treatment Centers, a non-profit substance abuse treatment center where I work, we stress how important it is for parents to teach their children healthy coping skills from an early age. We understand that parents may need some help when figuring out how to best approach the issue, so we pulled together some tips on teaching kids to cope: http://www.caron.org/teaching-kids-to-cope.html.

Warm regards,
Katie S., Caron Treatment Centers
@CaronTreatment
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titanshanks
Back for more
10:57 PM on 02/13/2011
Many people believe that simply addressing drug use is enough. As with any subject matter, it has to be addressed effectively. DARE, while well intentioned, has been seen to have very little effect. I can't say I've seen an anti-drug campaign that I thought looked very impressive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
02:30 AM on 02/13/2011
The advice in this piece is not helpful. Drug abuse is rampant in high schools now, but this was not at all the case 45 years ago. The teen/parent bond has not degenerated that much since 1966.

The difference is supply. Sorry if that is politically incorrect but that is the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titanshanks
Back for more
11:00 PM on 02/13/2011
I don't know why that idea is so taboo. I don't think it's the most important factor, but of course it matters whether a drug is $50 a hit or 5, and it matters how much work it is to get it. If the DEA and police just backed off, everything else being equal, I imagine drug use would rise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
10:55 AM on 02/17/2011
I think kids, who are looking around at the world, see pollution and destruction championed by politicians. They see the problems and wrongdoing much clearer than their parents who may be caught up in the system; for instance working in the oil industry, for insurance companies, or investing in polluting and destructive technologies. The result is a desire to disconnect from reality.

Supply has been there all along. Motivation is the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rochelle MacDonald
Living life at the legally accepted maxium speed
09:06 PM on 02/12/2011
Just wait, someone is going to make a hallucinogenic drug using broccoli, spinach and diaper rash ointment or some such crap. It is relatively easy to get an eduction in chemistry today (just look in your local book store), and the equipment to create elaborate formulas are cheap and accessible.

Maybe it is time to get rid of the "war on drugs" and create a learning environment where kids can identify the biological harm some of these substances can cause. Oh, wait! But then kids will learn that the foods they are being encouraged to eat in large quantities are really, really harmful. We can't have that, now can we, Big Agra?
05:53 PM on 02/12/2011
I'm glad this article mentions the fact that without demand, there will not be supply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
02:32 AM on 02/13/2011
Most addicts start using before age 18, while they are legally children. They should not have these substances available to try, since we all know that kids that age will do almost anything for acceptance. The demand only comes into play after they are addicted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
11:06 AM on 02/17/2011
I don't think you CAN control the sources. These substances are everywhere - when I was young in the 60s it was popular to smoke a cough syrup and a ubiquitous painkiller, to snort aerosols that had freon in them, to drink certain cough syrups, and of course neither alcohol or pot or LSD were that hard to get either. Guess what,
the things kid's do may have changed some, due to some of these things being illegal or not manufactured now, but some were illegal then and it still went on. Sorry, but I don't believe that addiction is as much in the substance as it is in the users' minds and bodies (DNA).
01:43 PM on 02/12/2011
Love how every effort possible is taken in this article to not name the actual chemical in the "bath salts". It makes this look as if its a bigger threat to the nation's youth than it really is. Its not like kids are just going down to Bed, Bath, and Beyond to get high...you won't find this stuff there
12:21 AM on 02/13/2011
With some searching online the specific drugs in "bath salts" that are banned are: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethcathinone, 3,4-Methyenedioxypyrovalerone, 4-Methylmethcathinone, 4-methoxymethcathinone, 4-Fluoromethcathinone, and 3-Fluoromethcathinone.
01:16 PM on 02/12/2011
I think at this point we might as well just legalize marijuana. Kids are going to find ways to get high. It's going to happen, and there's really no way to stop it. But we've gotten to the point where you need a photo-ID to buy whipped cream and White-Out. This is getting ridiculous...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tsudopnem
I'm just this gal, y'know?
07:33 PM on 02/13/2011
Agreed. Just educate your kids!
01:01 PM on 02/12/2011
Look, Portugal is probably the best example of what happens when you focus on treatment/prevention measures rather than incarceration. All drugs have been decriminalized, use is down, and the people who are using have the support they need to take care of the problem. If Republic*nts are so concerned about the deficit, why don't they cut funding from the "War on Drugs" instead of trying to defund things like NPR (PEANUTS IN THE WHOLE SCHEME OF THINGS)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Agent Cooper
02:26 PM on 02/12/2011
Fanned and Faved!
12:53 AM on 02/13/2011
I don't see the Democrats stepping up either.
01:01 AM on 02/13/2011
Well, I was only trying to make the point that they are going after small (very important) programs, which in the long run will prove far less beneficial and do more damage than simply bringing order to large programs riddled with waste, fraud, and abuse (corporate/private ie: Medicare Advantage). I'm fully aware democrats don't have the stomach to do what needs to be done. They're all just worried now about keeping their jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titanshanks
Back for more
11:03 PM on 02/13/2011
I think I saw one stand up briefly, before sitting back down and making a public apology.
12:59 PM on 02/12/2011
Whenever I read HuffPost comments that the war on drugs is ineffective or that marijuana should be legalized, I wonder if those people have ever held any amount of responsibility in their lives. Has that person ever been an EMT? Ever been a behavioral health worker? An emergency room doctor? A law enforcement officer? Have those people ever been the parent of an addicted teenager? The brother or sister of one? The grandparents?

Before people start tearing down fences simply because they are there, why not ask yourself why they were put up to begin with. Odds are, it was a fairly good reason.

We currently "legalize" tobacco and alcohol and look at the hundreds of thousands of lives each year that those drugs (yes, drugs) directly ruin. Look at the millions (yes, millions) of lives that those drugs indirectly harm at the same time - Stressed out family members, friends, hospital budgets, police budgets... All from legal drugs. And drug advocates clamor for legalizing even more under the guise of "increased revenue" and "more jobs."

If legalizing drugs is a panacea for society's ills, then why didn't lifting Prohibition work? Why do we have more crime, more deaths, more ruined lives, more deficits... Why aren't places in Europe where drug laws are more lenient swimming in government revenue and jobs instead of being nearly bankrupt with unemployment even higher then the US (the so-called "backwards" nation)? Drug advocacy makes no sense and never will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Agent Cooper
02:28 PM on 02/12/2011
That's one very narrow way of looking at it, yes.
05:26 PM on 02/12/2011
The solutions always have been, and always will be, education and treatment, regardless of the legality of drugs. Well informed people, who are fully aware of all the consequences, are not likely to abuse drugs unless they already have other psychological issues.

The reasons criminalisation fails society as a whole are because it creates a barrier to information, about drugs and their effects, and it also creates a disaffected criminal class from people who really need help, but instead are persecuted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
02:42 AM on 02/13/2011
Most drug use starts in high school or before. By then they have already had numerous DARE lectures and other programs in school and in scouts, most of the parents and teachers have taught the dangers. They get involved because they are going through some angst (many do at that age) and someone - a "friend" offers it. And the friend uses it and says all the warnings we were told are BS, it doesn't hurt you and it makes you feel good.

By the time they realize their mistake, many need rehab to get clean. Quality drug rehab costs $8,000 to 15,000 per month. Three months would be the minimum that a person abusing hard drugs would need. How many parents have $24,000 to $45,000?
09:54 AM on 02/12/2011
decriminalize marijuana let the people have a safe alternative to all the crap an bullshit
09:11 AM on 02/12/2011
obviously theses "drugs" differ greatly from generic bath salts, or those kids would be pooping their brains out. legalize and regulate...it's the only way.
08:21 AM on 02/12/2011
Recreational pharmaceuticals should be made legal. End the prohibition of pharmaceuticals.
08:13 AM on 02/12/2011
EU governments have been trying to legislate away so-called designer drugs after the explosion in mephedrone use in the last few years. It's all a bit pointless, because the designers are very good at staying ahead of the law - better the drug you do know than the one you don't. When they banned mephedrone, lots of suspect new chemicals were developed that could be much more dangerous than the ones just banned.