On May 20 at Citi Field, thousands of people are expected to gather for an underdog cause. It's not the Mets. Rabbis, community leaders and ordinary citizens will gather to discuss the dangers of the Internet. With the Internet having been a popular medium for more than 20 years, the rabbis feel that it is about time they did something to ban it. Repeated efforts over the last 10 years have been fruitless.
There have been suggestions or exceptions for proper Internet use, such as filtering, passwords or just keeping the computer in the family room. However, when every device from your TV to your phone can get you and your kids online, the proliferation of Internet is almost too much to deal with. What is so bad about the World Wide Web that the rabbinical authorities are seeking to abolish it once and for all?
With the click of a button, one can access pornography, chat and websites that contradict religious Jewish thought. However, the Internet is needed for business and school. The very businessmen who sponsor the rabbis use the Internet for business. Even when you swipe a credit card in a store, the processor goes "online" to check your credit. Furthermore, groundbreaking efforts on the part of the Jewish community to petition for Sholom Rubashkin would not have been possible without the Web.
Many religious private schools burden students with books upon books of homework in both Judaic and secular studies. In addition, the typical Hebrew day school ends at 4 or 5 o'clock. Students can find a lot of resources online -- as long as they don't tell the teacher. Some schools have the ridiculous policy of banning the Internet when such a ban is simply unenforcable and unrealistic in the 21st Century.
When one thinks of the mountainous efforts of getting a meeting/rally together for the purpose of abolishing the Internet, you have to ask yourself, "Why?" There are many problems facing the Jewish community: intermarriage, teens-at-risk and divorce. Ridiculous, unenforceable bans just serve to divide the Jewish community. We should be talking about bringing the downtrodden back into the fold, and defending Judaism from negative public opinion.
It is easy to ignore the issues and issue an across-the-board ban on the Internet. Nevertheless, this is not the answer. The Internet issue is a private one that parents should work out with their kids. There are many tools available to parents today for the monitoring of their children online. Parents should also be alert as to who their children's' friends are and what kind of influence they have. A pre-teen was recently abused in upstate New York by a man he met on Xbox Live of all places. While his parents should not be blamed, we all should keep track of our children's online activity. This is not a reason to ban the use of the Internet.
As a Jew, I support Israel, human rights and free choice. The fact that so many leading individuals in our community scream in fever pitch about an electronic box they do not know much about, rather than pressing and embarrassing issues, is in it of itself an embarrassment. We should not be afraid to defend an 8-year-old girl from religious fanatics. We should not be afraid to speak out against sexual abuse in Brooklyn. However, if we ignore these issues, we should be afraid for the Jewish future.
Chaim Levin: The Education I Never Had, and Why No One Is Doing a Thing About It
I do take issue, though, with your assertion that this gathering is for the sole purpose of forbidding internet use; that was tried 15 years ago and failed miserably. I am have a strong impression that rabbinic leaders now realize that banning the internet is impossible, and are calling this gathering to educate people on 'internet evils' and how to minimize 'internet risks and dangers'. A step, albeit small, forward.
Thanks for your reply. To me, there's little question that the rabbinic leadership behind this gathering has given up on forbidding the internet - they've realized that it's like trying to ban air. But, I think that they will never give up the idea that "the internet" is inherently a religiously destructive force and can only be grudgingly accepted, as long as there is proper control, mandated and monitored by said leadership, natch.
This is where the emperor shows that he has little or no clothes. This type of thinking is very anachronistic and lays bare the fact that the rabbinic leadership that supports such thinking and the events that flow from it are pretty much out of touch with reality and really don't fully understand what "the internet" really is. "The internet" cannot be distilled down into a one word "thing" that "has good and bad". The "internet" is a really a word that describes something quite vast and pervasive in the way in which we live our lives and simply go about our daily business. Unfortunately, parts of the rabbinic leadership really view the internet simply as a vast repository of pornography and heretical ideas that will destroy the Jewish nation. They are still firmly stuck in an anachronistic rut and will not move forward. One might have said such a thing 15-20 years ago and might've had a point. Not today.