Left, Right & Center: Sotomayor, North Korea and GM

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Is Sonia Sotomayor a judicial activist? A racist? Is empathy a good or bad thing in a judge? Arianna wonders what the GOP thinks it's doing by attacking her, but Tony says conservatives have legitimate reasons to object to her based on their own philosophies of jurisprudence -- a slight chortle here about Rush Limbaugh's motives.... Matt wants to know what the role of the court is: to lead or follow society's direction? North Korea's nuclear activity is an unwelcome challenge but Tony says only China has the kind of influence to get them to scale back -- and they've chose not to pull those strings. What's in GM's future? Will the free market or government influence the kinds of cars they should be producing? And, can Obama succeed in reforming health care?

 
Comments
4
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- slowtono I'm a Fan of slowtono 5 fans permalink

Stumble and fall

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 05/31/2009
- kevinabt I'm a Fan of kevinabt 17 fans permalink

I don't see how beaurocrats appointed by the federal government should have any legal or moral power to take our rights away. The people wrote a clear contract in easily read english laying out the actions which the government is prohibited from doing. You don't need any fancy law degree to understand it. Apparantly you need to law degree to craft tortured logic to strip the rights away though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 AM on 05/31/2009
- nk007 I'm a Fan of nk007 29 fans permalink

I am sorry to say but you don't need stupid people entrusted with interpreting the Constitution. The Constitution contains broad general principles. Besides, Judges/Justices have to rule on statutes as well as state laws to ensure that they don't violate the Constitution. Over two hundred years courts have handed down rulings that serve as legal precedents dealing with complex legal questions. Obviously these precedents have been, and can be, overturned by Current Courts. Nevertheless, it would be idiotic to expect some one like me who is not versed in the complexities of laws to be entrusted with interpreting the Constitution as well dealing with the complexities of precedents and trying to discern the intent of law makers when adjudicating on the basis of statutes. So, may be you may not need "any fancy law degree" to understand the general text of the Constitution, but you sure need advanced legal training to be able to deal with statutes, precedents, various state laws, to ensure that they comply with the U.S. Constitution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 AM on 05/31/2009
- vietveter I'm a Fan of vietveter 19 fans permalink

The members of the court that "Selected" - NOT elected the president in 2000

should be impeached.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 05/30/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect