On Thursday's episode of MSNBC's "Morning Joe," Arianna offered her opinion on the "tiger mom" controversy and whether she thinks taking a tough, hard-lined approach to parenting is the best way to raise children.
"I'm completely against it," Arianna, the mother of two teenage daughters, said. "The most important thing a mom can give her children is that sense of being loved no matter whether you succeed or fail."
Arianna continued by saying she believes the world is hard enough on people, and the best gift a parent can give their children is unconditional love. "The world is constantly going to be judging them," she said. "The idea that suddenly discipline and incredible expectations is the way to go as a parent is completely the wrong direction."
WATCH:
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Charlotte Hilton Andersen: The Question No One Is Asking in the Tiger Mom Debate
Darell Hammond: In Support of the Bulldozer Mom
Spot on Arianna.
My strongest and warmest memories are of my loving parents to whom I feel I owe everything to this day.
It is true that some tiger moms may have struggled to show their love after they discipline, or some 'helicopter moms' may have not applied much discipline while they show love around the clock. To find the right balance is probably the key to successful parenting. And I am learning it every day.
Amy Chua's daughter Sophia shared her story: Why I love my strict Chinese mom? http://www.nuzcom.com/why-i-love-my-strict-chinese-mom
I suspect successful children in most fields come from successful parents who learned successful parenting (or the opposite) from their parents. Confidentiality would be essential because successful people are not going to criticize their parents publicly.
Fortunately many modern biographys deal at length with this subject and hint at worthwhile parenting techniques which are more subtle (and apparently more successful) than Dragon Mom's rather simplistic approach. Continued
This subject deserves documentation rather than speculation. How were giants in their fields brought up? Many biographies from Yo Yo Mah to Elizabeth Blackburn (a recent noble prize winner for the discovery of the hormone which repairs DNA strands), and from Charles Darwin to Genghis Kahn. All of their parents encouraged these children from an early age, but also brought them up to be independent. Parents encouraged their children's interests, not what the parents or the world necessarily thought was best. Darwin's father, a doctor, built endless cabinets with large shallow drawers to house Charles' collections of beetles, rocks, etc., which Charles drew and catalogued from the age of five - all while the outside world considered his son a failure at school and conventional studies.
Yo Yo's father, also a professional musician, made him learn a complete musical phrase each day to the point of where he could pay it beautifully. Not just play it - but play it with superb interpretation and understanding.
I think combining the two would be appropriate. Be firm with our kids and give them a push in the right direction. Don't coddle or protect them all their lives and don't be so easy on them, but at the same time, take the time to build that relationship with them. Be supportive, not a drill sergeant. We are human, we will fail, but it's how we take that failure and pursue success in life that matters. We can't be forbidden from failure, or the truth of failure hidden from us.
In essence, I think we're witnessing two extreme sides of something where both have their merits, but where both have more cons than pros.
I cannot understand being harsh with ones kids. There is no excuse as far as I am concerned
Think about it this way, people in Africa and the Near East perform female genital mutilation for generation after generation.. mother does it to daughter, daughter to her daughter... etc etc etc.. can you really say that because people do something generationally, it must be good? That is illogical
There are so many ways to parent, and no one approach is perfect. It seems as if Ms. Chua is extremely restrictive; Ms. Waldman moderately permissive.
And while both have its positive side, I'd go with Ms. Waldman's approach as I believe strongly is self actualization and personal choice.