iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost TV

HuffPost TV

Posted: February 13, 2011 11:13 AM

Arianna appeared on ABC's "This Week with Christiane Amanpour" on Sunday, as part of a roundtable discussion on the protests in Egypt with George Will, Robert Kagan and Mona Eltahawy.

"Right now there's been a perfect storm of three conditions," Arianna said. "The growing connectivity in the Middle East. It's phenomenal what is happening -- 5 million people on Facebook in Egypt. There's been the growing unemployment among the young, which has been a tinderbox, especially after the global recession. And also there's been this real organization of a dozen to fifteen real leaders, including Ghonim from Google, who've been a lot of very creative and very important things. And so even though there isn't a Lech Walesa, there is real leadership behind this movement."

Regarding the political power dynamics in the Middle East, Kagan said, "We've been under the illusion that these dictators were somehow bulwarks against radicalism, and we've got to understand that stability is not dictatorship. Stability may mean gradual change toward genuine democratic society."

"So many powers, including Iran, are under the illusion that they can control what's happening," Arianna replied. "Whether we endorse it or not, may be irrelevant. Whether Iran calls for an Islamic revolution, as it did, or not, is irrelevant because this is not an Islamic revolution. There are Christians and Muslims, and it has a real non-ideological tenor, which is what makes it so strong."

Arianna also said that the United States has a role to play in helping to foster democracy in Egypt. "We have this leverage of the $2 billion that we give Egypt every year. Of course, let's compare that with the $2.8 billion that we spend in Afghanistan every week, just to see how we also need to refigure our priorities in the globe."

WATCH:


The discussion continued in the Green Room after the show:



 
Arianna appeared on ABC's "This Week with Christiane Amanpour" on Sunday, as part of a roundtable discussion on the protests in Egypt with George Will, Robert Kagan and Mona Eltahawy. "Right now ther...
Arianna appeared on ABC's "This Week with Christiane Amanpour" on Sunday, as part of a roundtable discussion on the protests in Egypt with George Will, Robert Kagan and Mona Eltahawy. "Right now ther...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 193
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:09 PM on 02/14/2011
I was under the impression that the whole thing started with a strike outside Cairo, a labor dispute. I don't see that much in the coverage, or hear it.
And I worry a little when the first thing the generals seem to take aim at are striking working people. I hear the protesters asked to suspend the constitution and dismiss parliament, and maybe they did. Maybe both entities are just Mubarak machines to maintain control. Hope so.
But something makes me a little uneasy when the first four things I hear are:
-The army takes over
-the constitution is suspended
-the governing body is dismissed
-strikes and labor issues are top priority

I am wrong so often, and I hope I am here. I wish those people the best and like everyone else, I'm kind of holding my breath.
And if things do turn out well, that would be fantastic.
11:52 AM on 02/14/2011
I'm so puzzled! Why Christiane Amanpour keeps on ignoring what triggered the events in Egypt? The Egyptian revolution would never took place if the Tunisian one didn't happen. She never talked about it and intentionally changes the subject as soon as someone evokes the Tunisian one, as she wants to push for her own version of the history. I don't find it ethical...
photo
Chopin
Multiply the truth. Speak truth through power.
02:27 AM on 02/14/2011
Christiane, lead more panel discussions. You're very good at steering and letting high level interaction of panellists come forward. I look forward to seeing more of your panel discussions to probe deeper into current topics with a good roundup of backgrounds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
curmudgeon98
01:24 AM on 02/14/2011
I guess when you own the spot you get the headline.

Mona Eltahawy was the real star of the show. None, including Arianna, really understand what took place and Mona had to keep reminding the others.

Her best line , as near as I can remember, was that the Egyptians should come to DC and show the US citizenry how to take back its own government.
AllAmericanAmericanBoy
Fate is a cruel snake with bitter herbs and spices
01:09 AM on 02/14/2011
If you're going to write an article to showcase video clips, either delete the article when the clips are no longer available, or write a transcript of the clips.

Right now, you've got no clips, so what is the point?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
12:36 AM on 02/14/2011
The fascinating thing about Egypt is how TOTALLY irrelevant and helpless we were in its revolution. This should be a hint as to how our power in the world is fading fast. We can't "control" the Middle East for Israel, or "control" much of anything anymore. We're a former empire in rapid geopolitical decline, and we'll all just have to get real and adjust to the new reality. We're going to get relatively poorer and militarily weaker from now on, not the reverse. We're broke now, and will be broker.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhineasGage730
02:04 AM on 02/14/2011
Well, I agree that we SHOULDN'T control the Middle East for Israel...but I don't think our power is fading at all. When you say we were helpless during the revolution...what are you talking about? Helpless to what? What would you haven't wanted the US to do exactly? Send troops?
photo
Chopin
Multiply the truth. Speak truth through power.
03:31 AM on 02/14/2011
"empire in decline" is accurate description, more accurately "in terminal decline".
Two phenomena are brought out in sharp contrast: --
1) limits and end of unconstrained American worldview and philosophy of "Might makes Right";
2) the unimagined potency of people power based on the worldview of "Right makes Might".

Arianna mentioned Washington is wasting $2.8 BILLION each week on "democratising" Afghanistan, with no success. Contrast that with the power of several hundred thousand unpaid, determined and peaceful young Egyptians risking their own lives in the public squares in many Egyptian cities. The bankruptcy of one worldview and policy, and the potency of a fundamentally different and opposing worldview and approach are now laid out in the open for all Americans and the world to see.

$2.8 billion per week = $145.6 billion per year. That's a lot of money to throw down a bottomless hole. The trajectory of that policy approach ends in fiscal bankruptcy of the nation and moral bankruptcy of the people. If that projection wasn't clear before the Egyptian Revolution, the sharp contrast in differences of approach should bring things into clear focus after the past 2 weeks.

America, it's time to voluntarily dismantle empire, and restore the republic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WritingfromAlaska
12:01 AM on 02/14/2011
Glad to find anything on Egypt here today. Though I had to search for it - Extremely disappointed to find the Grammies as your main headlines with Egypt nearly nonexistent and nothing I can see on Yemen and Algiers. I don't know where else to put this comment, and though it may not get posted, I really don't care as long as it is read and noted somewhere along the line. After all these days of vibrant news from and through HuffPo, the switch is extremely disappointing. I have not assumed that the AOL purchase would ruin this source, but the combination of the gossip and celebrity news, which I was only mildly interested in, plus the increasing number of inaccurate and inflammatory headlines (what happened to sanity??) have served to discourage me from considering HuffPo as any longer being the key source of my news. I have read your publication several times daily for a couple of years and sad to say, will only be checking in from time to time now. The Grammies headline sunk it for me, the proverbial straw.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WritingfromAlaska
01:35 AM on 02/14/2011
I seriously did not think this would get posted. I would have worked harder on the writing.

Since it did, if I may add, if you are going to have a Divorce section - which seems a little weird - why don't you have a Marriage section, or a Relationships section. seriously.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhineasGage730
02:08 AM on 02/14/2011
Arrianna on Bill Maher said this site is 80 PERCENT nonpolitical...ENTERTAINMENT being a big part of it. Do you not read this site...all the style cr@p and "Guess Who's Kid." This is a site for any and everything (mostly bad). We are just lucky Arrianna is a political person or I doubt the little 20 percent (if that), would even be on here. Everytime I come I"m weeding through loads of terrible, childish stories.

You should find a better site if you want political. Go to bbc.com or something. But don't wine about it. (even though that's essentially what I just did).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WritingfromAlaska
04:01 PM on 02/14/2011
PS if my reply get posted, just adding that I intended to say a more PROMIENT World News page. oops.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:15 PM on 02/13/2011
The American, French, English, German way of looking at world countries is this: if that government leadership is pro West, than we get brain washed, that in fact that country is "democratic" despite the fact that it may be very fascist regime...against its own people or neighbors...Such are examples of Egypt, Iran under Shah, Israel, Turkey, Tunisia, etc. Once a country fairly and freely elects a government that is anti West, they immediately become "fascist", "terrorist" "non democratic"...go figure that out!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
desidid
11:32 PM on 02/13/2011
You are so fanned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PG812
12:22 AM on 02/14/2011
How terribly simplistic.

Esh.
10:13 PM on 02/13/2011
I think that Mona Eltahawy is perfectly right: many reactions in the West have been very cynical. Suddenly we started to worry about the Muslim Brotherhood, whereas it's the dictators we support AND the fact that we support them that have clearly fueled Islamist extremism in the region.
 
It's time to understand - and I agree with her when she says that Obama do seems to understand - that it's in our own best interests to have real, full-fledged democracies in the region, which doesn't mean states that have free elections (that's the Republican idea of democracy), but institutions that can guarantee the rule of law, a dynamic and high quality media landscape, and separation of the three branches of government and respect for minorities written in the Constitution. THAT's what a real democracy looks like, and that's what we should support in the region.
 
This isn't just about supporting or getting rid of dictators. It's much more than that. And if you want a non violent transition period, continuing to support dictators but also moving towards broad reform instead of simply repeating that we would like more respect for human rights is crucial.
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
10:34 PM on 02/13/2011
Good post, however as to what a REAL democracy looks like, I might take a Parliamentary point of order ...

Snerd
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
09:35 PM on 02/13/2011
Wow! A few years ago it was NOT having democracy in the Middle East which threatened us with mushroom clouds ... Now it's democracy that threatens us in the Middle East ...

Snerd
photo
Marlyn
If I'm wrong, let me know.
10:32 PM on 02/13/2011
Republicans are not so much for democracy.
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
10:43 PM on 02/13/2011
... as a '(R)ule', eh!?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Bark
It's a MAD world after all...
02:10 AM on 02/14/2011
Can you explain your statement..... while if I remember correctly it was the Repulicans that push to abolish the slavery and supported LBJ rights act against the Southern democracts.....
09:04 PM on 02/13/2011
I think it's time to allow Egypt to take care of Egypt and the US not to play the role of an opportunistic big brother. If the people would happen to vote for a candidate with the support of the Muslim Brotherhood or the support of Christan Copts or secularists, then so be it. The Suez Canal is America's largest dependency or interest in Egypt that can be affected by the new rule, so the answer is "energy independence" rather than influential strength within another puppet dictator.
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
09:12 PM on 02/13/2011
Yes ... but this is so unprofitable for the dirty oil co(R)po(R)ations ... err ... I mean for trickle down jobs

Snerd
wyldthings
as a young man I said I'd never get old an didn'
09:18 PM on 02/13/2011
Let me ask you? Are You aware that Democrats have controlled the Congress for over 4 tears and the  Presidency for 2. Please take responsibility for the last 4 years Quit blaming Bush or Republicans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MANK
08:21 PM on 02/13/2011
Iraq and Afghanistan are 2 monkies on our back.
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
09:00 PM on 02/13/2011
Yes ... Monkeys from the 'Bush', eh!?

Snerd
09:14 PM on 02/13/2011
Then the U.S. is a big gorilla on their backs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nastywolf
Pass 28th Amendment: Separation of Cash & State
07:29 PM on 02/13/2011
OK, now! The USA has tried "regime change" and bankrupted itself in the process. The Tunisian, Egyptian and the Czechs and Romanians before them, have brought about regime change, at far less than the $15Trillion spent on our own failed efforts.

How will the American people absorb this evidence and will their perceptions of Washington, the Defense establishment and the traditional notions of global power?
08:35 PM on 02/13/2011
what is different in Tunisia?

Romania didn't break free until the collapse of the USSR. they had the benefit a environment of settled European nations around them to help them and the European Union to support them. And if you think it was cost free, you need to do more research.

Beside Romania, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Poland all benefited from the "velvet revolution". Egypt is in no way the same.
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
09:03 PM on 02/13/2011
However, the point distinguishing between 'organic', home grown change, as opposed to militarily imposed change is the main distinction, and a correct one in my thinking

Snerd
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigkay
12:38 AM on 02/14/2011
The evidence was clear during the Vietnam fiasco, apparently the politicians in D.C.are not students of history!
06:59 PM on 02/13/2011
Another Sunday. The right goes on TV to plug Bush, Reagan and their heroes. They attack the President while the left pundits sit and watch. Who was representing the President on this show?
photo
Snerdgronk
co(R)po(R)atoc(R)acy plutoc(R)acy
09:04 PM on 02/13/2011
Yes the right love their ca(R)icatures, don't they?

Snerd
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drumbeato
06:54 PM on 02/13/2011
Egypt is a secular country. The people there are not swayed by religion, nor would they want or stand for an Islamic Theocracy to take hold there. Egypt is not Iran. Egyptians also are very nationalistic, they have a strong sense of nation, something that does not exist at all in a place like Afghanistan. You cannot paint the entire middle east with one paint brush, nor can you understand Egypt by what is happening elsewhere in the region.

The new regime in Egypt, at least in the short term, will most likely be the military, & not the Muslim Brotherhood. They are already in charge, are not hated by the people (yet anyway), & are supported monetarily by the US aid we send them each year. This will also insure stability with Israel as if they don't maintain the peace accord, the money will stop flowing.