More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Huff TV

Huff TV

Posted: January 19, 2010 10:45 PM

Arianna: Massachusetts Loss Could Be Blessing In Disguise (VIDEO)

What's Your Reaction:

Arianna argued that Tuesday's loss in Massachusetts could be a blessing in disguise for President Obama and Democrats if they actually use it to course correct before 2010.

She appeared on a special Countdown with Keith Olbermann Tuesday to weigh in on Scott Brown's victory and what it means for Democrats.

WATCH

 
Arianna argued that Tuesday's loss in Massachusetts could be a blessing in disguise for President Obama and Democrats if they actually use it to course correct before 2010. She appeared on a specia...
Arianna argued that Tuesday's loss in Massachusetts could be a blessing in disguise for President Obama and Democrats if they actually use it to course correct before 2010. She appeared on a specia...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,742
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
06:56 PM on 01/23/2010
Yeah, Wall Street.

I think it's a referendum on the senseless wars in which we are engaged.
Spending is upwards of two billion dollars a day.
It is the source of the suppression of our civil liberties.
It is the drain on our resources - economic and human.
09:53 PM on 01/22/2010
Thanks for a great populist and patriotic statement Arianna! Key words: Course Correction. As in, the upset in Mass gives the Dems the opportunity to make one before the upcoming midterms.

The Scott Brown victory was indeed a referendum on the Obama Admin's policies that bailed out Wall Street with no strings attached whatsoever, resulting in them using the capital to bolster their balance sheets, but not to actually lend.

President Obama are you listening?
07:10 PM on 01/22/2010
Yeah Ms. H, spin it with the best of them! Keep telling them the wrong things. I hope they listen to you and continue towards their slide to the dung heap of history!
07:10 PM on 01/22/2010
Well that's surprising. The two people responsible for conning gullible progressives to split from their party and essentially vote with republicans against an expansion of a major social program think everything turned out just fine. Terriffic. Next, anyone who really cares about america should vote out any congressmen who want to fund public transit if busses keep charging fares. We've already pretty much guaranteed the failure of cap and trade. Maybe the next time someone proposes protecting a wilderness, we should vote him out unless he can gurarantee protection of all wilderness areas. It's time to get tough and make sure that nothing continues to get done.
10:31 PM on 01/22/2010
I disagee -Mass felt the need to send a message about right wing solutions coming from the Democratic Party. If this message by the base is ignored, more messages will be sent. I am afraid the base will not be ignore - and folks like yourself will need to learn to deal with that fact.

But not worry - your interpretation is the one the media is pushing. Indeed the crowing by the media is all about how 2 things PROVE that the left is rejected - the Brown result - and the Air America bankruptcy

As to Air America, the bankruptcy's land station effect on left wing radio - what little there is of it - always on the weaker signal stations because they are 15 years late to the party relative to the right - is limited to Air America's Ron Reagan Jr. who was carried by most. Most of the other shows that fill the airtime on land stations and on XM's America left are not via Air America hosts -- Bill Press and Stephanie Miller and Thom Hartmann and Randi Rhodes are distributed by other companies.

I swear our media is determined to believe only GOP PR handouts. And some Dems are willing to accept a welfare check to the corporations - the subsidy and mandates of $600 billion to the insurance companies with no cost control via public competition or via regulatory price controls - as change they can believe in.
04:12 PM on 01/22/2010
Obama (addressing his critics) said,

"If the financial system had gone down, it would have taken the entire economy and millions more families and businesses with it".

(Gasp) .. Any possibility of that being true? What if we had done nothing and the entire economic system had collapsed, making the Great Depression look like a day on Tiger's yacht.
Could it be that Obama is NOT in bed with the big banks and Wall Street as the critics say he is?
Hind-sight's 20/15 these days it seems like every armchair quarterback and his dog has a pair of 20/10 spectacles.
10:55 AM on 01/22/2010
Mass. by voting for Brown has jumped out of the frying pan into the fire.
09:52 PM on 01/21/2010
That's the same thing that I said when I heard that she lost, it's a blessing and they need to recognise it. Will the voters realise that they're being duped into believing that their lives will improve because of his win? I sure hope they realise that they're just pawns for the greedy. I guess for some people it feels great to feel that they belong to something. Haven't we learned anything from the previous year to work together?
02:40 PM on 01/21/2010
Last check, I was American born and bred (Tarheel) and the voters in Massachusetts didn't speak for me Tuesday night, the dem's canidate ran a bad campaign and lost.
11:10 AM on 01/23/2010
This is most probably correct as to why Coakley lost.
02:17 PM on 01/21/2010
I'm behind President Obama 100 percent. Do I agree with everything he's done? No, but I know he's working hard for us; he cares about all of us and I'm happy to say I voted for him. I also agree with Ms. Huffington....Mr. Brown going to Washington will be a good thing for Congress...shake things up a bit!
06:38 PM on 01/21/2010
drinking from the media waterfountain exclusively I see. Obama does not care about you one bit. If you did your own fact finding you would know this by now. Please quit using the TV as your only source of information. At least google some terms or names both with search and in youtube to get an overall base to start from. Agreeing with Arianna however is a good thing, she has her own take on most things political and they are usually fair in their scope. So she is good for ideas on the subjects she speaks on. Don't trust any politician to do good for anyone wether they are dem or rep. They only want what you have. Your money. The only way they get paid is to take what you have. Period.
01:02 PM on 01/21/2010
Amazing. Mr perfect, Keith Olbermann and Arianna Huffington discussing the monumental upset and election of Mr Brown (R) to the seat vacated by the late communist leader of the Democratic Party Ted "the alcoholic philanderer" Kennedy.
Despite a five minute conversation between these two talking heads, there was not one second of their conversation dedicated to the real reason that the Independents rallied and threw down the gauntlet:

HEALTHCARE,..........STUPIDS................HEALTHCARE!!

The American people have come to realize that it is totally unfair to expect hard working taxpayers to support a small segment of society (roughly 10%) and have to pay for THEIR healthcare as WELL AS THE REMAINING UNINSURED. After all, the sick, poor and elderly are already covered through Medicare and Medicaid (and neither of those programs, despite MASSIVE funding are going to survive long term). The 30 million or so that are left uninsured( after you deduct approximately 16 million people that just choose to buy other things with their insurance premiums, like cars, clothes, jewelry or cell phones and electronic devices and make those decisions consciously and without pre existing conditions.)Of those remaining 30 million about 15 million are kids in the 18-24 year age range, and will probably not need insurance , barring a major event or illness, both of which will be covered through various charities and/or hospitals.
02:36 PM on 01/21/2010
Wow, hating much?!? Who do you think is paying for the uninsured right now? Do you think that the insurance companies are so magnanimous that they're picking up the 'tab'? With healthcare reform at least we know what we are paying for. And, why is it so bad to try and get everyone some form of healthcare. Wouldn't we all be better off as a society if everyone is healthy, strong and viberant?
07:06 PM on 01/21/2010
No your idea of stealing from people who provide the most in the structure of all that is government already is wrong and quite frankly very unfair. How would you like it if you made !00 dollars and your neighbor made 90 dollars. Then at tax time they took 50 from you and only 25 from him? Or more than likely only 5 from him. Progressive taxation is wrong no matter how it is sold. Income taxation is illegal and only the few who priveledge from the government are required to pay it. But with the clever way those who suck the lifeblood(people who take from the system incl. IRS agents, postal workers, any agency of gov't that has a payroll) from the producers in society and return only a small percentage in the income taxes they alone are required to pay, they have good reason to keep you in the dark on the truth about the income tax code.
04:40 PM on 01/21/2010
StopAIPAC's post is spot-on for why a majority of Americans are against Obama/Pelosi/Reid healthcare as currently planned. I have spoken with several people who complain about working "because I need the benefits." So, if you did not need the healh benefits you wouldn't be working? No, I need my big house, two cars, vacations to the coast, cell phone, cable and online high speed internet, but I should not have to spend my money on healthcare!

Uninsured with no job? Let's open up the VA hospitals. Catholic hospitals that don't turn anyone away. Health care clinics are already available in almost all communities. Why remake the great system we already have? Simply improve what is already working.
10:14 AM on 01/21/2010
Arianna: the President "is in charge of all three branches of government"...?

Olbermann: "snake oil" - do you mean like when a guy runs on transparency and broadcasting bill debates/deals on C-Span but delivers neither?

Obama could have delivered on the above but chose to live in the white house instead of work there
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealTimeHistory
04:09 PM on 01/23/2010
Let me see, now... Doesn't Congress control what is on C-span? They control where the cameras are pointed. As I understand it, the President can only suggest & request, but does not actually control the focus of the cameras.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
letthemdrinkkoolaid
09:55 AM on 01/21/2010
This Coakley does not seem like she tried very hard to win, like she took it for granted, and people don't like that. That said, the people of Massachusetts must be very stupid to hand over the Congress to the Republicans. Teddy must be spinning in his grave right about now.
01:55 AM on 01/21/2010
I would have given Coakley a courtesy vote yesterday had she spent anytime actually running for office. The only person I know that should be able to win that seat without campaigning during an election is the late Ted Kennedy.

Running negative political advertising during the NFL Playoffs is not campaigning.

fyi... I didn't vote for Brown, I voted for myself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:53 PM on 01/21/2010
Ted Kennedy always campaigned very hard, except in 1964 following the near fatal plane crash.
02:00 PM on 01/21/2010
She took off the month of December...not very intellegent. Theirs nothing worse then a politicion taking the voters for granted.
01:05 AM on 01/21/2010
yes - the end of Obama's hubris
12:31 AM on 01/21/2010
You mean to tell me that Martha Coakly was the best Democrat that Massachusetts could offer to run against a relative unknown??
The woman shot herself in the foot by showing contempt for the electorate in her snobbish snubbing of them. You can't be anti-social and run for public office...you'll lose every time. So, Coakley's defeat was more a rejection of her than a message to the Democratic party.