More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost TV

HuffPost TV

Posted: December 3, 2010 07:33 PM

Arianna appeared on CNN's "The Situation Room" Friday evening to discuss the dire unemployment numbers released earlier in the day.

"The most important thing is really to change the national conversation to jobs, away from the deficit and tax cuts," she told host Wolf Blitzer. "They need to come to terms with just how serious the jobs crisis is, and really, they have the power to convince the public that we need to throw everything against the wall to create jobs."

WATCH:

 
Arianna appeared on CNN's "The Situation Room" Friday evening to discuss the dire unemployment numbers released earlier in the day. "The most important thing is really to change the national conversa...
Arianna appeared on CNN's "The Situation Room" Friday evening to discuss the dire unemployment numbers released earlier in the day. "The most important thing is really to change the national conversa...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 329
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
itiswhatitmaybe
My micro-bio is NOT empty, it's contemplating.
photo
itiswhatitmaybe
My micro-bio is NOT empty, it's contemplating.
09:19 PM on 12/04/2010
Democratic Senators who opposed Baucus's bill today:

Russ Feingold (Wis.)
Joe Manchin (W.Va.)
Ben Nelson (Neb.)
Jim Webb (Va.)
Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.)
Sens. Dick Durbin (Ill.)

http://feingold.senate.gov/contact_opinion.html
http://www.joemanchinwv.com/pages/contact
http://bennelson.senate.gov/email-issues.cfm/pages/contact
http://webb.senate.gov/contact.cfm
http://lieberman.senate.gov/index.cfm/contact/email-me-about-an-issue
http://durbin.senate.gov/
photo
itiswhatitmaybe
My micro-bio is NOT empty, it's contemplating.
09:45 PM on 12/04/2010
Correction: Durbin voted against the Schumer bill, not Baucus's.
photo
itiswhatitmaybe
My micro-bio is NOT empty, it's contemplating.
09:47 PM on 12/04/2010
Correction: Durbin voted against Schumer's bill, not Baucus's.
photo
jeffrey678
You don't happen to make it. You make it happen.
05:27 PM on 12/04/2010
Business tax cuts DO NOT create jobs, Demand creates jobs. Businesses will not hire anyone if they do not have customers even if taxes are zero.
photo
itiswhatitmaybe
My micro-bio is NOT empty, it's contemplating.
08:46 PM on 12/04/2010
That's exactly right. The republicans are using jobs to promote their argument even though there is ample empirical evidence to show that the opposite is true. Putting that aside, the fact that republicans are expressing "concern" for the working class by itself should be enough to convince people that they're liars and are just it for themselves.
photo
jeffrey678
You don't happen to make it. You make it happen.
05:21 PM on 12/04/2010
““The economy Before and After Tax Cuts. It doesn't have to be that difficult .The tax cuts are then invested in China for new factories lowering our economic growth.

Annualiz­­­­­e­d Growth Rates

Clinton

1993 to 1996 Real GDP = 3.44%
1993 to 1996 Real GDP per capita = 2.22%

1997 to 2000 Real GDP = 4.44%
1997 to 2000 Real GDP per capita = 3.26%

1993 to 2000 Real GDP = 4.01%
1993 to 2000 Real GDP per capita = 2.81%

Bush

2001 to 2004 Real GDP = 2.62%
2001 to 2004 Real GDP per capita = 1.68%

2005 to 2008 Real GDP = 1.75%
2005 to 2008 Real GDP per capita = 0.79%

2001 to 2008 Real GDP = 2.31%
2001 to 2008 Real GDP per capita = 1.36%””
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sito
02:12 PM on 12/04/2010
When W. Bush was President, every moronic burble of his would be loudly supported by Tom Delay, Trent Lott and the Republican Majority. Today Obama is out there alone. I see McConnell and Boehner in the news every day. Who speaks for the Democratic Majority? Where is the Liberal Lion of the Senate?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:08 PM on 12/04/2010
What is happening with the unemployment rate is to be expected. This is basic Economics 101.

The U.S. economy lost 8.4 million jobs in the Great Recession, which was not caused by politicians. There is a natural business cycle at work. The recession actually began in 2007 and has been in recovery for over a year, but the hiring didn't really start until January of this year. In 2010, private employers are on track to create one million new jobs. That's a lot of jobs! But at the current pace of about 50,000 jobs added per month on average, it will take nearly ten years to re-generate all the jobs we lost during the Great Recession.

Against that backdrop, the unemployment rate will continue to rise, and so will job creation. A growing economy will add jobs and as it improves, more people - formerly discouraged workers and others laid-off return the workforce. I wouldn't be surprised if unemployed rose to over 10% in the next several months.

Congress and Obama can do very little to affect the business cycle, but because we Americans seem to associate just about everything into politics, we're missing the bigger picture. Neither Democrats or Republicans have any solutions to the real problem - our inability to manage the transition into a fully globalized economy. Neither party is making education better or more affordable, confronting China's inflexible exchange rate policies or encouraging a culture of achievement.

www.LieMerchants.com
www.JViser.blogspot.com
photo
Independent66
www.linkedin.com/in/harveyring
09:18 PM on 12/04/2010
You got it partly right. You need to look at root cause to understand what happened. The debt bubble was caused by both government and an unregulated financial system running in parallel with banks. Government encouraged the GTE's to guarantee mortgages that were not sustainable, unregulated entities, read IndyMac, Country Wide, etc, played the game until we ran out of live bodies to take out a mortgage. Too much debt, reduced economic growth and you have the great 2007 recession. With 18% unemployed or very underemployed and the great baby boom of retirements starting we will not create much incremental growth here. The vast majority of the stimulus money was wasted on maintaing the status quo for government workers and pushing our problems out in time. There is plenty of blame to pass around. What we need is leadership to get us out of this mess. Obama has no idea what to do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:05 PM on 12/14/2010
I agree with your analysis that the banks made tremendously poor lending decisions reinforced (or even encouraged) by the GTEs. Combined with $4.00+ per gallon gasoline that sucked the diposable income out of overleveraged household budgets and the result was the Great Recession.

That said, the business cycle is already in an upswing. The U.S. economy is now producing more than its pre-recesssionary high with 7 million fewer workers. That can't continue, employers are going to have to increase their pace of hiring. Make no mistake, it will take a long time to regenerate the jobs lost in the Great Recession, but Congress (Republican or Democrat) or Obama can't do much to slow it down or speed it up. We give government way too much credit for its ability to "manage" a relatively free-market system.

Here's the real policy issue - the lost jobs in construction, mortgage banking and real estate are not coming back. The economy is taking off, but the sectors driving growth in this upcycle are different than the ones generating growth before the Great Recession. If the government really wants to help out, it can provide funds for securing retraining and higher education so that former construction workers can transition into the growing sectors (i.e., healthcare and manufacturing).
12:56 PM on 12/04/2010
He doesn't seem to want to change anything.
12:22 PM on 12/04/2010
Obama needs to go
11:59 AM on 12/04/2010
Arianna should tell the corporate mass-media and politicians that the 3.3 trillion in bail outs FAILED and they need admit it FAILED!

Then she should admonish the CLAWBACK the bail out trillioins and RESTORE GLASS-STEAGALL!
sarabono
Oldie but Goody
11:38 AM on 12/04/2010
In the State of the Union, Obama said he was going to have a laser focus on jobs.

For many many months, the Administration and Congress, hasn't been able to find the switch to turn on the laser. Let's hope the Pub's can find the switch that the Dem's are still unable to find.
12:15 PM on 12/04/2010
The laser is being built in China, and has been held up by customs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dutchdragonfly
Take Hwy 101 North, then veer Left
11:22 AM on 12/04/2010
Semantics should be a required study for all Dems before taking office. They are sorely lacking in that skill. We should have walked all over the repugs by now with their selfish & greedy agenda.
Unbelievable.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
05:43 PM on 12/04/2010
Walking over anybody is definitely never going to help. Such alpha-dog tactics must end.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
cyrano1
11:13 AM on 12/04/2010
Arianna absolutely nailed it. Obama has insulated himself from mainstreet by listening to all of his wall street advisers who, or course, are tuned into restoring our economy from their singular point of view. They see the machine but don't see the people within the machine.

Focusing on jobs (mainstreet) of course, should be his primary concern, and smart people like Elizabeth Warren who speak our voice, should have equal time in accessing the president's ear.

When the stimulus money which hired teachers in our state runs out, coupled with continued tax losses in our state coffers, we are soon heading for monumental cuts in teaching jobs, police protection, and fire protection. We haven't seen anything yet!
photo
Billar
Fighting The Lies From The Right
11:08 AM on 12/04/2010
Lets go Obama!!!!
Jobs
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mgmstl
11:00 AM on 12/04/2010
Great piece Arianna, it is time that the Democrats change the national dialogue and Obama needs to be right out in front of it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:55 AM on 12/04/2010
We already have a $13 Trillion deficit - extending the Bush Tax Cuts will raise it by 33% to $17 Trillion.

WHY ON EARTH WOULD WE WANT TO BORROW MONEY TO INCREASE THE DEFICIT ?

Sir, use your common sense !

Screw the Bush Tax Cuts and EXTEND THE UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS INSTEAD.

We don't need the Bush Tax Cuts,
We don't want the Bush Tax Cuts,
We can't afford the Bush Tax Cuts.

So, Mr. President, do the responsible thing - LET THE BUSH TAX CUTS EXPIRE.

Use some of the savings for extending unemployment benefits and reducing the retirement age to 62 to make room for the younger generation to enter the work force.

DO THE RIGHT THING, SIR.

Step Up or Step Aside.
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
11:26 AM on 12/04/2010
Your retirement age is up to you.
You can't live on Social Security checks; never were meant to.

It's up to each individual to plan and save for retirement;
it's not the government's responsibility.
03:47 PM on 12/04/2010
What you are not taking into account is a systematic effort by corporations over the last 15 years to lay off their highest paid workers (those over the age of 40) and replace them with younger people at entry level wages. These older individuals have had to use up their savings just to survive and no longer have their retirement savings to supplement their social security.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
05:48 PM on 12/04/2010
You're obviously in a very solid economic position. The same can't be said for most of us, howecer.
12:29 PM on 12/04/2010
I would go even further. Reduce the lowest age to receive SS benefits to say 60, also with a reduction in the amount one could receive currently at age 62. The reason I pick 60 is it is 6 months after 401ks, IRAs, and other similar retirement plans mature and can be withdrawn from without penalty. A 3 tier SS retirement benefits plan. Also I would reduce the age at which one can receive medicare to age 60. I agree that there should be some incentive to get older workers to retire sooner to open up job opportunities to younger people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:24 PM on 12/04/2010
I suggested 62 as a temporary measure but at the same time extending Medicare to enable that.

If the math works out, 60 would be ok too.