More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost TV

HuffPost TV

Posted: November 30, 2010 08:37 AM

Arianna appeared on "George Stromboulopoulos Tonight" Monday and called WikiLeaks' "cablegate" a "really good" thing.

Arianna told the Canadian talk show host that she hopes the leaked diplomatic communiques shed light on the Afghan war, its cost to America, and prompt the public to ask why we're still there.

"The question that everybody should be asking is why. Why are we there? Why is it in the national security interests of America or Canada to be there propping up a corrupt regime. Spending, in the case of America, $2.8 billion per week."

The leaked State Department documents reveal that in addition to the unflattering assessments of President Hamid Karzai and his cabinet, Afghanistan's Vice President Ahmad Zia Massoud was once caught traveling through Dubai with $52 million in cash. Massoud "was ultimately allowed to keep without revealing the money's origin or destination."

WATCH:


 
Arianna appeared on "George Stromboulopoulos Tonight" Monday and called WikiLeaks' "cablegate" a "really good" thing. Arianna told the Canadian talk show host that she hopes the leaked diplomatic c...
Arianna appeared on "George Stromboulopoulos Tonight" Monday and called WikiLeaks' "cablegate" a "really good" thing. Arianna told the Canadian talk show host that she hopes the leaked diplomatic c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 281
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
07:13 PM on 12/04/2010
The only real politician in America anymore is Ron Paul, and half the country thinks he's a crackpot and the other half can't be bothered to vote for him. Ron Paul is a man of very strong principles. He has his positions and he sticks to them and refuses to be moved whether by Republicans or Democrats. Within Australia we also have a politician of a similar bent, a man named Bob Brown. He is also treated similarly to Ron Paul yet time and again, these men are shown to be the true leaders with the vision of how things should be rather than how they are. Men of principle are rare and should be cherished when they are found.
photo
beerbagger
12-pack of genius
06:18 PM on 11/30/2010
"Funny name. Serious sandwich."
Schlotzky’s Deli
photo
intotheabyss
Imperialism is a form of insanity.
05:03 PM on 11/30/2010
Noam Chomsky on Democracy Now! discussing WikiLeaks.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/11/30/noam_chomsky_wikileaks_cables_reveal_profound
05:01 PM on 11/30/2010
Wikileaks is doing the job that journalist­s used to do. They are bringing the truth to light.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgieMark
Cogito Ergo Sum
01:22 PM on 12/05/2010
I think you're under estimating the part of true journalism here.

I wouldn't say that WikiLeaks has supplanted journalism (although there is something to be said about Fox-style demagogy) it has provided a more secure platform for people to reveal secrets, much more direct much more effective, a lot faster than conventional methods.

Journalists are still required to look through the heap of information for really interesting titbits and analyse those. I must admit they are doing a good job. As soon as Wikileaks announced the upload of the cables, journalists launched a coordinated effort of scrutinising the information and delivering the analysis to their audience. They did it at lightning speeds.

Government officials were caught with their knickers around their knees all of a sudden hordes of journalists were asking very difficult questions based on cables government officials had not assessed yet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bertski
just a guy trying not to be part of the problem
04:32 PM on 11/30/2010
If the American people find out much more about what is really going on behind closed doors, our heads will likely explode. Not only do we not know the half of it, we don't even know a small percentage of the half of it. Further, I'm not so sure that the bulk of Americans want to pull their heads out of the sand long enough to think about what is really happening, or why. That said, let those who want to understand have all the information available to them.
04:22 PM on 11/30/2010
i agree with Arianna. Wikileaks is good for the democratic process.
05:02 PM on 11/30/2010
Wikileaks is doing the job that journalist­s used to do. They are bringing the truth to light.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1Troubles
03:48 PM on 11/30/2010
during what time period, presidency, do these wikileaks cover-I haven't seen a time frame?
04:13 PM on 11/30/2010
1966 to 2010, but mostly in the last decade. Check out bbc, or pbs.
04:16 PM on 11/30/2010
1966 to 2010. Check out bbc or pbs.
photo
imdesign
Expression is Everything.
03:45 PM on 11/30/2010
What WikiLeaks will do is expose that huge economic gain is what a lot of their decisions are about and is the standard way elite business is conducted across the world.

There are so many areas around the world that have leaders and governments that impoverish their people so why spend $2Billion + a week in Afghanistan and Iraq? Big business has massive influence and financial interest in the outcome and now they are having to "please explain" some of their actions and they don't like it on bit.

The thing they fear most is that across all levels of middle class to the unemployed, their corporate and personal benefit is contrary to the welfare (and in some cases lives) of the very people they enlist to achieve their business goal.

When the volume of material being released by WikiLeaks becomes so much - you have to ask why are some people in positions of security doing this? Because they're unpatriotic, criminals or are they seeing the level of deception going on and the bail outs on one hand and the impact of hardship inflicted on fellow community on the other? Surely $2B + a week could be better spent.

Easy to point the finger and say 'you're putting our soldiers at risk', but who put them there in the first place and why - perhaps now some of these questions are being answered and those who gain from it don't like it one bit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aroddo
03:34 PM on 11/30/2010
How do they say? "In Diplomacy, if you don't spy on your allies then you ain't trying hard enough."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BSiegler
03:17 PM on 11/30/2010
To all who think Wikileaks is doing damage to our country, think of it this way: Wikileaks is furthering the democratic process in our country by checking our dishonest government. Which basically boils down to this: if you're against Wikileaks, you are implying that you are okay with our government lying to us, which is a severe disruption of our country's political process and that, in all honesty, is UnAmerican.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Definition of Management is to create a surplus
03:21 PM on 11/30/2010
Look if Bill O'Reilly is against it it must be right.
03:46 PM on 11/30/2010
I think your being simplistic. It clearly cuts both ways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BSiegler
04:49 PM on 11/30/2010
It's 'you're' not 'your,' and I have to disagree. I think that there is no valid argument to counter Assange leaking these files. Unless, of course, they give away troop positions. But they don't. They don't risk military operations. If anything, they are going to piss the American public off enough to get these troops back home to their families where they BELONG. The American Government is to blame for putting "lives in danger," not the guy who said "Oh hey, check out these documents I have." It's not like he made or altered the documents, he merely decided he wanted to be a helpful member of society and help out our democracy.
03:11 PM on 11/30/2010
Why are we still there? Same reason we're still in Germany and Japan 70 plus years after ww2 ended, same reason we're still in Korea 50 years after their cease fire, same reason we expanded NATO after the fall of the Soviet Union-because the US government wants to run the whole world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbeez
what about a nano-bio?
03:32 PM on 11/30/2010
I think it has more to do with the jobs program we call the military.

Training someone how to kill takes only a few months - training someone how to save takes years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Definition of Management is to create a surplus
03:05 PM on 11/30/2010
Bush went into War in Iraq and was told by a five star Sec General touch it and you will own it.
Bush made a last ditch effort surge and it never worked . To little to late.
Obama made a surge Afghanistan with a plan of Exit, a date that slid. With Mc Crystal and Karzai talking to fake Taliban were done.
If the exit strategy is anything like the TARP plan taking a loan of 715 billion dollars . Going big was the only way out . The result was the Banks already payed back all the money with Interest and the whole deal only cost 25 billion to get the Economy going . .
We lost six of our most precious family today by a guy wearing our uniform. .
Arianna mentioned 2.8 billion dollars per week. In comparison Ireland was bailed out by the EU today and that would mean in twelve weeks we would be bankrupted again.
Its not just money but ten thousand people are now dead and 100,000 maines are wounded.
The middle east is in a debacle.
Vietnam Ended when the NVC attacked 157 US basis simultaneously on the same day. Our Ass got kicked and we went down. .
If we don't go big we die. Thirty thousand with a plan to cut and run is ridiculous.
Fight or get out . Our soldiers only know how to win. The policeman days are over we don't have the dough.
03:02 PM on 11/30/2010
I realize that since I'm not ranting, I will look like I'm not taking a stand here. But, I have lots and lots of questions (and not enough room here to vent them all). First, who is "watching the watchers?" Now that they have given a list of other information they have, they have the potential to:
a) change the world for the good (if paranoid governments like N. Korea and Iran don't blow us all up first), or
b) they can be the new bullies who go to the highest bidder.

And, if "b" happens, how will we know? The nature of what they do is in secret, of course. I'm not saying we need to crucify them. But we do need to ask questions.

Despite what people here are cheering or jeering about, the newest Wikileaks, IMHO, are a mixed bag. In a world of rational people, it might all be good. But that isn't what we have.

I posted my full thoughts at mabworld.wordpress.com.
photo
tippisheadrun
Get 2 birds stoned at once
02:51 PM on 11/30/2010
Why are we still there? I've been asking that question since the day the U.S. attacked Iraq. I never understood how the war in Afghanistan could be important enough for Canadian soldiers to fight & die in, but wasn't much of a priority to the American govt. that got us into it. Not only did they involve us in a fight they weren't much interested in but the U.S. had the temerity to question our committment as allies when we refused to follow them into the Iraqi abyss.
I didn't need wikileaks to tell me that we are caught up in a useless, unwinnable conflict but it was helpful to know that the former head of our intelligence service (CSIS) thinks we are all a bunch of whiners because we support human rights and are rather good at moral indignation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Velvettazz
Finer than frog hair split three ways
02:48 PM on 11/30/2010
I've been asking myself that for the last 7 yeas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Definition of Management is to create a surplus
03:19 PM on 11/30/2010
One I think was about Hassan Husein trying to control the price of oil with a UN oil for food program.
The other was something to do with drugs financing Terrorism.
We Hung one Guy and the other Guy we don't know if he is dead or alive.