Arianna went on "Morning Joe" today to discuss the official launch of HuffPost Women, debuting today, as well as HuffPost Parents and HuffPost Black Voices on Wednesday. At the top of the Women vertical today is an exclusive by HuffPost reporter Amanda Fairbanks about college-age girls selling sex in order to pay for school.
One young woman, named "Taylor" in the piece, found herself with $15,000 in unpaid tuition and resorted to using a matching site for "sugar daddies" to find college-age "sugar babies". As Arianna points out, the perverse reality is that: "This is what is going on in America while we debate the debt ceiling."
Watch:
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Arianna also gave her impressions of the debt ceiling compromise reached Sunday night by President Obama and Congressional leaders.
She lamented the outcome as a breakdown of our political system, and that the president surrendered to congressional Republicans without negotiating over what his own party wanted.
Talking with NBC's Chuck Todd about the fallout, she contrasted the economy Obama faces with the one President Clinton dealt with. Most notably, Obama's pledge to now deal with the jobs crisis was labeled his most "laughable" statement of this whole process, as it's a promise he's made many times before.
WATCH Arianna's discussion with the show's panel.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
See this article about Alimony battles, from HuffPost Women
First of all, he could and should have demanded an increase in the debt ceiling back in December. When asked why he didn’t, he replied that he was sure that Republicans would act responsibly. Great call.
And even now, the Obama administration could have resorted to legal maneuvering to sidestep the debt ceiling, using any of several options. In ordinary circumstances, this might have been an extreme step. But faced with the reality of what is happening, namely raw extortion on the part of a party that, after all, only controls one house of Congress, it would have been totally justifiable.
At the very least, Mr. Obama could have used the possibility of a legal end run to strengthen his bargaining position. Instead, however, he ruled all such options out from the beginning.
But wouldn’t taking a tough stance have worried markets? Probably not. In fact, if I were an investor I would be reassured, not dismayed, by a demonstration that the president is willing and able to stand up to blackmail on the part of right-wing extremists. Instead, he has chosen to demonstrate the opposite.
Clinton was the first republican I voted for and Obama was the second.
don't blame me, I voted in 2010. If it was up to me, they'd be no tea party to give in to....
Can you say the same about 2010, and will you stay home in 2012.
staying home is caving in.
democrats, for all their flaws, oppose these things. they're on the defensive, but far better than the alternatives.