HuffPost's Howard Fineman appeared on MSNBC's 'The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell' Wednesday night to discuss President Obama's budget speech.
"I think more generally you're seeing a more combative, populist president here who's clearly in presidential campaign mode," said Fineman
Fineman went on to explain that President Obama knows "that raising taxes is not popular. He's right, even when you're talking about the rich."
In terms of Paul Ryan's budget proposal, Fineman stated that the president "generally thinks that he can take on Paul Ryan if he makes Paul Ryan the enemy here, Paul Ryan and his plan, it's a winner all the way through 2012."
WATCH (via MSNBC):
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Obama's Budget: Almost $1 Trillion in New Taxes Over Next 10 yrs ...
Obama's 2012 Budget Proposal: How It's Spent - NYTimes.com
Obama budget would raise taxes on affluent, businesses - The ...
Obama's $3.7 Trillion Budget Sets Fight in Congress - Businessweek
Obama budget sustains Pell Grants, but cuts perks - USATODAY.com
If this is the initiation of the campaign for 2012, it's a good start.
2. Majority of Americans want Obama's agenda stopped. That is why the party of "no" won last November by a historical large margin.
3. Obama is weak. he doesn't have to give in. It is what he does. He is best at giving speeches, not actually doing anything.
However, I am concerned. I believe he _will_ talk about "reforming" Medicade at some point. If he even _talks_ about it, I'm out. Also, before I'm back on-board, he has to actually DO, not just TALK. ...I'll be a lot more open to him AFTER he "wins" future "negotiations" with the Rs. ...Just ONE more capitulation, though, and he can forget about my vote in 2012.
You can't balance the budget without INCREASING REVENUE and giving more tax breaks to people who are already the richest in the country WILL DO NOTHING TO BALANCE THE BUDGET OR INCREASE REVENUE in any meaningful way as we've seen in the PAST DECADE UNDER THE BUSH TAX CUTS. What that provided the country were HUGE LOSSES IN REVENUE AND THIS HUGE DEFICIT hanging over our heads are the result.
WHY would this plan coming from Ryan which reflects the very same economic principles work any better now than they did under Bush? Because some obscure politician from Wisconsin says so? Please! Start actually getting serious about the deficit or shut up and sit down!
Or do you no longer hold him to any sort of standard of his word?