More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost TV

HuffPost TV

Posted: November 18, 2010 10:20 PM

HuffPost's Howard Fineman appeared on MSNBC's "Countdown" Thursday night to discuss the decisive defeat of extended jobless benefits in the U.S. House of Representatives, the day after a new report from the Center for Responsive Politics revealed that nearly one in two members of Congress is a millionaire -- and most are getting richer.

"The members of Congress are insulated in many, many ways here," Fineman told host Keith Olbermann, referring to the suffering of middle-class Americans. "It's the nature of politics today, which ... favors wealthy people, number one."

WATCH:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:43 PM on 12/09/2010
Again " we the people " get the shaft.... Been unemployed for two years, having survived cancer and trying to get some work..... only problem no one will hire me because when asked what have you been doing for the last 2 years I reply I survived cancer. I never hear from them again, also I am 60 years old...no unemployment or disability.
Why not quit paying all the politicans and take away their healtcare and benefits and see what we can get done..... Work for pay incentive to all politicans if they don't get what we want done, they do not get payed... Lets work on something other the food labling.
01:58 PM on 11/19/2010
It's true. So called Millionaires clubs do tend to insulate themselves from the suffering of those with lower incomes and where we once had the "common man" in Congress, we now have a Congress made up of business opportunists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rick Ayers
09:57 AM on 11/19/2010
I think, that many Americans may need to (if they haven't, already) read the book: "A Tale of Two Cities." I read it, back in Junior High school.
Because, that is where I see this country heading. It has truly become an issue of the "haves an have-nots." Even racism, has become a secondary issue. But, here's a thought that I've had for some time: why is it such a problem for the upper (fairly rich) 2 per cent of the population, to pay a little more in taxes? I mean, the operative word here is "RICH!" Right? Besides, with all the tax shelters, and tax loopholes that are provided for them, they will not feel this pinch, anyway.
09:55 AM on 11/19/2010
And people keep getting on me about refusing to vote from now on. THIS is why. Because these people are not "WE The People" - none of them represent me and none of them can identify with my situation.
08:49 AM on 11/19/2010
The corrupt congress is filled with people making at least 20 times more than they are worth and all of whom directly benefit from the obscene tax cuts for the rich. The runaway greed and stupidity of the ruling class is so out of control that they feel free to spend trillions on the overseas empire while veterans are sleeping in the streets and people are losing their jobs and their homes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:02 AM on 11/19/2010
$ave the Rich: Vote D or R!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Don't settle for less evil, demand good
06:29 AM on 11/19/2010
Is Congress trying to create a population of desperate people out of the most armed country? It shouldn't take domestic acts of mayhem against the greedy class to show the stupidity of bestowing all the benefits of American citizenship on only part of the population. History should be lesson enough.

If we are willing to spend 3 trillion dollars because 19 fanatics acted out, how much would we be willing to spend if 20 desperate Americans decided that taking things into their own hands was their last chance to make an impact on the world?

Maintaining a better social safety net is by far the cheaper alternative. Let's try prevention instead of overreaction just this one time.
09:53 AM on 11/19/2010
Excellent, excellent point. But if that happened, the Pubes would only say 'give 'em the death penalty' - not 'give 'em more unemployment'. They care nothing about a social net, the economy, the children they are always pretending to want to save, and they especially care nothing about the country.
02:33 AM on 11/19/2010
The money to cover unemployement can be taken from a couple of days' worth of what we're paying for two wars.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
yweston
Wild Wild "Proud to Be a Progressive" West
03:54 AM on 11/19/2010
Republcanis aren't interested in solutions for the poor. They're interested in solutions for the top 2%
10:05 AM on 11/19/2010
"Republicans"? How stupid are you? Democrats control both the House and the Senate, and it is THEY who couldn't even get enough votes to pass the damn thing.
photo
srivers
"Honesty is the best politics." - Stan Laurel
02:02 AM on 11/19/2010
The GOP: "America? What America?"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:03 AM on 11/19/2010
if by GOP you mean the "GOP __and__ the Democratic caucus", I wholly agree.
01:33 AM on 11/19/2010
The wealthiest 2% need their huge deficit raising tax cuts from expiring-

Yet those same wealthiest believe that unemployment insurance for the desperate poor,should be allowed to expire - the richest corporate republicans tell us..

The TEN YEAR deficit raising tax cuts for the wealthiest have produced NO jobs for Americans - (But those same 10 year tax cuts that have made the rich so much richer, just as those same tax cuts for the rich have made our country poorer and deeper in debt).

Yet these same greedy republicans want unemployment insurance to expire for the poorest of poor and give hundreds of billions of our tax dollars to the greediest 2% who always want more and more and more......

These same greedy who don't want their billions of no job-producing tax cuts to expire on Dec 31st 2010.

But the rich do want the poorest unemployment insurance to expire ASAP!
10:01 AM on 11/19/2010
Everyone who loses their unemployment benefits - including me - is going to go down to the welfare office and apply for food stamps and cash assistance and healthcare on December 1st, meaning we're still going to be getting some form of aid from the government. Either way they have to pay for it. Don't these Pubes see the correlation here? The only difference is welfare benefits would hardly be going back into the economy like unemployment benefits would simply because it's a mere pittance, whereas unemployment is at least generally enough to pay your rent and utilities.
01:23 AM on 11/19/2010
Why not take the $$$ from the 245 billion we shovel out in "farm subsidies", or better yet the 30 billion in oil and gas company subsidies? I understand that some of the members of congress have members of their families have been collecting millions in farm subsidies for years.
As far a a poor person creating a job? Look at AG Bell, Hewlett and Packard, Henry Ford, Bill Gates etc. These were innovators who created products and put their ideas to work. All "backyard garage" start ups. They grew and hired people to fullfill their ideas, and most got wealthy doing it. But they all started as small entrepenuers...and borrowed the money to do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HappyBalance
People BEFORE Profits
01:06 AM on 11/19/2010
We truly live in a plutocracy. Sad state of affairs.
10:04 AM on 11/19/2010
And I'm amazed at the number of people who are always clamoring to get in here. Wherever they come from must be a truly horrific place if they want to come here. Unfortunately, the rest of the world has this glamorous idea of what America is. Only we who are from here know the truth. Even someone from Denmark was on this comment board yesterday saying how shocked he was that the US government would let unemployment benefits lapse and let people starve.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
11:57 PM on 11/18/2010
Unfortunately, President Obama will be known for compromises that fall way to short for the American people.

Compromise is good when both sides came out of it with fair results. Anyone on the left feel like the compromises that the President made were even really required?

I like the President and I totally respect him, but I don't want him to compromise my future anymore. I want him to get in there and beat the sh!7 out of the Republicans!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhoneedsGoverment
And the horse you rode in on...
11:35 PM on 11/18/2010
Lets explain to them that we are sooo soorrry for losing our jobs...