More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost TV

HuffPost TV

Posted: October 13, 2010 05:55 PM

Howard Fineman appeared on "Hardball" Wednesday to weigh in on The New York Times' interview with President Obama and the paper's look at his time in office.

White House aides told Times reporter Peter Baker that they believe in 2012 former Arkansas Governor and Fox News host Mike Huckabee -- not Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney -- will be the Republican nominee.

Howard praised Baker's piece, but panned any analysts that pegs Huckabee, a "regional" candidate, as Obama's future challenger. Instead, he believes that White House aides were floating the name of the person that "they're least afraid of."

WATCH:


 
Howard Fineman appeared on "Hardball" Wednesday to weigh in on The New York Times' interview with President Obama and the paper's look at his time in office. White House aides told Times reporter Pet...
Howard Fineman appeared on "Hardball" Wednesday to weigh in on The New York Times' interview with President Obama and the paper's look at his time in office. White House aides told Times reporter Pet...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 99
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:08 PM on 10/14/2010
New Post up - and it's a doozy!!
Revisiting the questions surrounding Trig Palin’s birth - "Anything goes?"
http://palingates.blogspot.com/2010/10/revisiting-questions-surrounding-trig.html
02:59 AM on 10/14/2010
There is one and only one thing you need to know about Mike Huckabee.

"Some of my opponents do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it's a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards."
- Mike Huckabee
12:17 PM on 10/14/2010
The constitution is already in God's standard
02:19 PM on 10/14/2010
A curious comment. In what regard is the Constitution already in God's standard?
01:56 AM on 10/14/2010
Regretfully, I think it will be Palin.. She has been working to place the Tea Party under her wings and with the help of big money like Murdock, PNAC, she maybe be able to steal it.. I see no other with any like resources so far do you???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
11:29 AM on 10/14/2010
I think Palin will be GOP chair. Her unfavorability numbers are too high to run for President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:19 PM on 10/14/2010
She's angered too many of the old guard gop. She'll never be made or win chair. They'll use her if they can for noise and money and keeping people riled up as their consciousness grows dimmer and dimmer and their voices louder and louder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
04:26 PM on 10/15/2010
Considering how she always seems to aim for the n*ts@k, I don't think the Good Ole Boys of the GOP want her anywhere near them. She's burned too many bridges. She tried to be a populist, but she's not popular enough.
photo
TurnToTheLeft
It's only called CLASS WARFARE when we fight back
01:53 AM on 10/14/2010
Oh Howie, is anyone really scared of Sarah actually winning?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
01:13 AM on 10/14/2010
Huckabee is reasonable? Awight then.
12:35 AM on 10/14/2010
This is a hopeful sign, if you want him to get reelected.

He knows what the problem is. Along with being unlucky about a bad economy, he has seemed too much like a "tax and spend liberal" and he hasnt been bipartisan enough.

If he can fix these problems, much like Clinton did, he has a good chance of being reelected.

The hard part is he cant care what the the liberal media and the professional left thinks. Its better if they don't like him, that will tell him he's going in the right direction. The fact that they dont like this interview already shows he's on the right track.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:08 PM on 10/14/2010
You can't be bipartisan if the other side isn't interested and thinks the best way to defeat you is to "Just Say No" to everything. Hasn't worked all that well regarding the drug war. I don't agree with much of Obama's work to date but it's not all his fault.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
12:18 AM on 10/14/2010
I don't see Palin lasting through the primaries. It's too much work and the other GOP candidates will say things that will make her feel bad about herself.....
photo
TurnToTheLeft
It's only called CLASS WARFARE when we fight back
02:01 AM on 10/14/2010
She is a Mama Grisley with thin skin and a lot of hair pieces. She even makes Rove wet his pants in terror. Her facebook page and tweets will be fun to read as she tears right through those men. The Republican Primary Season would be Mama Grisley stars in Lord Of The Flies.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
11:25 PM on 10/13/2010
There are Republican candidates even easier to beat: How about Newt, or Bolton? Maybe we can even convince Tancredo to give it another go. O'Donnell might make a bewitching candidate, or Carl could offer to bring his gaybashing baseball bat to the White House.

The Republican primaries are going to be a hoot again. And only 7 months to the first debate if they stick to the same schedule as last time.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
12:12 AM on 10/14/2010
Just in time for next years baseball season...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:10 PM on 10/14/2010
I can see Bloomberg causing some mischief. Can't see him winning.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
11:17 PM on 10/13/2010
I think Huckabee is likely. The mainstream republicans are terrified of Palin. The baggers won't tolerate Romney. The religious right wins with Huckabee. He can draw the base, is acceptable to the baggers, and while he scares reasonable republicans, there aren't many of them left.
11:11 PM on 10/13/2010
Look at what this cool president have accomplished in 20 months. So, concentrate on this intellectual president who is well loved all over the world..
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
11:19 PM on 10/13/2010
It really doesn't matter who the Republicans put up. They will lose. They don't have any candidates capable of beating Obama. In two years the economy will have recovered and the anger will subside.
photo
colah
Sometimes I sit & think. Sometimes I just sit.
01:49 AM on 10/14/2010
Has his timing ever been off?

Nope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LegallyPalin
needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few
10:45 PM on 10/13/2010
Forget about it, the American people as a whole will not elect another republican for decades to come.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
11:19 PM on 10/13/2010
Two more years of changing demographics, and an improving economy likely make that true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LegallyPalin
needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few
11:27 PM on 10/13/2010
Plus when you look back, the American people (popular vote) haven't voted for a republican president since 1988. Aside from 2004 of course, when Bush/Cheney whipped out the Bin laden tapes 3 days before the election and scared the people to vote for them, otherwise they would have lost that election too.
12:51 AM on 10/14/2010
If the Republicans take the House on November, and continue their strategy of obstructing any effort at economic recovery, the economy will remain in the pits and they'll be in excellent shape to take the White House in 2012. Keeping the economy on its back and unemployment high is a small price to pay to regain the Presidency.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:23 PM on 10/14/2010
The republican's theme song will be "roll me over in the clover, start all over again". I think you have stated their aims and methods in a nutshell. Or in the case of the gop, a "nut"shell.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
10:39 PM on 10/13/2010
Here's my challenge to the GOP:

Find someone who hasn't already ran and lost.

Just a thought. We call them "repeats" on TV.
01:59 AM on 10/14/2010
Can't be McCain, he was born in the country of Panama..in the Canal Zone and that was not even a territory of the US..
09:23 PM on 10/13/2010
To HOWARD:

President Obama is AFRAID of NOBODY in 2012, or ANY YEAR. Nor does he have reason to be.

He's been the MOST EFFECTIVE President EVER in less than 2 years, and has accomplished initiatives that OTHER PRESIDENTS tried and failed at for over 40 years.

Just because YOU and OTHERS IN THE MEDIA are trying to denigrate and SUPPRESS his success DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACTS. TRUTH will ALWAYS WIN.
09:50 PM on 10/13/2010
Other than playing golf daily and taking ten vacations this year, what has he REALLY accomplished?

His healthcare bill will be gutted before 2014 by you know who. More people than since the Depression are out of work. Obama has continued the vast majority of Bush's policies on war, gays, spying, Gitmo, lobbying, no wall street regulation, etc. And if he has accomplished anything, how come so many Dems are running ads against their own president in this election cycle? He really needs to resign at the end of this term and hand the 2012 nomination over to someone who's up for the job. I volunteer. I guarantee you I'd kick repub/teabagger ass up and down Pennsylvania avenue 24/7!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
10:40 PM on 10/13/2010
When Barack Obama matches George W. Bush's time under the desk, THEN you can talk sh*t. Until then, put a sock in it, it's a failed argument.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LegallyPalin
needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few
10:47 PM on 10/13/2010
Other than playing golf daily and taking ten vacations this year, what has he REALLY accomplished?

Boy that sure sounds like Bush. You do realize Bush took over 2 years of vacation, more vacation time than any president in history.
07:08 AM on 10/14/2010
Caps Lock: are you ready to unleash the FURY???
photo
theprez21
I like sarcasm
08:26 PM on 10/13/2010
The nominee in all likelihood, is going to be Romney, if he can win over the Evangelical vote, which is very critical of his Mormonism. If not, I think the dark horse is Gov. Haley Barbour.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
1murillo
Can't be neutral on a moving train - Zinn
08:37 PM on 10/13/2010
Romney "won't" win over the evangelical vote. That was one of his major problems in 2008, and it'll be one of his major problems in 2012.
Barbour is too much of an obvious southerner. He won't play nationally.
Huckabee is disliked within the GOP, the party will want someone it thinks can compete with Obama, like Daniels - though Daniels is a bore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Redwood Eagle
Treehugging, Hippy, Druid Grandfather
09:17 PM on 10/13/2010
Evangelicals will not vote for Romney because they view Mormonism as a "Cult."
09:19 PM on 10/13/2010
I think they're run either Thune from S.D., or Palenty from Minnesota.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
10:12 PM on 10/13/2010
Besides being a Mormon, Romney has Romneycare and being a Private Equity Manager torpedoing his chances. Besides that, people don't like him. People like Huckabee and Palin.
photo
ShellyintheWest
No pain or trial that we suffer is ever wasted.
10:26 PM on 10/13/2010
Really? I hate Huckabee and Palin. I will devote thousands of hours to bad mouth them. They make me sick.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
12:17 AM on 10/14/2010
Huckabee isn't even a very good bass player. And Palin and that flute...I won't go there.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
davidpkronmiller
08:23 PM on 10/13/2010
I don't think Obama is afraid of Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney - he beat one already and the other couldn't even get his party's nomination.

Although I don't see Huckabee getting the nomination or even running.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
09:58 PM on 10/13/2010
Yup, I think you are right, Huck is probably happy to have a steady job with Fox now, at least he has gas money this year.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
myth buster
11:37 AM on 10/14/2010
Reagan didn't get his party's nomination the first time, either. Neither did Bush Sr. Both of them cleaned the clocks of the Democrats they ran against.