More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Huff TV

Huff TV

Posted: February 1, 2010 03:10 PM

Ryan Grim: Goldman Sachs' Bonus To CEO Is 'A Slap In The Face' To Obama

What's Your Reaction:

Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankenfein will reportedly get a $100 million bonus just one year after his company received billions in taxpayer money to survive a financial crisis.

HuffPost's Ryan Grim appeared on MSNBC Monday to weigh in on Blankfein's reported bonus and the political implications it could have for President Obama and his relationship with Wall Street.

WATCH:

 
Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankenfein will reportedly get a $100 million bonus just one year after his company received billions in taxpayer money to survive a financial crisis. HuffPost's Ryan Grim a...
Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankenfein will reportedly get a $100 million bonus just one year after his company received billions in taxpayer money to survive a financial crisis. HuffPost's Ryan Grim a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 127
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:29 AM on 02/02/2010
If the government had kept their noses out of big business like they should have, Blankenfien would not receiving these types of bonuses.
So, stop the whining. Would it have been better to allow Goldman Sachs to collapse or was giving them billions a better call ?
Mr. Blankenfien is not demanding the money. Clearly the stockholders and the board feel this compensation is warranted.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SomeGuy41
03:22 AM on 02/02/2010
Obama's face huh? How about the American taxpayers face.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
01:43 AM on 02/02/2010
It's not a "slap in the face" to the President. It's a bet against any further government intervention in Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs is betting on Lloyd Blankfein as the guy who will lead Goldman Sachs back to profitability, pay back the government, and disperse negative attention for the other favorable deals they've enjoyed.

Also, the idea is to shore up his personal finances against negative speculation directed towards his own fortunes, and thereby strengthen his leadership, and thereby strengthen the company. They've probably been reading about the consolidation of power and figured a stronger executive is a good defense against adversity.

In times of uncertainty, strong leaders calm the will of anxious people. I read it in a fortune cookie. When people have more confidence, they become more distant from their leaders. This applies to the President and leaders of other nations as well. Everybody is doing it, and it isn't bad, nor is it permanent.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
01:54 AM on 02/02/2010
I think Lloyd must have read some of my advice. In order to break apart dysfunctional relationships in the economy, it becomes necessary not to be cooperative, to get back to self interest, to throw down the gauntlet and let the government do what it must do.

The government will need to hit back, obviously. But at least we're getting back to an economy based on self-interest and real enforcement. Lloyd will have enough of a cushion he'll be able to sustain a pretty good hit, if he needs legal counsel or gets fined.

Things have to be dry and crispy between executives in the finance sector and the regulators. They've been way too sympathetic and it's created a mushy, confusing economy. Time for people to mind their own business and play their roles. Let the chips fall where they may. I recommend the government looks for their next move because they need to find a way to hurt Goldman Sachs after this next round of bonuses, in order to demonstrate authority. It doesn't have to be severe, but it must be strict and immediately forceful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truthfinderddw
05:02 AM on 02/02/2010
Lord, I hope Goldman Sachs pays You Well for that PR. Most of Your point is mute, although you are correct, it is the Game their all playing, and thats exactly why need to be Regulated and Governed by a Consumer Protection Agency!
12:14 AM on 02/02/2010
When Reagan took office, the top tax rate was 70%. I say we bump it to 90% for these guys and call it even.
photo
breakingrocks
I enjoy banana splits.
12:12 AM on 02/02/2010
Is Tamron getter better looking everyday? I am having Tamron dreams of late.
11:46 PM on 02/01/2010
More has always been better in America. We don't tolerate limits. Pride and Greed, the American virtues.
photo
AngusC
M.B.A Live
11:36 PM on 02/01/2010
Just makes me smile when these guys do this because next time there is a financial meltdown and it will happen again and I don't think it will take very long this time, there will be no help for these guys and they will be finished.

If they do help them out again, it will be a guaranteed civil war in this country.

Corporate America has entrenched itself too deep into the inner running of this country and the people are not happy.
This will not end well.
10:55 PM on 02/01/2010
As a private firm I really dont care what they do that is an issue between Mgt and Shareholders BUT when you come to the Govt with hand out begging for money that is my business. Sure I give you what you seek but there will be strings attached. Pay back at the same interest rate that they charge bankcard holders and possibly shares in the firm. With the inability to increase rates in an effort to punish customers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catro51
10:40 PM on 02/01/2010
I don't see how this becomes a slap in the face to Obama. It is definitely a slap in the face for greed and all that is wrong with capitalism gone awry. This is a result of years of tax breaks for the ultra rich who could really care less about what anyone thinks...including the president. What is anyone going to do to him and those like him ? With the outrageous salaries and bonuses they receive they have no concerns about being fired, criticized or maligned because no matter what happens they are set for generations. Even when they are fired they receive outrageous severance packages ! There is no fear among the ultra rich about anything or anyone. They are truly the Untouchables who don't care about anyone or anything...other than their accounts.Obama is right to attack the ultra rich who have received all of their benefits without paying their proportion of taxes etc. I just hope that Congress will have the stomach to implement rules to rein them in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarkInEugene
A blasphemy a day keeps the deities away.
10:33 PM on 02/01/2010
Blankenfein is obviously an opportunist and a pure capitalist who sees his compensation as nothing more than business. Honestly, he likely thinks that Obama can stick his altruism where the sun doesn't shine. Nothing matters more than the accumulation of wealth to guys like this. And if that means gaming the system or dis'ing the President...so be it. Besides he's the ultimate insider now...and making money hand over fist is like taking candy from a baby in his position.

What do we do to fix it? Either we collectively agree to introduce moderation and civility into our system or we strengthen the unions and move toward class warfare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:51 PM on 02/01/2010
What is his regular pay if bonus is 100 million. Usually your bonus is less than your regular pay.
09:33 PM on 02/01/2010
A slap in the face of the President my @ss.
It's a slap in the face and a kick in the groin to American taxpayers who saved the incompetent Wallstreet casino cohorts from a major meltdown.
photo
MardiGrasGirl
At 65, you'd better not give me a d*mn voucher!
09:10 PM on 02/01/2010
Why aren't the teabaggers marching on Goldman Sachs? Also, it is getting a bit ridiculous to keep blaming the president for things that Congress should be handling. First, find out what your representatives and senators are doing to stop this and adopt real reform. It is so easy to just point the finger and blame. What are you going to do when you don't have Obama to blame?

Guess what, the problem will still be here.
photo
OldTart
Let it begin with me...
07:53 PM on 02/01/2010
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.

Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BenjaminPhillips
Thinker, Dreamer, Lover of Humanity
07:49 PM on 02/01/2010
100 Million dollars could:

Buy 10 million meals on wheels @ $10 each
Buy 6,666 mobile homes for the homeless @ $15000.00/home
Buy 18,181 wheel chairs for the cripple @ $5,500 each
Buy 28,571 cars for the poor to have decent transportation for much needed jobs @ $3,500 each
Pay the power bills of 500,000 homes for 1 month for the poor, elderly, etc... @ $200.00 avg.
Give $100 cash donation to 1 million Haitians for recovery relief

Yet, all these people who deserve this money will remain hungry, cold, homeless, unable to walk, continue w/o reliable transportation to work, loose power due to this economy and loss of jobs/income, etc.....

simply because of a greedy company who cares NOT for the very people that made this type of bonus possible.......

Until we burn nationalities and embrace humanity......suffering is imminent! Ave Humanity♥
photo
SamEllison
I feel so clean!
07:58 PM on 02/01/2010
Pay off Sen Dodd's mortgage?
09:03 PM on 02/01/2010
Snap! :)
12:35 AM on 02/02/2010
SamEllison.

It's a good thing you put that last word on your sentence. If you had stopped one word sooner, it wouldn't be enough.