More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Hussein Ibish, Ph.D.
 
GET UPDATES FROM Michael Weiss
 

Alastair Crooke: The Ex-Spy Who Stepped Into the Cold

Posted: 07/31/11 08:54 PM ET

In 2007, an organization called Conflicts Forum, which at the time was being funded by the European Union, issued a report intended to promote a "positive assertion of Islamist values and thinking" in the West. It essentially lays out a public relations campaign for rebranding "resistance movements" in the eyes of Westerners in terms of "social justice," specifically promoting "Hamas' and Hezbollah's values, philosophy and wider political and social programmes."

"We need to clarify and explain that Islamist movements are political and social movements working on social and political justice," the report explains, "and are leading the resistance to the US/Western recolonisation project with its network of client states and so-called 'moderates'." It claims "the progressive space of social movements [in the West] is empty" and asks, "how the West can learn from the values and the notion of society that Hezbollah and Hamas have at the centre of their philosophy?"

Conflicts Forum, which received $708,000 from the EU between 2007 and 2009, is the brainchild of Alastair Crooke, a former long serving British intelligence agent and advisor to the former EU Foreign Policy Chief, Javier Solana. In recent years he has emerged as the leading Western champion of Arab and Muslim extremists and anti-Western regimes. Conflicts Forum, in other words, does not seek to resolve conflicts but rather exacerbates them.

Crooke's most recent intervention was a commentary in the Asia Times in which he argues that the Syrian uprising is almost entirely the work of extremist followers of the late Al Qaeda terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and that a large majority of Syrians back the dictatorship of Bashar al-Assad, who they believe shares their desire for radical reforms. Crooke merely parrots the demonstrably false propaganda of the Syrian regime. In an earlier essay in Foreign Policy magazine, he insisted that Assad was uniquely immune to the "Arab Spring" because of his championing of "resistance" movements -- news, no doubt, to the 10,000 detained Syrians and the families of the 1,400 dead, who Crooke now expects us to believe are all followers of Zarqawi.

Crooke is noted for arranging back-channel meetings between Western officials and members of groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. But other than the grant from the EU, the rest of his funding remains mysterious, as do his core motivations, about which he is decidedly coy.

Crooke is a strong supporter of the Iranian ruling faction and its ideology, and argues, "there's absolutely no evidence the election [of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009] was stolen." He apparently believes that the radical Shiite Islamism espoused by Iranian hardliners is the key to the future of the Middle East, as opposed to any form of liberalism or democracy, or the conservative Sunni Islam championed by Gulf Arab monarchies. He cites Hamas as a Sunni group positively influenced by Iranian notions of revolution and resistance.

Most of the publications on the Conflicts Forum website are essentially reflections of Iranian official ideology and foreign policy, including articles explaining "Iran's commitment to the Palestinian cause," attacks on the Palestinian Authority, strong support for Hamas, celebrations of the "principled foreign policy of Ayatollah Khamenei," and efforts to cast the "Arab Spring" as an Iranian-style "Islamic awakening."

Conflicts Forum strongly advocates the narrative that the contemporary Arab world is the site of a macro-historical struggle between a "culture of resistance" (which it champions) and a "culture of accommodation," meaning all moderate, secular and pro-Western forces in the region. Crooke's attachment to Assad appears to be a function of Syria's self-professed role as a supporter of "resistance" and its strong ties to Iran and Hezbollah.

Conflicts Forum's documents do not reflect Western efforts to understand the Islamist movements, but rather speak in a clearly and unabashedly Islamist voice. Its advisory board includes Azzam Tamimi, a prominent Hamas sympathizer in Britain who has defended suicide bombings. It also includes Moazzam Begg who, as Britain's Daily Telegraph recently reported, confessed in a signed statement to the FBI that he learned how to shoot guns and operate explosives at an Al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan.

Crooke's and Conflicts Forum's activities are not only alarming from a Western point of view, but even more so from the perspective of those interested in the spread of democracy and liberal values in the Arab and Islamic worlds, above all Arabs and Muslims themselves. What they champion are in fact ultra-right wing, reactionary and fundamentally totalitarian ideologies hostile to human rights in general, and particularly the rights of individuals, women and minorities. Crooke is evidently a spy who gladly stepped into the cold.

This man, his odious views, and his nefarious organization have had a free pass for far too long. It is time to recognize them clearly for what they are: champions not of "resistance and revolution" but of violence, intolerant religious fanaticism and totalitarian ideologies. That should be enough to make Alastair Crooke and Conflicts Forum anathema to anyone even remotely interested in a decent future for the Arab and Islamic worlds.

Hussein Ibish writes frequently about Middle Eastern affairs and blogs at Ibishblog.com. Michael Weiss is the Communications Director of The Henry Jackson Society, a London-based think tank that promotes democracy and human rights abroad.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:16 PM on 08/02/2011
Maybe I should mention that the head of the Middle East section of the Henry Jackson Society is Barak Seener, who is both a Talmudic scholar and a contributor to publications of prominent neocon organisations (Hudson Institute, WINEP). And an "international patron" is Max Boot, who advocates grotesquely large levels of "defence" spending by the US. And he is a well-known neocon (formerly with the Wall Street Journal).
07:04 PM on 08/02/2011
When David Cameron was in Ankara not so long ago, he condemned Israel for keeping Gaza as a "prison camp" and for its attack on the flotilla. Michael Weiss strongly attacked Cameron for saying what was obviously only too true.
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
01:16 AM on 08/03/2011
If you have a link for that article I would seriously like to read it. In the meantime I can find articles in which Michael Weiss is only too happy to criticize Israel. Such as this one...

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/michaelweiss/100096555/israels-stupid-and-self-defeating-new-law/
02:08 PM on 08/02/2011
This reminds me of St John Philby. British intelligence repeatedly engages in questionable approaches. One would think after years of thriving on 'odd' a more responsible position would be organized. BI thrives on BlowBack. It's almost as if the stranger & more convoluted they can make it the better the chances of a desired outcome materializing.
11:06 AM on 08/02/2011
The authors of this article are less credible than the person they are trying to discredit. Just do a little internet search and read about these two individuals and their opinions and or positions. The world upside down I tell you.
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
05:57 PM on 08/02/2011
What is your specific beef with Hussain Ibish? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussein_Ibish

Michael Weiss is the Connucations Director of the Henry Jackson Society. Which has as its statement of principles the following ... "This was to be based on clear universal principles such as the global promotion of the rule of law, liberal democracy, civil rights, environmental responsibility and the market economy. The western policies of strength and human rights, which later hastened the collapse of the Soviet dictatorship, owed much to Jackson’s example. The fundamental and enduring values of the modern democratic world eventually prevailed."

So where is the smoking gun you speak of?
06:57 PM on 08/02/2011
waldo - - Was Henry Jackson a champion of civil rights for the Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip?
09:37 AM on 08/02/2011
"Crooke's and Conflicts........What they champion are in fact ultra-right wing, reactionary and fundamentally totalitarian ideologies hostile to human rights in general, and particularly the rights of individuals, women and minorities."
- Hussein Ibish is the same man that defends the Saudi-occupation of Bahrain http://bit.ly/fQ86ZS
Apparently, Ibish believes that the Saudis are the champions of women rights and minorities

"to the 10,000 detained Syrians and the families of the 1,400 dead, who Crooke now expects us to believe are all followers of Zarqawi."
- This is what Crooke said "there is indeed a genuine, domestic demand for change. A huge majority of Syrians want reform."http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MG15Ak02.html

"He apparently believes that the radical Shiite Islamism espoused by Iranian hardliners is the key to the future of the Middle East, as opposed to any form of liberalism or democracy, or the conservative Sunni Islam championed by Gulf Arab monarchies. He cites Hamas as a Sunni group positively influenced by Iranian notions of revolution and resistance."
-IRAN IRAN IRAN, Yet I have never heard of an iranian suicide bomber(okay once, and it was by a member of the sunni Jundullah). Crooke makes 3 distinct separations(sunni,shia and salafists). He is blaming the salafists
06:56 PM on 08/02/2011
truth - - And yes, Wahabi extremists are often anti-Iran (and anti-Shia).
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
01:56 AM on 08/02/2011
Watch this Alastair Crooke interview and see if you agree that he is guilty of having "odious views":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2ad8YmR0NQ
02:15 PM on 08/01/2011
Do the authors of this piece think Iran is not trying to achieve justice for the Palestinians?
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
10:08 PM on 08/01/2011
Justice for the Palestinians would be a democratic and free nation with elections. I would hope you would agree with that. Do you think that Iran wants to see a free Palestine with free elections? Iran does not seek that for themselves. What Iran seeks for the Palestinians is that they be an outpost for their own purposes of power projection. That is all.

In addition - good work on zeroing in on the minor point, rather than seeing the big picture of the wider Arab world and the ordinary Arab civilians who are struggling and dying to attain what we enjoy. Namely the right to not live in fear for their lives from their own government.
02:34 PM on 08/02/2011
waldo - - Iran thinks the Palestinians should choose their own form of government. And you will recall, that after Hamas won free elections, the US and Israel conspired to overthrow the government.
02:12 PM on 08/01/2011
Crooke does the US and the UK a signal service by trying to facilitate better relations between them, and Syria, Hezbollah, and Hamas.
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
10:09 PM on 08/01/2011
No, that is what he wishes people to think about his efforts. But what he really does is to entrench the great divide between the Arab peoples of the world and the rest of the globe.
02:32 PM on 08/02/2011
waldo - - Why would you think Crooke wants more violence in the Middle East, rather than less? What is the "great divide" to which you refer?