More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Iara Lee

Iara Lee

Posted: July 6, 2010 03:50 PM

I would like to say that I am disappointed by this new round of sanctions leveled against Iran by Congress, but the sad fact is that I didn't expect anything less than the aggressive wrong-headedness displayed by our elected legislators last week. And so, as the war drummers up their aggressive tempo against Iran, I'd like to take this moment to share some facts, and a few of my own experiences living in that country.

In 2008, I made a home for myself in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I had hoped at that time to foster cultural exchanges between my home country, Brazil, and Iran. It was indeed for me a shock of cultural bipolarity, going from bikinis in sultry, carnal Brazil, to long sleeves and headscarves in the more socially-conservative Islamic Republic. Despite this, however, I found the Iranian people to be exceedingly warm, generous, cultured, educated, and fun.

One thing that struck me immediately about Iran was how overwhelmingly young the country is. About one-third of the Iranian population is under the age of thirty, one quarter being 15-years-old or younger, and I found that kids in Tehran, for better or worse, are not so different from kids in any other developed nation. They love junk food, American music, and pop culture. Hip-hop is considered "un-Islamic" by the regime and is therefore banned, though this has not stopped rappers like Hichkas from gaining an underground following in Iran. As a zealot for free-speech, I helped produce a video for the rapper, and although he and his crew were jailed in the process, they promptly returned to finishing their music video after they were released.

Excerpt from a Cultures of Resistance feature documentary:

iran 070110-Vimeo HQ from Cultures of Resistance on Vimeo.

Iran is a multi-ethnic nation of Azeris, Baluchis, Arabs, Armenians, and Kurds, in addition to the dominant Persian population, and is also home to various religions including Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Baha'i and the ancient faith of Zoroastrianism. I was able to learn a bit about Iran's Kurdish minority through my friendship with classical musician Kayhan Kalhor, a virtuoso of the kamanche (an early predecessor to the violin). When I first met Kalhor, he had just conceived his album 'Silent City' -- a tribute to the Kurdish town of Halabja, where a U.S.-backed Saddam Hussein unleashed a poisonous gas attack, immediately killing around 7,000 civilians and wounding 11,000 more. His hope, he told me, is that through his music the world will not forget what happened in Halabja, and will be cautious not to repeat such an atrocity. I thought this was a noble ambition, particularly when I considered that the attack on Halabja was at the time ignored by the international community, under pressure from the United States (who then deceitfully and unsuccessfully attempted to blame Iran for the attack, thus absolving them of their complicity in the massacre).

I was especially curious to hear what the average Iranian thought of the state of Israel. Israel, after all, has been the principal agitator for a military conflict between the US and Iran, and an impatient one at that. Though not a signatory of the NPT, the state of Israel is an illegal nuclear power -- the only nuclear power in the region -- and, along with the US, has long sought to contain the nuclear ambitions of Iran -- a fully compliant member of the NPT. Most Iranians were quick to point out this hypocrisy, that Israel's illegal and secret arsenal of nuclear weapons is completely overlooked by America and Europe, while Iran suffers increased isolation and provocation despite full compliance. Many were also quick to point out the distinction between Judaism and Zionism -- the former represented a beautiful and important monotheistic religion -- one which has existed in Iran for 3,000 years -- while the latter signaled racism and aggression to the average Iranian. In general, however, most Iranians are not represented by the aggressive posturing of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Women comprise around 65% of university students in Iran, and while I do not wish to whitewash the unacceptable political restrictions on women and minorities there, it should be noted that females hold prominent positions across the professional spectrum. I had the honor of meeting and interviewing one of these women, distinguished Iranian jurist and Nobel peace-prize winner Shirin Ebadi. Ebadi is a dogged advocate for the rights of women, children, and minorities in Iran, and is a frequent target of harassment by the Iranian government. The Dalai Lama Center for Peace introduced me to Ebadi, whom I had long admired for her outspoken approach in the face of government hostility. After our interview, I offered her the support of our foundation but she politely declined -- receiving support from an American organization would signal to the government a foreign-backed effort to promote regime change in Iran.

This is a sentiment worth our consideration, especially now as hawks in the U.S. and Israel are cynically exploiting last year's massive electoral protests and "Green Movement" to isolate Iran. Although the Iranian people are under the control of a repressive government, we should have no illusions in thinking that they are crying out for another American-style regime change. To the contrary, what is now a fractious body politic will unite to stand against such aggression, essentially undermining the movement for reform. The Iranians are a people profoundly aware of their illustrious, millennia-old history, including the darker chapters of this story, in which the United States has played no small part. When considering Iran here in America, we seem to have an anti-historical fixation on one singular event, namely the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Ayatollah Khomeini and subsequent hostage crisis, often with no mention of the decades which preceded it: how the CIA in 1953 orchestrated the collapse of the democratic government of Mohammed Mossadegh (who was ousted for asserting that Iranian oil profits should be for the Iranian people) in favor of the brutal, tyrannical monarchy of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, which was amenable to British and American control of their considerable oil and gas reserves. Given this history of degradation and abuse perpetrated by the U.S. government against the Iranian people, it is ludicrous to think that any Iranian, wherever on the political spectrum, will welcome American meddling in the political affairs of Iran.

This recent round of sanctions is an unjust act of economic warfare against the people of Iran, and another step in the wrong direction on our calamitous approach both to that country and to the region at large. It is high time that we assert another kind of two-state solution, namely that the U.S. shake off the heavy hand of the Israeli lobby to begin acting in the interests of Americans. As citizens living in the lap of hegemony, it is our duty to better understand the Iranian people who our leaders (and their foreign backers) seek to isolate, and demand of our elected representatives that they act responsibly, with humanity, in our name.

Opposing Violence Towards Iran from Cultures of Resistance on Vimeo.

 
I would like to say that I am disappointed by this new round of sanctions leveled against Iran by Congress, but the sad fact is that I didn't expect anything less than the aggressive wrong-headedness ...
I would like to say that I am disappointed by this new round of sanctions leveled against Iran by Congress, but the sad fact is that I didn't expect anything less than the aggressive wrong-headedness ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:26 PM on 08/11/2010
thank you for posting this important entry. and while a few items of contention abound, it is commendable your efforts to reach out and study ALL of Iran--you mention the many minorities that are fighting for equality....http://advocacynet.org/wordpress-mu/asolarin/
09:35 AM on 07/21/2010
'ludicrous to think that any Iranian, wherever on the political spectrum, will welcome American meddling in the political affairs of Iran.'

in fact as with iraq, some will be found,..welcome to the world of colour revolutionaries:
http://maravi.blogspot.com/2009/07/herald-gowans-us-hand-in-attempted-iran.html
'US hand in attempted Iran colour revolution
By Stephen Gowans

AS the head of Freedom House, a CIA-interlocked think-tank that promotes free markets, free enterprise and free trade, Peter Ackerman has been at the forefront of efforts to topple foreign governments that place more emphasis on promoting the welfare of their citizens (and often their own bourgeoisie) than providing export and investment opportunities to US corporations, banks, and investors.

An ex-Wall Street investment banker who was once junk bond trader Michael Milken’s right-hand man, Ackerman’s speciality these days is regime change civil disobedience — training activists in the use of civil disobedience destabilisation techniques to bring down foreign governments.
etc
07:11 PM on 07/21/2010
Gowans makes claims that conflict with a wealth of facts that are easily accessed. As best I can determine, Ackerman's center is an educational nonprofit with a small staff that does institutes and workshops for teachers and civil society people all over the world about nonviolent resistance. I know, for example, that they've helped teach many Palestinians, some of whom were active supporters of the Gaza aid flotilla that Iara bravely joined. I'm afraid the world isn't comprehensible on the basis of conspiracy theories, and if someone who made a lot of money wants to use it to train people about how to resist governments that don't tolerate dissent, I'm all for it.
09:31 AM on 07/21/2010
Chavez suppors Irans president,..
http://www.realclearworld.com/blog/2009/06/chavez_reaffirms_his_support_f.html

is Iran a victim of a colour revolution?
http://maravi.blogspot.com/2009/07/herald-gowans-us-hand-in-attempted-iran.html
http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2010/hp160310.html

what Iran is is an independent state, under threat by the US and Israel
and by its own foolish elites...BUT the giovt has the support of the majority of its people as the last elections showed.
09:18 AM on 07/21/2010
The iran you present is a fiction..
here is another view:
http://gowans.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/a-sober-view-of-iran/
Ahmadinejad is one of the most demonised leaders along side Chavez of Venezuela and Hezbollahs Nazrullah...please DONT be fooled by US lies or iranian elites.
05:06 PM on 07/12/2010
great write up thanks
03:14 AM on 07/10/2010
All this is nonsense. The only way for Iran now is to develop the ultimate weapon. This whole propaganda machine in the media and the warmachine, will all end the very next day. Then everybody can sit down an negotiate when they can't entertain wars in the back of their minds.
09:20 AM on 07/21/2010
Israel has the ultimate weapion: the US...along with 200+ nukes...Iran has ...what?
Its a pity that Iara is half way to your view...
Since when has the US sat down to negotiate? when it can use brute force...
03:30 PM on 07/09/2010
I've read the article several times and I've read the comments too. There's a little bit of mixed truth in almost all the comments. I do see that she is trying to portray Iran in a positive light and I commend her for that. Lest anyone try to "label" me, let me be perfectly clear. I'm an American with strong support of Israel. I'm also married to an Iranian with family in Iran. I think I'm in a pretty good place to make some objective comments. I personally DO support the sanctions. I do NOT believe they are a prelude to war. You would be surprised at how many Iranians (albeit mostly in diaspora) who also support them... particularly those intended to cripple the murderous IRI.
02:21 PM on 07/12/2010
i don't expect anything different from you, a supporter of American and zionists killers who have killed a few millions in the last decay. a true blood suckers who have looted the whole world and never stop doing it unless with force. just because your wife is an Iranian doesn't mean you can push your imperialistic agenda to the Iran like 1953 or so.. US has no right to be in middle east and loot the oil.
11:11 AM on 07/09/2010
The author of this piece appears to be misinformed and misguided. In reference to the sanctions she writes, "This recent round of sanctions is an unjust act of economic warfare against the people of Iran..." This is surprising because the sanctions are targeted. Rather than pursue "economic warfare against the people of Iran," these sanctions specifically target individuals involved in Iran's illicit activities, the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution, Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, Iran's ballistic missile program, attempts to acquire fuel for illicit activities, and financial institutions that facilitate dealings in weapons.

The aim of the sanctions is precisely the opposite of warfare. The sanctions are a tool being used by policymakers to avert conflict by attempting to alter the calculus of the regime and constricting the operating environment of its illicit actors. The alternative method of preventing the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Iran is military conflict. Sanctions signal to Iran's decision makers that there are costly consequences to pursuing that course of action. Furthermore, their targeted nature seeks to undermine the efforts of those who are involved with Iran's illicit weapons program. Thus, to refer to the sanctions as "warfare" is an egregious use of hyperbole and is in fact counterproductive if warfare is what the author seeks to avoid.
02:45 PM on 07/12/2010
. even though they call this targeted sanction but in realty it's towards the iranian people , iranian people use gas to run their cars and most of the iranian banks are not able to operate which makes it hard to import or buy anything from overseas and importers plus they also stopped refilling the Iranian Air plain in some countries which had nothing to do with so called Targeted sanction.
either some zionists and warmongers are miss using the sanction or we've been mislead so they can do whatever they want like Iraq.
04:51 PM on 07/13/2010
The sanctions are precisely a prelude to war. They never work and they only degrade ordinary citizens lifestyle. They are designed to weaken the country and leave the door open for future wars, as in case of Iraq.
11:11 AM on 07/08/2010
To keep this in perspective, keep in mund the U.S. Congress is a subsidiary or the Knesset.
10:35 AM on 07/08/2010
Not Attacking Iran -The Reasons
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1KSzT3UvKs

The Iranian threat is generated as a way of keeping us from examining our domestic political situations, particularly inside Palestine and also wherever we live.
05:33 PM on 07/07/2010
Saddam was not US backed. The vast bulk of Iraq's weaponry at the time of the gas attacks was the USSR. The bulk of the chemicals used came from the world market outside the US; Netherlands, Singapore, Egypt and so on.

Israel's nuclear weapons, if it has any, are not "Illegal". Lee is just making things up.

People everywhere are nice to visitors.

If there were a good sanctions system in place against Saddam, he would not have been able to commit genocide against the Kurds.

The holocaust deniers running Iran are not normal, reliable men, they should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons.
09:09 PM on 07/07/2010
"Saddam was not US backed." WRONG---read some history EastAsia! The Reagan administration was Saddam's important ally during the Iraq-Iran war (which Saddam instigated), seeing it as just retaliation for the 1979 US embassy takeover. Not only did the US supply Saddam with spy-satellite imagery enabling his army to kill hundreds of thousands of Iranian soldiers--mostly conscripts, but also ignored Saddam's complicity in the Halabja civilian massacre. Like it or not, countless families of all these soldiers are still grieving, not to mention the countless Iranian veterans; so is it any wonder most Iranians are not embracing the anti-Iranian policy of the US?
11:22 AM on 07/08/2010
East Asia-I want what you're smoking. We fully supplied Sadam for the 10yrs. he waged war against Iran. Remember the pic of Rumsfeld shaking hads with Sadam? That's when he was "our" thug. We had been bounced out of Iran for subverting their govt by "placing" the Shau of Iran in power in 1953. Their duly elected president wouldn't play ball so we kicked him to the curb. The Shau played ball, got lots of military aid, terrorized his own people, and we got cheap oil. And you wonder why they took over our embassy? Now, we're following in Russia's footsteps(1980-1990) trying to "liberate" Afghanistan and get "our" pipeline laid. The opium is an extra bonus. All empires have a shelf life. We are there.
01:12 PM on 07/07/2010
The Baha'i Faith is not ancient. It was founded in 1844 and so is only 166 years old. A quick check on Wikipedia will verify this. As well, I am Canadian born and raised, and I am a Baha'i. While it is true that Persia is the birth place of the Baha'i Faith, it is inaccurate to say that Iran is the home of the Baha'i faith. As Baha'is, we consider ourselves world citizens, Earth is our home. There are several million Baha'is residing outside of Iran.
12:15 AM on 07/07/2010
I agree fully with this article. I have been writing the same for months, eg:

http://menso.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/greens-nukes-fears-untangling-iran/

It is shameful that legislators pass such laws without any understanding of the people they will affect.
06:50 PM on 07/06/2010
By putting the Iranian people in very positive light and America, Israel, and Jewish lobbies in the complete opposite, Ms. Lee attempts make the sanctions seems like a horrible, antagonistic move. However, until the author or anyone else from her side of the spectrum can provide a better next step, I fully back the sanctions and hope they are enforced. Lastly, trying painting a picture where Iranians are victims while America and Israel are the perpetrators over simplifies the situation at hand and is detrimental to all involved.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
3M Rocker
02:12 PM on 07/07/2010
She is illustrating the hypocrisy and double standard between the treatment that Iran receives as opposed to Israel. One has them illegally and lies about it while the world ignores and the other is SUSPECTED to be developing it and is dealt with harshly. Get it?
05:37 PM on 07/07/2010
Iran's slogan is "Death to America", Israel is very friendly to the US and Europe. The Mullahs feel obligated to wage jihad against the west. That's the difference. Not all nations are equally trustworthy or equally friendly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:19 PM on 07/07/2010
Thank you Freedom is the Key for a very clear, very concise and to the point post! Faved and fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:21 PM on 07/06/2010
Like your Flotilla piece, this too is more propaganda.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
3M Rocker
02:13 PM on 07/07/2010
long live Israeli fascism!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:20 PM on 07/07/2010
Well, you're certainly entitled to that opinion even if it's wrong.