iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Iara Lee

GET UPDATES FROM Iara Lee
 

Bahrain and the True Face of US Foreign Policy

Posted: 07/28/11 10:40 AM ET

It is no coincidence that the two main success stories of the "Arab Spring" -- Egypt and Tunisia -- were both non-violent and non-western in nature. These anti-authoritarian protests across the Middle East and North Africa have been a time of awkward shuffling for much of the western world, and for the Obama administration in particular, which had been quite content with the status quo of corrupt, repressive dictatorships in the region while putting a polite face on the continued militarist and corporatist policies of the Bush era. Nowhere did this become more evident than in the tiny Gulf nation of Bahrain, where I headed in early March to join the demonstrations and learn about this unprecedented uprising in a Gulf country.
2011-07-28-184619_190916787615939_100000928581236_452118_2523875_n.jpg
Around that time, it was an almost festive occasion -- men and women, young and old alike gathered in Pearl Square, bearing signs like "Down Down with the Crown," holding flowers and waving the red and white colors of the Bahraini flag.

Soon after arriving, I was given a gift: a button that read Not Sunni, Not Shi'a, but Bahraini."

Tents were erected where the men smoked sheesha, grilled kebabs, and listened to the radio for news about the chain reaction of uprisings all over North Africa and the Middle East. Watching ordinary citizens marching in human chains, chanting pro-democracy slogans, and protesting in front of government buildings, I was possessed by a sort of surreal joy -- surreal because everyone in the streets knew that this couldn't possibly last, that the Bahraini monarchy would not abide such dissent, no matter how peaceful and non-violent. Everyone was right.

During a speech to the State Department, President Barack Obama claimed that "America's interests are not hostile to people's hopes; they're essential to them."

Perhaps he could have been clearer as to which "people" and what "hopes," he was referring to, for shortly after I left Bahrain US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates arrived in Saudi Arabia, and on his heels, tanks from the House of Saud in a demonstration of force that sent an unequivocal message to the citizens of Bahrain: "change" would not be tolerated.

By late March, Pearl Square had literally become The Martyr's Square, the monument itself destroyed, a once jubilant and hopeful atmosphere in shambles. Since then, in the home of the US Navy's Fifth Fleet, dozens have been killed, over a thousand Bahrainis (and counting) arrested, close to thirty Shi'a mosques have been destroyed, and a campaign of targeted repression against all segments of society has continued with nary a peep from the Obama administration. If this were Libya, and not Bahrain, we can rest assured these abuses would be trumpeted with frothy indignation as further justification for NATO's intervention. But this is not Libya, this is Bahrain, where "people" and "hopes" mean different things.

2011-07-28-189882_194816530559298_100000928581236_474867_2144945_n.jpg


Indeed, in a nod to his Gulf Arab masters, president Obama referenced Iran in relation to the Bahrain protests, a country which he claims "has tried to take advantage of the turmoil there [Bahrain], and that the Bahraini government has a legitimate interest in the rule of law" -- a shabby apology for the brutality of Saudi forces intent on sending a warning to potential protestors in other Gulf Arab states. Because the Sunni royal family rules over a largely Shi'a population, they have been eager to point fingers at Iran and Hezbollah rather than face their own inadequacies in governing their people, who protest not for any sweeping revolution, but for greater freedoms in education and in the economy, the same issues affecting youth in places like Tunisia and Egypt.

Bahrain is the face of a US foreign policy not guided by any benign democratic principles, but by opportunism -- one beholden to the unctuous Gulf monarchies, that belies president Obama's pleasant speechifying, and makes him very much a partner-in-crime against the ordinary people of Bahrain.

The mainstream western media has willfully ignored the continued abuses in Bahrain, and al Jazeera, which had provided the most robust coverage of unrest in Egypt, Tunisia, and elsewhere, has also been conspicuously silent on the repression in Bahrain. Small wonder, when you consider that al Jazeera is owned by the royal family of Qatar, another Gulf monarchy made uneasy by change in the region. Fortunately, courageous activists on the ground in Bahrain have linked up with concerned citizens from around the world to create awareness for ordinary people removed by thousands of miles and blinded by the smokescreen of media obfuscation. I encourage you to visit the websites below, to sign the petitions, and to subscribe to their mailing lists to stay aware of a truly democratic revolution happening despite the best efforts of the oil monarchies and their allegedly pro-democratic American clients.


Bahrain Youth Society for Human Rights

Bahrain Center for Human Rights

Amnesty International

Campaign for Peace and Democracy

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:02 AM on 08/01/2011
Dear Iara Lee,

On behalf of all peaceful and modernized people of Bahrain I say Thank You so much for discovering the truth in Bahrain and your support to my people in their struggle for Freedom Democracy and Just.
11:36 AM on 07/29/2011
When foreign governments and corporations can bribe elected officials with campaign donations, those elected officials will do their bidding.  Gulf monarchies are very wealthy and it seems our elected officials will do anything for that campaign cash.
11:35 AM on 07/29/2011
US foreign policy will continue to be controlled by corporate interests (including foreign corporations) as long as unlimited bribery continues to be legal.  The Supreme Court conservatives have made unlimited bribery legal, and that includes foreign companies and governments.  US foreign policy is for sale, and the Gulf monarchies have lots of money to spend.
07:48 PM on 07/29/2011
It would be nice if you meditated on your comments when the subject of Israel influence comes up.
10:47 AM on 07/29/2011
for people who agree with the article, here's an easy way to sign a petition:
http://bit.ly/bahraintrials
09:27 AM on 07/29/2011
USA has shown that their so call support for democracy is merely a tool to create puppet states or to undermine USA's competitors. A morally bankrupt champion for democracy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conchcept
Sir Peter Anderson Secretary Gen'l. Conch Republic
09:05 AM on 07/29/2011
oil-a-garchies
02:58 AM on 07/29/2011
Sorry, but what the author labels "opportunism" I'm going to label realistic, practical, and in the world's best interests... for now.

Peace and stability throughout the world will NOT be well served if the US encourages an Arab Spring and revolution in Bahrain. There's a very good chance that the folks who take over in Bahrain will take their cues from Iran. Not from any playbook on democracy or civil society.

There's a whole long list of negative consequences that flow from that. Negative to global oil prices and the very shaky global economy - which economy the entire world depends on for food and stability. Negative to the already dim prospects for peace in Iraq. Negative to the already dim prospects for actual democracies and civil societies in other troubled Middle Eastern nations. Negative for anyone who doesn't want to see the current Iranian regime increase its reach and influence, exponentially.

I would have that that last part in particular included this author, but her intent gaze on US opportunism apparently blinds her to everything else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimtodd
Unrepentant child of '60s
12:21 PM on 07/29/2011
Our current policies are resulting in all the outcomes you claim they are designed to prevent, so how are they realistic and practical?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
porsche996
an inelastic scattering of photons
01:04 AM on 07/29/2011
In foreign countries freedom marchers trying to gain a voice in their countries and establish democracy are shot down in the streets....here in America if we try to re-emphasize democracy we get shot down in our living rooms by government propaganda on high definition TV's.
10:43 PM on 07/28/2011
Great article Thank you for your support
from bahrain :)
luckybear
Coffee Drinker
10:01 PM on 07/28/2011
Foreign policy is complicated. We do not live in an ideal world. It is not in America's interest to make the House of Saud mad. The world depends on inexpensive crude oil. In an ideal world we wouldn't have to make deals with despicable regimes. This would be an argument for more domestic production and a increase in gas taxes and/or a carbon tax. Yet Americans nearly lost their minds when gas hit $4.00 a gallon. Given the choice between Bahrain (which Americans couldn't find on a map) and cheaper petrol, they'll choose cheaper petrol.
09:23 PM on 07/28/2011
Imagine freezing the assets of Bahrain's royal family!
08:34 PM on 07/28/2011
Nice to see a piece on Bahrain. As soon as it became evident that Saudi was taking over dealing with their small PR problem and Obama was gonna let it happen without a peep everyone pretty much saw the writing on the wall and gave up trying to write and report on it. I can see why but it's nice to see that people haven't forgotten it all the same. Especially considering the fact they've put doctors on trial just for treating protesters and it looks like the situation for the majority of the population has gotten not one jot better.
07:27 PM on 07/28/2011
thanks for the wonderful peace which touches our wounds
10:45 PM on 07/28/2011
yes it is :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PerotVentuSheehCarte
gravel kucinich paul nader
07:09 PM on 07/28/2011
Only one candidate will change the status quo establishment
Only one candidate strikes fear into the heart of the Machine.

NadePaulKuciGravMcKi
hint hint
Ron
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PerotVentuSheehCarte
gravel kucinich paul nader
07:26 PM on 07/28/2011
No more carrots, sticks, and coercive diplomacy.
05:33 PM on 07/28/2011
The Iran, Syria, Hezbo shiite alliance is the most dangerous enemy threat to the region. We have to back our Saudi and Barain allies. What choice is there?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madsen26
08:30 PM on 07/28/2011
Were you saying that when Bush was spouting his phone "democracy for the Middle East" nonsense to initiate war and bloodshed in Iraq?

Syria is going to change. Wake up and smell the coffee, it's 2011.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IrishInsurgent
Marx / Fanon / Sartre / Robespierre / Che
01:46 PM on 07/30/2011
No "the most dangerous enemy threat to the region" as you call it, is the US/Israeli axis backed by the corrupt house of Saud.