Doesn't sound like it according to this exchange with Brian Williams.
BRIAN WILLIAMS: Gov. Palin, yesterday, you tied this notion of an early test to the president with this notion of preconditions, that you both have been hammering the Obama campaign on. First of all what in your mind is a pre-condition?
PALIN: You have to have some diplomatic strategy going into a meeting with someone like Ahmadinejad or Kim Jong Il, or one of these dictators that would seek to destroy America or our allies. It is so naive and so dangerous for a presidential candidate to just proclaim that they would be willing to sit down with a leader like Ahmadinejad, and just talk about the problems, the issues that are facing them, that's some ill-preparedness right there.
Ummm.. What Palin is describing is what would be called preparation not precondition. Just to be clear. Not negotiating until preconditions are met means not starting your negotiatins until the other side has met some kind of condition you imposed. In the case of Iran, McCain insists that the Iranians suspend their uranium enrichment program before we can even begin to negotiate. Obama opposes this precondition. The basic argument against preconditions is that you can't ask your adversary to give up a big negotiating point in exchange for absolutely nothing and expect them to actually sit down at the table. Doesn't happen. Didn't happen when we dealt with the Soviets or the Chinese. And so then you have no exchange of information whatsoever and can't find points of common interest or negotiate. You end up in a total stalemate.
Anyway, this is not very complicated. It also happens to be the crux of one of the most important foreign policy issues being debated between Obama and McCain. You'd think Sarah Palin would understand this. But at least its comforting to know that she is against sitting down for a major international summit without first doing some preparation. I guess that qualifies her to be President.
Unlikely.
She's been upstaged by a 3rd grader, upstaged by every interviewer, upstaged by the podium at the debate.
What happen to America's precondition that our leaders exercise a sliver of brainpower before seeking high office? Gone with the Alaskan winds!
SOT
The time for U.S. arrogance in international relations has passed; McCain hasn't realized this yet and likely never will. Obama's position is that nothing happens until communication begins, so let's start talking. Without communication, all you have to go on is speculation and guesswork. McCain's position is that he won't talk to anyone without first being bribed.
In logic a precondition is a condition that has to be met before a main argument can have any value.
If she had done this simple task of PREPARATION, that of which she spews about, she might have had an inkling of how to answer the question from Brian Williams.
But then again, I am assuming she might know what "logic" means or is somehow going to be a logical person....My bad.
Can you imagine if she were to become president... God Help Us!
Have a nice day!
Obama/Biden '08
Nor, does she know the what the responsibilities of a Vice President are. She's had 3 months to get that straight, and she still DOESN'T GET IT.
"She had to be seated next to McCain, only certain types of questions could be asked.
And Brian said he had months worth of questions, but was not able to ask many."
What is McCain trying to hide. And his petty correction of 5 not 4 secretary's of state back him, who are they?