iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ingrid Newkirk

Ingrid Newkirk

Posted: December 26, 2009 11:00 AM

A Green Message From the Land of Rice and Curry

What's Your Reaction:

Last week, I addressed a "green" conference on economic sustainability in Mumbai, India. The talk, other than the argument about whether we could survive in a room without air conditioning, was mostly about how much shucking and jiving the U.S. had done in Copenhagen, all in an effort not to commit to anything terribly serious regarding changes that nations must make to combat climate change. The Indians felt pretty good about their nation's commitments, particularly to cut emissions and to fund energy projects such as those using biofuel from plants. Activists returning from Denmark, with precious little to show from the conference except truncheon bruises, were united in the idea that if people want to make change happen, we have to do it ourselves and pass on what we know to others.

It shouldn't be news anymore that the most important thing that we can do for the planet is not to use less holiday gift wrap -- it is to go vegan. That's because it is impossible to be a meat-eating, milk-drinking environmentalist. Meat and milk are not "green," which makes it all the more shocking that our government has decided to help large dairy farms use newfangled machines to deal with methane gas burped up by all those cows rather than helping to wean America off its ugly, fatty, Earth-destroying dairy habit. Actually, meat and milk are anti-green! Of course, such remarks give those who have grown up with or acquired a taste for meat and cheese cause for consternation to add to their constipation. No one likes change. Witness the handwritten sign on a little jar at an airport coffee stand that read, "Afraid of change? If so, leave yours here."

How about some dry facts to go with the dry sherry this season? A 200-pound man will burn off at least 2,000 calories a day even if he stays in bed the whole time and watches food commercials or football. He consumes most of those 2,000 calories simply to keep his eyes open, breathe, and otherwise keep his body functioning. If he leaps up to scream at the screen when the other side does something untoward, he will burn even more calories. In the same way, most of what is fed to farmed animals in those crowded, filthy sheds is burned off, simply because animals have to breathe, stand, blink, and―because of the throat-burning ammonia vapors rising from the waste accumulating beneath them―cough and choke.

It's bizarre, really: In order to eat meat and drink packaged milk, we take a crop like soybeans, oats, corn, or wheat, which are all rich in protein, fiber, and complex carbohydrates―the things we need―and totally devoid of cholesterol and artery-clogging saturated fat―the things we don't need and shouldn't have. We feed it to a chicken or pig to create a product with no fiber or complex carbohydrates at all but with megadoses of cholesterol and saturated fat! All bad for us and bad for the Earth and bad for animals. It makes about as much sense as taking a glass of sparkling Evian, running it through a sewer, and then drinking it.

As most people must now be aware or should be, in November 2006, the United Nations released a massive report that details the environmental consequences of consuming animal "products." It's called Livestock's Long Shadow, and it concludes that raising chickens, pigs, and other animals for food is one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems at every level, from local to global. So, no matter what environmental issue you're looking at―from land and crop use to water pollution to air pollution to climate change―funneling crops through animals in order to create meat is one of the top causes of the problem. So much for wrapping paper!

Here are some more facts: It takes about 6 to 16 pounds of grain to produce 1 pound of animal flesh. If we have to grow massive amounts of vegetable matter―with all the tilling, irrigation, and herbicides and pesticides and other chemicals that are now used―transport all that grain and soybeans to factory-style farms and dairies, feed it to all the land animals raised for food, transport those animals to automated slaughter facilities and dairies, take the dead animals to processing centers, run the processing and packaging machines, and then take the packaged meat to food outlets and butchers' stalls―well, there's a lot of energy being used up at each one of those stages. And in case anyone is saying, "But they don't slaughter dairy cows," dream on! There is no retirement home for the millions upon millions of cows kept for milk, butter, and cheese.

If all this energy is being used, all these fossil fuels are being burned, and all this manure is being produced, then we're talking serious air pollution. Many environmentalists would sooner walk than drive in order to decrease air pollution, yet many eat meat and dairy products without realizing that they are paying for gas-guzzling animal-transport vehicles, refrigerated meat and dairy trucks, pollution-spewing processing plants, and so on. Where the environment is concerned, eating meat is like driving a 16-wheeler and leaving the engine running all the time. Eating a vegetarian diet is like riding a motorbike, and eating a vegan diet is like riding a bicycle.

More horrors: According to Diet for a New America and The Food Revolution author John Robbins, the average vegan uses about one-sixth of an acre of land to satisfy his or her food requirements for an entire year; the average vegetarian who consumes eggs and dairy products, like cow's milk, real cheese toppings on pizza, and even non-soy yogurt, requires about three times as much land; and the average meat-eater requires about 20 times as much land. Obviously, a lot more of the food grown on any given parcel of land can be made available to humans if it's not being funneled through animals first.

Raising animals for food also requires about as much water as all other water uses combined, even as many areas of the world are experiencing extreme drought conditions. Just outside Mumbai, farmers have been committing suicide in their dry, cracked fields, leaving widows with nothing: There are no government-sponsored bereavement benefits. It takes about four times as much water to feed a vegetarian as it does to feed a vegan and 14 times as much water to feed a meat-eater. And, if you have to feed animals, you have to irrigate the crops that you feed to them and you have to give them water too. You have to hose down the factory farms and slaughterhouses with water. It's all very water-intensive.

Raising animals for food is water-polluting as well. One "dairy cow" produces more than 100 pounds of excrement per day, and it is estimated that the animals raised for food in the U.S., for example, produce 130 times the excrement of the entire human population of our country. Add to this delightful image the fact that animal excrement is more concentrated than human excrement and is often contaminated with herbicides, pesticides, toxic chemicals, hormones, antibiotics, and so on.

Massive factory farms generally don't have waste-treatment plants. Instead, the manure is poured onto land or into giant lagoons, where it often spills over into local waterways, killing fish and poisoning the drinking water that people depend on. All over the world, streams and rivers that once were clear and full of fish are now lifeless because of manure runoff from factory farms. In the Gulf of Mexico, there's an enormous "dead zone" the size of the entire state of New Mexico, where no fish or other animals can live. This is because of the enormous amount of animal waste that has flowed from filthy factory farms into rivers and streams.

As for the forests, they are being destroyed to create grazing space for cattle. Greenpeace published a report in 2006 specifically blaming the chicken industry for leading the way in the destruction of the Amazon, and it unveiled a banner in the Amazon that read, "KFC: Amazon Criminal," because that company's chickens were fed soybeans that had been grown in the rain forest.

2009-12-26-2009IndiaandUK013.jpg


Finally, there is something fishy going on. One super-trawler is the length of a football field and takes in 800,000 pounds of fish in a single netting. These trawlers scrape along the ocean floor, destroying coral reefs and everything else in their way, and hydraulic dredges scoop up huge chunks of the ocean floor to sift out scallops, clams, and oysters. Most of what the fishing fleets get isn't even eaten by human beings. Half is fed to animals raised for food, and each year, about 30 million tons of dead sea animals are just tossed back overboard, disturbing the natural biological balance. Commercial fishing fleets are destroying sensitive aquatic ecosystems at a rate that is beyond comprehension. A major study found that in just the last 50 years, commercial fishing has reduced the populations of all large fish species by a staggering 90 percent.

The new "fishing" is aquaculture, which is increasing at a rate of more than 10 percent annually. This horrific invention takes up to 5 pounds of wild-caught fish to reap 1 pound of farmed fish. Farmed fish are often raised in the same water that wild fish swim in, but fish farmers dump antibiotics into the water and use genetic engineering to create unnaturally large fish. The antibiotics contaminate the oceans and seas, and the genetically altered fish sometimes escape and breed with wild fish, throwing delicate aquatic balances off kilter. Researchers at the University of Stockholm demonstrated that the horrible environmental influence of fish farms can extend to an area 50,000 times larger than the farm itself, an amazing indictment.

We demonstrate our environmental concern or lack thereof every time we sit down to eat by choosing to eat vegan, vegetarian, or non-vegetarian foods. A hand went up from the audience in Mumbai. "If I become a vegan, what can I eat?" said its owner. Being a lover of Indian food, I could only say this:

Papad, chapattis,

Dumplings and naan,

Channa and rotis,

Onion uttapam,

Masala dosa,

Green callaloo,

Gourd and samosa,

Corn and aloo.

Shalgam, bryani,

And channa masala,

Tomato soup,

That hits the spot.

Taka dahl and bhindi,

And okra fried hot,

Gobi pakoras, samba, idli,

And brinjal in a pot.

Yam and cassava,

Coconut stew,

Mangoes and guava,

Cornflakes, tofu,

Palaak and gaajar,

Shakkar kandi, nut roast,

Lotus root salad,

And garlic toast!

Chillis, bhaji, walnuts,

Peas and mint rissole,

Pine nuts and peanuts,
Sweet potato roll,

Cashew nut cutlets,

Okra in sauce,

Tamarind, turnips,

Mulligatawny, of course.

Banana-walnut pancake,

Mango floats,

Longan, orange, cherry cake,

Pineapple boats,

Paratha, puri, mooli,

Rajma, pomegranate,

Breadfruit pudding

With almonds on it.

Noodles and pancakes,

I eat all the time,

Veggie cutlets, palao,

Papaya with lime,

Melon, chickoo, pears,

Soya ice cream, litchee,

Loquat and apples,

Pistachio and lentil kedgeree ...

What was that question now?

What can we eat?

I think we'll survive

Without milk and meat.

In fact, it may be the only way to help the planet itself survive.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 178
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:21 PM on 01/04/2010
I find it interesting that India - the country in which Tata motors is hell-bent on selling millions of internal combustion engine cars - can say it's happy with it's position re. global warming mitigation. I won't defend the pathetic policies of most countries on this issue but to encourage the use of automobiles seems to fly in the face of reducing emissions...
01:19 AM on 01/04/2010
That is a tremendous list of foods given there. I could add some more ideas, such as Middle Eastern foods, Indonesian foods, whatever foods. The problem is that not everyone can eat those foods. I believe even the Dalai Lama eats meat! Some of us become anemic if we only eat vegetarian. But do try to incorporate some Indian and other foods in the diet. Tomato soup Indian style with mustard seed pops in the mouth. A hot tea, made of ginger powder, lemon grass and a little bit of honey and boiling water is great before bed, for digestion and against congestion. Simply have one or two meatless days a week. Eat less of everything, including meat, and if you do eat meat use it as a condiment, just a little. HINT: if you partially freeze meat you are able to cut it paper thin. Prepared with a coating (cornstarch or waterchestnut powder) and stir fried just right, it blows up and a tiny bit looks like a whole lot and it is real food. Shrimp crackers and bean crackers also blow up and are crunchy. Add a tiny bit of salt if allowed. There are really good Lebanese pastries (like mini pizzas) you can make with feta and spinach - very easy. Save your money, save the planet, get some variety.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston
Is hemp legal yet?
12:15 PM on 12/29/2009
Eat eggs every morning YOUR BRAIN IS MADE OUT OF CHOLESTEROL!!!
Eggs are brain food.

Animal Fat Information | eHow.com
Animal Fat Information. Dietary fats fall into two main categories: saturated ... for development of the brain and nervous system in infants and children. ...
www.ehow.com
10:32 AM on 12/29/2009
INGRID is RIGHT

PETA ROCKS

Go to www.peta.org

STOP EATING DEAD ANIMAL FLESH TODAY

MEAT is KILLING

(And bad for the environment)
02:19 PM on 12/29/2009
My wife is ex-PETA. She wouldn't eat meat when we first met. Before we were married, she suddenly resumed eating meat, with the comment "alot of what PETA says isn't true, I have now seen that firsthand".

My wife told me all I will ever need to know about PETA.
05:32 PM on 12/29/2009
Coming from a rancher who raises and kills animals for a living, it's not exactly surprising that you would be threatend by PETA. After all, your livelihood is dependent upon how many animals you can successfully kill and sell.
10:29 AM on 12/29/2009
It's a tremendous mistake to argue that not eating meat is the most sustainable thing humans can do. Humans have been eating meat for millennia! Rather, what has changed in the blink of an eye is our means of acquiring meat by way of industrialization. The how is the problem, not the what.
08:26 PM on 12/29/2009
This is true. I lucky for me, I think most people agree with you.
04:14 PM on 12/28/2009
I had an insulin spike just reading that food list.
03:20 PM on 12/28/2009
I always thought the single best thing one could do to help the environment is only have one child per couple. That and the 3 Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. Maybe I'm just kidding myself because I'm not ready for vegan or even vegetarian, but it's a start.
04:18 PM on 12/28/2009
Look at it this way: each time we sit down to eat, we get a vote -- we can choose to support this industry, or we can choose a cruelty-free alternative. We can vote as many, or few, times we'd like. But every vote counts!
08:07 PM on 12/28/2009
We can also choose to support a local rancher who raises the animals outside on grass, or an alternative that kills hundreds of field-dwelling animals and used loads of fossil fuels to plow, seed, harvest, and transport.

I'm going with the chickens from down the road.
02:14 PM on 12/29/2009
I fill out those census forms you mention, nowhere on them are there any questions like "do you run a factory farm?". What PETA has done is create their own formula I suppose based on livestock numbers per farm and decided that constitutes a factory farm. I don' t much care for the term, but to me it means a farm that is total confinement and more than likely vertically integrated. Knowing first hand the number of beef cattle raised on rangeland, I know without a doubt that 99% of meat does not come from what most people would consider a factory farm.

I did not avoid your comment about why the cattle were in the snow to begin with, 250 words limits my responses. On one hand, animal rights groups do not like confinement, apparently free range, as most beef cows are, isn't any better? Cattle are made to deal with the elements as long as they have a good feed source and some type of shelter, Nothing cruel about raising them on pasture winter and summer.

If you do not believe eating meat is ethical because you do not like killing animals, I am fine with that, it is your choice to make. What I do not like are blanket statements made about stock farming that are not based in fact.
12:48 PM on 12/28/2009
Thanks, Ingrid. Every single one of us can make a huge difference for the planet, for animals, and our own health by simply switching to a healthy and delicious vegan diet. Any cuisine (not just Indian, which I love) is better vegan! My personal vegan faves include veggie pot pie, creamy corn chowder, and grilled cheese made w/ amazingly cheesy daiya vegan cheese.
04:47 PM on 12/28/2009
I don't eat fake food, or anything that's highly processed.
11:11 AM on 12/28/2009
Talk about "afraid of change!" I suspect some people are reluctant to go vegan because they still don't realize that delicious vegan foods are available no matter where you live. Many mock meats and soy products even taste very similar to meat and dairy products. I've been vegan for nearly two decades and I've had no trouble finding an array of tasty vegan foods.

But let's move beyond selfish preferences: a vegan diet is undoubtedly more humane. It's also greener and healthier The excuses not to go vegan have more holes than a sponge. For the new year, please do what's best for animals, the planet, and us all: go vegan!
04:15 PM on 12/28/2009
Fake soy food is really, really bad for you.
08:13 PM on 12/28/2009
No, a omnivorous diet with locally grown foods is the most humane, the greenest, and the healthiest. The ground venison we have in the freezer only killed one animal, is lean and chemical-free, and the only emissions that came about because of it was the smoke from my dad's gun. A locally grown vegan diet might be a tiny bit better, but not by much.

Unless you grow your own soybeans by hand (or buy it locally from someone who does), the ombine that harvested them definitely took out loads of mice, and the the heavy machinery used to transport and process it released a lot of CO2.
05:35 PM on 12/29/2009
So all you eat is "venison"? You never consume ANY other food items, ever?

Are you a survivalist or something? I'm surprised that you have access to an internet connection from within your bunker.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
07:47 AM on 12/28/2009
how about ireland and the highlands of scottland? meat and dairy are sensible there.
03:34 PM on 12/27/2009
Only 30% of Indians are vegetarian, and the vast majority of those are lacto-ovo...they eat dairy products.

Veganism is almost as marginal there as it is here.
12:53 PM on 12/27/2009
That's an interesting photo of a woman (Ingrid?) petting a dog.

Here are some of Ingrid's own quotes on that subject:

“Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation.”
— Harper's, Aug 1988

“The bottom line is that people don't have the right to manipulate or to breed dogs and cats... If people want toys, they should buy inanimate objects. If they want companionship, they should seek it with their own kind.”
— Animals, May 1993

Note that this rhetoric has been toned down & taken out of the formal PETA agenda...clearly so they don't alienate the majority of their supporters that have & adore pets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duke1225
01:41 AM on 12/28/2009
She must have changed her mind. She has pets.
11:06 AM on 12/27/2009
What the honorable Ms. Newkirk will never, ever mention are the thousands of farmers and ranchers in the USA that spent Christmas day struggling to care for their livestock in blizzard conditions. Nobody was out tending to the wild animals, especially no one from PETA. I saw plenty of deer and other wildlife eating the hay and corn I was feeding to my cattle.

The image of thousands of cold tired ranchers working all day long to get feed to livestock on range certainly wouldn't square with the PETA stance that we simply use and abuse our animals on a daily basis entirely on "factory farms". PETA only uses the truth when it is convenient for them. Bet the Huff post won't print this one.
01:12 PM on 12/27/2009
So, the farmers and ranchers "care for their livestock in blizzard conditions" purely out of love?

Not out of a need to protect their (farmers' and ranchers') commodities (cows)?

The cows just live out their lives on your lovely little ranch, is that it?

You would never consider killing them and selling them, would you?

Nah, course not! You're too nice a farmer, aren't you?
02:15 PM on 12/27/2009
That is kind of a dumb comment on your part. Of course I sell cattle, and of course they are eaten. My point is that livestock is quite well cared for in most instances, and, PETA wasn't out in the snow Christmas day feeding the deer and the antelope, whatever they got was courtesy of farming operations unless they dug through the snow to scrounge. You and PETA would like the public to believe stock farmers are terrible people raping the planet and abusing animals and that is not true.
01:27 AM on 01/04/2010
Well, Vesta, it is good that you care for animals. People, however, you do not care for much, do you. Your comment is all negative and nasty, accusatory. It does not convince anyone to go your way, or the highway! Have a discussion with the Dalai Lama and some Indians I know and *demand to know* why they eat meat! Since you do not approve, we should all do as you say, or...else!! By the way, I DO think you should go out and feed the deer, and polar bears daily. They are animals too, you know. They need your help!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Duke1225
01:43 AM on 12/28/2009
But, wouldn't you be against factory farms? Aren't they bad for family farms. BTW, I'm vegan, don't kill bugs, don't hunt etc., but I do not on any level equate family farmers and ranchers with factory farms.
02:01 AM on 12/28/2009
So you've never swatted a mosquito, huh? You probably don't do much gardening either.
09:04 AM on 12/28/2009
Actually I am against "factory farms" but I think my definition is very different from yours. I do believe they have pushed many individual farmers out of business, I know they have forced me to exit raising pigs, and have seen all the dairies in my county quit milking cows because they could not hang on through the low milk prices brought on from the overproduction of the huge dairy farms.

But, PETA isn't going after only factory farms, they are going after all farms that raise livestock for meat, and much of what they say about raising livestock, along with the slaughter process, is false. So they are intent on stopping me from making a living as well. PETA forces alot of farmers to side with factory operations by default, because the factory farms hurt us collaterally, while PETA seeks to destroy us outright.
10:57 AM on 12/27/2009
A really good natural rotation is 3 or 4 years in a mixed clover/grass pasture, followed by 3 or 4 years of cropping. Taking livestock out of the equation will force more farmers into monoculture, and more reliance on sythetic fertilizer, not less.
04:27 PM on 12/28/2009
Yes, and you can actually build topsoil that way, if you're very careful.

Grain and soybean crops are destroying our topsoil and a very alarming rate. If we lose our soil, we lose everything.
09:57 PM on 12/28/2009
Farming methods lead to the erosion of topsoil, not the actual crop grown(for the most part). I strongly disagree with you that soybeans are bad for the soil. Soybeans are a legume, they fix nitrogen from the air and put the soil in excellent tilth for the following crop. If anything, soybeans are very good for the soil.

You are right though, if we lose our soil we do lose everything, think of that everytime you drive by a new subdivision on land that was once farmed. If I was going to worry about anything, I would worry about the amount of farmland being lost to developement.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:08 AM on 12/27/2009
Vegans are six times more likely to suffer brain shrinkage.
12:40 PM on 12/28/2009
False beyond belief! A plant-based diet is absouletly the healthiest diet one can eat. According to the American dietetic association, vegetarians are far less likely to get cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and other leading killers of Americans. Go veg for your health, for the animals, and the planet!
10:40 AM on 01/03/2010
Vegetarians are less likely to get cancer than... who? People who eat nothing but chips, burgers, and soda?

An omnivorous diet can be just as healthy as a vegetarian diet.
04:28 PM on 12/28/2009
Yes, more Azheimer's too, and memory problems.