iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM InvestingAnswers
 

The 5 Wealthiest Members of Congress

Posted: 09/13/11 04:45 PM ET

Benjamin Franklin once proposed that elected officials not be paid for their service to the nation -- a proposal that was quickly struck down by other representatives.

However, it must be said that during the recent recession, members of Congress did conform somewhat to the idea of "austerity" and quietly declined their annual salary bump for the second year in a row.

Regardless, members of Congress have continued to see their wealth grow. Many saw their fortunes increase by millions of dollars. The combined minimum net worth of this year's 50 wealthiest lawmakers was $1.6 billion, over $200 million more than last year's (2010) group.

Methodology: We compiled this list according to each member's financial disclosure report, which he or she is required to file every year. But members are only required to report the values of their assets and liabilities in broad price categories (one category ranges from $5 million to $25 million), so these reports don't give an exact picture of net worth.

For example, if an investment falls into the "$5 million to $25 million" category, we have no way of determining if it's worth $6.1 million or $24.7 million. The only thing we know for sure is it's worth at least $5 million.

Based on this, members are ranked based on minimum net worth. This number is calculated by adding the minimum value of all reported assets and then subtracting the minimum value of all reported liabilities.

Bear in mind, these financial disclosures report each member's "minimum net worth," so each lawmaker's actual net worth could be much higher.

Here are the five members of Congress with the highest net worth, according to their 2010 financial disclosures:

5) Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) -- $76.3 million

When Warner joined the Senate in 2009, he was one of 11 freshman members that made the list of 50 wealthiest congressmen. Since then, his net worth has grown $6.1 million, making him the wealthiest junior Senator.

Not another trust fund baby, Warner made his millions in telecom and venture capital. He co-founded Capital Cellular Corporation and was an early investor in Nextel Communications, which was bought by Sprint (NYSE: S) in 2005 for $36 billion. Warner was also the founder and managing director for Columbia Capital, a venture capital firm that he's still invested in.

Warner also grows grapes on his Virginia farm for Ingleside Vineyards, and has his own private label that he offers at charity auctions.

4) Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) -- $81.6 million

It should come as no surprise that much of Rockefeller's wealth comes from the family that made his last name famous. Many of his assets stem from the fortune made by his great-grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, who founded Standard Oil.

Many of his assets are family trusts, the two largest of which are worth at least $50 million and $25 million.

Rockefeller's wife, Sharon Percy, is a board director at PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP) and holds more than $1 million in the company's stock.

3) Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) -- $193.3 million

With a reported minimum net worth of $193.3 million, Senator Kerry probably doesn't have to worry that there was no salary rate hike this year.

Where is the bulk of Kerry's cash from? His wife is heir to the H.J. Heinz Company (NYSE: HNZ) food fortune. Her net worth is estimated to be between $750 million and $1.2 billion.

In August 2011, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid appointed Kerry to the United States Congress Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, a new committee created in the wake of the debt-ceiling crisis. The 12-member group is responsible for recommending a plan to cut an additional $1.5 trillion from the budget over the next 10 years.

2) Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) -- $220.4 million

Coming in second (for the third year in a row) is ex-Army captain and Riverside/San Diego County Representative Darrell Issa, with a minimum net worth of over $220 million.

A Grand-Theft-Auto-type stunt pulled by Issa and his brother served as the inspiration for the business that would make him millions -- car alarms. Issa founded Directed Electronics (Nasdaq: DEIX), the nation's largest aftermarket auto electronics manufacturer. Even if you've never heard of Directed Electronics, you've probably heard of its Viper system, which asked passers-by to "Please step away from the car" (voiced by Issa) when they were too close.

Issa is one of 257 congressmen who have signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, a written promise stating that signers will oppose all tax increases.

1) Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) -- $287.0 million

Everything really is bigger in Texas -- even the wealth of its politicians.

In 2010, McCaul's fortune grew an astounding $213 million, propelling him past five congressmen (including long-time wealthiest member Sen. Kerry) to the top spot. When McCaul was first elected to the House in 2004, his minimum net worth was $12 million.

This meteoric rise in McCaul's net worth appears to come from large transfers of money to his wife, Linda McCaul, from her father, Clear Channel Communications founder and CEO Lowry Mays. According to his 2010 financial disclosure, all of McCaul's assets are attributed to his wife and dependent children.

By Meredith Margrave of InvestingAnswers.com

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
08:52 AM on 09/14/2011
Many politicians have said that the Government should not be helping the poor, that private charities are the best venue for humanitarian efforts.

It would be interesting to see just how "Charitable" members of Congress are.

Actions speak louder than words, and in my opinion more honestly.

How 'bout it Investinganswers? Care to do a follow up?
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
08:26 AM on 09/14/2011
So much for representative government.
It's no surprise that the wealth disparity has grown.
These congressmen cannot possibly relate to the masses.
08:02 AM on 09/14/2011
These figures tell us very little about how this corrupt system has enriched these people because many of them have their wives or husbands appointed to the boards of their corporate sponsors where they get paid millions of dollars for doing nothing and this money is not counted as being theirs. They are actually much richer than this analysis indicates..
10:57 PM on 09/13/2011
Their just doing it for the insurance right?
10:48 PM on 09/13/2011
Wow! I think they could afford to give up their salaries for a year. It would be at least something toward the debt. There should be a threshold at which they don't get a salary. Heck, all of Congress doesn't even work as many days as the middle class and working poor! Let's see how many of them would run if they knew they weren't going to get paid. Term limits need to be put in place too. A career politician looses touch with the realities of the way the majority of Americans function and struggle.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saxton
11:33 AM on 09/14/2011
It really is appalling and this doesn't include the number of politicians who are in the top 10% of wage earners. How can you possibly relate to the issues of the middle and lower class when your life is the best of everything. I agree the career politicians have to go. I find it funny that the ones who don't like government are the ones who have served a long time in Congress.
03:17 PM on 09/14/2011
I agree. Watching MSNBC just now they had Charlie Rangel on and mentioned he's been in public office for 41 years! Talk about the need for term limits. I know he's a Dem. but still. I still wonder what it means to be censured like he was yet he still goes about business like nothing happened. I thought maybe they'd at least not allow him to speak on the floor but I've seen him do it. I mean, what is censure if not some kind of restriction?
09:30 PM on 09/13/2011
‎435 Congressman is way too many. Nothing positive can get done with that unweildy number. We need to downsize the number to 365. I realize it will dilute our representation, but it will also have the affect of making it more difficult for extremists on both sides from getting elected. Oh, and the give the remaining Congressman 20% pay raises. Pass it On.
10:51 PM on 09/13/2011
I don't really agree with cutting down on # of congressmen. And I definitely don't agree any of them need a pay raise. None of the rest of us are getting pay raises. I think $174,000 is too much already.
stateretiree
Yes, I know my micro-bio is empty!
07:51 AM on 09/14/2011
Why 365, cut it down to 2 per state and cut their salary by $24,000. Plus no government healthcare or pension. Lets take it back to what it was supposed to be, and that was not a lifetime job to fill your coffers. I believe our "Founding Fathers" as tpers like to point out, meant for government service to be just that, service. I don't believe they meant it to be a way to enrich yourself at the expense of everyone else!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saxton
11:37 AM on 09/14/2011
So agree with you but can you imagine the kicking and screaming you would get if they knew that they were on their own for health care, were going to get a pay cut, and could not stay around forever. You would think the T/P would be fighting for those improvements to our government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littlemonster
Grrrrrrrrr
09:18 PM on 09/13/2011
how about a list of the five most morally bankrupt members of congress?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kamact
Market Observer
09:15 PM on 09/13/2011
Feeling represented?
06:01 PM on 09/13/2011
Are the Dems on the list socialists?
Just asking.

{sarcasm for the Repugs}
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Bastie
01:59 AM on 09/14/2011
No, they are just con artists.