VOICES FROM JERUSALEM: The City and the Dogs: A Psychedelic Tour through Jerusalem's More Peculiar Districts

A Special Report by Yizhar Be'er

You have to see it to believe it. The photographs that appear here document the murals that stretch dozens of meters down the length of the road that leads from the neighborhood of Silwan -- that is, the City of David -- along the Eastern Wall of the Old City on the way to Dung Gate. The murals decorate a wall that conceals one of the ugliest and conflicted corners of the world. Similar murals can be seen along the border between the Jewish neighborhood of Gilo and the Palestinian neighborhood of Beit Jalla during the days of firing between Jerusalem and Bethlehem during the second intifada. I saw murals like these in Belfast, when the Civil War of Northern Ireland was still playing out on the streets and in the pubs. But the skirmishes there are long over, so whoever is looking for such insanity now has to come here, for here you can find it in abundance; especially in the City of David -- that is, Silwan--the place where, as they say, it all began.

Whoever looks at these murals -- pop art-style oil paintings in a style that's gleaming, crisp, and crisp, like the industrial paintings of Andy Warhol -- sees an image that doesn't exist in reality, but may be led to believe depicts the city of Jerusalem. The greatest enemy of knowledge, the mathematician Stephen Hawking once said, is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge. These murals present a reality that is imaginary, illusory, and utterly alienated from the darkness and treachery that is being conducted beneath and atop the very grounds of the holy basin of the Old City.

Exhibit A:

The hills of this imaginary Jerusalem are grassy and green and carry the symbols of Jewish sovereignty: the Knesset, a menorah, Montefiore's windmill. Beyond the murals sprawls the true reality: the run-down Arab neighborhood of Silwan with a gaping wound in its middle, the pit of the "Givati Parking Lot," one of many megalomaniac projects of the Elad organization--a right-wing entity that aims to thwart any possibility of arriving at a compromise agreement in Jerusalem. The State of Israel, in a fit of insanity, handed the administration of one of the most sensitive and explosive sites in the world to Elad. But we'll get to that.

The next segment also paints an imagined reality. The Western Wall, cloaked in moss and sadness, with lovely and clean Jews standing around with polite self-discipline. The Western Wall plaza, empty and glittering against the unsightly foreground of the flooring of the actual city: dirty, poor, beleaguered.

In this third section we will examine how the narrative of Jerusalem has been radicalized to portray a city that is green, modern, secular, and open to the winds of the world--in other words, all that is foreign and opposed to the possessive and sealed off city in which I live. The Yad Avshalom monument, which according to Jewish tradition holds the remains of the rebellious son of King David, is shown planted in the center of a green hill, upon which glides a golf cart against the blue sea and sky. The sun is rising (or is it setting?) on the eternal capital, half submerged in the water. On the side, a Hebrew worker labors--an Elad man, most likely--with two buckets in his hands, hovering above a pile of cement. The man embodies what by now is the nostalgic fantasy of the good Hebrew laborer, a Zionist emblem that has long been replaced by the flood of Arab workers who uphold the construction industry. It is only the sidewalk stones, dislodged from their places in front of the mural and lying alongside the actual asphalt road, that remind us of the neglect and ugliness that no amount of oil paint can correct, and neither the cement that the diligent worker prepares in the image.

The concrete can't cover over a thing, owing that ancient Jerusalem, like the heart of a nuclear furnace, is boiling over from within. The Arabs (still) populate the majority of the land in the holy basin, including the lands of the Old City and Silwan/City of David, as well as the holy sites outside the city walls. The ground beneath their houses are the sites of secretive digs which rattle the ground, crack the walls and the roads, and pave the way for the big explosion, the inevitable eruption which is sure to come.

The radical right-wing organization Elad, in its activities with the approval and authority of the Israeli government, is embittering the lives of hundreds of Palestinian residents. Jewish settlers have control over properties in the heart of Arab neighborhoods and disseminate small islands of settlement which create impossible mosaics. They are aided by the Israel Antiquities Authority--which has acquiesced to the generous payment proffered by Elad--to dig on Elad's dime and with the support of the Jerusalem Municipality, government offices (every Jewish administrator in Arab areas is given a personal security attaché funded by the government), and even the police. Arab residents of Silwan who dared to appeal to file legal opposition against the digs that were cracking the walls of their houses were arrested by police in the dead of night and charged with ridiculous accusations that were never brought to court but were sufficient to plant fear.

It's hard to believe, but the surrealistic plan to dig a tunnel beneath the entire Old City from Damascus Gate to Dung Gate is already beginning to find its footing on the ground. In several places, digs are being run just dozens of meters from the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Handing over the administrative keys to one of the most sensitive and volatile sites in the entire country, and possibly the world, to a political, extremist organization is akin to deciding to hand over the keys of the nuclear base in Dimona to Ahmedinejad and friends.

In any event, the Arabs are convinced that the Jewish settlers living in their neighborhoods are trying to reach under the Temple Mount, and ultimately aspire for their very destruction. Just another conspiracy theory? Not necessarily. Thousands of Jews identify with the movement to rebuild the Temple. They gather around Succoth in the national convention center and swear to "remove the abomination" (i.e. the holiest Muslim site in Jerusalem and one of the holiest sites of all of Islam) from the premises.

In this reality, all the pieces are adding up to the colossal Armageddon that awaits.

Even in the idyllic mural of Jerusalem of high, signs and symbols are concealing themselves from evil messengers. One can find in the murals Israelis, tourists, the ultra-Orthodox, the nationalist-religious, the secular, a smattering women and children, but only two Arabs. Two images of Arabs were selected to represent the quarter-million Arab residents of the city. Below is Arab A, standing alongside an imaginary wall of Jerusalem. Passing behind him is a group of tourists who are indifferent to his existence. Arab A stands, leaning on his walking stick, and glances around (what is he plotting?). Beside him: a dog.

Arab B appears in the second picture. The background of this part of the mural is the alleyways of the new Hebrew Jerusalem. Two Yeshiva students stand around talking, a woman returns from shopping, a boy in a knitted yarmulke walks home with his bicycle. Arab B, a woman in a traditional embroidered dress, steps into an alleyway, with her back half-turned against the viewer. Next to her stands--you guessed it--a dog!

Did the anonymous artist deliberately plant two dogs--an animal known by Israelis to be considered impure by the Muslim tradition -- next to the only two Arab figures in the huge mural that extends along the entire holy basin? I don't know the answer, and the truth is that the answer is not all that important. It is enough that the Arabs are convinced that this was the intention. And here vandals managed to blot out the faces of both Arab A and the dog that stands beside him.

Dogs and pigs have long been hazardous material in the Muslim world. The oft-used taunt--a settler favorite--that couples "pig" "dog" and "Muhammad" are words that light fires. Dogs are an impure animal according to Islam. According to tradition, the prophet Muhammad claimed that angels do not enter houses with dogs or pictures (Orthodox Judaism, similarly, considers it forbidden -- even an image is considered an abomination). Another tradition says that a Muslim who runs into a dog on his way to pray must purify himself again, even if the dog did not touch him. In Muslim folk culture, in any case, a dog is a contemptible animal.

In this case, it's no surprise that on the day of Arafat's death, the newspaper Yedioth Ahronot proclaimed in an eye-catching (Hebrew) headline: "His Day Has Come," referring to the Arabic proverb known well to every Israeli, "Every dog's day will come." (Kul kalb bi'gi yomo in Arabic, and kol kelev ba yomo in Hebrew.) Unlike the phrase's English cousin, which rosily promises that even the lowest among us will have a day of good fortune, in its Semitic form it may as well be, as the Forward's "On Language" column aptly remarked: "Every scoundrel will receive his comeuppance."

In this reality, in which every drop of mutual trust has long since evaporated, intention doesn't matter. The question -- "Did settlers really intend for their archeological digs to run up against the foundations of mosques in reaching for the very roots of Jewish existence?" -- is not particularly relevant; much like the question of whether the Arabs really do want to throw us into the sea. It's enough that Muslims and Israelis, respectively, are convinced enough as to the (positive) answers to both of these questions as to have already amassed a stockpile of ammunition that could, with the slightest disturbance, engulf everything in sight. As we say in Hebrew, "The dog is buried here." In other words, X marks the spot.

Yizhar Be'er is the founder and executive director of Keshev - The Center for the Protection of Democracy in Israel, an organization that researches the Israeli media, threats to democracy, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Translated from the Hebrew by Ilana Sichel

Comments

[ModernTimes1]

1947-1967--- Arabs in TOTAL control of Gaza, West Bank, East Jerusalem.
No Palestinian state was declared! There was resistance movement, no complaints to U.N. against the occupiers. There no protests in world capitals, no world media attention.

Hows that for incredible.

[ModernTimes1]

Fact: Palestinians Charter EXPLICITLY gave West Bank to Jordan and Gaza to Egypt in exchange for military assistance in conquering Israel.

UN document:
THE PALESTINIAN NATIONAL CHARTER 1964.

Article 24: This Organization does not exercise any territorial sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza Strip or in the Himmah Area. Its activities will be on the national popular level in the liberational, organizational, political and financial fields."

http://www.un.int/palestine/PLO/PNA2.html

Big mistake. The war was lost and Jordanians just annexed the land. But Palestinains didn't mind. And there were no overwrought world attention to the issue.

[ModernTimes1]

"narrative of Jerusalem has been radicalized to portray a city that is green, modern, secular...­"
It is sign of radicalization to portray a city as and modern?!!! IUs this some kind of joke.
Any way here are some pictures of green Jerusalem. Enjoy.
http://www.jerusalemshots.com/Jerusalem_en135-2373.html

[Eva Lili]

I dont understand ... why do people argue on this issue on and on like this ... the Zionists began settlement with violence post WWII - how on earth can this be denied ... you know folks are just too dishonest

[ModernTimes1]

Fact: U.N. proposed the partition of British mandate area called Palestine into two states- Arab and Jewish.
Fact: Jews ACCEPTED it and began building their state.
Fact: ALL Arab states and ALL Palestinian leaders REJECTED U.N. partition.
Fact: Palestinian Arabs Invited in foreign occupiers and attacked Israel. BIG mistake!
Fact: For twenty years after Arabs controlled East Jeruslaem, Gaza, West Bank and other parts.
Fact: Palestinains did NOT declare a state. In fact PLO publically accepted Jordanian ownership of West Bank and Egyptian ownership of Gaza.
Study history.

[Chanan]

1. A little historical perspective. Those of us whose historical understanding of Jerusalem stretches beyond yesterday are aware that from 1949-1967, when Jordan controlled the Eastern part of the Holy City, Jews were ethnically cleansed from their neighborhoods, synagogues were destroyed, and Jewish Holy sites were demolished.

2. Despite your comments to the contrary, Jerusalem residents, by any measure (health, life expectancy, income, education level, and political rights) are much, much better off under Israeli rule than Jordanian rule. Inequalities should of course be addressed, but you simply can't make the claim the Israeli/Jewish control of Arab Jerusalem has impoverished them.

3. Finally, It is clear what Ir-Amim expects from Israel, but one is left wondering what they expect from the Palestinians. If the settlement enterprise and Jewish control of Jerusalem erodes the legitimacy of Israel, does Palestinian support for Hamas (a Jihadist group who openly seeks Israel's destruction) in the 2006 elections erode their legitimacy, or at least leave a question as to how Palestinians would govern if they were given control of half of the city? Are you at all concerned by the possibility that Palestinian control of E. Jerusalem could result in a Gaza-style takeover of the city by radical groups, such as Hamas, who will not only threaten Jewish interests there, but the rights of Palestinians, as well? Moreover, why do Palestinian national aspirations seem immutable, regardless of their behavior?

[MemoryAlpha]

Observation:
This is like making the case that Russian rule of Poland would be better than German rule of Poland.

[GZLives]

No MemorySelect, its like calling a spade a spade ... and just like you, this article is full of SELECTIVE information that deliberately paints a picture that is without any factual basis.

[TheFriendlyAtheist]

Jews were ethnically cleansed for East Jerusalem. Yes, and the Palestinians were cleansed from Western Jerusalem, so what's you point?

[MemoryAlpha]

Observation:
Zionists were planning and then enacting an ethnic cleansing for months prior to the Nakba and the independence.

Reference:
Plan Dalet.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Plan_Dalet.html

Additional Observation:
1947 - The United Nations votes to partition Palestine into an Arab state and a Jewish state. Golda has her first secret meeting with King Abdullah of Jordan.

1948 - Golda, again, meets secretly with King Abdullah. On May 14, Israel 's independence is declared. The ceremony takes place in Tel Aviv and Golda is one of the dignitaries who signs the document..­.
http://www.uwm.edu/Library/digilib/Golda/records/biography.html

Query:
What do you suppose Meir was negotiating, with regards to the subsequent Jordanian occupation of Palestine?

[PKatherine]

thanks for the good journalism!

I can't believe this is going on! It's appalling they would do such things and hve that kind of mentality.

[GZLives]

It is appalling which is why its untrue ... as usual

[MemoryAlpha]

Outright Denial without Substantiation:
Noted.

Further Analysis:
The rhetoric of all classes of deniers seems to be highly convergent.

[MotherMiasia]

Incredible observation Mr. Amim. Israel's intentions of creating a purely Jewish state on a multi-cultural land needs to be exposed. Usurping, suppressing and denying the Palestinians is a crime that needs to come to an end.

When this state either decides to grant human rights to those that are deprived from it or live to coexist with the indigenous inhabitants will it finally be at peace.

[loOranks]

Are you as vocal when Jews and Christians are forced to flee their homes due to islamic oppression?

[MemoryAlpha]

Observation:
Most countries in the Middle East have non-Muslim populations in excess of 10%, and with the exception of certain extremist states -- like the US/British ally, Saudi Arabia -- those religious minorities enjoy civil rights and protections.