Poor corporate governance at U.S. companies is like resistant bacteria: attempts at eradication only strengthen the disease. Despite a few steps in the right direction, the current climate isn't much better than when Tyco's Dennis Kozlowski pickpocketed shareholders to buy his overpriced floral-patterned shower curtain.
The losers are the shareholders, the true owners who are strangely powerless to stop the over-reaching by their employee-executives. At the heart of this tragedy are ineffectual boards, who continue to oppose proposals such as poison pill prohibition and advisory votes on compensation. But the true culprits are the institutional owners like the fund behemoths, who continue to condone, indulge and coddle their portfolio companies. Whether due to fear of losing pension contracts or a sad type of institutional laziness, the executive gravy train rolls on -- as unhitched to the engine of performance as ever.
Of course, as a shareholder of a public corporation, you can vote "with your feet" as the saying goes, selling shares and moving on. But the pool of companies with shareholder-friendly practices is limited and the search ever harder. Morningstar grants an "A" for corporate stewardship to only 93 out of 7,646 businesses. This implies that nearly 99% of public companies have sub-optimal governance -- really no surprise to shareholders who notice their wallet feels a little light after the board convenes.
And not much has changed since Tyco and Enron. Long after Kozlowski went to jail for squandering corporate loot on toga parties and Jeff Skilling played it loose with the balance sheet, executive nonsense goes unpunished.
Robert Nardelli was booted by Home Depot for excessive compensation on the back of lackluster performance, but his severance package of $210 million was an unmitigated disgrace. We'd all love to receive an amount equal to the GDP of the Kingdom of Tonga in exchange for being fired, but most of us can't find someone dumb or silly enough to offer us the deal. The failure of Home Depot's board to attend their own shareholders' meeting may be the most cowardly display of fiduciary irresponsibility ever.
There's no problem with hefty compensation -- as long as that pay is actually tied to cash flow performance, and given in restricted stock, not in some different currency from shareholders. Compensation should be tied tightly to long-term cash flow generation and return on investment, not short-term earnings -- and executives should be forced to hold vast quantities of stock for long periods of time. Good corporate governance is good business -- and good business is good investment. According to a study by GovernanceMetric International, companies with top governance scores have significantly higher investment returns.
But until companies pay for performance instead of palatial powder rooms, we can expect more of the distressing same.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
It would also be nice if executive compensation were somehow linked to all other employees compensation at the company.
The syndicate didn't die with Al Capone. It just moved to Wall Street and the boards of most of corporate America. NAFTA had allowed it to go global, and, unless Obama has the talents of a 21st century Eliot Ness, these racketeers will destroy all the economies of the world.
Are we really shocked by this one??? This is why we need govt regulation, as the govt is the only organization in the world which can focus on the long term!!
I agree totally. How about a "Golden Tax Shower" whereby Uncle Sam hauls in 90% of any compensation package above some multiplier of the average wages of the company. Right now the average differential between the worker in a company and the CEO is somewhere over 350x. So if an average worker gets, say $10/hr., how about taxing the excess of some wallowing rich CEO sombitch above 100x? That would require the wages of the average worker to increase before the ceiling on the top cheesers could go up, and it would help fund worker unemployment, relocation and retraining programs, etc. There is no free CEO wage market today, only PIRACY. Anyone who buys a $6000 shower curtain clearly has money to burn, while the average American is just burning money in there cars and heaters. Is this the meaning of "pursuit of happiness?"
The worst part is that he didn't even buy it, he had the COMPANY buy it for him!!
WASHINGTON — With the economy still firmly in the grip of...
WASHINGTON — Contrary to White House wishes,...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
The Obamas dropped by the Vatican on Friday, with daughters...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I never actually heard the words made famous by a certain man on a certain TV show. Instead I got a lot...
"What's for dinner?" A lot of us ask that question right...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
Think Progress flags David Brooks telling...
While we of course do not claim to know anyone's thoughts, we nominate these...
The Daily Show's John Oliver is unhappy with mainstream journalism, and even drearier...
For this week's installment of their "Lunch with the FT" feature the...
Al Franken's been anointed as Minnesota's junior senator, but how did the...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
What are your greatest strengths? I am...
Posted June 8, 2008 | 06:33 PM (EST)