Deadblogging The Republicans

Posted January 25, 2008 | 11:16 AM (EST)



stumbleupon :Deadblogging The Republicans   digg: Deadblogging The Republicans   reddit: Deadblogging The Republicans   del.icio.us: Deadblogging The Republicans

Last night, I had three slices of free pizza and the good fortune to live blog the Republican debate, along with the fashionable Glynnis MacNichol, Huffington Post tour-de-force, Rachel Sklar and John Neffinger who was being held in a secret location which turned out to be the green room at Fox News. Our tit for tat is here.

I woke up this morning, with that uneasy feeling that I had witnessed something a little scary, and struggling to put it in words - here's what occurred to me.

Watching these white men on a stage it struck me that the fundamental underpinnings of the current Republican party are so flawed, just so fundamentally wrong, that the discussion of the nuances of the positions immediately falls into absurd satire.

It's like being at a Flat Earth Convention where everyone is arguing and dissecting their opinions about how the earth is flat, how we know the earth is flat, how important it is the earth be flat, when of course, the basic and fundamental truth is, the earth is round.

Ron Paul, ironically of that crowd, is the closest to owning a globe. At least he gets that the war in Iraq was not worth the blood and treasure, not even close and he got a huge reaction from a Republican audience, and a positive one at that.

The question about the last eight years is unanswerable if you are a Republican, and it's really tragic that we as Democrats have not done a better job of driving this home. Everything from unemployment to the price of a gallon of gasoline -- everything is worse now than eight years ago. The Republican Party is built on the premise that the wealthiest of the wealthy need to get wealthier and damn the rest. They have done extraordinarily well at their core strategy.

Other than the 8 year question, I thought Russert and Williams looked like fawning high school reporters given the chance to interview the town mayor, really, tragically bad.

For example, the question about Romney and his wealth, I believe the current Mitt donation is just under $20 million, it's an easily obtainable fact Tim, and on top of that, remember when Mitt raised $6 million in his phoneathon? He committed to not putting his own money in when he did press for that - nail him on it.

Any question about Romney and Massachusetts, just add a fact or two. Job creation? Ah not so good. Tax hikes? Absolutely. Deficit reduction? Hmm, not really.

There were a couple more moments, with 20/20 hindsight that struck me as tragically humorous.

Mike Huckabee, and the Easter Egg analogy: I wish I had been there with the follow up question, but Governor Huckabee, if you hide all the Easter eggs, you can find a least one right? So, if Saddam hide all the WMDs, then you would find one right?

Or, are you saying Governor, you actually believe in the Easter Bunny?

The question Ron Paul asked McCain about the Market Committee? Someone should have followed up and asked, "Senator McCain, do you have any idea what Congressman Paul is talking about?"

When Romney started talking about the separation of Church and State, Huckabee should have been asked the follow up question about his belief that Church and State are inseparable.

In fairness, when Huckabee started talking about real people and real problems, I thought he sounded like someone from the Democrat Party to tell the truth.

But, all in all, as my friend Atrios says, it's good to be there to document the atrocities.

I find it sad, and tragic, that the Republican Party has fallen to the point, where they actually are advocating assault rifles for all and like to tie Saddam Hussein to the Easter Bunny.

I didn't understand what prostitutes had to do with reforming the tax code of the United States.

I was surprised to learn that the Republicans once wanted to do away with the Department of Education.

And you know the scariest thing? The worst thing of all?

Something has happened to our country, our media, our national discourse, something has happened to the concept of fundamental truth in our nation, that there are men on that stage, who actually right now are favored to beat our nominee.

I want my country back.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
46
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- kingcityguru See Profile I'm a Fan of kingcityguru

Why this visceral hatred toward those with beliefs in tune with the Republican party? I see nothing frightening about the Republican candidates. Truth be told, I find their economic policies far more sensible than any put forward by the Democrats. Lower taxes, smaller government, and a reduction of hurdles to start businesses and employ workers is just good sense.
If you want to revive the economy from its slump, cut all business related taxes by 30% and the economy will take off. I suspect the Democrats do not want to do that because of the message it sends -- governments do not create jobs, people and businesses create jobs and wealth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 01/26/2008
- LindaJay See Profile I'm a Fan of LindaJay

James, you hit the nail on the head when you made the analogy with a Flat Earth Convention. These frauds are definitely not in the reality-based community, which would explain the pervasive feelings of cognitive dissonance so many of us feel. Not that this is new. It's been evident to me since Reagan. I think what is new is that this latest group of frauds have become so obvious. They haven't hidden behind vague rhetoric, as Ronald Reagan did, or as dubya did in 2000. Their sociopathic personalities and voodoo economics are now overt and out there for everyone to see. Kind of a strange election strategy. It almost makes me wonder if they are so sure of their diebold machines that they don't even care if people can see that they're crazy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 01/26/2008
- retarius See Profile I'm a Fan of retarius

The problem is not the candidates, it's the idiots that make up the American electorate. If voters could actually think critically, it wouldn't much matter that these Repugnant candidates believe the earth is flat, or only 6000 years old, or the the moon is made of cream-cheese. The real problem is the deplorable education that Americans receive that leaves them susceptible to rhetoric that is patently false.
Look who is in the White House now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 AM on 01/26/2008
- rockymountainhigh See Profile I'm a Fan of rockymountainhigh

You just don't get it. The republicans aren't about the rich and screw everyone else. The Republicans want EVERYONE to be rich. For Republicans it is about the individual. What have YOU done to better yourself. What have YOU done to make yourself more successful. The Democrats are all about someone else. What can someone else do so I am successful? What can someone else do so I am better off. The democrats think it is up to the government to right all wrongs. The Republicans don't. I, for one, have worked my ass off to get where I am today. I did it by making sure I was educated(on my own dime, with a lot of student loans, not my parents money). Every job I have worked, I made it a point to learn and advance myself as much as possible. I have been very responsible with my credit, once I rebuilt it after college, never overextending myself. If I couldn't afford something, I saved until I could, or I just didn't get it. It sickens me to see so many people who want to get something that is rightfully mine, namely my hard earned money. Be a man for once in your life and go fight for, work for, and earn what you desire. Don't just sit back and expect it to be provided to you. The sooner we get out of the "it takes a village" mentality, the better off this country will be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 01/25/2008
- TheCondor See Profile I'm a Fan of TheCondor

Hey James,

Thought you might appreciate this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqKaU2fZkAc

Enjoy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 01/25/2008
- Citizen54 See Profile I'm a Fan of Citizen54

Nice piece.
We should get used to the idea of President McCain [or insert name of Repub. nominee here]. The immoral war will not sink them, although in anywhere but our waning empire it would. McCain will say that if the war had been run the way HE would have run it as President, everything would be hunky-dory in Iraq. The voters will buy it. The Democratic candidate will be depicted as "weak on national security," and the media will go along. Working people will be broke but will fall for the Republican line about the magic of tax cuts.
What the Democrats should do is focus on House and Senate elections in order to totally dominate Congress and thwart the Republican President (sound familiar?).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 01/25/2008
- research See Profile I'm a Fan of research

It looks like you can't even get in the debates unless GE approves you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 01/25/2008
- Meanwhile See Profile I'm a Fan of Meanwhile

We will have our country back, eventually, but we'll have to live through utter hell first.

It's going to take a complete collapse of the economy, which is possibly closer than anyone wants to believe. Remember how it took The Great Depression to wake people up to the folly of the Republican dream last century? Well, here we go again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 01/25/2008
- Zenpilot See Profile I'm a Fan of Zenpilot

The men on that stage favored to beat your nominee? Here's an idea....pick a nominee who beats them, not one who divides and inspires so much vitriol. It's simple, really. Mondale, Dukakis, Gore, Kerry....part of a pathetic pattern, wouldn't you say? The Democratic machine needs to resist its instinct to fail in general elections. For a blueprint on flawed thinking, read the painful logic behind the NY Times's endorsement of Hillary. We Democrats will get what we deserve in November. Another nailbiter, a country still polarized, and a leader far from the best and the brightest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 01/25/2008
- RossalGondamer See Profile I'm a Fan of RossalGondamer

James et al.

The Federal )pen Market Committee (FOMC) is the most important monetary policymaking body of the 'Federal' Reserve System. (Federal that is in name only)

You remember the other day when all the NEWS went "...." and then the Stock Market went "....", and your dollar went from 50 cents to 45.

Oversight of that body was what Dr. Paul was asking a sitting US senator about.

McCame fell back on the trusty Sec. of the US Treasury. Which is sad because believe it or not, no Sec Treas or any branch of the US Federal Government has control over the 'FED' or the FOMC.


    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 01/25/2008
- americanwhocares See Profile I'm a Fan of americanwhocares

I am not a Hillary or Obama fan, I like Edwards, but having said that, I truly hope whoever is the Democratic nominee is, beats the pants off any repug. I also hope (and plan to make a donation) to Cindy Sheehan so we can get rid of Nancy Pelosi. Poor Nancy is spineless along with her buddy, Senator Reid, and actually all the Democratic leadership. It appears they are also in the "pocket" of corporate America and lobbyist. Sad day in America folks unless we take back our beloved country from the greedy. If true Democrat"s with spine"s win the Presidency and a hugh majority in Congress, within four years Bush will be in jail in the Hague along with Cheney, and we will be able to rid the government service of all the cockroaches that now infest it because of repugs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 01/25/2008
- mageduley See Profile I'm a Fan of mageduley

What scares me is how chummy Bill is with George Sr.. Is hillary clintons biggest advocate (her husband) any indication of the clinton administration to come? Will Bill and George Sr. do a "improve America's image" world tour? It would be kind of hard to indict your BFF's son for war crimes against humanity wouldn't it? If you thought the marc rich pardons were bad, just wait until the world learns the clinton's have forgiven the worst law breaking, imperialistic, blood stained president in history.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/14/politics/main679881.shtml

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 01/25/2008
- sarge See Profile I'm a Fan of sarge

"I want my country back."

Me too, but I've pretty much given up on that. I'd settle for live-blogging with Rachel and Glynnis.

-SklarBoy

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 01/25/2008
- disgustedcitizen See Profile I'm a Fan of disgustedcitizen

Amen, Brother. I watched NBC news last night and saw that their poll showed that McCain (!) was favored to beat Clinton, and tied with Obama. WTF?
Is this a skewed poll or has this country truly gone insane?

I, too, want my country back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 01/25/2008
- BaltoAman See Profile I'm a Fan of BaltoAman

James,

It was truly sad and funny at the same time. Four guys tooting their own horn incessantly, and one guy telling it like it is (for about 4 minutes anyway, is all the time they game him.)

Now comes the scary, not-at-all funny part. The Republican party is dead, UNLESS there is another 9/11-type incident between now and the general election.

God help us all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 01/25/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
James Boyce›
 

 Site  Web ask.com