It is not possible to know at this time the precise scope or the duration of the deployments of U.S. Armed Forces necessary to counter terrorist threats to the United States.
- Excerpt from a letter accompanying a classified report to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate President Pro Tem Orrin Hatch, R-Utah this week from President Barack Obama
If that little tidbit of information that escaped the red-alarm of the mainstream media obsessed with reality-show transgender announcements, presidential candidates with zero chance to ever be president 17 months from Election Day, and Lebron James doesn't scare the living shit out of you then it damn well should.
Start being scared.
The president went on to state that he would strongly consider "direct additional measures," which more pointedly means expanding bases and additional troops could be deployed if needed.
Our antiwar president is slowly being dragged into a giant mess we've already made of Iraq with the kind of "cautious" speak we've heard for a century around here from many a president citing national security to embroil us in a useless, unwinnable, soul-sucking, fund-sinking, bloody fray.
It began a few months back with "advisors" and "special forces"; buzz words for your kids coming back from some foreign desert sinkhole in bags or with stuff missing from their bodies. Just so we're clear. Don't want to miss the point of all these "advisors" and "special forces".
Remember when the president announced a few months back to a dubious and overwhelming majority of war-weary Americans that this kind of thing was a mercy mission and a training exercise? This is translated as "See you in another quagmire, sports fans."
Lock up your sons and daughters. It's time to add more wounded that will be ignored and dead that will be forgotten.
We're off to WAR again.
As if it ever ended or will ever end.
Granted, Barack Obama has cited the wildly sweeping 2001 AUMF, the bane of American foreign policy and arguably the sole reason there is an ISIS and a massive national deficit. It is the golden ticket for every U.S. president until the end of time to wage questionable military exercises all over the joint. He is well within his right and purview.
The egregious Authorization for Use of Military Force, a fancy piece of legislation titled Pub. L. 107-40 was codified at 115 Stat. 224 and passed as S.J.Res. 23 by the United States Congress on September 14, 2001 and eventually signed into law by President George W. Bush on September 18, 2001. It gives the Patriot Act a run for its money and puts all this haughty talk for the past few years about presidential overreach into grim perspective.
You want presidential overreach, jack?
The AUMF, which Obama (the guy who in 2007 scoffed at these sort of tyrannical knee-jerk powers) mentioned directly in his letter, "authorizes the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the attacks on September 11, 2001". The authorization grants the president (any president) the authority to use all "necessary and appropriate force" against those whom he determined "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the September 11th attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups."
What does ISIS have to do with 9/11?
What did Iraq have to do with 9/11?
What did Libya or Syria or Iran have to do with 9/11?
Glad you asked. It's simple. It all does.
Why do you think former Vice President and godfather of Iraq madness, Dick Cheney was so hot and heavy about conflating Saddam Hussein with 9/11 - something that had credence due to faulty intelligence and Bush 41's laughably unnecessary Kuwait war in 1990, but could not lead to war without the AUMF?
Why do you think every hawk in congress cites 9/11 when anything goes awry overseas, especially in the Middle East, and berate the president for "leading from behind" every time a firecracker goes off in the desert?
It is not to remind us of our weakness in the summer of 2001, how we felt invincible and untouchable for all the crazy shenanigans we pulled aboard for more than half a century fearing no consequence. It is strategic. It puts all missions under the guise of the AUMF, providing the kind of unchecked military power that even Abraham Lincoln would have found troubling.
Well, maybe not Lincoln. He went a little nuts. But that was our Civil War, not someone else's. But the AUMF makes it, prompts it, cajoles it, nay, demands that it is ours.
The idea of 9/11 is no more a date in American history than a blank check for future actions against any threats that remind one of 9/11, like EVERYTHING.
All that crap the CIA pulled after WWII would have been so much easier if congress had not merely declared war on Japan and Germany in 1941, but simply said that any country that sees fit to 12/7 us or threats to 12/7 us is open game.
Stick that in your "Don't Tread on Me" pipe and inhale.
And so while we debate the merits of insane cops running amok or whatever middling crap we can dig up on Dr. Ben Carson, who is a pathetic side-show to our already insipid presidential politics, our president is once again thrusting this nation into another war it cannot win and will likely only exacerbate its incendiary status.
Think I'm simply an anti-war whiner? A cynic?
Fair enough: Let's examine the facts of how there came to be an ISIS in the first place.
After the Iranian overthrow of the puppet tyrant the United State implanted in 1979, ignoring the democratic wishes of yet another in a long line of oil rich nations, we began arming auxiliary tyrant Saddam Hussein's Baathist soldiers to combat it. These are the same soldiers that rumbled into Kuwait in August of 1990, prompting the Gulf War, which helped to build the case for al Queda (the terrorist outfit led by Osama bin Laden mobilized from the CIA-created Mujahideen that fought the Soviets in Afghanistan and were later abandoned when we no longer needed them, grew predictably and stridently anti-American, and bombed American foreign installations and ships in the late-'90s) to unleash the 9/11 attacks. These are also many of the same soldiers that today (with American weapons) make up ISIS.
And you know who our ally in all this is now?
So, now with all of that whiz-bang success from arming rebels and propping up corrupt regimes and our spectacularly disastrous foreign military-led policy of the past 15 years, we once again go slowly down the path of self-destruction.
Don't be afraid of ISIS.
Or Iran, the Affordable Care Act, Caitlyn Jenner, Wall Street.
Be afraid of "additional measures".
Be very afraid.
Do yourself no favors and "like" this idiot at www.facebook.com/jc.author
How will Donald Trump’s first 100 days impact YOU? Subscribe, choose the community that you most identify with or want to learn more about and we’ll send you the news that matters most once a week throughout Trump’s first 100 days in office. Learn more