More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
James Kotecki

GET UPDATES FROM James Kotecki
 

Why I Don't Support Ron Paul

Posted: 01/12/12 04:45 PM ET

I've personally liked and respected Ron Paul ever since I interviewed him in my college dorm room. But I don't support his political movement. It reminds me too much of the evangelical Christianity I once embraced.

Consider the ways that many of Ron Paul's core supporters are like religious fundamentalists:

  1. They have a simple solution to every problem. For evangelicals, it's more God. For Ron Paul supporters, it's less government.
  2. Their positions are logically consistent, but only if you accept strict, specific interpretations of key documents. For evangelicals, it's the Bible. For Ron Paul supporters, it's the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
  3. They have an "us against the world" mentality in which business, government, and media elites are all working against them.
  4. They believe our civilization teeters on the brink of destruction and only their philosophy can save it. Evangelicals predict apocalyptic tribulations for the unsaved; Ron Paul supporters warn of a tyrannical socialist police state.
  5. They reflexively lash out against any perceived criticism of their philosophy or its leader (see: every comment section on the Internet).

These similarities to religious fundamentalism are extremely ironic of course, given Ron Paul's belief in individual liberty and independent thinking.

When I was an evangelical Christian I believed I had all the answers. Anyone who thought otherwise was simply wrong. Eventually -- and painfully -- I realized I was wrong.

That's why I'm so skeptical of any single-minded movement brandishing absolute truths and promising simple solutions to complex problems.

And that's why -- very respectfully -- I don't support Ron Paul.

 

Follow James Kotecki on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JamesKotecki

I've personally liked and respected Ron Paul ever since I interviewed him in my college dorm room. But I don't support his political movement. It reminds me too much of the evangelical Christianity I ...
I've personally liked and respected Ron Paul ever since I interviewed him in my college dorm room. But I don't support his political movement. It reminds me too much of the evangelical Christianity I ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
09:04 AM on 02/08/2012
"They don't want to have anything to do with us, because they see us as a threat, that we might convert them." - Ron Paul
04:30 PM on 01/16/2012
Very disapointing, Mr. Kotecki. You give such an inconsequential reason for choosing to reject supporting an honest, kind man who is trying to reverse the socialist trend our country is on. So what if you don't like evangelical Christianity anymore? So what if Ron Paul's supporters are sometimes too passionate about their support of him? A lot of the rude ones are socially clumsy college students, so what would you expect? You'll actively disendorse someone you said you like and respect because of something he has no control over? I had expected better from you, Mr. Kotecki. This is hardly fair, and hardly logical.

As for a rebuke of your article, go here: http://www.dailypaul.com/204467/we-are-not-going-to-hold-your-hand-kotecki
12:20 PM on 01/16/2012
then who do u support?
05:40 PM on 01/14/2012
Unfortunate that you cannot see the difference between Religious Orthodoxy and Political Philosophy-

Also, that the further individuals apostisize the principles given to us- ( whether it's morale or constitutional doctrine) that humanity seems to take on a less kind nature-

That nature is implicit in how the government currently conducts itself in an immoral manner -

Things in this world ( like religion) are not so black and white--- And it is not the majority that espouses their beliefs the loudest- ( often it is the naivety of youth out apostilizing on missionary type ventures)

I too fell away from a catholic faith due to the congregations hypocrisy -- but I found even more so---- that inevitably , my inability to NOT JUDGE OTHERS is what my personal problem was---

If you do not support GOOD INTENTIONS which is at the root of every movement ( religious or political) and DAMN THE PROPHET for the weakness of the followers--

Then you have become the bigger problem by not "LIVING AS AN EXAMPLE AMONGST THE HEATHENS" in order to lead by example--

Your admonishment of others misguided views is justified-- but puts the sin back on you for the judgement instead of pitying and praying for them-

Remember -- Faith is not Knowing-
It is the hope for things not yet seen-
If you already know everything, you will surely be shipwrecked by the laughter of the GODS-

The years will bring clarity as the anger so inherent in youth
05:42 PM on 01/14/2012
Are peeled away
04:14 PM on 01/13/2012
Big Government Fundamentalists:

1. They have a simple solution to every problem-- +Yes, More Government.

2. Their positions are logically consistent... specific interpretations of key documents-- +Yes, Money, follow the money. (money's a document in this case ;).

3. They have an "us against the world" mentality-- +Yes, "you're either with us or against us."

4. They believe our civilization teeters on the brink of destruction and only their philosophy can save it-- +Yes, The philosophy of perpetual war will save us from the barbarians.

5. They reflexively lash out against any perceived criticism of their philosophy or its leader-- +Yes, Read the comments of any article against Big Government.

Ron Paul/Gary Johnson 2012!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:07 PM on 01/14/2012
Santorum/Bachmann 2012!
Return to righteousness, America!
Don't let another Texas cowboy run roughshod over this once-great country of ours!
03:13 PM on 01/13/2012
So your new religion is to religiously root out anything that resembles religion? Sounds a bit circular to me, but hey, you're entitled to your dogma--for now.
02:32 PM on 01/13/2012
How did you come to this generalization, because I'm as far away as possible from being an evangelical Christian that blindly follows authority. I happen to be an agnostic Jew, and I'm also a biochemistry PhD candidate @ NCSU. I take the truth as the authority, determined by the scientific method, then I consider the data presented to me, and make an educated decision. Ron Paul is incredibly accurate at predicting the future, watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM . I consider this an attribute I want in my president
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just logic
11:59 AM on 01/13/2012
So lets get this straight. Because you see similarities of Ron Paul Philosophy to Religion you will not support them. I would like to point out its your right to do so but the same argument can be made on practically anything.

You say Christians have a bible and Paul has the Constitution. Atheists have no bible and our government forgets the Constitution. Simple answers are not always correct. The difference is it’s a simple answer at the Federal level and a complicated one at the states. Its like the Catholic Church saying decisions are no longer made by the Pope but by the Bishops. The only difference is the Bible gives authority to the Pope and the Constitution gives authority to the states.
03:29 AM on 01/13/2012
Right on, I get it. It's kind of like a protest against change, just to say your different. Good thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremy Arthur Vandelay
02:24 AM on 01/13/2012
that's pretty poor reasoning.

Ron Paul isn't a mythical religion. Paul's economic views have been vindicated to no end, as well as his foreign policy views.

Who's left to support? Obama and his TARP endorsement? His utterly failed stimulus legislation? $5 trillion of new federal debt in only three years?? Bombing countries like Libya without even CONSULTING congress, let alone obtaining a constitutionally mandated declaration of war??

Are you kidding me???? Every solution the left and right have come up with is another layer of government bureaucracy and it has failed in every way possible.

Perhaps you should just reconsider Paul after all.
09:25 PM on 01/12/2012
I dont think people will start disappearing from the rapture, but you better believe they will be disappearing from the NDAA...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
07:29 PM on 01/12/2012
Great points. Ron Paul is so extreme that his political positions are close to Dennis "UFO" Kuchinich.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:10 PM on 01/14/2012
Not that there's anything wrong with extreme positions. It's just that their proponents are unelectable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I just had to say that.
07:09 PM on 01/12/2012
"5. They reflexively lash out against any perceived criticism of their philosophy or its leader (see: every comment section on the Internet)."

Truer words were never spoken. And yes, this is very similar to a religious cult.
07:05 PM on 01/12/2012
These are your top 5 reasons? Okay then... moving right along.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:10 PM on 01/14/2012
Try the Green or Socialist parties. You'll be glad you did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
06:45 PM on 01/12/2012
I've been saying for some time that some of Ron Paul's supporters are his own worst enemies. Your statement about how they always claim he's being held back by some media conspiracy amounts to paranoia. The world just doesn't work that way. Sometimes, Ron, people are just not into you ...
10:51 PM on 01/12/2012
Have you seen the Jon Stewart clips where he openly mocks the media bias? Watch them and then tell us why you think there is no bias or improper coverage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
12:20 AM on 01/13/2012
(1) You didn't provide a link, honey.

(2) Your claim of media bias is proving exactly what I said. Paul's supporters are full of paranoid theories about why he can't seem to win a primary. It's always some kind of conspiracy, never the fact that people just aren't into Mr. Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeremy Arthur Vandelay
02:27 AM on 01/13/2012
what the- JON STEWART WAS THE FIRST PERSON TO SAY ON NATIONAL TELEVISION RON PAUL WAS BEING IGNORED BY THE MEDIA. It's not a conspiracy- there have been studies done confirming this fact! Stewart has gone out of his way to shed light on this truth more than once!

I'd hardly call him a "staunch supporter" of Ron Paul and I certainly have never heard anyone on the left side call Stewart dishonest or untrustworthy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
08:25 AM on 01/13/2012
(1) You did not provide a link, sweetie.

(2) Stewart is a satirist. He may have said this tongue in cheek. I wouldn't know, because you didn't provide a link for that, either.

(3) It's still making excuses and suggesting, cynically, that people are gullible enough to fall for a conspiracy. That suggests that Paul and his supporters don't think very much of the American voters' abilities to make the decisions for themselves. I repeat: It just doesn't look like they're that into you, Ron.