How Trump Lost Iowa

Going forward, I do not see how Trump undoes the damage he inflicted on himself in Iowa. Not only has he unilaterally destroyed his narrative that he is a "winner," but he has now given the rapidly rising, if boyish, Rubio a clear path to victory.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

It's now confirmed that Donald Trump has decidedly lost the Iowa caucuses to Texas Senator Ted Cruz. Moreover, he barely surpassed the vote total of Florida Senator Marco Rubio, this year's "comeback kid." Keep in mind that Trump was beating Cruz by 11% and Rubio by a whopping 23% as late as January 21. Given his huge double digit leads in New Hampshire, South Carolina, Nevada and Florida, a win in Iowa would have made the billionaire reality TV star/real estate developer a prohibitive favorite to win it all.

2016-02-02-1454388965-8763064-Trump.jpg

Mr. Trump's dramatic fall from voter grace is due, as I made clear last Thursday on another platform, to his colossally stupid decision to skip the last Fox News debate, which was held in Des Moines, Iowa less than a week before the Iowa caucuses. This decision was based on typically petty Trump premises: he did not like a snarky press release that Fox News sent out ahead of the debate. Moreover, there was his weird and vile ongoing animus towards extra peppy Fox News Debate co-host Megyn Kelly. My prediction of last week about how much this would hurt Trump was confirmed by Iowa caucus exit polls: Trump ranked horribly in his grasp of Iowa voters' values.

Up there with God and ethanol, one of the chief values that Iowa Republicans and Great Plains folks in general hold dear - I hail from Omaha, with many kin who hail from neighboring Iowa - is being a person of your word. Look at the very nature of the Iowa caucuses: you have to arrive early in order to make it in the door on time to caucus. You think these voters are going to cotton to a candidate who literally skipped a nationally televised debate - the only national GOP debate held in Iowa - that he previously agreed to attend? Iowans, like Nebraskans, expect you to get to that debate, without excuses, no matter what the circumstance. Trump's arrogant and petulant decision to skip the Fox News Debate in Des Moines is akin to John McCain's hysterical knee-jerk behavior in response to the financial crisis during the general election battle against the more measured and, thus, "Presidential" Barack Obama.

2016-02-02-1454389001-3912948-Cruz.jpeg

Iowans clearly took Trump being AWOL as a snapshot of how erratic a Trump Presidency could be. At a time as perilous as this (with a possible Recession on the horizon, low wages, broken borders, a ballooning deficit, ISIS and urban crime), Iowa's GOP voters gave a strong vote of confidence to the comparatively more emotionally stable Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.

Televised Fox News and CNN exit polls showed that 45% of Iowa GOP caucus voters made up their minds in the last three days. And, of these voters, most broke for Rubio and Cruz. Because Trump skipped the debate - proving Cruz's claim about his "New York values" - he did not get a chance to make a direct pitch to these late-breaking voters, far more of whom watched the Fox News Des Moines debate than Trump's hastily assembled and concurrent Des Moines fundraiser for vets.

The mainstream media didn't report it this way, of course, but, on the ground, this kind of late-in-the-campaign craziness is quite revealing. And steady-as-she-goes Iowans showed Monday night that they don't like it one bit.

Going forward, I do not see how Trump undoes the damage he inflicted on himself in Iowa. Not only has he unilaterally destroyed his narrative that he is a "winner," but he has now given the rapidly rising, if boyish, Rubio a clear path to victory. This path was never there as long as the more charismatic Trump did not do something unbelievably stupid. He finally did.

2016-02-02-1454389555-5285317-Rubio.jpg

By contrast, Ted Cruz was always expected to do well in Iowa, due to the huge evangelical voter contingent there, and the impressive ground game Cruz established (campaigning in all 99 of Iowa's counties in what is oddly termed "the full Grassley"). Until Trump skipped the Fox News debate, Marco Rubio was mired in the middle of the GOP pack. Now he's on his way to a possible second place finish in the next voting state of New Hampshire, where less evangelical GOP voters hold sway.

Rubio has one person to thank for this dramatic reversal of fortune: the imperious and reckless, if perversely entertaining, Donald J. Trump.

To get James Marshall Crotty's latest political commentary follow him @Crotty on Twitter and at James Marshall Crotty on Facebook. Links here: www.jamescrotty.com.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot