Huffpost Impact
The Blog

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

James Peron Headshot

The Artificial Imposition of Poverty

Posted: Updated:
Print Article

Most of the world's poverty is not self-inflicted, yet apparently many seem to think it is.

My experience, living in Africa, tells me otherwise. Much of global poverty is imposed and I don't mean by evil "multi-national corporations" or "globalization." Those myths are easily debunked. The real causes of poverty in these nations are not hard to find.

First, however, I'd like to start with what is not the cause of poverty. People in poor nations are not poor because they lack ambition or are lazy.

When I first moved to Africa, I lived in small apartment. Almost immediately upon moving in there was a knock on the door. A woman asked if she could have a job cleaning for me. The idea was foreign to me. I even had negative emotions about people "exploiting" the poor and hiring them at low wages. I declined, but she begged. She insisted she was a hard worker. My dilemma was that I didn't have a lot of money. I told her that. She named a wage that seemed ridiculously low.

I could not pay her what I thought to be a decent wage. Yet, by refusing her services I was sending her away with nothing. Clearly, she did not agree with my evaluation of the situation. I relented and hired her.

When I moved to a house, the same thing happened. A woman with a child appeared at my door looking for work. She had no home and was staying in a small "maid's quarters" with another women she knew. The child was a grandchild that she cared for. I agreed to hire her without a second thought and then she asked if I had a place for her to live. There was a small building behind the house, with storage on the ground level and two rooms above it. I thought it insufficient but it was all I had to offer. She thought it fantastic and started clapping her hands with joy when she looked at it. It was a huge improvement for her.

I regularly had people asking for work, while few asked for hand-outs. These people were willing to work. In the streets of the city, I would pass hundreds of hawkers, with blankets on the ground, or just cardboard. They would have paper plates of tomatoes or potatoes or some other vegetable. Some sold handicrafts. They would sit on the ground from early morning until it was dark, trying to earn what most Westerners would see as small change.

Outside the cities, the industriousness of the poor was more apparent. In rural areas, women would walk long distances for water. Their homes, sometimes barely shelters at all, were built by themselves, as best they could. There were villages I would drive by, with every home built by the people who lived in them. People would plant small gardens to grow food. Some just planted flowers to make the desolation a bit more bearable.

But here is what else I saw. Periodically, the police would sweep through the cities confiscating all the goods hawkers were trying to sell. Hundreds at a time would lose everything they had, because they didn't have permits to sell their goods. Nor did the legal system recognize their property rights. It was not unheard of for governments to send in bulldozers and level entire villages because no land titles were held.

Throughout the continent, farmers were told they had to sell their produce to a central marketing board run by politicians or their families. Farmers would get paid at rates below the market price. The board would resell at full market value, keeping the difference for the politicians and their friends. Farmers who wanted to sell to others were often arrested for it. Many simply resorted to producing what they needed for their families -- nothing more.

In Zimbabwe, the socialist Robert Mugabe made much of "land reform." What this meant in practice was the destruction of hundreds of thousands of jobs. Wealthy farms were confiscated. Most went to the military, police officials, politicians and Mugabe's relatives. A few were turned into "collective" farms, where no single peasant farmer was allowed to own anything. They were moved onto the farms and left there. Anything they produced did not belong to them, so they did the only rational thing available. They plundered every scrap of value they could out of the property and returned to homes where what little they could produce belonged to them.

Throughout the continent, the governments would plunder the people. They created impediments, making it difficult to produce, and then plundered what little was produced anyway. The people had few, if any, property rights; neither in land, nor in their labor and its fruits.

The aid these vampire governments received was used to oppress people, to fund wars or police states. Here and there, a show project would get some funds and the Western media would lap up how beneficial foreign aid was for the poor. But thugs such as Mugabe would use the Land Rovers donated to them by the British government so police could round up dissidents who dared protest his tyranny.

The people were industrious. They worked hard. But without property rights in the fruits of their labor, or the ability to own the homes they built, they were impotent. Between impediments put in their way, and plundering of what wealth they succeeded in producing, the incentives these people had were destroyed.

These were not people born to be poor, nor did they earn their own poverty through choices they made. Poverty was imposed on them by the governments that ruled them. That they were able to produce anything at all is a testament to their industriousness.