More

James Warren

James Warren

Posted April 3, 2009 | 06:17 PM (EST)

For Blagojevich, There's No Place Like Home


When Rod Blagojevich and family return from Disney World, they will confront the Big Squeeze.

As journalists, present company included, scrambled to quickly dissect the late-afternoon indictment of the governor, an array of intriguing specifics were by and large missed. One of the biggest is found near the end of what is, by and large, a rather snooze-inducing document, absent the sorts of sexy new allegations many Blago watchers had expected.

For starters, there is "Forfeiture Allegation One" on p. 71 of the document. As a result of his alleged misdeeds, the government wants his Chicago home and a condo Blago owns on 18th Street, Northwest, in Washington, D.C.

In the case of the house, the government informs that the family home on Sunnyside Avenue on Chicago's North side is legally described thusly:

"LOT 24 AND THE SOUTH 20 FEET OF LOT 25 IN BLOCK 52 IN RAVENSWOOD MANOR, BEING A SUBSDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 40 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS."

So they want his house.

Then, there's his real gold mine. His campaign funds.

The government wants:

"All funds, certificates of deposit, letters of credit and assets held by Ravenswood Bank, DuQuoin State Bank, First Suburban National Bank, and Community Bank of DuPage in the name of or on behalf of Friends of Blagojevich."

That's the more than $3 million in funds the former governor surely hoped to use in part for his defense. Now, the government is essentially warning the banks to not let a single penny out of those accounts.

The government's approach is straightforward: starve the beast. Regardless of how much of taxpayer money has gone into the extensive prosecution---figure many millions of dollars---they want to prevent him from spending ten cents.

It was widely believed in the Chicago legal community that some prominent defense lawyers took a pass on representing him specifically due to the fear that he wouldn't pay. It's unknown if he fronted his latest attorney, the well-regarded Terry Gillespie, with any funds.

If he did, those may be the last filthy lucre Gillespie, or anybody else, gets from Blago.

And if the governor wants to buy a new flat-screen television, he best make sure it doesn't come from one of those accounts. the government will be watching.

For sure, tension is rife in millions of American homes these days, first and foremost due to the rising ranks of jobless. It's tough on families.

In the case of a jobless governor, with wife and two kids, it won't be any easier. Throw into the mix the nearly $70,000 prosecutors alleged Thursday that wife Patti received for no work, and the possibility that they're still trying to pressure the family by raising the prospect of her potential indictment, and you have a lot more tension than presented on Thursday's "E.R." finale. My friend, Chris Matthews, hosts Hardball. Blago now confronts hardball. It might make a guy considering seeking political asylum at Disney World.

When Rod Blagojevich and family return from Disney World, they will confront the Big Squeeze. As journalists, present company included, scrambled to quickly dissect the late-afternoon indictment of t...
When Rod Blagojevich and family return from Disney World, they will confront the Big Squeeze. As journalists, present company included, scrambled to quickly dissect the late-afternoon indictment of t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadsuch
A 70 retired construction worker/truck driver
01:25 PM on 04/05/2009
Rod got indicted. Well......now he can call a witness and defend himself!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr. Sam
12:14 PM on 04/05/2009
I truly feel sorry for the guy. I hope he can hold on. He is a smart guy who overplayed his hand. Politicians generally try to reward those who helped them in their rise to power and in campaign. But it is another thing to base your campaign on quip pro quo arrangements. That is where Brago crossed the line. He negotiated deals about appointments and in some cases threatened to withhold funds, as in the case of a public hospital. He sought jobs for familiy members through those he helped. And in the political establishment, he had no real friend he could count on in times of trouble, not even his next in line Pat Quinn nor his Attorney General. Too bad such an intelligent man would end up like this.
12:33 AM on 04/04/2009
We don't like him and we want his money taken away --- However, you are supposedly innocent until proven guilty in a court of law in this country. Also, what many Americans don't get, is that seizing people's assets is being done in most states with no proof, and sometimes no accusationsof wrong doing. Since getting your assets back can cost a fortune in legal fees, most people just lose their assets to the government. Funny how few people know what really goes on all around them. If you thought seized assets were just taken from drug lords, think again. IT CAN HAPPEN TO YOU....
01:59 PM on 04/03/2009
Why should a legal defense in any case cost the defendant a dime?

A defendant is innocent until proven guilty and forcing the defendant to pay for his legal defense is forcing an innocent man to pay. This is not innocent until proven guilty, this is guilty until proven innocent.

Shame on lawyers and their lobby. They have set up this system where they can extort money from innocent people. An accused man is forced to pay whatever it takes to defend himself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Watch out! He carries a big stick!
04:07 PM on 04/04/2009
Isn't that why the gov't provides public defenders?
01:20 PM on 04/03/2009
IT amazes me that Bush and his administration committed heinous crimes and are free to live their lives and continue to profit, yet people like Blago and Don Siegelman are tormented. We have selective justice now. Ted Stevens gets off because of a legal maneuver and is welcomed back with open arms, despite the fact that he was obviously on the take. Why isn't a new trial ordered for Stevens? Blago is being crucified in the press. How will they find an intainted jury? I had hoped for blind justice with the new administration, but it isn't happening. The Obama administration is actually protecting the Bush cabal. Would he have been elected if this is what he proposed during the elction? I wouldn't have voted for him.
12:31 PM on 04/03/2009
I wonder when Blago will make his next Larry King appearance... LOL.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
03:08 PM on 04/03/2009
Oh well, there goes Blago's chance for that radio show.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
07:20 AM on 04/03/2009
The government enjoys strong-arming a bit too much here. Indict first, then sieze.The houses will still be there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Watch out! He carries a big stick!
04:09 PM on 04/04/2009
Do you mean convict first? He has been indicted already.
01:00 AM on 04/03/2009
It bothers me to think the government can freeze all of someone's funds when indicting them, making it difficult if not impossible to mount an extensive defense. People like Blago and Madoff look like all their money is tainted (well, Madoff pled guilty, sidestepping that question). But is it, before there's even a trial?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
12:49 PM on 04/03/2009
You make me wonder how far down the economic scale the government can do this. Not the Blagos and Madoffs of this world but, for example, during the Bush years someone wrongly accused of terrorism. It's a good point because, as it stands, the power already lies with the government, not the accused. Do they make it impossible for ordinary blokes to mount a defense?
11:51 PM on 04/02/2009
Bear in mind that the forfeiture/seizure is limited in this case to laying hands on a relatively small amount of identified misdirected funds - the homes will only be seized if the Friends of Blago accounts don't satisfy that bill. Its not (at least as written now) nearly as harsh as the Feds are when they go after drug dealers and seize any asset that was even tangentially used in the criminal enterprise. Now, if more funds are identified as having been extorted by Blago, then the houses may really be at issue.