Viewing the aftermath of the assault on Gaza, and listening to some of the commentary coming from Israel, the Arab world and from Israel's supporters here in the U.S., can be disturbing on many levels. Most troubling is the failure of the apologists for both sides to even consider the human and social dimensions of the profound tragedy that just occurred. What flows from this is their inability to understand the war's long-term consequences.
Because, in fact, Palestinians are fully human and, therefore, mourn their dead, feel their wounds and hold their hurts to their hearts as deeply as the rest of us, the impact of this calamity requires attention. It cannot be passed over, objectified or reduced to faceless numbers, or dismissed with the stroke of an apologist's pen.
There are over 1,300 dead, more than 5,000 injured and thousands more (e.g., pregnant women, cancer patients, etc) who suffered irreparable harm because they could not receive the hospital care they needed during this conflict. In addition, thousands of homes were destroyed, affecting the lives and fortunes of hundreds of thousands. Because of Gaza's strong family ties and its population density, no one in that impoverished strip was untouched - either by personal loss, or by the pain resulting from this assault.
Societies are like human organisms: when part of the body is traumatized, the pain radiates throughout, affecting all its parts. Not only Palestinians in Gaza but worldwide, and to a remarkable degree Arabs, in general, were affected by the shock of this war. That is so, because Palestine and the dispossession of its people has long been an open wound among Arabs, reminding them of their loss of control of their history, their vulnerability, and their inability to secure legitimate rights in the face of Western betrayal. So it is that the pain in Gaza has taken a toll, which will not only last for generations there, but has also radiated outward.
In the war's aftermath, therefore, it is important that attention be paid not only to Gaza's physical wounds and its immediate humanitarian needs, but to the psychic wounds of the survivors. These will not heal of their own accord. Left untended, they will fester, resulting in aberrant behaviors with long-term social and political consequences.
Though extreme in its intensity and impact, it is important to remember that this latest assault was but one in a long trail of traumas to affect Palestinians: from the shock of colonial displacement in the 1930s and 1940s; the dismemberment and dispossession of 1948; the occupation and further dislocations resulting from the 1967 and 1973 wars; and the assault on the PLO in 1982, as well as the crippling violence of two intifadas - all have taken an immense human toll, with raging consequences on Palestinian society and beyond. How else to explain the deformities of extremist religious ideologies that have developed across the region and their attendant "cult of death?"
Prolonged oppression and systematic violence affect societies, and individuals within them. Ignoring the trauma and the wounds of war solves nothing. Pretending there are no victims and no problems to address can be fatal.
So, pardon me, if I am horrified by Israel and its supporter's indecent efforts to absolve Israel of "paternity" in this tragedy - to dismiss the war's excesses and to diminish its impact, or to reduce all of this to a justifiable "lesson to be taught." In this, they forget that the lesson learned is not always the one taught. And pardon, as well, my disgust with Hamas and its supporters, who seek to portray this horror as a victory for "the resistance." Their bizarre bravado is itself a psychic aberration and response to oppression. Their rhetoric, their behavior, and their insensitivity to the suffering all around, are just plain wrong.
I am pleased that President Obama has addressed, with compassion, the victims in Gaza, and recognized the need to address the future hopes of Palestinians. I am distressed, however, that now, more than one week after the onslaught has ended, more dramatic and immediate action has not been taken. Attention must be paid to the survivors and their needs.
In this context, a letter sent this week by sixty-four members of Congress to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, strikes an important and welcome tone. It must be considered. Calling for "immediate action by the U.S. to address this crisis," the letter notes the "dire circumstances" and "desperate conditions" in Gaza, and warns of "a dramatic increase in individuals suffering from psychic trauma."
As these members know, this is no time for wasted political debate, apologetics or finger-pointing. It is too late to save those who perished, and those who will forever be marred by this war. But is not too late to address this war's other wounds, by providing the immediate care that is needed. Our response should have been, and still could be, as rapid and substantial as were our post-Tsunami and post-earthquake efforts. The needs are as great, and the consequences are, as well. As the pain from Gaza radiated outward, so, too, will salve on Gaza's wounds help heal far-reaching injuries.
|
Obama Immediately Gets Working On Gaza
Before attending an official prayer service this morning, President Barack Obama put in a bit of work, his communications office let it be known. And...
|
|
Obama Speaks Out On Israel-Palestine
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is calling on Israel and Hamas to take steps aimed at ensuring that the cease-fire that's in place in Gaza...
|
|
Why Israel Is "Losing" In Gaza: Lessons For America
AYTA AL SHAAB, Lebanon -- The hue and furor over the humanitarian cost of the Gaza conflict have obscured the matter on which Israel's...
|
|
International Tribunal to Save Israel and Palestinians
As we peer into the abyss, we believe that the establishment of a War Crime Tribunal needs to be supported both by Israel's friends as well as by supporters of Palestine.
|
|
The Violence And Settlements Anathema, Part 1
George Mitchell's emphasis on diplomacy will certainly help him tremendously on his mission, but he may need more than that to pierce through this conflict that has eluded all of his predecessors.
|
|
Mitchell "An Ideal Man for the Job"
if peace is your objective then Obama could not have picked a better person. His efforts in Northern Ireland were exceptional.
|
|
|
Keeping Civilians Away From Violence
Israel's latest assault on Gaza showed a very weak attempt at avoiding civilian deaths and injuries or the destruction of infrastructure. Similarly, Hamas rockets showed lack of concern for Israeli civilians.
|
|
Change Gaza Can Believe In
In Gaza in the last few weeks, however, the Bush approach imploded, leaving Obama no choice but to initiate a new policy of his own. Hopefully, it will be one rooted in Obama's renowned pragmatism.
|
|
Why Blaming The Media Is So Played Out
The battle over blaming the media seems to have heated up to levels commensurate with the actual battle over the Holy Land. Can the media really be fueling both sides in the Gaza conflict simultaneously?
|
|
At Last, an Honest Broker
George Mitchell is going down in history as the man who brought peace to Ireland. It is inconceivable that he would choose to follow that success with failure in the Middle East.
|
|
Mitchell's Challenge: After Gaza, Five Questions About Palestinian and Israeli Realities
Given the overwhelming odds facing a two-state solution, a strong American negotiating presence will be necessary, of a sort not seen since... well, ever.
|
|
|
How Mitchell Should Deal With Hamas
The recent appointment of George Mitchell as special envoy to the Middle East is no doubt a positive sign of President Obama's commitment to the...
|
|
Obama Foreign Policy Heavyweights Emerge
Holbrooke's policy of engagement or what Hillary Clinton is calling a "robust" foreign policy agenda suggests that Foggy Bottom will figure prominently in the early days of the First 100.
|
|
Obama's Inauguration and the Israel-American Paradox
It doesn't make a difference if the U.S. president is "good for Israel". What would be "good for Israel," would be an entirely new government in Israel.
|
|
|
Can George Mitchell Astound the Skeptics, Again?
Ironically, Mitchell's first challenges may come less from the Israelis and Palestinians and more from the skeptics and naysayers in the Middle East peace industry back home.
|
Period.
Aside from having endured a protracted inslaught from the IDF, they still have a blockade to deal with and are denied or restricted the necessities of life.
And we all know this - it's irrefutable.
That we can somehow rationalise further such suffering in our collective complicity is and will be an enduring shame....
Gaza has been abandoned by the rest of the Arab world, except Iran and Syria because their behavior is indefensible. Yes they need to heal. Israel is more than willing to let them heal. They just have to stop shooting.
You are wrong in your statement that this is no time for debate. It is predicated on the ill-informed assumption that hostilities are over. There is no lull in the fighting by Hamas. The war progresses. Israel has let up a little. That is the only thing that has happened. Hamas knows it can't win. The people in Gaza must make a decision.
Hamas is in the position of the sniper on the roof in a downtown building. The police could kill him but haven't yet. He is determined to fight it out until either the police go away or he is dead. The police don't go away. They call this "suicide by cop."
Hamas seems to be determined to commit suicide by IDF. The question is whether the people living in Gaza will follow Hamas into suicide. The IDF isn't going away.
Thats why IS is defending itself
Israel is losing because people around the world are waking up to the fact that Israel cares for it's own and to hell with the rest of us.