One thing to keep in mind as we live through the pain of this deepening recession: It didn't have to happen.

Sure, recessions are part of the natural economic order, implicit in the yin and yang of the business cycle. But often they're brought on by some external shock, like a spike in energy prices.

This one, however, is different. It can be traced right back to the careless policies and practices that fostered the housing bubble, putting people in homes they couldn't afford and allowing financial wizards to mask the risk by slicing and dicing loans to the point that they could no longer keep track of them.

Where were the regulators -- the officials whose job it is to oversee precisely these types of excesses -- when we needed them? Why did high-level officials of the Federal Reserve, including Alan Greenspan, sit back and watch as the bubble inflated, or worse, blow more air into it by encouraging "innovative" lending schemes?

That's not all: The same neoconservative agenda that set the stage for this recession has left most Americans woefully unprepared to deal with it. Many families' real incomes never fully recovered from the last recession, in 2001, and now real wages are falling again. More families than ever lack health insurance, putting them one medical emergency away from financial disaster. Pensions continue to erode, and increasingly, people are tapping into their 401(k) plans - the supposedly enlightened alternative - just to survive.

More Americans are working part-time because they can't find full-time work. That number grew by 600,000 over the past year. More workers have turned to temporary jobs to replace the solid work they've lost, and now even those are disappearing -- employment in the sector was down 28,000 last month, the largest loss in five years.

And then there are the hundreds of thousands of would-be workers who've given up and dropped out of the job market altogether because they couldn't stomach any more rejection. They're not even reflected in the unemployment rate.

Millions have been financing their lives with debt, largely by pulling equity out of their homes. This worked fine while the housing bubble was inflating and home prices were soaring. But as gravity has reasserted itself, housing debt burdens have climbed to the point that for the first time since 1945, Americans' percentage of equity in their homes is exceeded by their debt.

That scene was being painted when the economy was supposedly flush. Now that it's tanking - with a new government report showing a loss of 63,000 jobs last month alone - things look bleak indeed.

So what's the answer? Both President Bush and his new political soul mate, John McCain, call for more of the same tax cuts, deregulation, and business-friendly policies that helped stack the deck against ordinary Americans. Leading Republicans argue against common sense interventions such as extending unemployment insurance or expanding the food stamp program on the grounds that they will only encourage sloth.

At one time, perhaps, those approaches resonated, playing into the myth of rugged individualism, and the idea that we're better off striving on our own than working together. Surely we're past that now.

We are in for a very tough year, but we can ease the pain of this self-inflicted recession by reviving some other basic American concepts, such as the idea that government can serve a useful role in mediating a heartless economy.

In the short term, that means building on the recently-enacted stimulus package by funding needed public works projects and boosting unemployment insurance. In the long run, we need a more fundamental change in the way we approach our economy, from a YOYO (you're-on-your-own) philosophy to one of WITT: we're in this together.


 

Comments
52
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I have finally(am a bit slow at times) why no one wants to say we are in a recession. If someone were to make that statement, it would add another handful of nails to the bush/rep coffin and we know that all of the 'a$$ kissers' in corporate america would not want to do that. It would cost them the election and the dems would take away ALL of the windfalls that the reps have given to them.
We are in a recession and just watch, it is going to get a heck of alot worse. Are you ready America for what your shrub of a president has done to you?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 03/11/2008

Hello, the credit / housing crisis is a system, not the root problem.

The rapid unrestrained fixed and manipulated price of energy is at the heart of the problem. Never before in human history has so much wealth been transfered to so few from so many in such a short period of time. Everything we touch, everything, is directly impacted by this unrestrained grip of greed. Pick any item in your home or any aspect of your life short of the air you breath and it is affected by the price of energy, some items much more than others. Have your wages risen 3 fold in the last seven years to keep pace with your direct energy costs. We call that in accounting 101, a budget buster.

This government could change the course of this robbery tomorrow. Release 10% of the S.P.R at $45.00 per barrel to domestic refiners only and keep it coming until the cartel is broken. Flood the market with product we already own and the price will come crashing down.

Please don't respond with comments like the SPR only contains a 45 day supply of crude. This line is an industry and Bush co. propaganda line scare tactic that has no basis in reality We are importing about 5 million barrels a day from OPEC right now. Thats it. we have over 300 million barrels in domestic inventories and 700 million barrels in the SPR. Even if all of OPEC stopped delivery of all imports to our market in the morning, which they won't, they are too greedy. the same amount of crude would still be pumped per day and we would buy it through a third party. And by the way, that shell game is what drives the price already. Every major producer also has a major trading organization bidding up it's own and it's competitors product. It the little favor they do for each other in this "FREE MARKET". So the next time this president or any one lies to your face and talks about the "FREE MARKET" Tell them they are full of shit and spit on the ground in front of them.
You know better America. Go to your United States Energy Information Agency website and get the facts. Then IMPEACH these criminals. Tic Tic Tic April 1st is coming soon!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 03/10/2008

I'm with you Pete. It appears that little George, Trickey Dick, and Condoleezza are in on this.
America could start by cutting back 10% per day with no harm, 20% with a little efficiency and effort and the other 4 mill per day could be supplied from reserve.
It is long past the time that we bust the cartel.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 03/11/2008

THE F H A TODAY SAID 900,000 OF THE DEFAULT LOANS ARE HELD BY INVESTORS NOT HOMEOWNERS.

BUSH WANTS TO BAIL OUT PRIVATE INVESTORS BY GIVING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MONEY TO BUY THE DEFAULT PROPERTIES .,

BAIL OUT PRIVATE INVESTORS WITH TAX MONEY?????????

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 03/10/2008

After the McCain win in Texas last week I heard the Governor on TV (I think that's Ann Richardson - correct me if I'm wrong), praising McCain because he would fight for an end to "Big Government" and "regulations". Does she smoke crack???

Being politically a conservative or a liberal has nothing to do with sensible financial managment. I suggest each of you....particularily the Repubicans....get on the phone and make your opinion known to your representatives. Regulation is constraining business but it can constrain greed.

On what world does it make sense for a bank to give someone a mortage worth 100% of the value of their home. On what world does it make sense to make a loan at reduced rates knowing that when the rate increases the payee will not have the resources to pay. You bet you got yourselves into this mess. The unfortunate part is that because your economy is so huge - your problems affect the rest of the world.

Is it any wonder we are all watching the coming Presidential contest with such interest. The world is praying you guys don't screw up and elect another short sighted idiot to the job. Why don't you ask the democratic contenders what they think about regulation....perhaps that will help you find the best man/woman for the job.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 03/10/2008

Ooops - I noticed a major typo in my post...meant to say that Corporations are not contrained by regulation the way the fearmongers in the Republican party indicate but regulation can constrain greed. Can you edit a post once it's up??

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 03/10/2008

I accidently posted something that was totally unedited. I then posted a request to the moderator to delete it after which posted the edited version. I guess it works (see below.)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 03/13/2008

You couldn't possibly have heard Ann Richardson say anything about McCain - she was governor of TX only from 1991-1995 (a Democrat defeated by W in her 1994 bid for re-election), and she died in 2006. The current governor of TX is Rick Perry, a Republican (and a man). There are currently 8 female governors - 5 Democrats (DE, MI, AZ, KS, WA) and 3 Republicans (HI, CT, AK), so perhaps you heard one of them instead? My guess is that the comment was by Janet Napolitano, the Democratic governor from Arizona, McCain's home state ... Cindy

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 03/10/2008

The Neoconservatives replaced one bubble based economy by another. After the Internet bubble burst the Federal Reserve Board lowered the interest rates and soon the reckless and in some cases fraudulent investing took off like starving immigrant framers at a land rush. Anybody who asked "what happens if interest rates go up and all those loans readjust upward?" was treated like a Pollyanna at best. So now the inevitable has happened and the bubble has burst and the Neoconservatives do things best likened to shamen shaking rattles and chanting. Therefore, it's time to ask where must our nation go? Will we let ourselfs be cast to the side and help empower those who would strip us of our prosperity or will we unite and act with reason. Those who benefitted in the long run from these bubble economies were at the very top of them. Such people by in large encourage such economic turbulence for much the same reason that a whale blows a ring of bubbles to concentrate its prey. While the strings of power that manipulate our government, like so many puppets, lie in the hands of these people and not the general citezen our nation will falter and stumble to the tune of their jingling purses.

We must amend the constitution to utterly remove money from politics. This must be made to outweigh the first amendment.

We must amend the constitution to forbid the concentration of the media and ownership of the media by corporations that have other large holdings or interests.

I know we should not lightly amend this document but in times of great need, like now, men with wisdom and foresight, but not power or vested interests, should be chartered with the delicate task of amending our treasured constitution.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 AM on 03/10/2008

This is a series worth reading:

http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/

It will take some time but all the dots are connected.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 03/09/2008

Sundial. I can commisserate with you on your experiences with our despicable banking swindling bunch. I switched banks recently and this regional bank sent me 3 sets of credit' checking cards which I promptly destroyed. Then I received a phone call from one of the minion vice presidents about my failure to open the card account,.. I told him in no uncertain terms that I didn't want their damned cards.
Now I am finding problems of recording and accounting that always are mistakes against my account. Dishonest business practices are a pattern that only an inattentive, trusting customer could overlook.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 PM on 03/09/2008

Either of these candidates would be great, we all know this.
And actually, we all know that we should be keeping the rethugs under pressure for their stupidity and mismanagement of our nation.
There are so many things that need to be said very vociferously right now, keeping these rightwing jerks on the defensive where they belong. OK , here's a real good one:

For instance, the fact we all know and know too well that had Al Gore won, or been allowed to win in 2000 the price of gas would now and still be probably no more then 1.50 at the most !!!!
There's no way it would be more then that, with the fact that Gore would have made automakers give us cars with better MPG, and strongly stressed better and other alternative forms of energy, making OPEC work harder and have to compete more for the business.. Also, he would not be afraid to take the oil companies to task to work with us better, rather then be a president who looks the other way whenever he is asked to!!!!

Why isn't this argument being expressed, over and over and over, until it has become a MANTRA on the daily news???????????

SO WHAT if they say that's impossible to state? SO WHAT if they say you are "full of it because no one has a RIGHT to say such a thing????" SO WHAT!!!!!

This is the way people need to be made to think!! This is what gets there attention!! the CONTROVERSIAL STATEMENTS THAT PISS EVERYBODY OFF SO BAD WHEN IT AFFECTS THEM!!!

Come on, people... I cant think of anyone better who deserve to be questioned and treated controversially then Bush, Cheney, and all the rethugs, after all they have done to this nation.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 03/09/2008

The critics of our economic policy commonly write superfical analyses of an economuy that is fundamentally flawed and can not survive without pump primping through government borrowing and spending. None of the critics mention trade deficit and the influw of foreign goods and services that are destroying the middle class. Mercantelistic trade, euphemistic called "free trade" is sacroscant and can not be discussed except through praise and unquestioning adulation.
If I did not know better, I would deduce our economic policies as being conducted by inmates in an insane asylum and the custodians as cheerleaders.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 03/09/2008

I can see the truth in ... a bank's annual report. A recent national bank cited $14 BILLION in income from "fees and penalties." Are its account-holders really that careless? Or could it be that the bank has figured out how to program its computers to tender transactions in the way that you supposedly "agreed to," namely that transactions will be posted in the manner most favorable to the BANK?

I can see the truth in ... credit reporting. You never know when someone "dings" your credit rating; you have no recourse. But the worse your score is, the more money a financial institution can make from you. Run your credit-score lately? Surprised? Uh huh... and you think you're alone?

I can see the truth in title-pawn and cash-advance stores even in middle-class places, charging nine THOUSAND percent interest.

I can see the truth in credit interest-rates that jump from 6% to 35% overnight for no reason and again with no recourse.

I can see the truth when I post a payment online on Tuesday, with a receipt showing the Bank's own timestamp... and the payment magically doesn't post until Saturday after $135 of "fees and penalties" are levied. I protest and it disappears. But how many people neither protest, nor know?

Oh, the list goes on and on ... and it's all fraud ... all swindling ... and yet when you look at other pages on that annual-report (always read 'em starting from the back page) you still find that the bank's teetering on the edge of non-existence.

When an entire national economy is massively looted from the top down, and an endless series of shell games are run to try to make everything look rosy and "we'll have oh so much fun as a consumer economy," the first(!) thing to do is to make sure that the criminals responsible don't make it to the end of their terms without impeachment and prosecution. Then, start reversing sixty years of neglect. "Rosie the Riveter" is still around here someplace... and so is "Uncle Sam."

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 03/09/2008

It easy to assume that the Oligarchs who run this country are so greedy that they act blindly and stupidly. Maybe it is no accident that our figurehead president is, in fact, a moron. However, I assume that they ( the Oligarchs), including Greenspan, Bernanke, George 1st, and Cheney (but with a large cast of billionaires), know exactly what they are doing. It is Noami Klein's Shock Doctrine applied to the good, ole USA. Good bye middle class - hello flop houses and sweat shops.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 03/09/2008

Absolutely no accident...you know what I think about accidents.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 AM on 03/10/2008

Right you are, El, this was not an accident!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 AM on 03/10/2008

Criminal and financial retribution is the solution. Pay for their criminal lending and gambling practices and Rigging the market towards Corp profit margins. Not just your Countrywide etal Big whigs- but those who have staffed the Private Banking firm , intentionally deceivingly named the Federal Reserve.
Institutional High Rollers- and We are their Bank Roll, with Our Futures stashed in their back pockets for 'emergencies' to stay in the 'game'. they borrow money claiming we are co signing, charge US interest on the loans they have taken out or send Guido our way to pay with OUR flesh- We take th eBeating no matter what happens. No more protecting their asses, no more WE OWE YOU-
they Owe US, so well take it all back, along with the pound of flesh you owe! High Crimes, Treason!
Since 1934 we have been Betrayed.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 03/09/2008

Is there an inference in this article that the $45 trillion+ total combined debt wasn't the principal factor devolving into the current state of affairs?

Time to reverse the trend ...

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/02/rebounding-us-economy.html

Start with Iraq.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 AM on 03/09/2008

No, actually Bill Clinton "set the stage" for this disaster. The financial industry was deregulated on his watch and we shouldn't for a minute forget that.

He also gave us NAFTA, the WTO, PNTR for China and media conglomeration. All Shrub and His Thugs had to do for the situation to ripen was add a needless "war" and further tax cuts for grillionaires.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 03/08/2008

DID YOU MISS THE ENTIRE REGEAN ERA??????????

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 03/11/2008

Tsk! How can everyone have forgotten? Everything, by definition, is Clinton's fault! Today's suck economy? Clinton! The fact that the US has the highest per capiota healthcare costs in the world? Clinton! The tendency of Internet Explorer to freeze up, just when I have drafted yet another incredibly insightful and brilliant diatribe to post to HuffPo comments? Clinton! The heartbreak of psoriasis? Clinton!

At least ... that's what I've been told. ;-)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 03/10/2008

glitzqueen:
You are either a shill(paid) or a nitwit! Deregulation started with James Earl Carter and was the beauty queen of the Reagan administration. Remember usury? Remember the Glass Steagal limits that prohibited interstate branching? Remember the Federal limits on the payment of interest on deposits e.g. 7.25% int for 36 month certificates of deposit???
Can you name for us one single element of financial deregulation that was put into the rule - book by Slick Willie? Wasn't he subject to a Republican Congress for the majority of his administration?
We're all ears, there, glitzqueen. Please edify us.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 03/09/2008

Henry, my friend, surely you are aware of the GLBA...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 03/10/2008

Can you tell me how Clinton deregulated the financial industry. Exactly how does one person do this? Did he create NAFTA or did he go along with the Republicans for political aims? I am confused as the man hasn't been in office for 8 years. To reach back and place blame on this mess solely on him seems a reach. Greenspan and the Fed is to blame and it should be abolished and replaced with an accountable agency. We should not have the bankers making the rules. The Fed is not elected and they work unilaterally. Read The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve.

http://www.amazon.com/Creature-Jekyll-Island-Federal-Reserve/dp/0912986212

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:06 AM on 03/09/2008

msjennifer, the two biggest players in the deregulation of the financial industry were Alan Greenspan, the architect of the so-called mortgage meltdown and the head of the Fed under Clinton; and Sandy Weill--

Sandy Weill's creation of Citigroup -- the first so-called "superbank" -- and his successful lobbying for repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act that stood in his way, was a demonstration of Weill's and Wall Street's political muscle. Citigroup, formed by the 1998 merger of Travelers and Citicorp, is the biggest financial institution in the world, combining one of the largest insurance companies (Travelers), one of the largest investment banks (Salomon Smith Barney), and the largest commercial bank (Citibank) in America. But before it could come together, Travelers CEO Sanford I. Weill, who had proposed the merger to Citicorp's John Reed, had to overcome one major obstacle: the historic Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which in the wake of the 1929 crash had prohibited commercial banks from underwriting securities. The law, still on the books in 1998 but weakened over the years, separated investment banking from commercial banking in order to prevent conflicts of interest and protect investors.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 AM on 03/10/2008

"Can you tell me how Clinton deregulated the financial industry. Exactly how does one person do this? Did he create NAFTA or did he go along with the Republicans for political aims?"

Yes, I would love to, Ms. Jenn. Yes, he did create NAFTA. While Bush 1st started the ball rolling, Bubba signed it. But most importantly, he signed the repeal of the Glass - Steagall Act of 1933, which FDR instituted so that combo investment bank speculators could not pose as commercial banks. This abuse was more responsible for the Great Depression than any other factor. And Bubba then sent the signing pen as a gift to billionaire Sandy Weill, CEO of CitiGroup. Exhibit A. This signing will probably go down in history as the primary cause of the Great Depression 0f 2008.

Gore Vidal had it right when he described the USA political system as one party with two right wings. Or to put it another way, two sets of pigs feeding from the same trough.

For more information see:

http://www.progressivehistorians.com/2007/11/bill-clintons-role-in-mortgage-crisis.html

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 03/09/2008

And, El, he also deregulated the Media which has led to the controlled information we receive today and made it easier for Bush to install his fascist state. Additionally he signed off on the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 (?) which cut food programs for the 70% of people on welfare--Kids! Compassionate Conservatism.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 03/10/2008

Is our childrens learning, yet??

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 03/10/2008

Thank you. I did some research and had no idea about the Glass-Steagall Act being repealed. Makes me wonder what rock I was living under in 1999. I really was a lightweight and probably still am. I am very discouraged with the choices and agree with Gore Vidal who I admire. Thank you for responding.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 03/09/2008

Glass-Steagall Act was repealed by Clinton with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act signed in 1999. Extremely helpful of Bill to set the stage for what we have today.

Bill also signed legislation to deregulate the wall between Investment banking and stock analysis directly leading to the dot.com implosion wrecking $7 trillion of investors equity..He did that number on America around 1995.

Clintons and Bush are flip sides of a corrupt to the bone coin.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 03/20/2008

Nobody in Washington DC or elsewhere in the country gave a crap after my and a bunch of other peoples layoffs and simultaneous massive outsourcing of jobs in my profession in 2001. I escaped barely the the burden of my mortgage, but now it's coming back around for a bunch of other people....take a taste of the bitter medicine of free trade folks...the conditions are worse this time and no good jobs are coming back...I know this because the globalists said they aren't coming back.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 03/08/2008

I love how the one rule of the neocon gov't is that the gov't can't do anything right, and is inefficient. Thus to prove themselves right, they cut funding to the gov't, which causes it to be wrong more often, and inefficient, which proves the point, and thus we need less gov't!!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 03/08/2008

The only question that remains to be answered is whether we'll refer to the living arrangements the newly evicted will be driven to are called "Bushvilles" or "McCainvilles," in keeping with the famous "Hoovervilles" that dotted the land during another of our "periodic downturns."

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 03/08/2008