Employment was up 120,000 last month and the unemployment rate dropped significantly, to 8.6% in November down from 9% in October. Job growth in October and September was revised up by 72,000.
While the employment story has improved over the past few months, the decline in the November unemployment rate isn't as good as it sounds. People who drop out of the labor force, like those who give up looking for work, are not counted in the jobless rate, and about half of the 0.4 percentage point decline was due to this factor. In fact, about 190,000 of the unemployed left the labor force last month.
Once again, the private sector added jobs -- 140,000 last month -- and the public sector cut them (down 20,000).
The report is consistent with slightly better economic performance over the past few months. It's always useful to average over a few months to work out some of the monthly noise in the data and over the past three months, employment is up by an average of about 140,000 per month, compared to 84,000 over the prior three months.
But there's still a great deal of slack in the job market. Average weekly hours worked didn't budge and hourly wages ticked down slightly -- over the past year, hourly earnings, before inflation, are up 1.8%, well behind inflation.
In other words, we're a long way away from providing job seekers and workers with the job and wage increases they need to get ahead. Outside of the public sector, we're at least moving in the right direction, but very slowly.
Update: Why did the labor force decline? Well, first we should loudly establish the monthly caveat; there's a lot of noise in the monthly data so we shouldn't read too much into any one month.
That said, the labor force 315,000 last month and that explains about half of the large and unexpected decline in the jobless rate. We can get a better feel for the dynamics at play here if we consider the components of the monthly flows behind this drop.
The labor force is the sum of the employed and the unemployed from the BLS Household survey. Last month the labor force count was 153.9 million, the sum of 140.6m employed and 13.3m unemployed.
About 55% of the decline in the labor force last month was people giving up looking for work, meaning they are no longer classified as unemployed by the BLS -- they're out of the labor force. The rest were employed people who went from working to neither working nor looking for a job. Some of those may have gotten laid off and decided not to try to find another job yet. Others may just be retiring or taking some time out of work -- we don't know how those shares distribute.
The figure shows the long term trend of the share of the population in the labor force (aka the labor force participation rate, LFPR -- this is from the invaluable FRED database but it doesn't have the Nov data in it yet, which ticks down from 64.2% to 64%). Note that in the 1990s recovery the LFPR slid in the recession and then grew in the recovery. That didn't happen in the 2000s and it's not happening now.
While some of this is demographics -- boomers aging out of the workforce -- the big story is weak labor demand. Remember, employment was up a measly 4% over the 2000s business cycle and tanked thereafter.
Other bullets from the report:
- Retail employment posted a big gain, up about 50K, perhaps reflecting stronger buying than expected so far this season. (Reminder: these numbers are seasonally adjusted, so that's 50K more jobs than you'd expect just based on seasonal hiring.)
This post originally appeared at Jared Bernstein's On The Economy blog.