iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jared Bernstein

Jared Bernstein

Posted: February 8, 2010 03:29 PM

Where We Are and Where We Were

What's Your Reaction:

Along with a massive snowstorm, Friday brought a blizzard of new info on the job market. From the perspective of our work at the White House, two points stand out, one about where we are and the other about where we've been.

First, while there are encouraging signs regarding jobs, they are early signs and must be viewed with care. The job market is clearly doing better than it was but the level of unemployment is miles north of where it needs to be. Unemployment fell significantly last month, which is good, but a) it's a one-month data point and not yet a new trend, and b) it fell from 10% to 9.7%, and that's still an unacceptably high rate of joblessness.

Second, today's data release has new, revised information on just how bad this recession has been in the job market. The chart below is worth a lot of words.

The chart plots the course of payroll employment over the last four recessions, including this one. In each case, we index jobs at the start of the recession to 100%, and the x-axis shows the number of months from when the recession began.

By setting it up this way, you get a lot of useful, comparative information across different downturns. For example, you see how much longer it took to regain the lost jobs in the 1990 and 2001 recession compared to the 1981 version.

But the main point is how severe this recession has been on job loss. There are two lines in the graph for the current recession because last week's data provided a revision based on more complete data. We knew it was bad, but it turned out to be even worse. We thought we were losing an unprecedented 690,000 jobs per month in the first quarter of last year. It turned out to be 750,000. In the four months between December 2008 and March 2009, we lost more jobs than during the last two recessions combined.

That's where we were. Where we are, as noted, is better but not good enough. Last month, we lost 20,000 jobs and that's not an outlier -- it's another data point in an improving trend moving towards net job gains, which we expect to be seeing in a few months. But the job market won't be in recovery until those small negatives turn into big positives.

2010-02-08-payroll_comprison_2810.JPG

Here's what comes out of all this: our policies, most notably the Recovery Act, have helped move us from a situation where we were losing a nightmarish 750,000 jobs per month to one in which we've pulled back from the economic abyss and are moving a lot closer to adding jobs, on net, on a regular basis. But we can't kick back and wait for that moment. There's too much pain out there, too many families struggling with a job market that's simply not providing the opportunities they need to get back on their feet.

So we have to hasten the arrival of more robust job growth with a set of initiatives targeted at the factors holding back job creation. The House passed a targeted jobs bill in December that included some of these priorities, including upgrading transportation and infrastructure, and aid to states to keep teachers, cops, and firefighters on the job. The Senate's actively working on proposals with some of those same components.

Last week the President announced an initiative to help credit flow more freely to small businesses that want to expand their operations and payrolls but can't access the capital. Both the President and Congress have been working on a new hiring tax credit targeted at the business owner who is considering adding workers but needs a nudge (and you can see employers dipping their toes in the labor pool -- temp work has increased in each of the past four months).

Another idea in the mix right now is investment in infrastructure to help offset the continuing job losses in construction, a sector that took another big hit last month. And another is help to state and local governments facing tight budget squeezes and the resultant layoffs in folks like teachers, down 10,500 last month at the local level.

GDP is growing and growing pretty solidly. The employment data show employers cutting a lot less but not yet adding a lot more. Unemployment moved in the right direction last month, and we need to build on that positive movement.

But as the figure above shows so clearly, we've got a huge hole to fill. That hole wasn't dug overnight, and it's going to take some time and some smart, targeted policies, to fill it up. Now there's a shovel-ready project worth taking on.

Originally published at WhiteHouse.gov.

Jared Bernstein is Chief Economist to Vice President Biden, and Executive Director of the Middle Class Task Force.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:18 AM on 02/14/2010
Things are better people, we have a chart that proves it!

Oh and the counter party payouts via AIG will mean our taxes will be going up and social security payouts will be coming to an end so the bankers can make their numbers this quarter (and every quarter going forward) so they can "earn" the big bonus.

The tea party guys are mostly crazy (where were they during the Bush years?) but they will get some traction in the coming years as the fatal damage to the middle class economy becomes clear as our standard of living declines even more (the middle class is at best treading water)

President Obama says he helped save the nation's economy from going over a cliff when all he did was join Bush in cooking the books and good. It will be years before we know what the hell happen.

The Republicans have succeeded in ending the the FDR reforms, and the middle class will soon be the working poor, just like the good old days.
11:52 PM on 02/13/2010
Seeds of our decline have been planted over the last decade and before. These seeds continue to be planted today, while we ignore the results of what was sowed. Half the marriages end in divorce. About 60% of babies are born today to unwed mothers. Half the children drop out of school; and an additional 25% drop out of college before graduation. These are the results after spending billions on high school and undergraduate education.

Senior citizens die in hospitals and nursing homes (raising the cost of health-care); because their children refuse to care for them at their home in their dying days. Yet everybody is ready to sue at the drop of a hat ... because we have a right and contingency fee legal system in cahoots with judges.

The leaders in politics (both political parties and at all levels of govt.), and various sectors of business, finance, industry, education, media, health-care, etc, are only interested in their own selfish well-being; while robbing society and the country of billions of dollars in assets.

We have to stop the hype and self-glorification. Let us start accepting the facts and speaking the truth. Spin has gotten us no where. America continues to live high on the hog; with the expectations that the sky is the limit and America is a rich country.
11:33 PM on 02/09/2010
The unemployment rate in January only fell from 10.0% to 9.7% on a seasonally adjusted basis. On a non-seasonally adjusted basis the unemployment rate increased from 9.7% in December to 10.6% in January. Most people don't realize that every year in January there is a large net loss of jobs as workers hired for the holidays are released, and that the Household and Establishment surveys adjust upwards the January numbers every year to iron out that seasonal noise. Conversely, there are some months during the year where the job numbers are adjusted downward because there is more hiring in that month every year than in other months (like in March). This year the BLS added 1.9 million imaginary jobs to the January total.

What is most important to note about the current seasonally adjusted unemployment rate is that in March and April the adjustments will subtract jobs, so if the total number of jobs simply flat line from now until April, then the unemployment rate should approach 11% on a seasonally adjusted basis.
09:38 AM on 02/10/2010
Another important issue is that the seasonal adjustments in recent months have been seriously flawed. This is because the BLS models considered the huge economic downdraft in late 2008 and early 2009 to be normal seasonal patterns. As a result of that, the BLS added 1.9 million jobs to the January seasonal adjustment. That is 850,000 more jobs than were added to the January 2008 seasonal adjustments. In fact, the most jobs in the past decade added per the adjustment in January were in 2003 and 2004 when about 640,000 less jobs were added. The seasonally adjusted weekly initial unemployment claims numbers show similar distortions as the reported numbers are showing the job market to be much better than it really is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aneesia
04:43 PM on 02/09/2010
I wouldn't laud the governments policies.
This recovery is based upon government debt. The others were based on increasing production without massive government stimuli.
There has been a precipitous drop in production since then. With production being sent overseas for lower wages using the "Global Economy" as an excuse...telling the American People that this was good for the middle class.
Until Congress gets out of bed with Corporations (quits accepting bribes), and returns much of the overseas production to the USA there will be no long term recovery.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alex61
02:41 PM on 02/09/2010
Everyone, even liberal economists, knows that the economy runs in cycles. Things are good, for awhile, they get bad, hit bottom, level out , and then start start to improve. It matters not what government does; the cycles are inevitable.
The Democrats blame all the bad part on Republicans, (Bush in particular) and then try to take credit for anything that is good when the cycle starts to improve.
TARP, which came out of the Bush administration, probably did prevent further catastrophy. Obama's stimulus bill's effect is more open to interpretation.
It's funny; no matter how much power the Dems have, they are never responsible for problems. However, if things improve, the Dems are right there to try to take all the credit. It goes to the nature of the liberal mentality; they are never responsible for anything bad. All the problems are someone else's fault. This is immature in the extreme.
Jazzcomedian
An easy going responsible bohemian
01:31 PM on 02/09/2010
This is a global financial calamity. Our troubles are not happening in a vacuum. The world is in uncharted financial and economic waters. Except that the European countries have better safety nets for events like this, than we do. And nobody knows for certain the answer as to what will be the catalyst to pull us out of this hole. Nobody on the left or right. Nobody in America or Europe. They are all guessing.

The government and the FED only have fiscal and monetary policy weapons to address the economy, and they are just about out of bullets. The private sector has run for the hills, even though in my opinion it was the private sector that created this calamity by abusing and showing the folly of a deregulatory environment of the financial sector. Bankers, investment banks, mortgage brokers, real estate brokers, borrowers--private sector all--all ran amok. It was "Deadwood capitalism.""

The good news is that the world with the exception of a few is just as screwed as we are. The world has suffered an 7.0 economic earthquake with our AAA rated sub-prime mortgages as the epicenter. The digging out will be slow--no matter what the government does. Significant job creation is way down the line.
12:38 PM on 02/09/2010
I can hardly believe my eyes, but comments to this story seem positively fiscally conservative -- almost libertarian -- by HuffPo standards. That's a remarkable on the political mood of the country, if you take this microcosm to mean anything. Bravo, skeptics of government action on every ill.

Bernstein assumes the hackneyed "voice of technocratic reason" regarding unemployent: "We have a long way to go, but we're doing better, thanks to us." Right. We have all sorts of faith in you after learning the number crunchers in the BLS missed the job-loss estimate by about 250K, or about 10%, in the first quarter of last year. Let's run out and devise multi-billion government fixes based on our faulty understanding of what's going on. When the stimulus ends up costing another $80 billion or so in extended unemployment insurance and food stamps, we'll just have the Fed print more money. The private sector -- what's the private sector? Carpe crisis!
11:42 AM on 02/09/2010
ARE YOU KIDDING ME!

The only reason the unemployment number dropped is because hundreds of thousands of Americans simply fell of the grid! They didn't get a job. They just aren't being counted anymore and the 10% unemployment number is reduced by their "loss"

This is everything we need to know about how seriously the Obama administration is tackling unemployment. Statistical tricks and the blame game.

Earth to Mr. Bernstein: Those hundreds of thousands of dropped unemployed? - they're still out there!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CAPTAINSKIPPY
from the Far side of Frostbite Falls
10:40 AM on 02/09/2010
Guess we should be grateful for the invention of "fuzzy math". Taken separately, the post is quite scary, as are the comments. Taken together, we're going to need a lot more hope and lots more change.
10:33 AM on 02/09/2010
I am not an economist. I look around and just ask, "Is this working?" What we cannot know is what would have happened if we had done nothing.
Right now, it looks like those countries that did not spend are in better shape than those, like us, that spend foolishly and massively!

I am beginning to believe that Obama's cure for this is to prolong it, and leave us in a worse situation. There are worse things than a recession, let's hope we arent going to find out just what that is!
10:59 AM on 02/09/2010
You are exactly right! The only thing government can really do to hasten a recovery, is to inspire confidence in the private sector. The private sector takes the risks necessary to create jobs.

Sadly, Obama's big spending, anti-business, anti-capitalism approach scares the heck out of the private sector.
08:02 PM on 02/09/2010
You only have to look at the graph in the piece above to see you're right. Look how quickly jobs came back in 1981 after Ronald Reagan had Fed Chief Paul Volcker reverse the Carter plan and stop printing money,.and force the country into a steep downturn rather than trying to "ease the pain" (as Obama is doing now} and really just prolonging it for years. The private sector worked it out and came roaring back without massive stimulus programs.
10:30 AM on 02/09/2010
Some kind of economist's joke? You referencing the GNP as it pertain to jobs. Since the GNP is driven from everything from consumer demand to hedge fund managers shorting stocks, it is not a very good indicator of what is happening in America. Did you forget to mention that the Bush administration offered incentives to companies to push jobs overseas and if that was not enough, the stock market would penalize you if you did not outsource. An analogy for you on creating jobs by tax incentives to corporations without changing any other rules. Chasing a bucket down a roof, you can't catch the bucket and you eventually fall off the roof trying.
09:44 AM on 02/09/2010
The graph makes it very clear that the tax cuts used in 1981, 1990, and 2001 to fight recession, were much more effective than Obama's spending approach.

People are right to criticize Bush for overspending, but Obama has increased spending by a $Trillion dollars over Bush's last budget. That 33% increase in spending scares the heck out of the risk takers and job creators.
10:25 AM on 02/09/2010
Yeah, that extra ten-buck tax break last year sure helped me.
photo
x76
HELP HELP I'VE BEEN BANNED
09:32 AM on 02/09/2010
I'm really sick of spin from the Democrats -- Obama has been an unthinkable lemon, the economy is still crashing (LOOK at the amount of empty office space around) and, worst of all, the US is still butt-deep in two wars of conquest with NO PROSECUTIONS FOR BUSH43/CHENEY??!!

The GOP is like a pack of cavemen, but the Democrats are like that "Nowhere Man" character from the Beatles' "Yellow Submarine" -- an ineffectual, disconnected twit.

1. Get OUT of Iraq and Afghanistan
2. Tell Israel NO, Iran will NOT be attacked, Iran has broken no treaty nor law
3. INVESTIGATE 9/11 because the official story stinks to high Heaven
4. Hang every man in a suit in Goldman Sachs and the Treasury Department. A mass public execution. Then implement Glass-Steagal II.
5. Prosecute Bush43/Cheney/Rumsfeld et al for stark war crimes -- torture is illegal under ANY circumstances

Oh, and it would be nice if the US stopped rewarding corporations which offshore US jobs with tax breaks. If you sell it here, you'd better MAKE it here.
07:48 AM on 02/09/2010
Fake numbers due in part to the errors in how the BLS "assumes" too many things. Wait a month or two and the data will change for the worse, especially unemployment. You can only spin things so far.

TrimTabs uses actual tax receipts data, and shows a total increase of 1.1 million of people that stopped looking for work. If that was included in the latest .gov figures, it would have looked much worse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mikegriffith
Non-partisan Independent
07:35 AM on 02/09/2010
Hundreds of economists argue that we'd be in better shape if the government had not spent hundreds of billions of borrowed dollars on Keynesian stimulus measures, had not bailed out corrupt banks (with more borrowed money), had not tripled the deficit, had not added nearly $2 trillion to the national debt, had not increased spending by some 20%, and if we had instead cut taxes and cut spending even more.
09:00 AM on 02/09/2010
Please name some of these economists. Can we see a list of their peer reviewed writings?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:39 AM on 02/09/2010
Of course. Unfortunately, we still have hundreds of millions of Americans who literally think that the federal government has some sort of magic box filled with infinite amounts of money, that all one needs to do is to say, "This problem should be fixed!" and funds will be happily plucked from the magic box and sprinkled over the problem. And don't ask me where I was during the Bush years--I was voting for Ron Paul. But you all knew better. LOL...good luck!