iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Jason Flom
 

Can the Music Industry Help Reduce Overdose Deaths?

Posted: 08/24/11 10:01 AM ET

After decades in the music industry, I've seen just about everything there is to see. I've seen talented people become superstars in a matter of weeks, and the joys and thrills of sudden fame.

But great talent often comes with great struggle, and the intensely private pain of not knowing how to cope with all of fame's demands. Many of my closest friends have struggled with drug addiction over the years. Some have worked through it and survived, but others weren't as
lucky. I've lived through decades of this -- decades of rehabs, decades of relapse, decades of the life-changing grief that comes when someone you love dies from an overdose.

I'm writing in hopes of shining a light on the problem of overdose and some solutions that can save lives.

Every year, on August 31st, people around the world join together on International Overdose Awareness Day to recognize the pain and loss associated with overdose, and to call for policy changes that will save lives.

Drug overdose, of course, isn't unique to the entertainment industry. It happens everywhere, to all kinds of people, and it's been getting a lot worse in recent years. In 2007, the last year for which data is available, more than 28,000 people died from an accidental drug overdose in America. That's the highest number of accidental overdose deaths ever -- and more than twice as many as just a decade ago.

More people now die from accidental drug overdose than from HIV/AIDS. Drug overdose is now the number one cause of accidental death for Americans between the ages of 35 and 54; and in 17 states, it is the leading overall cause of accidental death, now ending more lives than even car accidents.

That's completely unacceptable. And it's stunning that so few people even know about this. This issue needs to be addressed by the public and by policymakers, but it rarely is.

We all know why, and it's an ugly elephant in the room. But we need to say it, and start talking about it. The truth is, people don't like to talk about overdose because it's so easy and convenient to blame the victim, to blame the person who accidentally died.

The chorus of "Take no pity!" that rang out in the days following the death of Amy Winehouse was a real eye-opener for me. The typical response to drug use, of any kind, is to condemn the person who does it. All compassion is routinely discarded, and drug use is considered a moral failing.

We barely know how to have a rational conversation about drugs in this country, so it's no surprise that we don't really yet understand how to talk about overdose. It's why August 31st is so important. Perhaps the most important function of International Overdose Awareness Day is just to get people to start talking about it -- not just how we feel about it and how we suffer when it happens, but how we can prevent it from ever happening again.

The sad news -- and the hopeful news -- is that most of these deaths are easily preventable. The solutions are no mystery, and two in particular I believe to stand out as no-brainers.

The first is expanding access to naloxone -- a cheap, non-narcotic, generic drug proven to reverse the effects of opiate overdose and restore breathing. By simply expanding access to it I believe we can prevent thousands of deaths each year.

The other is passing "911 Good Samaritan" laws. Overdose witnesses are usually scared to call for help because they, or the victim themselves, frequently face arrest for possessing small amounts of drugs. New York State just became the fourth state to pass a law that allows people to call 911 when witnessing an overdose without fear of prosecution. This life-saving law should be replicated across the country.

We cannot forget the lives that have been lost, nor can we allow this catastrophe to continue. I'm calling on radio stations everywhere to help spread the word on International Overdose Awareness Day by playing music created by bands that have lost a member to a drug overdose, like Sublime, Blind Melon, Hole, Alice in Chains, the Red Hot Chili Peppers and the Ramones. Music by legends like Jim Morrison and Janis Joplin. I hope that the radio stations will mention Overdose Awareness Day and to give out the website www.drugpolicy.org/overdose so listeners can learn more about how to reduce overdose deaths.

We hope people reading this column will call their radio stations and let them know about Overdose Awareness Day and request songs in remembrance of musicians we have lost. People can also play these artists music on their iPods, in their offices or homes and talk to their friends about the problem of overdose and the easy ways we could be addressing the problem right now.

Overdose has been in the news a lot lately. We don't know how Jani Lane of Warrant died. We don't know how Amy Winehouse died. It would be tragic if they turn out to be the next two talented musicians we've lost to something so preventable. We can't bring them back. But we can save a lot of lives by educating people how to prevent, recognize and respond to an overdose -- and simply by talking about it.

 
After decades in the music industry, I've seen just about everything there is to see. I've seen talented people become superstars in a matter of weeks, and the joys and thrills of sudden fame. But gr...
After decades in the music industry, I've seen just about everything there is to see. I've seen talented people become superstars in a matter of weeks, and the joys and thrills of sudden fame. But gr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:27 PM on 08/31/2011
Like asking the adult film industry to stop the spread of STDs.
11:15 PM on 08/26/2011
what music industry?
09:03 PM on 08/24/2011
We may not know precisely how Amy Winehouse died, but we DO know it was NOT an overdose! Toxicology is back and the news was reported yesterday. Try staying current if you're going to blog where people are reading.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theveggiedude
my body is a temple, not a living graveyard
02:20 AM on 08/27/2011
The verdict is still not in for alcohol.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:05 PM on 08/24/2011
When you say the word addiction, most relate to the more accepted forms of addiction.
Drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, all of the other chemical substances which have become a mainstay focus of the mass myopic, fact finders.
But back up a moment. There is a much more sinister addiction which hits you where you live and challenges you to refuse it's seductive grasp. The horrific grasp over it's victims are legendary.

It's mystifying, secretive, repetitive charms, entice you to eagerly consume it's wonder.
It promises to complete you and allows you power over others under certain terms.
It is an older tradition of escapism, and is easily pandered and scored, even right out in the open.
But, this seductive, highly addictive, rhythmic, psycho-drug, must be consumed in a most unusual way, and it's usage, will remain as an addiction to be consumed faithfully, without fail,daily.
.
But for the unrelenting, daily, ritualistic, usage, and after you accept the innately infused iconic lexicon substance, it's enigmatic canon, grants you an acceptance, and a strong feeling of belonging, and a willingness to merge as if to be seductively, as one.
Yet if you figure it out, it will absolutely abandon you.
The repetitive nature of this systematic venture is mind numbingly stimulating, with all of its monotone chanting rituals and it is very sadly, highly habit forming. Religion is it's street name.
It sells for the knowledge of truth to trust, and it requires blind faith to observe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Titanshanks
Back for more
05:45 PM on 08/24/2011
Too many people see addiction and dangerous drug use in black and white terms. It is completely possible to hold a person responsible for their actions and still give them resources and support. I'd like to see drug problems regarded much more as a medical issue, and less as a moral issue. Unfortunately, I think AA plays an unhelpful role in blurring these lines with their heavily moralistic strategy for overcoming addiction.

SMART Recovery does excellent work.
04:16 PM on 08/25/2011
I must totally agree with you , But what Americans do not see is drug use as a medical problem , and more as a moral issue, I have had a family member die of cancer, I have had a family member die of heart disease. I have had a son die of heroin overdose. My point is it is all a DISEASE, no difference. Unfortunately you see that where many americans do not ,,,
05:05 PM on 08/24/2011
Thanks for your very thoughtful piece, Mr. Flom. Rational, compassionate, wise. You'll always be one of my favorite label guys, and this is an excellent example of why that is..
04:20 PM on 08/24/2011
All these years later and "Behind The Music" still hasn't taught people a darn thing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Droid Noir
Graphic Designer, Writer.
03:04 PM on 08/24/2011
It seems to me the you have answered the question, "Can the Music Industry Help Reduce Overdose Deaths?", by asking people to request songs on the radio and to spread the word about Overdose Awareness Day, fine, but what does that have to do with the "Music Industry" or maybe I'm the one whose mistaken?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:06 PM on 08/24/2011
There are 79,000 alcohol poisonings, I mean overdoses, per year. Illegal drugs account for around 17,000 overdose deaths per year. Marijuana, zero. You can't see the whole picture if you focus on the part you want to see. It is my opinion that education and access to pure measured doses, or possibly safer alternatives, would go farthest in reducing overdose deaths. Naloxone is a no-brainer, but it only works when the damage is done.
12:16 PM on 08/24/2011
I agree we need to pass good samaritan overdose laws. The last thing we need is people who are to scared to take someone to a hospital. That and we need to treat addiction like a disease and not a crime.
11:43 AM on 08/24/2011
Winehouse did not die of an overdose, her picture should be removed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:36 AM on 08/24/2011
The music business needs to treat drug use like any other industry in this country. Music contracts should be dependant of drug testing and no contract should be signed unless the musician was verified to be drug free. By cutting off the funds to musicians the drug use would be eliminated as well.
11:39 PM on 08/30/2011
The terms "drug free" and "drugs don't work" are misnomers. "Drug-free" workplaces are full of drug-users, and drug-users work all the time--the only thing that doesn't work is drug testing, and that is not free. Drug testing is not only an unacceptable violation of a person's intimate privacy, but has been proven time and time again to be both inaccurate and ineffectual even when conducted by "trained" lab techs. Do some reading on the subject that isn't funded or conducted by the testing industry, because all unbiased studies have shown this. It does not test for actual impairment, but for metabolytes in the bodily fluids that occur after the body had metabolyzed a substance, and those metabolytes are shared by many over-the-counter drugs (like cough meds) or foods (like poppy seeds). False positives and negatives abound and as a result, drug-users DO work all the time while innocent victims of a false positive (and people like me with strong principles who refuse to submit to violations of their rights) are denied work, fired, have their kids taken away, etc.
11:40 PM on 08/30/2011
My mother was talking about this at her own workplace and some stupid coworker said "well, your son works in a warehouse, how would your daughter feel if they didn't test and someone came in stoned and killed her brother", and my mother's response, to the coworker's amazement, was "People DO come in stoned, all the time, and work on the heavy machinery despite submitting to avid drug testing!" It's security theater and confers no safety benefit on the company that adopts such a policy. I have never worked at a drug testing company (and I have worked at some nice places, BTW, with only a waiver that says "keep what you do at home and away from company property and it's no business of ours" with some butt-covering language that they reserve the right to test for suspicion) and they have always been well-run with a good safety record and wonderful reliable people, while all my family and friends who dutifully piss in the cup have nothing but stories of the glassy-eyed stoned-out incompetents that they have to deal with as coworkers. Why is that? Could it be because the company that doesn't drug test ends up relying on more proven and reliable management methods, while a company whose management relies on security theater to avoid taking responsibility for their own decisions has the predictable lousy results?
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
11:34 AM on 08/24/2011
Let's also remember just how much more cutthroat the music industry's become lately: the labels will drop you if you're not #1 with a cruise missile on your first album, the Napsterites believe you should give away your albums for free and only earn money from concert ticket sales...it's enough to develop so much agita in your life that you'd turn to substances just to be able to get some sleep.
crakrman79
Like broken clockwork he's right twice a day!
11:34 AM on 08/24/2011
I'm sure if they werent so overpaid with so much disposable income it would help to keep them from blowing money on drugs!
11:21 AM on 08/24/2011
This is what's wrong with our society now, no one wants anyone to take personal responsibility. The labels are not baby sitters, an Artist usually is a grown adult that's making decisions in his or her life that will be positive or negative. There is empathy for them, it's just that they choose that which either destroys them, or helps them,CHOICE!
photo
SocratesFan
Elitist who loves books and learning
12:33 PM on 08/24/2011
What about small children who are forced to take Prozac in schools from the time they're two years old?

THEY, I believe, do not have the mental capacity to refuse such a "choice." And I think this is where a lot of our drug problems are coming from: over-medication in schools. Disagree with a teacher? Medication. Don't like your peers? More medication. Too much of a brain so you outshine your classmates? More medication. Too little of a brain so you fall behind your classmates? More medication.
11:56 PM on 08/30/2011
Thank you! We keep harping on illegal drugs and how we should be testing everyone at all times, but that problem is actually not the biggest. Legal prescription drug abuse dwarfs it by many degrees, and it is another elephant in the room no one wants to talk about. Much easier to demonize that guy for smoking MJ or taking cocaine while you pump you and your kids full of drugs that are often much much more harmful or dangerous. Always with the magic bullets, whether it's the magic pill that will fix all your problems or the magic test that will make inconvenient issues disappear (or will give you the ability to pretend they do).
12:08 AM on 08/31/2011
No man or woman is an island. There is definitely personal choice and responsibility, but at the same time no person is a solitary blip in a vacuum, unaffected by those around them, and at some point drug addiction ceases to be a choice and becomes something one needs some help overcoming--hence, the call for the problem to be seen as a medical one rather than a moral/criminal one. It's not a negation of personal responsibility to acknowledge this effect of people and society on one another and think of ways to help someone, whether by helping them out of a bad choice in which they have become stuck, or by acknowledging possible social causes (such as an industry policy of "squeeze 'em dry, then let 'm fly") that might have driven them into that problem. And in the end, everyone is better for it, not just the person receiving the aid.