iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Javier Sierra

GET UPDATES FROM Javier Sierra
 

Time to Clear the Air: Wind Works

Posted: 07/06/2012 2:53 pm

Don Quixote, in one of his most delusional adventures, attacks a group of windmills after becoming convinced that they are mythological monsters.

In another example of real life imitating fiction, Big Coal and its allies in Congress are attacking the windmills of the 21st Century.

This attack is not only against one of the main sources of clean, renewable energy, but also against the health of our communities -- especially the Hispanic community.

In order for wind energy to prosper, it needs the Production Tax Credit (PTC), a federal policy that helps level the playing field and that has become a key driver in wind industry job growth over the past decade.

However, under strong lobbying from polluters, Congress is resisting renewing the PTC. If it is not renewed by December 31st, over half of the 75,000 jobs that the wind industry has created are expected to be lost.

Polluters like Big Coal are in desperate need of this dishonest help from their allies in Congress because, as it turns out, the coal industry is hitting strong head winds.

In recent years, and thanks in large part to the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal Campaign, 112 coal-burning plants have been retired and the plans to build 166 coal plants have been scratched. Only four years ago, coal generated half of the country's power. Today, it generates just one third.

Furthermore, from an economic perspective, the industry is a losing proposition. According to a study by the Environmental Integrity Project, the country's dirtiest 51 coal plants cause 5,700 deaths and up to $47 billion every year. The report makes the salient point that the social costs of premature deaths caused by just 18 of those 51 plants are higher than the value of the electricity the plants generate. In fact, according to another study published by the American Economic Review, the $100 billion in health costs inflicted by Big Coal as a whole are higher than the value of the service it provides.

And who gets to pick up the bill for Big Coal's pollution in a disproportionate way? The Hispanic community. According to a LULAC study, almost 30 percent of Hispanics live dangerously close to a coal-burning plant. The Environmental Protection Agency tells us that 50 percent of Hispanics live in the counties that frequently violate federal standards for what is considered safe air quality. And the ones who suffer the most because of this toxic bombardment are Hispanic kids, whose asthma rates are considered an epidemic.

The wind industry, on the other hand, is sailing along. It generates 25 percent more energy than it did last year. Iowa and South Dakota already get 20 percent of their energy from wind and the entire country is on track to obtain 20 percent of its energy from wind by 2030.

More than 400 American manufacturing plants build wind components, and more than 60 percent of the U.S.-installed turbine value is produced right here in the U.S. This means tens of thousands of good-quality jobs that cannot be exported and that also benefit Hispanic workers.

Wind Works: it produces clean, renewable energy right here in our country; it creates tens of thousands of jobs in an economy that so desperately needs them; it is a safe alternative to electricity generated by the country's dirtiest energy sector, and, most importantly, it has the potential to avoid thousands of premature deaths.

Congress's refusal to extend the PTC right now is, well, delusional.

Javier Sierra is a Sierra Club columnist. Follow him on Twitter @javier_sc.

 
 
 

Follow Javier Sierra on Twitter: www.twitter.com/javier_sc

FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:32 PM on 07/15/2012
Thanks for dumping the windmills where no one lives in the Dakotas. No one out east wants them, proposed wind farms have been shut down. Put them where no one is going to fight them, build power lines to transport all this excess energy out of our area, and give the wind power giants huge subsidies so they can make the wind farms solvent.

Thanks for dumping them in my backyard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
01:19 PM on 07/09/2012
I am shocked, anyone with the Sierra Club writes about killing the Earth and man's existence for planet gobbling windmills. Windmills devour huge tracts of Earth's ecosystems, the eco-nomy of life itself and every reason Earth is a life giving and supporting planet. Ecosystems are also the homes/habitat, food, shelter, cover and nurseries of the rivets and bolts of spaceship Earth or ecosystems' plant and animal biodiversity.

Many scientists are far more concerned with land-use changes than climate change. Can a windmill, unlike an ecosystem, release oxygen, balance the gaseous composition of the atmosphere, naturally regulate and moderate the climate; sequester those climate warming heat trapping gases that will be re-released into the atmosphere when the soil is disturbed and the plant biodiversity slaughtered for these immense, frantic swords that butcher the strands in the web of all life, like birds and bats?

provide the nitrogen cycle, fresh water, create and renew a life giving soil, purify the air and water, to name a few ecosystem life giving and sustaining services, and all ecosystems have loops and ties to both the atmosphere and the climate.

Kill the Earth for windmills? We've already destroyed 43 to 50% of Earth's terrestrial ecosystems, and now more dead planet, more dead plant and animal biodiversity, about as intelligent as promoting thermonuclear war.
10:06 PM on 07/08/2012
Big natural gas producers love wind power (by the way - how much do those production tax credits add up to?), since for every gigawatt of wind power added virtually a gigawatt of gas-fired power needs to be built too. The wind doesn't always blow but we always want our electricity. Exxon and the Sierra Club make a great, if unlikely, team.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neillevine
want to go into waterwheel business
12:50 PM on 07/07/2012
Party line, lot of hot air. Hydro, waterwheels and hydrogen would be cheaper if Obama had fewer pwtronage schemes like Solynda.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:41 PM on 07/06/2012
Hmmm, just this week, and just on the West Coast, I learned of 3 new gas plants entering the permit queue with the specific excuse that Big Wind requires huge amounts of Big Gas because it's so erratic. Big Wind has always just been a front for Big Gas - ask T. Boone Pickens (Big Gas Robber Baron) or Carl Pope (of Sierra Club), who went all over cheerleading wind and gas in exchange for $50 million from Chesapeake Energy. So, besides slaughtering raptors and bats, besides dynamiting ridgelines and filling them with concrete and steel and besides the SF6-spewing transmission infrastructure for Big Wind, we now get a double-down on fracking for super inefficient wind coupled with super inefficient peaker gas combustion from increased fracking?

Those of us who care about the planet, ratepayers, and taxpayers say NO MORE BIG ENERGY OF ANY KIND and support clean, affordable, non-deadly solutions sited in the built environment like democratically-owned rooftop solar, efficiency upgrades, and passive heating and cooling - and we say no to dead wilderness for Big Energy profits, greenwashed or not. Join us or be on the wrong side of history...
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
08:40 AM on 07/07/2012
What a pile of nonsense.

Adding foundations to ridgelines, or razing them and strip mining?
All to produce three times the CO2 emissions of gas.

As ever... count up all roof area. It helps, but it's not enough. You need some sort of `big energy', or some sort of much less consumption.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:03 PM on 07/07/2012
we could slash electricity use by over 60% in this country if all states adopted the (outdated, hardly stringent) efficiency rules CA has (mostly from the 70s) - it is ridiculous to cause a problem (overconsumption due to cheapness) then act like the solution is to create another problem (overgeneration which is extremely costly). if we only used the electricity we needed, we could power the country many times over from within the built environment, provided we had effective storage solutions. it is what we need to be working towards, not killing more wilderness to produce more boondoggles for Big Energy profits.

it is telling that you consider the dynamiting of ridgelines to be a great idea, even greenwashing it by calling it "adding foundations!" what? each base of each turbine uses 35-50 concrete trucks full of emissions-intensive concrete and thousands of pounds of emissions-intensive chinese steel. then they kill the migrating birds, local raptors and bats, which throws the entire ecosystem off and increases disease vectors, and produce at ~15 to 20% of rated capacity, usually when power is not needed. come on.

don't compare them to coal, compare them to rooftop solar. NREL has - there is plenty of in-city rooftop, parking lot, brownfield and marginal land to fully power the country during daylight hours - when power is needed. Let's START there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:03 PM on 07/09/2012
What we need is ecological literacy. Windmills devour so much of the surface of the Earth as well as butchering biodiversity. They are raping California's fragile desert ecosystems for wind. They might as well have poured a massive oil spill on these ecosystems or dropped bombs on these systems as they are as dead planet as it gets.

Eco-science states clearly, man is suicidal when he kills ecosystems and pushing extinct biodiversity is about as safe for mankind as thermonuclear war. Recently, a paper appeared on the internet, that windmills heat up the climate, and "climate regulation and moderation" are listed as a natural ecosystem service.

Therein is the problem. To-date, we have destroyed 43 to 50 percent of the Earth's, natural surface, the life giving of Earth. All ecosystems are integrated, and they all have loops and feedbacks to the very atmosphere and the climate, and they all, altogether create and take care of Earth's life zone, the biosphere/ecosphere.