iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeanne Ball

GET UPDATES FROM Jeanne Ball
 

How Meditation Techniques Compare -- Zen, Mindfulness, Transcendental Meditation and more

Posted: 09/22/10 05:50 PM ET

Meditation shopping? Sounds like an oxymoron, right? Yet millions of Americans are seeking tools to turn within. As a nation we've tried to fix our problems with everything from psychotherapy and Prozac to positive thinking and politics. Now people everywhere are ready to close their eyes and take a dive -- not to escape, but to more fully be.

Having lectured on meditation for 25 years, I find that audiences no longer need to be convinced of meditation's practical benefits. But people do often ask, "Aren't all meditation techniques basically the same?"

Experts in the venerated traditions of meditation have always marveled at the mind's subtlety, appreciating its keen responsiveness and sensitivity to different mental procedures. Great master teachers of meditation have recognized that the various techniques engage the mind in different ways and naturally produce different results. With advancements in neurophysiology, scientists are now identifying distinctions among varieties of meditation practices.

The Myth of the Relaxation Response

The old "scientific" myth that meditation practices all induce the same, general state of physiological rest -- called the "relaxation response" -- has been overturned. Though many practices provide relaxation, decades of research show that not all techniques produce the same physiological, psychological or behavioral effects.1

Recently a doctor came to me for meditation instruction. He had learned a "relaxation response" technique in a class on integrative medicine during his training at Harvard. He was attracted to meditation by the promise of deeper insight into consciousness -- access to the mind's hidden, transcendent potentialities. He enjoyed the relaxation technique but yearned for deeper experience and understanding.

Reviewing the science journals, the doctor arrived at the same conclusion reached by leading meditation researchers: the "relaxation" model was based on inconclusive evidence and had never been substantiated. Hundreds of published studies on meditation techniques show varying effects from different practices -- ranging from measures of rest much deeper than the "relaxation response" to physiological states no different from sliding back into your easy chair.

The emerging paradigm: three major categories of meditation

Meditation labs have sprung up at universities across the country--places such as Yale, UCLA, University of Oregon, UW Madison and Maharishi University of Management. Their contributions have helped researchers identify three major categories of techniques, classified according to EEG measurements and the type of cognitive processing or mental activity involved:

  • Controlled focus: Classic examples of concentration or controlled focus are found in the revered traditions of Zen, Tibetan Buddhism, Qiqong, Yoga and Vedanta, though many methods involve attempts to control or direct the mind. Attention is focused on an object of meditation--such as one's breath, an idea or image, or an emotion. Brain waves recorded during these practices are typically in the gamma frequency (20-50 Hz), seen whenever you concentrate or during "active" cognitive processing.2
  • Open monitoring: These mindfulness type practices, common in Vipassana and Zazen, involve watching or actively paying attention to experiences--without judging, reacting or holding on. Open monitoring gives rise to frontal theta (4-8 Hz), an EEG pattern commonly seen during memory tasks or reflection on mental concepts.3
  • Automatic self-transcending: This category describes practices designed to go beyond their own mental activity--enabling the mind to spontaneously transcend the process of meditation itself. Whereas concentration and open monitoring require degrees of effort or directed focus to sustain the activity of meditation, this approach is effortless because there is no attempt to direct attention--no controlled cognitive processing. An example is the Transcendental Meditation technique. The EEG pattern of this category is frontal alpha coherence, associated with a distinct state of relaxed inner wakefulness.4
2010-09-22-graph.jpg


Some techniques may fall under more than one category: Guided meditation is controlled focus if the instruction is, "Hold attention on your breath." But if the instructor says, "Now just watch your thoughts, letting them come and go," then you're probably doing open monitoring--and your EEG would say for sure.

Different practices, different results

Without the scientific research (or until we have a cell phone app for measuring our EEG and biochemistry), meditative states and their effects remain subjective. Brain research, along with findings on psychological and behavioral effects, gives a more objective framework for health professionals or anyone to determine which meditation technique might be most beneficial for a given purpose.

For example, research suggests that concentration techniques may improve focusing ability. A study on advanced Buddhist monks--some of whom had logged more 10,000 hours of meditation -- found that concentrating on "loving kindness and compassion" increased those feelings and produced synchronous gamma activity in the left prefrontal cortex -- indicating more powerful focus.

The effect of open monitoring or non-judgmental observation is said to increase even-mindedness in daily life; studies on mindfulness-type practices indicate better pain management and reduction of "negative rumination."

For relief from stress, research suggests that an automatic self-transcending technique might serve you better than a practice that keeps the mind engaged in continuous mental effort. Because of the natural mind/body relationship, the more deeply settled the mind, the more deeply rested is the body. Studies show that the deep rest of "transcending" calms the sympathetic nervous system and restores physiological balance -- lowering high blood pressure, alleviating chronic anxiety and reducing stress hormones such as cortisol.

More research is needed to verify benefits of controlled focus, but there are numerous studies on mindfulness practices and automatic self-transcending, with over 600 studies on the Transcendental Meditation technique alone.

As meditation becomes a new frontier of scientific research, more and more people are becoming aware of the mind's enormous potential for impacting health and wellbeing. I find that most meditators are no longer concerned that a technique might come from the East or have roots in a spiritual tradition--their main concern is that the practice works, and science can help remove the guesswork.

Americans are opting for meditation to counterbalance a life that's been plugged in, outer directed and over stimulated, and we're turning to something as simple as our own inner silence.

Whether you're an athlete aiming for the "zone," an executive striving for peak performance or a harried mother needing some serenity, a reliable meditation practice can be your best friend.

1. Orme-Johnson, Walton, 1998. American Journal of Health Promotion 2(5), 297-299.
2. Lutz, Greischar, Rawlings, Ricard, Davidson, 2004. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101,16369-73.
3. Cahn, Delorme, & Polich, 2010. Cognitive Processing 2010 11(1):39-56.
4. Travis et al, 2010. Cognitive Processing 11(1), 21-30.

 
 
 

Follow Jeanne Ball on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jeanneball

 
 
  • Comments
  • 215
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:18 PM on 11/09/2010
something is wrong with the facebook counter, and tweet counter also probably. there were hundreds of facebooks on this article an now it says zero. i didn't think those meters were very accurate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:18 AM on 11/10/2010
ok, now it's working. the universe is in order.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goldenchoirboy
07:14 AM on 11/11/2010
Seems to be at zero again. but the universe is still in order, just not their counters.
06:49 AM on 11/08/2010
nice to be readin/discussin somethin besides politics -------- with the depressing outcome (for me) of the elections.

i like this article's opening statement, which says a lot more than meets the eye: many people had so much hope for change, are now feed up with politics, have tried everything. then, nothin hugely transformational happens, so much resistance, and there's even a strong national will among many to go backwards, it seems, away from non-partisanship, to refuse to listen to others, etc., everybody just voicing all their extreme opinions and denouncing everybody else, and the news media goin along for the ride.

what's left to do but go within --- or, TRANSCEND as said here. and take care of oneself. cuz nobody else will do it for ya. yoga. meditation. health. spirituality.

i appreciate the way the transcendentals here (meaning, people fond of meditating ---- positive and hopeful about changing themselves and the world through meditation) are not rejecting those couple of people who come here and dis them. i like how they are open to discussing these deep issues and even the not-so-deep ones. they do not get riled but to my ear cooly & satisfyingly answer. which is rare these days and speaks for the goodness of the meditation. very different from the political articles, where everybody's denouncing.

meditation may be the only way to accomplish what everyone wants on the outside: peace, harmony, love.

first you gotta clean your own windows of perception.
12:38 PM on 11/08/2010
I don't think there is one "only way." Though I do meditate in my own way that works for me, I have another outlet that truly helps me find myself in a way that nothing else has: theatre. Obviously theatre isn't for everyone either. Just saying what works for me. :)
11:51 PM on 11/07/2010
the TM movement deserves to hold @ least 500 million in assets. the more the merrier.
06:50 AM on 11/08/2010
maybe $500 billion they should have.
06:25 PM on 11/07/2010
I learned TM in NY City in 1970. I was hooked from the first meditation. I went into this space that was so peaceful, so totally easy and deep. My first thought was "everyone should know about this."

At university I had friends practicing Zen meditation which they'd learned at Zen monasteries in Japan. I believed humans had more potential than they were using. I kept reading about creative people having transcendent or mystical experiences which gave them energy, creativity and deeper insight into life. I had made up my own ways to meditate. I would stare at something without blinking for a long time. It was amazing to see that there was an effect in my awareness, some stillness. So when my friends told me about mindfulness Zen, I learned. I practiced two years, going regularly to the Zendo on Manhatten's upper West Side. I was never sure exactly what I was supposed to do, but I "sat" and I "breathed" and I liked it and I felt something.

When my TM friends finally persuaded me to give TM a chance, in my first TM meditation it was immediately obvious that this experience was what I had been looking for. I can't explain it, but in the first meditation I experienced clear, silent wakefulness ... and it was absolutely easy, just like they said it would be. When I went outside after the first meditation, my perceptions were sharper / richer. I've been doing it ever since.
04:31 PM on 11/07/2010
I learned TM when I was a 15-year old surfer kid in Santa Cruz and it is still the best and most important decision I've made in my whole life. Surfing runs a close second to meditating.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:52 PM on 11/06/2010
Yes some good comments but also some bizarre anti-TM ones, probably disingenuous from the same person who keeps clocking in under a new name -- no fans & no other comments anywhere else. There's a small but organized calculated effort to discredit TM -- steered by just a couple of people. Every time there's another TM article somewhere they announce it on their website and tell people to go & make comments & reference their negative websites, as below. Which is why the remarks have gotten so far off subject.

But it's obvious from the sincere, positive comments from meditators that the criticisms come only from the remote fringes...
07:03 PM on 11/07/2010
With all due respect, do you even realize what you're saying?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 PM on 11/07/2010
One thing I'm not saying is that you are one of those people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:15 PM on 11/07/2010
it's always fairly obvious when such persons are commenting, when that mentality rears it's head... and it seems true that the negativity is idiosyncratic and comes from the fringe.
04:25 PM on 11/06/2010
I have seen "trancenet", "meditation information network" and yahoo group "fairfield life". Why is the
TM movement publicizing mantras, sutras & other things ? These used to be guarded in secrecy. Are
we now able to learn advanced mantras on the internet? Why such generosity?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:10 PM on 11/06/2010
right, like those are real TM techniques you're talking about. like you're a real person just innocently asking a question. anyone with half a brain knows those are not honest, reliable or official TM sites.

TM has survived all the negativity and criticism from the beginning, and it will continue to be kept in it's purity by the teachers and the altruistic organization, for everyone sincerely seeking to benefit from it. the most generous act i've ever heard of was Maharishi structuring, systematizing the personal instruction of TM so that teachers could be trained, allowing the technique to be taught properly to more and more people and give consistent results for everyone who learns, as the scientific research has born out.
07:29 AM on 11/07/2010
Some people criticized Maharishi soon as he stepped out of the Himalayas and proclaimed that life doesn't have to be lived in suffering, that the true nature of life is bliss and that there's a practical, universal technique for unfolding that. There are people who attack just that simple message. Some folks have a fear of transcendence, a disbelief in the possibility of transcendence, or can't accept that there can be such a SIMPLE and easy way to unfold all the good that's inside us. It's the nature of the times. But it's also the nature of the times that people are getting it and that meditation is now so accepted.
03:08 PM on 11/06/2010
Thanks Jeanne for such a wonderful description/explanation of how meditations differ from each other and what makes TM so unique. I have seen a few disgruntled comments which appear to be coming from a level of ignorance either about the technique itself or about the organization teaching TM. There will always be a few individuals in any organization who believe that they know better or more than what the scientific community is telling them. These are the same types of individuals who refute just about everything that science tells them because they obviously know better. I believe that if the NIH awards an organization more than 25 million dollars for research there must be something to the technique. TM is the most highly endorsed and recommended meditation than any other technique. There is a website where doctors will even answer your questions on TM - www.doctorsontm.com. I can understand why some people may feel inclined not to practice TM, but I don't understand why they would try to disparage the value of such a priceless gift. Whatever the reason, even they would find benefits from practicing - we could all use less stress in our lives.
07:18 PM on 11/07/2010
It's really hard for me to be civil when people make such ridiculous accusations. I can't speak for anyone else, but I personally don't think I'm better than anyone. All of my comments have been based only on MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCES. My experiences are not wrong or invalid. Science is great, but too much emphasis on it leaves people's feelings and experiences in the dust. The insensitivity in the Movement, as illustrated in comments such as the one above, is staggering. It's very telling that the TMers can't deal with the slightest hint of criticism toward their organization without making personal attacks on anyone and everyone who disagrees.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:30 PM on 11/07/2010
i think you're mistaking some of these comments (about the anti-TM crusaders who've splattered the Internet with nonsense about TM) as pertaining to you. i don't see anyone here criticizing you at all, Jessica, just people who've had good experiences with TM representing what they see as the truth about the matter, same as you're doing.

you've done a good job of expressing yourself and making clear you feelings.

i also think it's important for people to know about the Internet effort by a few to discredit TM -- it's no secret -- so that people reading comments will know what they're dealing with and be on their toes and really use their discrimination.

people who slam others have probably been hurt at in the past. for many, TM brings hope and relief from the stress and negativity. anyone who really wants to find peace can find it, because it's within everyone. that is Maharishi's message, that is TM's message.

wishing you well, dear Jessica.
08:33 PM on 11/07/2010
Has anyone levitated in those domes(not just hop or bounce)? Why are some TMers so easily offended w/direct questions, such as gaining the stength of an elephant?
02:32 PM on 11/06/2010
Many stimulating and insightful comments. I appreciate Jessica's candor.

I agree that one person below keeps missing the whole point of the article and probably just doesn't get the innocence and simplicity of the TM technique. The article is about scientists establishing an objective parameter for determining the real, measurable effects of different meditation practices.

People can and will say anything that comes to mind. It's natural for people to have varying opinions, especially about something as subtle and subjective as meditation. The importance of science is that, regardless of what anyone claims, we have objectively verifiable knowledge about the positive effects of specific practices.The research takes it out of the field of personal opinion and subjective belief.

If someone doesn't value meditation enough to pay the course fees, it's always a personal choice not to pay. If others value a meditation program and appreciate the opportunity for advanced training, want to take the time to go through all the classes and retreats for more knowledge, gladly willing to pay for that educational expense, room and board for the retreats, etc then that's their choice. What I see in some of these negative "attack" comments is intolerance and disrespect for other people's views. Lighten up, man... go do your Chopra practice or something.
12:13 AM on 11/06/2010
one more comment. several years ago I called the regional TM center in Atlanta. The price of the TM-
"sidhis" was @ least $4000. I spoke to Dr. S. Rector, a TM teacher and medical doctor. He suggested
that I use my credit card to charge the TM-sidhi fee. Perhaps you TM defenders work for this movement.
I said(I actually thought f u) but I said, you are greedy. In Fairfield I was given a slice of very white cake.
True TM altruism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goldenchoirboy
03:39 PM on 11/06/2010
you're accusing people you don't even know of being greedy. Is that really rational? Especially when there's zero evidence that anybody in TM is keeping any of the money for themselves.
11:57 PM on 11/05/2010
I also doubt that TMers gain the "strength of an elephant" or levitate with "relationship of body and akasha,
lightness of cotton fiber". They may have a "flavor of experience", but no more than that. Jessica, I visited
Fairfield, & I considered employment on staff in order to learn advanced TM techniques. I was disturbed
by a few things. Meditators claiming that "the money just comes when the time is right" to pay the various
TM fees. Is Guru Dev functioning in some astral dimension, telepathically influencing our financial com-
munity to deposit the requisite amounts of money to pay for sidhis, jyotish, yagyas, assemblies etcetera.
02:42 PM on 11/06/2010
With due respect, that's all your personal interpretation, and I think it's extremely idiosyncratic — the stuff about Guru Dev and the "astral dimensions" and the negative generalizations...

I think if you look at www.TM.org and see the quality of people speaking out in favor of TM — Russell Simmons, Dr. Oz, Paul McCartney, Clint Eastwood, etc — it completely defines the stereotype you're trying to project onto TM. Obviously your goal here is to try and make TM look bad in comments, but it's so easy to see through your agenda.

Yes, I have an agenda too: to enjoy life to the max and share the positivity and hope to leave a clear trance of understanding when I see someone distorting the truth about something important to me.
11:34 PM on 11/05/2010
If you can not afford TM prices, please investigate other paths. Jai Guru Dev
02:45 PM on 11/06/2010
If you cannot afford the standard tuition for TM and you want to learn, just ask the TM teacher for a grant application and the organization will work out an easy way for you to learn.
11:32 PM on 11/05/2010
I have learned the TM mantra & also Dr. Chopra's technique, which is great. No need to spend $1500 to
support the TM projects. I also use a meditation CD called Synchronicity which is terrific. There are also
other meditation CD's, some bi-naural, @ reasonable prices, for the many who can not afford TM. So please do not dispair. Reasonably priced meditation exists, i.e. such as "Natural Stress Relief".
02:44 PM on 11/06/2010
Almost all meditation CDs and techniques that you pay money for have no research to back them up, and the people offering them are obviously making money off it. Ironically, you criticize TM which no one makes money off of because it's purely non-profit, and it's the one technique with more scientific verification of benefits than any other. Go figure.
11:20 AM on 11/04/2010
I learned several meditation techniques and gave sincere attention to each one before deciding that meditation was just a waste of my time. I couldn't bring myself to pretend I was getting anything significant out of it when I clearly wasn't. Then a friend insisted I try one more - TM. I didn't want to learn. By that point, I didn't even want TM to work. I would rather be right and suffer. Ha. TM was a revelation. I walked out of the instruction room having completely forgotten my rigid opinion, just basking in the sweet effortlessness of the real happiness I was experiencing. TM is the software the human physiology is made for -- and after 36 years, I'm still transcending twice a day and it's still beautiful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sparklingstar
08:04 AM on 11/04/2010
A big thanks to David Orme-Johnson for his 3 comments. Thanks for setting the record straight and for being a great voice of reason - quite thorough to boot! This article tackles an important topic and has sparked a very lively dialogue, a dialogue that is furthering the frontiers of human development as well as promoting practical techniques to truly improve quality of life.