iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeff Biggers

GET UPDATES FROM Jeff Biggers
 

Chicago Coal Protests Escalate: River Barge Halted By Banner, Fisk Occupation Paints Down

Posted: 05/24/11 09:23 PM ET

UPDATE: May 25th: 9am CST: Greenpeace activists have ended their 26-hour occupation of the Fisk Generation Station smokestack in Chicago, leaving behind a giant reminder of the Windy City's dirty legacy and clean energy future: The painted letters of "Quit Coal" now drape permanently down the sides of the smokestack with the demand that California-based Edison International close down its deadly Fisk and Crawford coal plants.

Nearly a century ago, Chicago activist Mary "Mother" Jones took on the great coal barons of her city. Jones declared: "Not all the coal that is dug warms the world. It remains indifferent to the lives of those who risk their life and health down in the blackness of the earth."

Until Chicago passes the Clean Power Ordinance, that deadly legacy remains for the children and citizens under the volcano of the nation's most decrepit coal-fired plants.

2011-05-25-Picture35.png

Greenpeace's daring actions against Chicago's lethal and widely denounced old coal-fired plants expanded this afternoon, as eight more activists rappelled off the Pulaski Bridge, near the Crawford coal plant in the neighborhood of Little Village and dropped a banner that blocked coal barge traffic on the river.

The banner declared: "We can stop coal" and "Nosotros podemos parar el carbόn."

Meanwhile, at the Fisk Generation Station, eight other Greenpeace activists scaled the 450-foot smokestack in the ailing Pilsen neighborhood this morning. Citing the spiraling and devastating impact of the decrepit coal-fired plant on the area citizens and the city at large, the protesters are calling on the Edison International subsidiary Midwest Generation and the city of Chicago to "quit coal" and shut down the plant.

2011-05-24-Picture33.png
Photo courtesy of Greenpeace Chicago

"I know that we can stand up to big coal and use our collective power and strength to stop companies like Edison International from poisoning our communities. All around America, people like us can stop coal. We must take a stand for our health, our welfare and our future," said Laila Williams, one of the activists dangling from the bridge.

Ian Viteri, a resident of the Little Village community affected by the Crawford plant said, "Communities like Little Village are being hit the hardest by pollution from coal plants, and enough is enough.

In a true testament to civic duty and responsibility, the Greenpeace activists atop the Fisk Generation Station are now cleaning up the filth and toxic particulates along the 450-foot tall smokestack with a new coat of paint -- and a special message for the city of Chicago, Mayor Emanuel, and the Irvine, California-based multinational corporate owners Edison International.

"As a Chicago resident, I know that we must shut this plant down -- to make our air cleaner, our communities safer, and to stop the effects of global warming. All across America, companies like Edison International are poisoning communities with their coal plants -- and people like us are fighting to have those communities voices heard. We're going to stay up here until Edison International hears our message," said Kelly Mitchell, one of the activists who climbed Fisk's stack.

Numerous studies have documented the link between Chicago's two coal-fired plants and lung cancer, heart attacks, premature deaths, acute and chronic bronchitis, emergency room visits, and record asthma rates and other respiratory illnesses, which cost the city an estimated $127 million annually in damages.

According to a released statement by Greenpeace, "Fisk and Crawford generate about 18 times the emissions of O'Hare airport's ground operations and equal two-thirds of the CO2 emissions generated by all modes of transportation in Chicago."

2011-05-24-Picture34.png
Photo courtesy of Greenpeace Chicago

"We're fighting for our lives," said Leila Mendez, a resident of the Pilsen community. "This plant has a significant impact on the health of our communities and our children. These plants don't power Chicago; the profits go out of state, and we get stuck with the pollution. It's time to stand up to Edison International and demand more for our future."

Earlier this spring, the Chicago City Council failed to vote on the Chicago Clean Power Ordinance, which would have forced the plants to clean up or shut down. A national coalition has focused on Chicago's dirty plants as ground zero for clean energy transition in the nation.

"Chicago is facing a serious challenge," says Chicago-based community activist Edyta Sitko. "Will the Council lead the country by quitting coal and standing up to corporate polluters? Or will it be the last major American city with two dirty coal plants within its borders? "

In 1892, an editorial in the Chicago Tribune opined: "Doubtless the end of the coal, at least as an article of a mighty commerce, will arrive within a period brief in comparison with the ages of human existence... How long can the earth sustain life?"

Over one century later, citizens across Chicago and the nation are now demanding that Midwest Generation and Chicago's new mayor Rahm Emanuel finally make good on this promise and transition the city to clean energy.

Here's a new video on Chicago's long-time movement to close the plants:

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KevinOConnor
full-time citizen
08:04 PM on 05/26/2011
ComEd gets their rate hikes, while consumers and activists get the shaft.
photo
DarcieRN
can't get an acceptable microbio
10:40 AM on 05/26/2011
Yes, fighting for our lives.
Nationalize them. And their partners in greed and destruction, oil and natural gas frackers.
Please check out my petition and pass it on if you like it

http://signon.org/sign/nationalize-oil-gas-coal?source=c.fb
12:52 PM on 06/01/2011
They're pretty daring .Kind of like a Justice League.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
g-moi
Let's GoGreen. We Can Do It.
10:07 AM on 05/26/2011
"We're fighting for our lives" - A very true statement - we all need clean air to breathe people. Go Solar! Go Wind. Down with Nukes and Coal and Oil!
01:36 PM on 05/25/2011
We don’t need to ban coal – just close or rebuild the old plants – or better replace them with nukes.
12:01 PM on 05/25/2011
That's cool just screw up that pilots run...
10:01 AM on 05/25/2011
If they want to ban coal, will these Greenpeace people start handing out money to a majority of the people living in Appalachia? Appalachia is a very economically depressed region; a large population of people works in either Wal-Mart(s) or in the coal fields/mines and or lives off of some form of government aid. The coal mines are already dwindling, but you are trying to close them all down because of the environment! if that means more people out of jobs, and a whole region of the USA from PA to GA, and an entire state (West VA) out of a large portion of the jobs! These areas are already economically depressed, so why add to their suffering, while times are already really bad! I say if it means more jobs, and a better standard of living for human kind, then we must put the environment second!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slider79
02:04 AM on 05/26/2011
uuhhh, that's why all these big greens need to start investing here in WV. We'll take green jobs.
photo
DarcieRN
can't get an acceptable microbio
10:44 AM on 05/26/2011
and they get free black lung, not to mention the joy of working in an environment where safety is compromised by profit, where a coal company decides to save 1% and people get killed.

This is the kind of situation where a government that is promoting the general welfare steps in, gets a team of experts analyzing the situation, say, in Appalachia (where my great-great-grandpa lived), and helps the residents make a plan. Manufacturing related to green energy, and worker education and training would be a good start.

I say, nationalize them all. http://signon.org/sign/nationalize-oil-gas-coal?source=c.fb
12:41 PM on 05/26/2011
I am not disagrying with you that there are risks envolved with coal mining, and that the miners are treated like dirt. However, I lived for several years in the south western part of Virginia where the only real jobs out side of walmart, and fast food, was the coal mines. I had friends who's fathers were coal miners. My girl friend's dad, grand dad etc... were all coal miners. So do not think i am ignorant to their situation. Do they need other jobs, yes of course. However, most companies want to be in urban areas, or out source work to other countries. They do not care about the plite of the poor in their own country. So making Appalachia "green" and having "Green" jobs, may be a great thing. However, it is unrealistic in the here and now. Therefore, the people of Appalachia either have to make do with what they have (the mines and walmart), or move away, and most of them do not want to move away!
09:39 AM on 05/25/2011
Sometimes protesting is a patriotic duty. Thankfully we still have people that are willing to step up to the plate and demand justice with a clear voice supported by a demonstrative action.
photo
badman5150
And the trees are all kept equal...
08:42 AM on 05/25/2011
Every single coal protester should refuse to use electricity.
photo
RealConservativeAmerican
Conservation is Key
10:06 AM on 05/25/2011
Why? I see no hypocrisy. They protest our lack of alternatives. We live in the stone age of energy production.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:42 AM on 05/25/2011
Well, unless their electricity comes from solar power or the like, yes.
08:35 AM on 05/25/2011
It is hilarious how the left has denigrated coal and made it a monster. Have you studied more than the hysterical reports put out by the left? Now it is okay to break the law to protest and disrupt the public? Before you resort to this or support these actions you need to live a life free of electricity.
photo
RealConservativeAmerican
Conservation is Key
10:07 AM on 05/25/2011
Are you gonna cry? You sound kinda whiny.
12:49 AM on 05/25/2011
and com ed just got clearance to raise the rates on us too... will the greed ever end? we need underdog
12:12 AM on 05/25/2011
Coal, like tobacco, is a mean nasty habit, harmful to human health and that of the planet, and we definitely need to KICK both.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Red Ohio
What we have here is... failure to communicate.
01:12 AM on 05/25/2011
Don't say conservatives are trying to control what people can and can't do , then try to do the same thing yourself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobertFromMN
Fiercely secular Luxemburgist
04:23 AM on 05/25/2011
When "what other people do" affects us all, it's not "what other people do".
photo
RealConservativeAmerican
Conservation is Key
10:10 AM on 05/25/2011
Don't be so dramatic. It's just a protest . . . with big signs. It's not going to stop coal. It may cause some more people to consider where their energy comes from and be more concerned with developing alternatives and it may cause other people to just get angry at Greenpeace . . . and that's all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
10:09 PM on 05/24/2011
Until updates are made to the power grid - the next stop after coal will be natural gas unfortunately. A LARGE government regulated initiative is needed to update the grid immediately.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shelby
Purveyor of tar and feathers
03:43 AM on 05/25/2011
You're right Jtt, that movement is already putting on it's party pants.
01:38 PM on 05/25/2011
agreed. A smart grid, nukes, some wind and solar and better cleaner coal plants will do the trick.