More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeff Simmons

GET UPDATES FROM Jeff Simmons
 

Urge 'Lame Duck' Congress to Fight for Alternative Fuels

Posted: 11/16/10 11:01 AM ET

A "lame duck" Congress commences this week, representing the final leg of the Obama administration's first congressional term. The way I see it, as an IndyCar driver with nearly 30 years of racing experience, these few remaining weeks are among the most critical, and dangerous. I liken it to those final, knuckle-whitening laps around the track at each year's Indianapolis 500. The driver knows the road ahead and has a good feel for what works. It's time to edge out the best finish with carefully-considered maneuvers.

Congress is back on the track, after its election pit stop, debating key legislative incentives meant to create more jobs and stimulate better business, including the extension of expiring tax cuts. The extension of one such tax cut is a strategic must: the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit, or VEETC. This tax credit helps ethanol producers meet our mounting energy demands. It also protects the American labor, farmland and manufacturing facilities that are integral in meeting that demand. VEETC is set to expire on Dec. 31 of this year, unless Congress passes a large tax bill that includes many different types of tax cuts including VEETC.

Without the extension, we risk too much. Failure to extend the tax credits would force tens of
thousands of Americans out of their jobs, further compromising an economy already struggling
with a 10 percent unemployment rate. (Some experts say that figure is closer to 17 percent when considering the underemployed and those who have given up looking for work.) Hundreds of millions of gallons of ethanol capacity would be wasted and the U.S. would be forced to import more foreign oil. Additionally, the Highway Trust Fund, which helps federal and state government agencies to improve transportation infrastructure, would lose the more than $3 billion generated from the VEETC annually.

Despite its already significant contributions to our energy needs, the biofuels industry is in a fledgling state. According to federal law, ethanol must be blended into every gallon of gasoline sold in the U.S. If our leaders make a strategic error now, the American ethanol industry could suffer and we may be forced to buy ethanol from our foreign competitors. With the right incentives and bipartisan congressional support, we can not only protect the 400,000 precious American jobs already associated with the industry, but grow that figure to millions. Currently, the primary source of ethanol in the U.S. is corn; continued ethanol production serves to stabilize corn prices and plant the seeds of future prosperity for our communities and hard-working farmers of the American heartland. Ethanol will continue to play an important role reducing harmful carbon monoxide emissions, a leading contributor to global climate change.

The decisions our politicians make from now until the end of the year will determine the role America will play in the development of clean energy. By extending the VEETC, Congress can demonstrate our nation's commitment to the future of clean energy and stimulate private-sector investment. The alternative amounts to shutting off our engine. With China investing billions into alternative fuel technology and Brazil generating nearly eight billion gallons of sugar-cane ethanol a year, we cannot afford to just wave them past. As an IndyCar driver, I have experienced the performance of pure ethanol under the harshest automotive conditions. Ethanol powers our cars to speeds over 230 mph and literally allows our participants and fans to breathe easier. I am proud to showcase an energy solution that is among the best and cleanest fuel technologies available today.

As the 111th Congress comes to a close, I encourage every American to get involved and let our congressional leaders know that ethanol is a key component to our country's future energy independence, our economic growth and our environmental responsibility. Urge your leaders to extend the VEETC. With the impending shift of control in the House, demand that this lame duck keep its eyes on the road ahead rather than handing over the wheel.

Jeff Simmons is a driver in the IndyCar series, has competed in four Indianapolis 500 races, and has long been an advocate for renewable energy.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:39 PM on 11/16/2010
Only a century back, 80% of americans used hemp oil in their lamps..
10:38 PM on 11/16/2010
Brazil would be the lead to follow here, but with our corrupt stranglehold with sugar tarriffs, we've painted ourselves into a corner. Corn ethenol really is a crime, in many ways.
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
09:45 PM on 11/16/2010
Corn is a food and feed stock! Whatever moron decided to put it in competition with fuel and then get the Gov. to subsidize it should be charged with crimes against humanity along with every politician who voted for it. This is what I like to call green madness. The amount of acreage needed to grow this fuel corn takes away from the food stocks. How much forest do you want cut down to replace the food stock, but wait that won't work because the price for fuel in the developed world is higher than the price of corn as food in the third world. Great plan! Letting the Gov. pick winners and looser in any market = madness or the road to disaster is paved with good intentions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:37 PM on 11/16/2010
Ethanol is a subsidized scam.
09:11 PM on 11/16/2010
Dang right.

Energy is my personal bete noir. I am convinced that we simply cannot go on paying the cost of ever more expensive oil. We must do something... invest in biofuels, or clean nukes turning out hydrogen, or whatever...or we will bankrupted.

http://explosive-cargo.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-isnt-being-said.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FernForestGuy
07:22 PM on 11/16/2010
I live in Albuquerque, a city that like to pat itself on the back for being green. NOT, in any way, shape or form. But they like saying it as if it's true. There is one bright spot. The road next to Costco is up high were you can see its roof covered (and I mean COVERED) with solar panels. As big as that flat roof top is, I imagine it creates quite a bit of juice.

For a city that promotes itself as green, I don't know why every city and county building doesn't do the same thing, as well as encourage all it's citizens to do the same.

Costco is a For-Profit corporation. If it makes sense for them to do this, why does it not make sense for all corporations to do it. I believe that even though Costco invests in this kind of renewable energy, it still makes money and does right by the stock holders. And they even pay decent wages and benefits. Am I missing something? Why isn't this done all over the place?
05:10 PM on 11/17/2010
Because Costco still believes in that old business model of making money by actually selling things.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaz
06:26 PM on 11/16/2010
What's the truth? There seems to be a lot of conflicting opinions with regards to weather ethanol is a clean alternative fuel. Is there a web site to reference?
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
09:56 PM on 11/16/2010
It's about equal to plain old diesel fuel but it cost so much to make that we the tax payers get to help offset the cost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaz
04:16 PM on 11/17/2010
Is that the same reason Bush gave 30 billion dollars to Exxon Mobile in 2006?
miloiki
sweet as can be
04:51 PM on 11/16/2010
The rise in use of biofuel is causing valuable farm land that was producing food to begin producing plants which are good for fuels. This has already caused the price of food to rise steeply world wide. And all this would not be happening without massive government subsidies, which we cannot afford. ..And for what? Biofuels are combusted in normal engines and produce green house gases just as does gasoline. The whole idea of biofuels must wait.
04:14 PM on 11/16/2010
All of the energy contained in ethanol originates from the sun since plants absorb and store energy from the sun, which is then harvested in the form of ethanol. Switchgrass can be used to produce significantly greater amounts of ethanol than corn or sugar, and yet average solar panels produce 100 times more energy than ethanol from switchgrass given the same sunlight. However, solar panels take a very large quantity of resources to manufacture.

My point is that one technology is not the end-all solution to energy. If we focus too much on one source of energy, then our children will just end up with the very same problem we face today with fossil fuels.
03:32 PM on 11/16/2010
.....continued.. Actually Garbage to Ethanol Production has already begun(May 2010).. Fiberight is making Garbage to Ethanol in Blairstown Iowa and has plans for a 120 Garbage to Ethanol plants across the Nation

Coskata.com is another Company that can make Ethnaol out of anything.. even old tires ..General Motors is invested in them..they have pilot plant running and is selling licenses for their process

Ineos Bio has started production in Florida on their Garbage to Ethanol plant and on and on the list goes..


This is an exciting time ..in a decade we can be making enough ethanol that we would no longer "NEED" Oil from the Bloody Middle East.. no longer need to subsidize Oil with not only the hundreds of billions each year but also subsidized with the blood of our troops..

Tats what we are working for ..where we no longer NEED the Middle East Oil..where we are no longer kissing, bowing , killing and dying ..so we all can drive to work each day..

It's about self respect .. Ethanol (even corn ethanol) is about Growing a Pair and being Master instead of enslaved to Foreign Countries for our Energy needs

Dan McCullough
E85Prices.com
03:31 PM on 11/16/2010
Enough on corn ignorance..Corn is $5.27 for 56 POUNDS ..thats 9 cents a pound..if you know anyone that is going hungry because corn costs 9 cents a pound then the issue is far greater the 9 cents.

. BY Law ..the Renewable and Fuel Standards of the Energy and Security Act fo 2007 only allows 15 billion gallons of ethanol a year for corn.. they already produce almost 13 billion gallons.. .... In a few years you ethanol will be made form Algae, wood chips and other waste wood , switchgrasses and even Garbage that you put out on the street every week..

BS?

continued....
04:21 PM on 11/16/2010
Actually, the Renewable Fuel Standard is a floor, not a ceiling, for ethanol production. Corn ethanol can continue to grow well above 15 billion if we allow it.

And, as cellulosic and advanced biofuels continue to not make their target, the RFS actually allows corn ethanol to fill that void. Let me wonk out for a bit here: this year, since cellulosic's RFS mandate was only filled with around 100 million gallons of cellulosic biofuels this year instead of the 1 billion it was supposed to, those remaining gallons are filled with corn ethanol. This number will continue to grow as the cellulosic portion of the RFS increases even though actual cellulosic ethanol production isn't growing nearly as much.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
03:13 PM on 11/16/2010
Biofuels create more smog than gasoline!  Why would we preach one thing and then do another?  Kill the subsidies for corn ethanol and let us import sugar ethanol if we have to, which is cleaner, gives more power and there is no damage to the engines.  The USA now has an ethanol glut and is looking for ways to dump the stuff only no one wants it.  It can't go into pipelines because it corrodes the pipeline, why would we want to put it in our engines?  Totally insane!  Yes, if they push E15 on me and something goes wrong with my car I will go to small claims court and perhaps we all can pull together and establish a Class Action Suit. 
T-Haight
What was wrong with federalism?
02:42 PM on 11/16/2010
What a canard.

1--> The current policies continue to push up the percentage of ethanol in our fuel because it had gross mandates for the amount of ethanol to produce, but the amount of gas sold has gone down. Why do we need this again?
2--> We're having a bumper year for corn prices following a bumer year for corn harvest. Prices keep going up, including for staple foods around the world. How much more should impoverished people of the world have to pay for food so that we can have ethanol fuel?
3--> Ethanol doesn't reduce CO2 once you factor in land usage, water usage (both growing and fermenting), and transport. It also doesn't boost fuel economy - even if you have 10% ethanol by volume, it's less than 1% of the energy in the fuel.

4--> Why does the government keep spending millions of dollars on the corn industry? Simple - presidential primaries start in Iowa. A calendar has ruined it for all of us.
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
09:52 PM on 11/16/2010
Boondoggle is the correct term.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PinkFloydsDr
02:27 PM on 11/16/2010
We need to do whatever needs doing to make America a leader in green technologies of all kinds. If we have energy independance, we will be a safer and richer country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
03:15 PM on 11/16/2010
But to push for stupid stuff seems like it is always on the agenda of our politicians, shooting ourselves in the foot with worthless crappola like ethanol from corn.  It creates smog, creates a huge dead zone in the Gulf and each of us will be impacted by the E15 damages it will do to engines, since it corrodes the valves
and everything else, yes on new cars!
01:59 PM on 11/16/2010
Instead of lobbying Congress to impose more ethanol in fuels for the rest of us, why not be an example and burn ethanol in your Indy car?

We'll see how competitive you are when you put your ideology ahead of other concerns.
02:13 PM on 11/16/2010
As he points out in the article, Indy cars run on ethanol.
02:39 PM on 11/16/2010
My understanding was that Indy cars used Methanol because it provided much more power and was safer than gasoline.

Ok, I looked it up and it looks like methanol was used from 1965 to 2006, and then as a marketing gimmick the IRL forced all drivers to adopt ethanol.

Due to the loss of power associated with this change, they had to increase the allowable engine displacement.

How about if we have Jeff run on ethanol and let everyone else use methanol again?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PinkFloydsDr
02:31 PM on 11/16/2010
Here it is for you again. You seem to have missed it the first time:
"As an IndyCar driver, I have experienced the performance of pure ethanol under the harshest automotive conditions. Ethanol powers our cars to speeds over 230 mph and literally allows our participants and fans to breathe easier. I am proud to showcase an energy solution that is among the best and cleanest fuel technologies available today."
Youre Welcome :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:41 PM on 11/16/2010
You forgot to mention that the cubic displacement had to be increased by 25% in order to get the same power so the emissions ends up being at least the same if not more.