More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeffrey Feldman

Jeffrey Feldman

Posted: October 27, 2010 02:26 PM

Question: When election rhetoric has been overrun by John Birch quacks, right-wing conspiracy burlesque, and xenophobic mobs -- how can a governing party craft a closing message sharp enough to cut through the miasmic mess and motivate the liberal base?

Should Democrats print more pie charts and bar graphs boasting less-than-but-greater-than results over the last 18 accounting cycles (adjusted for inflation, rounded up, carry the one, etc.)? Probably not.

Should Democrats generate more "car" talk about the economy being in a "ditch" because the opposition drove it there, but we're behind the wheel now, so do you really want to toss the keys to the kid in the backseat drooling root beer slushy on his sleeveless tee? Definitely not.

The key to busting through election rhetoric gone stark raving mad might well turn out to be two words so simple that they have eluded the usual Democratic Party language consultants: "President Palin."

Consider, for example, a new viral video ("Back From the Future") created for the last week of the midterm-election campaign by MoveOn.org:


Putting aside the tongue-in-cheek riff on The Terminator, and the post-apocalyptic portrait of a world rendered soulless and toxic by the corporate-political entity known as "Republicorp," the MoveOn ad is little more than a well-crafted vehicle for launching two words into the political ether: "President Palin."

A "Hail Mary!" pass? Who cares. I found myself laughing and nodding in agreement all the way through the video.

"President Palin" works, and it is not hard to explain why.

One would be hard-pressed to think of a cold slap in the face that stings Democrats more than the prospect of Sarah Palin in the Oval Office.

Even if Dick Cheney sprouted wings and installed George W. Bush for a third term, the results would be tame by comparison to even one term of "President Palin" -- a pathetic commentary on how far the Republican Party has driven itself into the land of the absurdly obscene.

That, in a nutshell, is the message to Democrats from the MoveOn ad: Either vote or accept that Palin will be president and destroy any hope of a viable future the world has.

Grim? Overstated? You bet your scantron sheet it is. This election is for all the marbles. Leave the college econ papers at the door.

Even with the mere suggestion of such a message aimed at beleaguered and not-so-hopeful-anymore Democrats, I can almost hear the lethargic groans of entrenched campaign consultants muttering the usual "buts" from their beltway offices:

"But Sarah Palin is not running for office... "

"But we need to convince the voters of how much we have accomplished... "

"But we need to spend every second talking about the economy... "

"But voters don't want us to stoop to that level... "

"But... but... my bar graph!"

Most of those concerns were probably relevant in the first or maybe the second scene of this four-act election tragedy. For now: Forget all of it. If Democrats want to motivate their base over the next seven days, they would be wise to paint a very bleak picture of the future on the horizon if the Palinocracy manages to seize even more seats than they are already poised to win.

The time for reasoned arguments and educating the voter on the economic benefits of this or that Democratic policy is long gone, squandered, evaporated, poof. The final week -- this week -- is about finding the right shot of adrenaline and administering it over and over and over again.

Still not sure?

Try this: The next time you are in a room with at least five people, tell them that you are voting to prevent a "Palin Presidency," then listen for the reactions. There may be someone in the room who finds that idea amenable, but everyone will have a strong reaction.

Strong reactions are the stuff of a closing week, and it is precisely what Democrats need to turn to right now.

Rallying the base against the ultimate threat to the national future will be a hard course for Democrats to follow. For too long, Democrats have laughed off the Mama Grizzly from Wasilla, believing that the electorate would just articulate on their own why the Palintoxication of the Republican Party poses such a threat to our future.

Democrats need to wake up from that cozy dream. DC Democrats in particular need to understand that in a 24/7, high-pitched, media-driven election, you must wade into the noise and grab the electorate by the collar.

"President Palin!" As the stars are currently aligned, that would seem to be the strongest message for Democrats from now until Nov. 2.

Let's just hope it's not the only effective message until 2012.

 

Follow Jeffrey Feldman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JeffreyFeldman

 
 
  • Comments
  • 201
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
11:19 PM on 10/28/2010
President Palin--------------------------has a nice ring to it. A little narrow minded Christian Conservatism is just what this country needs! I think Huffpo Nation should be a little more "open minded" about narrow mindedness. It's good for you. If you're poor, well you need to live poor, not have the gov. buy your food & pay your light bill. Failure in life is like pain in life, it tells you what you're doing isn't working. Shielding folks from the consequence of their actions is dumb social policy. And Sarah-----well, she's just what the Constitution ordered! A good "tough love" mother type to tell you to clean up your balance sheets & mend that fence in the "south forty" to keep out the pests. And all this while armed to the teeth! You just gotta love it. Sarahcuda for President!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paddy Murphy
03:35 PM on 10/28/2010
I never realized the movie "Idiotocracy" was a warning form the future. I think some John Conner-like figure came back to the past to warn us all of just such a scenario.
BigDaddyWow
This member is licensed to spank
03:10 PM on 10/28/2010
Give me a break. Palin will not be in the Whitehouse. It should be clear to liberals/democrats how America reacts when an extremist is in the Whitehouse; and Obama is as LEFT as they come. Palin would never get the independent vote because I think all Americans are now wise to the "change" mantra. Without a shift to the center (like Clinton) Obama will not be reelected in 2012 but rest assured that it will be a long time before the people of this country put another extremie in the Whitehouse; right or left.
11:23 PM on 10/28/2010
I think Reagan did pretty well after the Carter fiasco. Goober Grabber Jimmy ran as a southern centrist Democrat-------then pretty much "went Obama" (though we didn't call it that at the time). & the electorate whipsawed rather hard the right. (We do that when we see a real Democrat).
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
01:06 PM on 10/28/2010
I prefer to read "if there's nobody else to do it" as "if I'm the last breathing soul on the planet then
she gets my vote. :-) You guys know who I mean.

Mike
01:03 PM on 10/28/2010
post the comments!
photo
Skunkman
old & decrepit
11:39 AM on 10/28/2010
What did people really expect from Obama? I really don't understand the negativity. I know his campaign was based on too many vague messages and grand promises, but the messages coming from the right are no different, and it seems all but impossible to get elected on anything but. Yea, his health care plan isn't really an ultimate solution, but it's a step in the right direction.. Which is pretty much all you can ask for in this political climate. The last 2 years have really been a stroke of genius by the entire right wing PR machine. They've been so successful in this constant barrage of conspiracy theories, ideological catch phrases, and fear mongering that it's virtually overwhelmed anything legit to be said about the president. I think even some sane minded moderates might be convinced he's a Muslim Socialist at this point. It's absolutely unbelievable, after 8 years of having their man in office, the right has managed to portray this image that they are some sort of messiah, long waiting in the shadows for their pure ideology to sanctified once Obama is driven out of office. They've been saying the same crap for years, yet after ALL the failed opportunities they've had to prove it, they STILL manage to successfully portray themselves as some kind of shunned underdog.

Mike
BigDaddyWow
This member is licensed to spank
03:16 PM on 10/28/2010
People are convicted on circumstantial evidence all the time. The court of public opinion is particularly harsh; especially on presidents. The truth is that if Obama would have implemented a meaningful stimulus and would have taken the necessary (counter-ideological) move to stimulate business the "PR machine" would have run out of gas. The recession has people angry and Obama is the guy.
11:36 AM on 10/28/2010
The more shrill anti-Palin sentiments reveal a chilling phenomenon one would not expect to find in 21st century America: a-not-too subtle fear of women who don’t tow the traditional feminist line as expected.
Now that America has elected a black president, it is only reasonable to ask whether we are ready to elect a female one.
12:50 PM on 10/28/2010
Let's elect some female to be President of the United States. It doesn't matter if she's smart or ethical. It doesn't matter if she's a decent human being, or a mean SOB. It doesn't matter what her views are on...anything. It doesn't matter how she intends to run the country.

Let's pull her name out of a hat and hope she's in the better 50 percentile of responsible and capable. It's twenty-first century America--time to elect somebody female!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Angie Tyne 1
I want my disagree button!!
06:58 PM on 10/28/2010
I would happily support an intelligent woman president. I was ready to elect Hilary if Obama had not won the primary.

Instead the GOP panicked at the idea of Hilary as VP candidate and picked the prettiest durn republican woman in office to get their male base excited to vote. She is an insult to women, not just liberal ones either. I would have supported the republican gov of Hawaii as VP. From all I've heard she has a good head on her shoulders. Olympia Snow would have impressed me as well.

I think that women should do what they want in this life that includes stay at home mom or president or welder. The idea that this woman was what the GOP offered us is pandering at best. I was actually in favor of McCain back in 2k and might have actually voted repub if he had won. His choice of Palin lost him any shred of credibility in my eyes.

I do not fear women. I am one. I vote with my head, not my gonads.
Ifeomamn
When MSM report Facts, USA thrives.
11:08 AM on 10/28/2010
President Palin isn't going to resonant with 2010 Dem voters when they know that she is not on the ballot.

What ells Dems is inability to hang in the fight for a long time. They are not there when the going gets tough. Their pet issues becomes a badge to fight over. They debate themselves to earth's end.

DNC was not structured to govern after the 2008 elections. Tim Kaine was still a seating governor in VA, leaving a huge vacuum. Just like 4 senators were removed from the senate, once again leaving a vacuum, that is haunting Dems today. 2 Dem Governors were removed once again leaving Dems vulnerable.

A nation in crisis but No developed echo messaging methodology to combat a well oiled machine media chamber supported by Fox, 1300 talk hate and MSN. Then the Obama team, have NO body defending their agenda in the media. Most Dem pundits in the media are former Clinton people who were never supporters of the Obama team during the primary.

Then the narrative generated and framed by the MSM and the right were easier to be pushed when nobody was there to defend the administration.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WhatsLeft
What country IS your country?
11:01 AM on 10/28/2010
A Palin Presidency is a good scare tactic and just might get Dems and moderates out to vote. It isn't conceivable though. The Value Voters Summit straw poll for President had Sarah in fifth place and she tied for the VP slot. If such a conservative group doesn't want her in that high office who does?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bmattix
Don't label me, bro!
11:40 AM on 10/28/2010
John McCain placed #10 in the 2007 straw poll.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2
what to say?
10:05 AM on 10/28/2010
There must be some standards. No one should have to listen to the screeching. There's nothing in her head but a load of hate in her heart.
photo
Decorina
Hypocrisy means your karma ran over your dogma
11:06 AM on 10/28/2010
You got me with "the screeching". That woman's voice is fingernails on a blackboard. It makes me run for cover.

Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paddy Murphy
03:38 PM on 10/28/2010
Now imagine that voice, over and over for four (two?) long, torturous years. Imagine the State of the Union.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:53 AM on 10/28/2010
I predict that she will not run but will be out full force for the candidates but only for the money involved. She doesn't want to follow orders and do things she doesn't want to do. And she certainly cannot accept anyone that doesn't agree with her and worship her 24/7. How could anyone in their right mind want or trust her to have the nuclear codes? She can't even pronounce nuclear. If any country said anthing she doesn't like, look out because she would have targets in the Oval Office with Todd sitting next to her with a shotgun.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
CarolinaYankee
09:48 AM on 10/28/2010
She is finished, done in politics in Tundraland, unfortunately that means she WILL be spending more time in the lower 48, but in a few months we will be done with her too.
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
09:48 AM on 10/28/2010
The irony of the whacko running for president is that I don't think she even remotely thinks she could win, nor does she expect to.
I think she wants to run and this is because running is surrounded by all the glamour, mouth running and most of all, lots of money.

Pathetic, ironic, ridiculous, pick one or more words to describe the scenario.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MadamDeal
10:13 AM on 10/28/2010
Careful not to fall for her carefully crafted innocent PTA mom mythology. She is more vindictive and ambitious than Richard Nixon with her eyes on the same prize.

** Laura Chase, the campaign manager during Ms. Palin’s first run for mayor in 1996, recalled the night the two women chatted about her ambitions.

“I said, ‘You know, Sarah, within 10 years you could be governor,’ ” Ms. Chase recalled. “She replied, ‘I want to be president.’ ”**

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/us/politics/14palin.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZiloRS
11:31 AM on 10/28/2010
I think you're both right. She has the perfect amount of arrogance and cluelessness to be a politician. It's sad. I've known some really smart people in my life who said they were never cut out for politics, but what rises to the top in our current times are those that are not fit to run a 711, much less a political institution in this country. I can only imagine how history books will describe this woman, especially if she makes it to the presidency.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2
what to say?
12:00 PM on 10/28/2010
yeah and after she sees she can't just wink her way through a meeting with the joint chiefs of staff she might just get bored with it all. remember she said "being Governor of Alaska was hard." Besides, she got to at least know all the state capitals by heart before any of this Hail to the Chief stuff starts.
photo
BassguyGG
Former Moderate driven Left by eight years of Bush
09:25 AM on 10/28/2010
At the end of the day, I don't think the expected electoral apocolypse for the Democrats is going to materialize. The GOP has certainly mobilized all their right-wing voters, but all the noise they've generated has gotten people's attention. Many low-information voters have been alarmed by the radical rantings of the Tea Party, which has been wholly co-opted by the GOP (if the two were ever separate at all). People are paying more attention to this mid-term election than any other in recent history, even 1994. At the end of the day I hope that sanity will win (please God).
09:24 AM on 10/28/2010
Please... will those posting comments please stop saying "Having said that," or
"That said,." You sound exactly like the pundits on TV. Thanks!