The Real Meaning Of 'Free Press'

Posted November 3, 2007 | 03:43 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :The Real Meaning Of 'Free Press'   digg: The Real Meaning Of 'Free Press'   reddit: The Real Meaning Of 'Free Press'   del.icio.us: The Real Meaning Of 'Free Press'
TJ

Freedom of Press Is An Obligation,  Not A Luxury
For the second time in so many presidential terms, George W. Bush is using propaganda to drive the nation into preemptive war on false pretenses. Last time it was Iraq; this time Iran.  And what of the press?  This week, the mainstream media ran stories about UFOs, Hilary Clinton's being a woman, and--most importantly--Don Imus' return. 

Amazingly, the more visible a media outlet is in the United States, the less concerned they seem.  The bigger the broadcast reach of a news station, the less they seem to care that the country is petrified at the prospect of Bush driving our military into another head-on collision with disaster.   

The media, it seems, has forgotten the lesson of Thomas Jefferson and they are no longer holding up their end of the bargain as a result.

Way back in 1787 Thomas Jefferson once wrote that 'free press' is one of the keys to a functioning Democracy.  By reporting on UFOs in a week when the country is worried about a President waging another war on false pretenses, the media has lost touch with Jefferson's initial idea.  As Jefferson once put it, 'free press' is not primarily about freedom of expression, it is about maintaining the proper 'basis' of America government':

The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.

The purpose of a 'free press,' in other words, was not simply for the press to report whatever they felt like. The free press was only free if they reported news and events in such a way that their work guaranteed that the 'opinion of the people' would remain 'the basis of our government'--of American government.   

This week, the press demonstrated that they either forgot or no longer cared about Jefferson's principle.   Rather than making sure the opinion of the people stayed front and center, they made a mockery of the people by reporting on UFOs in this critical run-up to another unjust, preemptive war.  Oh well.  It's only the Bill of Rights, right?

Much of the media, it seems, has forgotten that it plays a role not just in circulating information as entertainment, but to make sure that government itself can function.

That's right:  the media needs to work a certain way or our government cannot function, cannot work, cannot do its job. 

Walter Lippmann put it best when he noted that a 'free press' was not a privilege of the individual, but an 'organic necessity' of democracy itself:

A free press is not a privilege but an organic necessity in a great society. Without criticism and reliable and intelligent reporting, the government cannot govern. For there is no adequate way in which it can keep itself informed about what the people of the country are thinking and doing and wanting.

Lippmann, for course, had doubts about whether the media could ever play the role that was required of it, given the economic and structural limitations in which it function.  But his notion of an 'organic necessity' is a haunting idea that we would all be well-served by repeating a few hundred times as we go about our lives.

WL

For what our country suffers from these days is a conspicuous absent of that organic necessity that allows our government to govern.

Specifically, the people of the country are thinking and doing and wanting that our government should not start any new wars until it first wraps up as best it can the disastrous situation in Iraq.

And yet, the government ignores what the people are thinking and doing and wanting to march to war with Iran despite the ongoing disaster in Iraq.

So what can we do?

Change Your Routine
Each of us can take steps to restoring the 'organic necessity' of the media by changing the media we frequent.

For a starting point, take a look at page 37 in 50 Simple Things You Can Do To  Fight The Right, a book full of hands-on ideas for action in a time when the press has lost touch with its own purpose.  There you will find a whole bunch of media sources who all understand their role as 'organic necessities' working to make sure our government can govern.

Even better, check out this list of alternative magazines: http://www.newpages.com/altmags.

One of my favorites is Mother Jones, but I always suggest people take a look at In These Times, one of the great progressive media sources not well enough known by Americans.

Want to help restore the meaning and value of the free press in this country--checkout  In These Times and then tell ten friends about it.  Talking about Jefferson and Lippmann is important, but it's even better if we can follow up with a concrete suggestion for people to make the situation better right now.

So remember what Jefferson and Lippmann each observed about the true meaning of the 'free press.'  Then bring the truly 'free press' into your personal  habits, and spread the word.

The ability of our government to govern depends on it.

(cross posted from Frameshop)

Comments for this post are now closed

 

Comments
9
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:

So many people are getting sidetracked in this 'free press' discussion - the American press is obviously very free, free to print the truth or any kind of lies or propaganda they want to, to investigate people doing crimes or not, as they please, to make a big issue out of who the movie stars are sleeping with and ignore the treason of the nation's leaders - the problem is they are not acting responsibly, at least to 'we the people' whom they pretend to be 'serving'. And it's not only the US, but every western 'democracy'. There's a longer discussion of this at "Freedom of the press sure - but is freedom enough?" - http://www.rudemacedon.ca/lgi/07/1023-toughill.html

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 11/05/2007

Fox News has a chilling effect on the rest of the press. Any press that attempts to uncover wrongdoing by the administration, Fox News characterizes as "helping the enemy." The press then concerns itself with "balance" and not with factual content.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 PM on 11/04/2007

If anyone wants more on Lippmann and how it fits today here is a piece by our friend Sidney Blumenthal;
"This article forms the afterword to Walter Lippmann, Liberty and the News (Princeton University Press. 2007), a reprint of the journalist's 1920 book."
http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/democracy_power/america_inside/walter_lippman

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 11/04/2007

I was infuriated yesterday afternoon as The History Channel ran hysterical promo after hysterical promo about a show last night dealing with our being "on the brink of war" with Iran.

This is insane!

The show they ought to be running should start with that comically incompetent speech in Tennessee when Bush said, "The point is, you can't fool me twice." And the show should continue with the not at all comical fact that Bush himself is having no trouble at all fooling many times over, not just The History Channel and the MSM, but all the rest of America as well.

Ironic example? Another story on Huff-Po tonight tells about how proud Brian Williams's daughter is of the great comedy stint her pop did on SNL. I'd be a lot more impressed if she called out her pop for failing to stand up and do his non-comedic proper job of truth-telling, of thwarting the madness of would-be King George the Lesser.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 11/03/2007

Thanks
The lack of an independent press has frustrated and angered me for years. From their obsession with the Clinton's sex life, to their refusal to tell Americans the truth about this man BEFORE he was elected president; to their alignment with the right to trash Al Gore; and their pandering to this administration to help them to wage war I have been telling anyone who will listen to find alternative sources for news.

I still cannot believe that this press aided and abetted this administration into betraying the country by releasing the name of one of its own agents. Where's the outrage? Instead the editors of the major papers still refuse to acknowledge what they did.

They are betraying democracy and getting away with it because they are in league with this administration,

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 11/03/2007

The problem with our modern MSM is that it's utterly commercialized. News has a a profit margin to consider, and that margin is determined by the simple arithmetic of viewers: how many, of what kind, and for how long -- i.e., the demographics of the ratings system. More viewers means more money charged to advertisers.

In a world where we are exhausted by 24-7 political coverage, UFOs and celebrity foibles dressed up as political news will always grab attention. And in a world where the average viewer expects and wants to be treated like a fourth-grader, the political conversation in a for-profit media will NEVER rise above that level.

http://www.osborneink.com

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 11/03/2007

Thank you for this reminder. We cannot rely on the spoon feeding that we currently receive through the standard media venues. It takes some time and effort to find out the facts to be able to make informed decisions or thought out opinions.

I come from a rather diverse area of the country (Mpls/St. Paul) and enjoy a wide array of media outlets and options from which to glean the news. I have spent the last 2 months visiting family in the North Coast of Florida and I will tell you, if you don't have cable or satillite tv your are inundated with such a slanted view of news or an ample dose of filler masking itself as news. When there is so much happening in our world, in our country of such significance, I cannot accept this dummying down dribble.

I would recommend "Democracy Now" as an option along with "Free Speech TV". Of course there are also monthlys like "The Nation (Albeit, certainly a lefty, but at times very hard hitting investigative journalism), and others.

We can blame our elected officials all we want, but we Americans need to WAKE UP, question authority, question ourselves and question the press.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:02 PM on 11/03/2007

Thanks. After seeing that the writer's strike topped the news on Huffpo I got a bit disgusted. Didn't know where to start looking for somewhere to get news and here you are with an answer.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 11/03/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


 
 
Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Jeffrey Feldman›
 

 Site  Web ask.com